自然资源学报, 2023, 38(9): 2201-2216 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230902

新时期自然资源利用与管理

城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治机制与优化路径

孙婧雯,1, 陆玉麒,2,3

1.浙江师范大学地理与环境科学学院,金华 321004

2.南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京 210023

3.江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023

Mechanism and optimization path of comprehensive land consolidation oriented urban-rural integration

SUN Jing-wen,1, LU Yu-qi,2,3

1. School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, China

2. School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China

3. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

通讯作者: 陆玉麒(1963- ),男,江苏张家港人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事空间结构与区域发展研究。E-mail: luyuqi@263.net

收稿日期: 2022-10-24   修回日期: 2023-04-20  

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目(42171171)

Received: 2022-10-24   Revised: 2023-04-20  

作者简介 About authors

孙婧雯(1995- ),女,山东禹城人,博士,讲师,主要从事乡村地理与城乡发展研究。E-mail: sunjw0525@163.com

摘要

城乡融合发展是城乡地域系统空间体系与功能价值重塑的综合过程。通过全域土地综合整治可以优化调整城乡人地关系,有效破解城乡发展不平衡、乡村发展不充分的主要矛盾与问题。解析当前城乡发展要素流通、城乡空间结构联通、城乡价值功能融通面临的现实难题;深入探究在“人地业权”要素协同视角下,全域土地综合整治有效促进城乡要素配置均衡、城乡空间结构调整和城乡功能价值统一的理论逻辑。运用地理探测器模型对浙江省展开实证分析,进一步揭示全域土地综合整治通过多因素交互作用,有效驱动城乡融合发展的内在机制。基于此,从土地要素市场化配置、现代产业发展空间重塑、多元主体参与价值共享三个维度,探明了城乡融合导向的整治优化路径。研究为深化新型城乡关系与人地系统科学认知,推进全域土地综合整治实践与城乡融合发展决策提供理论参考。

关键词: 全域土地综合整治; 城乡融合发展; 人地系统科学; 乡村振兴; 浙江

Abstract

Urban-rural integration development is a comprehensive process of reshaping the spatial system and functional value of urban-rural regional system. Comprehensive land consolidation can optimally coordinate the human-environment relationship, and effectively crack the main contradictions and problems of unbalanced urban-rural development and inadequate rural development. The paper analyzes the current realistic problems of the circulation of urban-rural development factors, the connection of urban-rural spatial structures and the integration of urban-rural functions, and explores the theoretical logic of comprehensive land consolidation to effectively promote balanced urban-rural factor allocation, urban-rural spatial structure adjustment and urban-rural functional value unification from the perspective of "human, land, industry and rights" factor synergy. The empirical analysis of Zhejiang province using the geo-detector model further reveals the mechanism by which comprehensive land consolidation effectively drives urban-rural integration development through the interaction of multiple factors. Based on this, the optimization path of consolidation oriented to urban-rural integration is explored from three dimensions: market allocation of land elements, spatial reshaping of modern industrial development, and value sharing of multi-subject participation. The study provides theoretical references for deepening the scientific cognition of new urban-rural relationship and human-environment system, promoting the practice of comprehensive land consolidation, and urban-rural integration decisions.

Keywords: comprehensive land consolidation; urban-rural integration; human-earth system science; rural revitalization; Zhejiang

PDF (3423KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

孙婧雯, 陆玉麒. 城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治机制与优化路径[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(9): 2201-2216 doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20230902

SUN Jing-wen, LU Yu-qi. Mechanism and optimization path of comprehensive land consolidation oriented urban-rural integration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(9): 2201-2216 doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20230902

中国城镇化驱动着城乡关系的转型与重塑[1]。伴随着乡村振兴战略的提出,城乡融合成为继城乡统筹、城乡一体化发展战略之后,进一步破解城乡二元结构、促进城乡功能统一与乡村多元价值实现的必然选择。然而,城乡生产要素流动不畅、公共服务配置失衡以及城乡空间用途管制差异等致使城乡土地市场割裂、城乡空间价值异化[2,3]。城乡发展不平衡、乡村发展不充分仍然是制约中国高质量发展的关键问题,以国内大循环为主体的新发展格局对城乡融合发展提出新的要求[4]。城乡融合应基于城乡平等的主体性,适应以人为核心的新型城镇化发展需求,促进城乡要素双向自由流动与公共资源合理配置,实现城乡功能互补、权利平等。基于空间布局优化和制度供给创新的社会、经济、生态全面融合是实现乡村振兴和农业农村现代化的重要制度保障[5]

土地是人类社会经济活动的空间载体,是实现城乡融合发展的要素保障和关键纽带[6]。在城乡社会经济转型发展背景下,土地整治由单一功能的整治工程逐渐向强调全要素、多功能、跨尺度、全价值的全域土地综合整治转变[7]。从“镇村示范”到“县域统筹”,全域土地综合整治的生态景观功能和社会治理功能逐渐凸显。立足于生产、生活、生态空间(简称“三生”空间)结构优化与功能整合,全域土地综合整治集约利用土地资源、综合治理生态环境、科学调整产业布局、优化配置设施服务[8,9];同时,针对土地要素市场不完善以及农村集体土地产权不明晰等问题,全域土地综合整治致力于构建城乡统一的土地产权体系,实现城乡土地资源配置效率与公平的统一。综合来看,城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治是统筹城乡全域全要素、优化城乡空间结构、修复自然生态格局、调整城乡权利分配体系的系统性、综合性整治工程[10],其本质是调整人地关系,成为统筹推进生态文明建设、破除“城乡并发症”、重塑城乡关系的关键手段和综合平台[11-13]

纵观已有研究,土地整治通过效率提升、价值显化、要素流通与结构优化等渠道促进城乡土地要素优化配置、公共服务提升,助推城乡融合发展[14-16];通过协调、处理社会关系与矛盾,促进资源集聚,转变传统农耕方式、固有散居模式和城乡发展路径[17]。而全域土地综合整治作为土地整治的高级阶段,关于其系统内涵、发展模式和内在机制的相关研究主要聚焦于乡村地域的要素耦合、功能提升与价值实现[7,18,19],缺乏对城乡互动关系的探讨,对于城乡融合导向的整治机制仍需强化。因此,解析全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合发展的理论逻辑与现实路径,对于深化新型城乡关系和人地系统科学认知具有重要的理论价值和实践意义。

1 城乡融合发展的基本内涵与现实困境

1.1 城乡融合发展的基本内涵

从系统的观点看,城市和乡村是一个共生共荣、相互依存的有机整体。过去追求城镇化发展的效率,在城乡关系发展的新阶段,城乡融合强调效率与公平的统一,城乡发展权益与社会保障的均衡配置。基于城乡之间的功能差异性与互补性,推动城乡融合发展是促进城乡发展要素自由流动、城乡空间结构互通互联、城乡功能价值统一,进而实现城乡经济、空间、社会多维有机融合,重塑城乡人地关系的动态过程。其中,城乡发展要素自由流动是城乡融合发展的基础,强调人口、土地、资本等社会经济要素在城乡地域系统之间优化配置;城乡空间结构依托一体化的基础设施和规划体系等,促进城乡空间发展的均衡协调;城乡功能价值统一则体现在社会服务的配给公平与文化认同等方面,强调城乡多元功能价值的实现以及发展权利的统一。

1.2 城乡融合面临的现实困境

1.2.1 城乡发展要素难流通

长期以来,城乡二元体制壁垒阻碍城乡之间的土地、人才、资本等生产要素自由流动,导致城乡资源要素配置严重失衡。当前的城乡要素流动格局仍以乡村单向城市流动为主,而城市要素下乡仍然面临一系列难题。一方面,乡村制度环境不完善,土地产权不明晰以及激励约束机制缺失阻碍土地高效流转,城市居民不能承包经营乡村土地,也阻滞了城市人才、技术、资金等要素入乡的通道。另一方面,乡村公共服务水平不高、基建配套滞后、产业发展空间有限,使得下乡要素参与农业活动的成本较高,投融资环境较差导致引资入乡难度加大。综合来看,乡村内生发展动力不足、城乡要素流动不通畅、城乡服务配置不均衡、土地收益分配不均加剧城乡供需错配和发展失衡问题,其亦成为阻碍城乡融合发展的基本问题。

1.2.2 城乡空间结构难联通

城乡空间结构割裂的症结源于城乡空间利用方式差异。第三次全国国土调查数据显示,国内城市用地面积约522万hm2,占全国城镇村及工矿用地总量的15%,而村庄用地达2193万hm2,占比约62%。城市建设用地紧张而乡村建设用地空废、闲置以及水土环境污损化等问题突出,城乡空间集约利用程度和国土空间开发强度差异悬殊;此外,村庄空间布局结构分散,也不利于乡村基础设施与公共服务的集中供给以及空间治理的有效实施,致使城乡空间结构性矛盾日益激化,城乡异速不同步与城乡异构非均衡现象并存[20]。当前,土地制度改革对于统筹城乡空间用地平衡发挥积极作用,城乡建设用地增减挂钩优化国土空间格局,但乡村规划布局与城乡融合发展格局之间的矛盾依然突出,生产、生活与生态空间冲突显著[21],亦难以形成城乡统一的建设用地市场和有序的城乡空间结构体系。

1.2.3 城乡价值功能难融通

在快速城镇化发展阶段,各类资源要素向城市快速聚集,而乡村更多地承载了城市发展所转嫁的制度成本,城乡空间价值鸿沟进一步拉大。一方面,乡村土地市场发育不完善、产权配置不合理导致土地利用的多功能价值被严重低估,乡村空间价值难显化和被弱化成为乡村生产要素流失、发展动力缺失的重要原因,不利于实现城乡空间价值转换。另一方面,由于城市建设用地无序扩张带来的负外部性恶性循环,致使乡村的生产、生态与文化功能受限,城乡空间价值割裂状态难以适应新时期城乡市场网络化、信息交互数字化、主体博弈多元化的发展趋势,也无法支撑高质量城镇化的发展目标。推动城乡多元功能价值融通的过程,核心在于破解当前城乡空间功能和价值体系的异化特征,实现城乡发展权利统一[22]

2 全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合发展的理论逻辑

2.1 全域土地综合整治的主要内容

全域土地综合整治的概念主要源于浙江省的“千村示范、万村整治”实践,通过整治农用地、建设用地以及生态保护修复,优化国土空间布局。在城乡融合目标导向下,全域土地综合整治围绕“人、地、业、权”,强调全要素、全产能、全价值系统整治,通过有效整合土地资源,带动城乡人口流动、产业集聚、权属调整,致力于构建生态与社会治理并重、多元主体参与、城乡协同发展的城乡共治体系[23]。全域土地综合整治是优化“三生”空间、统筹城乡发展、协调人地关系的系统性整治工程(图1)。

图1

图1   全域土地综合整治内容

Fig. 1   The content of comprehensive land consolidation


首先,以人为本是全域土地综合整治的核心。针对农户参与程度较低、整治资金外溢、农民权益受损等问题,全域土地综合整治充分发挥集体经济组织和人的主体作用,引导农业剩余劳动力良性转移,优化乡村人力资本。其次,全域土地综合整治以保护耕地为首要任务,治理农用地细碎化以及生产低值低效问题。通过整治废弃闲置用地,盘活存量土地和低效用地,加强宅基地创新管理,优化城乡建设用地供给;同时注重生态用地整体保护、系统修复与综合治理,提升城乡空间生态功能[24,25]。再次,全域土地综合整治落实产业发展空间。通过规范土地流转,适应产业规模化、集约化、现代化生产要求,促进一二三产业融合发展。最后,全域土地综合整治调整土地权属关系。通过地块合并、确权颁证等手段,协调多元主体利益分配,加强经济补偿、就业服务和社会保障,确保城乡居民共享土地整治增值收益和公平发展权利[26]

2.2 全域土地综合整治与城乡融合发展的关系分析

全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合发展是通过调整城乡用地布局,改善人地关系,实现自然生态系统与社会经济系统相统一的过程。全域土地综合整治统筹“人、地、业、权”要素关系,促进城乡要素自由流动、空间结构优化调整和城乡功能价值统一,是推动城乡经济、空间、社会多维有机融合的有效举措和综合平台(图2)。

图2

图2   全域土地综合整治与城乡融合发展的关系

Fig. 2   The relationship between comprehensive land consolidation and urban-rural integration


针对城乡融合要素流通困境,全域土地综合整治有效改变城乡发展要素流通的渠道、方式和效应,为促进城乡人口、土地、产业、资本等要素的耦合协调和高效配置创造条件。全域土地综合整治通过多元主体协同治理、优化土地利用方式、平衡土地分配收益、完善基础服务设施等方面,有效拉动工商业资本有序下乡,促进农村生产经营规模化、产业化,进而保障返乡劳动力就业服务,吸引农村劳动力转移和回流。全域土地综合整治平衡城乡土地资源的数量、结构和功能配置,综合提升城乡土地发展潜能;将城镇建新地块有偿供地所得收益返还农村,保障土地收益分配公平,缓解农村建设资金不足与城镇建设用地指标总量紧张的现实矛盾,有效解决“城镇缺地、农村缺钱”难题,促进城乡要素均衡配置与城乡融合发展。

针对城乡空间结构失衡问题,全域土地综合整治驱动城乡土地利用转型[27]、空间布局演化和空间网络重构[28],优化城乡空间结构和功能布局,为城乡空间融合提供基础保障[29]。通过实施农用地与建设用地整治、居民点整治与生态修复等工程,挖掘用地指标、占补平衡指标和增减挂钩指标,优化城乡生产、生活、生态用地空间布局,为产业项目落地、基础设施建设、公共服务均等提供保障。全域土地综合整治集中整合城乡低效、闲置土地资源,盘活存量建设用地,有利于调整城乡产业布局,畅通城乡经济循环;同时,人居环境整治促进村镇有序集聚,有利于优化城乡空间等级结构,为重构城乡高质量发展空间提供有力支撑[27,28]。全域土地综合整治破解城乡空间无序空废、资源利用效率低下以及乡村耕地破碎化、生态环境污损化等城乡空间失衡问题,促进生活空间适度有序集聚、生产空间集约高效和生态空间有机协调。

针对城乡价值功能异化难题,全域土地综合整治调整空间权属和组织体系,有利于破解城乡二元的产权配置体系,重塑公平、高效的城乡权利配置体系,实现城乡功能价值统一[30,31]。城乡分割的土地制度抑制乡村多元价值的实现,土地权利体系和土地增值收益在城乡之间分配不公平等问题突出。全域土地综合整治协调土地流转过程中多元主体间的权益关系,保障城乡土地财产权利平等、增值收益分配合理;并通过推进农村土地征收、集体经营性建设用地入市以及完善宅基地退出盘活机制,拓宽农民财产性收入渠道。这对于加快构建“同地、同权、同价、同责”的城乡统一建设用地市场体系和体现市场规则的农村集体建设用地权能实现机制具有促进作用,有利于充分发挥农村土地资本化的价值红利,支撑城乡融合发展[32]

2.3 城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治理论框架

全域土地综合整治调整城乡土地、人口、产业、权属等基础要素及空间结构,优化土地利用功能,重塑城乡空间价值,系统推进城乡融合发展和人地关系协调(图3)。城乡空间结构通过土地利用及空间组织联通,强调等级规模和基础服务设施配置。全域土地综合整治以“三生”空间为承载,统筹城乡要素有序组织和配置均衡,优化土地利用结构,从而推动城乡空间结构优化调整[33-35]。其中,生活空间整治以完善基础设施建设、提升公共服务功能、综合改善人居环境为重点任务,优化村镇空间结构和组织关系[36],实现生活空间宜居适度。生产空间的整治通过调整土地权属关系,推动土地流转,鼓励适度规模经营,培育新型农业经营主体,健全农业专业化社会化服务体系,依托“县域统筹—镇域集聚—镇村联动”,实现生产空间集聚高效、协同发展[37]。生态空间整治通过污染治理与生态修复相结合,环境保护与景观营造并重,推动生态空间价值转化与价值实现,促进城乡生态权益的公正配置。全域土地综合整治坚持经济效益与社会效益、生态效益相统一的原则,统筹“三生”空间协同治理,推动城乡融合发展。

图3

图3   城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治理论框架

Fig. 3   The theoretical framework of comprehensive land consolidation oriented urban-rural integration


全域土地综合整治驱动城乡多元价值功能统一,是提升土地利用复合功能、重塑城乡价值体系的过程,具体体现在生产价值、生态价值、社会价值、文化价值等方面。全域土地综合整治盘活存量建设用地,有效整合人力、资本、技术等先进生产要素,为现代化产业培育与城乡产业融合发展创造条件,有利于满足多元化消费市场及多层次消费结构的需求,促进产业价值链延伸,实现生产增值。生态型整治强化规划管控和空间治理,构建“生命共同体”,提升生态产品和生态系统服务的产出供给能力,有利于实现生态价值的转化与增值。土地权属调整体现全域土地综合整治的社会治理属性,有利于优化土地利用关系,激活土地承载的社会福利和保障功能;同时,完善城乡一体的基础设施配套建设,实现城乡设施共建、服务共享,可以满足城乡居民在社会保障等方面平等的利益诉求[38]。此外,全域土地综合整治注重保护传承乡土文化和历史文脉,城乡文化观念、经营理念、信息技术的交流有利于增强城乡文化认同,促进城乡深度融合(图3)。

3 全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合的实证分析

伴随着新型城镇化、工业化、信息化和现代化协同推进,多渠道、多要素推动城乡融合发展成为实现共同富裕的有效路径。城乡之间的人口、经济、社会等要素循环与配置均衡是城乡融合发展的重要体现。而全域土地综合整治通过协调土地及其承载的人口、产业、权属关系,优化城乡空间结构、经济结构和社会结构,促进城乡功能价值统一。浙江省坚持城乡融合发展,建设共同富裕示范区,形成高质量发展的国土空间开发保护新格局。自2003年开始,伴随浙江乡镇企业迅猛发展,乡村环境“脏、乱、差、散”问题日益突出,制约了社会经济可持续发展。为改善乡村生态环境、提升农民生活质量,浙江省全面推进“千村示范、万村整治”工程(简称“千万工程”),积极开展全域土地综合整治(图4)。通过全要素整治、全产业链发展,有效盘活农村土地资源,改善城乡生态环境,带动现代产业高质量发展与城乡居民生活水平提升,对于促进城乡融合发展具有显著性和典型性。

图4

图4   浙江省土地整治发展历程

Fig. 4   The development history of land consolidation in Zhejiang province


3.1 全域土地综合整治的城乡融合效应检验

为探明全域土地综合整治促进城乡融合发展的积极效应与过程机制,本文以浙江省为例,依据“要素—结构—功能”的理论逻辑,构建城乡融合水平与全域土地综合整治水平评价体系(表1),并结合CRITIC权重法确定指标权重。通过选取人口密度、景观破碎度、建设用地结构指数、地均GDP等显性指标,科学量化全域土地综合整治水平;选取城乡二元结构指数、城乡居民人均收入比等指标综合反映城乡融合水平。在综合测度浙江省及各地级市2000—2020年城乡融合水平与全域土地综合整治水平的基础上,结合地理探测器模型[41]进一步分析全域土地综合整治的城乡融合效应。

表1   浙江省城乡融合水平与全域土地综合整治水平评价指标体系

Table 1  Evaluation index system of urban-rural integration level and comprehensive land consolidation level in Zhejiang province

指标计算方式属性权重
城乡融合水平城乡二元化结构指数农业比较劳动生产率/非农业比较劳动生产率+0.22
城乡居民人均收入比乡村居民人均收入/城镇居民人均收入+0.19
常住人口城镇化率/%城镇常住人口/常住总人口×100%+0.15
人均GDP/(万元/人)地区生产总值/常住总人口+0.13
城乡居民年末储蓄余额/万元+0.17
夜间灯光指数+0.14
综合整治水平人口密度/(万人/km2)常住总人口/行政区划面积+0.17
景观破碎度指数/(个/km2)土地斑块数/行政区划面积-0.17
建设用地结构指数建设用地面积/非建设用地面积+0.15
土地综合利用程度指数Si×AiSi为各类用地面积(km2),Ai为相应能级[39]+0.18
地均碳排放量/(t/km2)[40]碳排放量/行政区划面积-0.18
地均GDP/(万元/km2)地区生产总值/行政区划面积+0.15

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


省级水平视域下,浙江省城乡融合发展与全域土地综合整治经历了两阶段发展历程:(1)2000—2010年,浙江省整体城乡融合水平较低,城乡二元化发展特征明显;同时期,全域土地综合整治水平不高,并有下降趋势。(2)2010—2020年,全域土地综合整治水平有了明显的提升,浙江省整体城乡融合发展迎来拐点,在城乡空间与社会秩序重新整合的作用下,城乡融合发展水平提升显著(图5)。

图5

图5   浙江省城乡融合水平与全域土地综合整治水平演化

Fig. 5   Evolution of urban-rural integration level and comprehensive land consolidation level in Zhejiang province


市级水平视域下,浙江省各地级市在2000年整体城乡融合发展水平较低,但在过去20年发展过程中,城乡融合水平提升明显(图6a~图6c)。2020年,呈现出以杭州、宁波、嘉兴等城市为核心的高水平城乡融合地区,中部金华、绍兴等地城乡融合发展水平次之,西南部衢州、丽水城乡融合发展处于中等水平。同时,在2010年之后,浙江省各地级市全域土地综合整治水平均有明显改善,其演化过程与城乡融合发展水平的演化存在空间一致性(图6)。评价结果指向全域土地综合整治在带动城乡空间重构、优化城乡功能布局等方面的关键作用。

图6

图6   浙江省各地级市城乡融合水平与全域土地综合整治水平演化

Fig. 6   Evolution of the level of urban-rural integration and comprehensive land consolidation in prefecture-level cities


本文通过构建地理探测器模型进行因子探测与因子交互探测,进一步探讨各类土地综合整治因子对城乡融合发展的解释力与交互作用。因子探测结果如表2所示(X1~X6分别为人口密度、景观破碎度指数、建设用地结构指数、土地综合利用程度指数、地均碳排放量、地均GDP)。可见,通过全域土地综合整治推动人口集聚发展、建设空间有序组织、生态化转型生产、土地效率提升等均对城乡融合发展水平的提升有较高的解释力。

表2   全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合发展的因子探测结果 (q值)

Table 2  Factor detection results of comprehensive land consolidation driving urban-rural integration (q)

年份X1X2X3X4X5X6
20000.653**0.2240.731**0.3280.3650.135
20050.596**0.1620.4500.0740.626***0.592*
20100.731***0.396**0.6770.1070.764***0.836***
20150.603**0.365**0.6130.0670.706**0.700***
20200.594**0.319*0.693*0.0420.728**0.915***

注:******分别表示各因子探测结果在0.1、0.05、0.01下的显著性水平。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


分析全域土地综合整治因子的交互作用有助于进一步理解其对城乡融合发展的驱动机制。探测结果表明,不同土地综合整治因子的交互作用q值均大于单一因子q值,呈现出双因子增强或非线性增强(图7)。其中,人口密度与其他因子交互的q值在研究时间范围内均较高;景观破碎度、地均GDP与其他因子交互对于城乡融合发展水平提升的解释力在2010—2020年间显著提升,均揭示出通过全域土地综合整治优化城乡空间结构布局、提升土地利用效率与土地利用功能对于促进城乡融合发展的重要作用。

图7

图7   全域土地综合整治因子交互作用q

Fig. 7   Interaction of comprehensive land consolidation factors (q)


3.2 浙江省全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合的经验总结

腾挪用地空间,加速城乡要素流动与集聚。浙江省全域土地综合整治统筹整治农用地、建设用地和生态用地,实现城市建设用地节约集约、农村耕地质量提升、生态环境保护修复,为新型城镇化和农业现代化提供土地资源保障。以嘉兴市嘉善县全域土地综合整治为例,依托“土地整治+”模式,吸引社会资金流入农村,大力发展乡村高效农业和生态产业,实现资金、技术、人才等生产要素在城乡之间有序合理流动。同时,注重提升人均、亩均效益,通过拆除村级“低散乱”企业,腾出土地空间,吸引新型科创企业入驻,推动土地要素市场化进程;通过对闲置农房的综合规划,鼓励利用闲置农房发展乡村旅游等产业,为工商资本下乡提供契机,促使生产要素在城乡之间有序流动。2021年,嘉善县城乡居民收入比缩小至1.59∶1,农民居民人均可支配收入提升至4.43万元,城乡融合发展水平提升显著[42]

城乡社区建设与生态环境建设融合,优化城乡空间结构。浙江省建设共同富裕现代化基本单元及城乡融合未来社区,依托土地测绘等现代技术形成规划基础数据平台,实现土地精细化管理,打破镇村之间的行政界线;通过因地制宜撤并村落居住地,引导已在二三产业就业创业的农民向城镇集居,统一规划安置住宅和厂房用地,并加强道路网、生态网、公共服务网等基础设施建设,有效改善城乡人居环境;通过开展城乡一体的“五水、五气、五废”治理,全域加强山水林田湖草生态系统保护和修复,探索绿水青山向金山银山转化的产业载体和科学路径。金华市浦江县被誉为“水晶之乡”,自2013年推行“五水共治”,通过治理“牛奶河”“垃圾河”“黑臭河”,改善生态环境,带动水晶加工等传统产业转型升级,也为电子商务、乡村旅游、生态农业、文化产业等生态型绿色产业提供发展空间;依托“土地整治+现代农业”“土地整治+乡村旅游”等模式,有效优化土地利用方式和用地布局。以村庄规划为先导,推进零星地块整并及空间置换腾挪,实现用地结构和空间结构的重构与优化,提高耕地连片度和建设用地利用率。

土地增值收益公平,促进城乡土地价值统一。浙江省整治低效用地主要采取政府收回、改造提升、产业转型等途径,通过城乡之间土地等量置换,有利于优化国土空间格局,缓解城乡用地矛盾。义乌市实施低效用地再开发,并开展“集地券”综合试点。由村集体对统一回收的农户闲置宅基地和集体建设用地进行拆除复垦后,市级部门按复垦总面积的50%对村集体核发“集体权票”,通过公开拍卖流转、政府流转等途径推动土地交易入市;农民退出宅基地形成的“集地券”由政府按40万元/亩(1亩≈667 m2)保护价回购,保障了农户的合法权益;通过建立周转“指标池”,探索指标分离管理,明确复垦指标交易流程,加快推进拆旧复垦项目,有效腾挪城镇发展空间,加大村集体经济反哺力度。通过腾退盘活建设用地指标,满足基础设施建设、产业园区建设等用地需求,保障收益分配公平,对于综合提升经济效益、生态效益和社会效益具有积极意义。

4 城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治优化路径

基于浙江省全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合的实践经验,全域土地综合整治在有效整合要素资源、优化城乡空间结构、统一城乡功能价值等方面发挥关键作用。城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治作为落实城乡国土空间规划的有力工具,以全域规划与综合治理为理念,不断完善体制机制与制度建设。未来亟需从土地要素市场化配置、现代产业发展空间重塑、多元主体参与价值共享等维度,探索城乡融合导向的整治优化路径(图8)。

图8

图8   城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治优化路径

Fig. 8   Optimization path of comprehensive land consolidation oriented urban-rural integration


4.1 土地要素市场化配置路径

土地要素市场化要求提高土地要素配置效率、促进土地要素自主有序流动、有效保障土地要素财产权益、激发土地市场活力。通过完善城乡统一建设用地市场、匹配产业用地供需、盘活存量建设用地、支撑发展农用地市场推动城乡土地价格市场的均衡配置,落实数量管控、用途管制和市场监管,促进城乡要素流动[43,44]。保障农民公平分享土地增值收益,赋予农村集体土地所有者在土地资源配置方面享有与城市建设用地同等的出租、转让和抵押等自主权利,拓宽农民获得土地财产收入和抵押融资的渠道,为城市工商资本下乡参与乡村振兴和城市居民到农村休闲养老提供必要的空间,利于促进农村居民长效脱贫,缩小城乡发展差距。

宅基地的多元有序有偿退出及盘活利用是推进土地要素市场化配置的重要内容,对于补充农用地数量,完善公益性公共基础设施,增加经营性建设用地具有明显促进作用。利用闲置宅基地发展民宿、康养、旅游等特色产业,并完善道路、停车场、公共厕所等配套基础设施建设,不仅可以提升乡村土地价值,也有利于增加城市居住建设用地的有效供给,优化城乡存量建设用地配置,促进城乡融合发展。此外,土地要素市场化配置与监管引导机制相结合,强化政府对市场的监管和调控保障功能。通过建立健全用地审批评价机制,加强土地利用有效管理和跟踪评估,避免由于市场盲目扩张而带来的农民失地问题;完善多元化征地补偿机制,解决失地农民的就业、安置、社会保障问题,保障农户基本的生存和发展权益。

4.2 现代产业发展空间重塑路径

全域土地综合整治促进城乡产业融合发展,要求县域统筹调整产业空间结构,为构建链条完整、功能互馈的城乡生态产业循环发展体系提供物质空间基础。通过引导城市产业链条向乡村延伸,将部分占地面积较大、技术含量相对低的轻工业及实体制造业向乡村转移,推动城市产业更新;全域土地综合整治将散乱闲置的乡村建设用地高效集约利用,宅基地有序退出腾出建设用地空间,承接城市功能与价值外溢;同时,规范多元资本投入,引导融资模式创新,为综合整治提供长效信贷支持,进而满足基础服务和配套设施建设需求,提升产业化、园区化、绿色化和信息化水平。

乡村是具有生产、生活、生态、文化等多重功能的地域综合体和人地耦合体[45],对于统筹城乡要素平衡交换,保障粮食安全与社会稳定发挥着关键的基础作用。全域土地综合整治统筹城乡经济生产空间,以市场需求为导向,强化粮食供给功能,并结合互联网平台和乡村旅游等形式拓展特色农产品销售市场,抑制乡村生产要素非农化趋势;通过规划预留基础设施和公共服务用地,落实产业融合发展项目,探索点状供地、混合用地等新机制,服务于休闲、观光、康养等生态产业分散布局的实际需要;通过科技引领型绿色生态整治改善生产结构和供给结构,优化调整产业结构与经营结构,将生态环境优势转化为生态经济优势,推动城乡产业空间结构互通互融。

4.3 多元主体参与价值共享路径

全域土地综合整治促进土地多功能价值显化,需要建立“自上而下”与“自下而上”相结合的多元主体协同治理与利益共享机制,探索多元化的投融资渠道。通过构建可持续、可循环的“投入产出”收益分配机制,激发公众和村集体经营组织参与整治的积极性,形成政府主导、部门协同、上下联动、公共参与的综合整治机制。通过探索存量建设用地盘活与新增建设用地计划指标挂钩的激励机制,并建立城乡建设用地增减挂钩结余指标调剂平台,合理分配土地指标交易收益,促进资源要素的优化配置和良性循环。

全域土地综合整治促进城乡发展权利均衡配置,突破城乡市场网络的阻隔效应与城乡空间发展权初次分配的制度缺陷,保障城乡土地生产性供给价值、生活性服务价值、生态性保育价值、社会性文化价值等多元功能性价值实现与价值共享[8]。通过系统规划城乡空间布局、强化空间用途管制、市场化开发等手段,全域土地综合整治促进城乡资源高效配置和公共服务水平提升。通过构建完善的生态产品价值核算体系、规范生态权益交易和生态补偿、推广生态绿色产业等手段,保障生态产品价值实现,实现经济效益、生态效益和社会效益的统一。同时,综合整治工程的开展要注重保护传承历史文脉,留住乡愁,增强城乡文化认同感。全域土地综合整治积极探索乡村空间发展权益实现路径,建立发展权益转移和补偿机制,保障城乡土地收益分配公平。

5 结论与讨论

5.1 结论

全域土地综合整治与城乡融合发展以人地系统协调与可持续发展为根基。全域土地综合整治是推动城乡融合发展的系统工程,城乡融合发展为新时期全域土地综合整治赋予更广泛而深刻的内涵。本文围绕“人、地、业、权”主导要素,从“要素—结构—功能”视角解析全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合发展的内在逻辑,并提出全域土地综合整治有效服务于城乡融合发展的优化路径。结论如下:

(1)城乡融合发展是促进城乡发展要素自由流动、城乡空间结构互通互联、城乡功能价值统一,进而实现城乡经济、空间、社会多维有机融合,重塑城乡人地关系的动态过程。

(2)全域土地综合整治统筹“人、地、业、权”要素关系及空间结构,通过土地资源开发、人居环境整治、产权结构调整、生态保护修复等举措,破解城乡发展要素错配、空间结构失衡以及价值功能异化的困境,系统推进城乡融合发展与人地关系协调。

(3)浙江高质量发展建设共同富裕示范区,从“千村示范、万村整治”到全域土地综合整治,通过多因素交互作用,优化国土空间布局,促进区域要素畅通,结构优化与功能提升,有效推进农业农村现代化和城乡融合发展。

(4)面向城乡融合发展,全域土地综合整治需要进一步探索土地要素市场化配置、现代产业发展空间重塑以及多元主体参与价值共享的优化路径,强化市场监管、县域统筹、多元主体协同治理。

5.2 讨论

城乡融合发展是适应城乡关系转型、重塑新型城乡关系、推进乡村振兴的根本途径。城乡劳动力、土地、产业等要素的自由流动与配置均衡,以及城乡权利价值的统一是驱动城乡融合发展的关键举措;城乡基本公共服务均等化、交通基础设施一体化等是支撑城乡融合发展的重要内容。全域土地综合整治协调城乡“人、地、业、权”多要素关系,统筹城乡空间规划布局,成为促进城乡融合发展的综合平台。实施全域土地综合整治,有利于激活乡村系统要素,优化乡村人地关系,提高资源利用效率,对于加快构建城乡融合发展的体制机制,建立健全城乡区域循环的经济体系具有重要意义。尽管全域土地综合整治目前仍处于试点探索与发展转型阶段,全域治理理念面临空间割裂、功能分离等问题,整治实践中仍存在组织和监管的困境;但面向城乡融合发展,全域土地综合整治统筹推进新型城镇化与土地制度、户籍制度改革,是保障城乡发展用地,促进要素自由流动的必然选择。生态产品价值实现与市场化、跨部门的组织协调机制与模式等仍是未来全域土地综合整治驱动城乡融合发展亟需深入探讨的问题。

中国城乡发展亟需转变以城市为中心的发展理念,兼顾城乡发展权益与效率,保障农民权益,避免为满足城市建设发展的土地需求而牺牲农村、农业与农民的发展空间。在高质量发展中探索推进共同富裕之路、保障改善民生之策,重在统筹城乡收入分配公平与基本公共服务均等化,保障城乡平等的发展权利,有效解决城乡发展不平衡、乡村发展不充分的主要矛盾,在不断深化改革和机制创新进程中全面推进新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴。

参考文献

姚士谋, 张平宇, 余成, .

中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题

地理科学, 2014, 34(6): 641-647.

DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.06.641      [本文引用: 1]

城镇化问题是当代中国社会经济发展的综合性课题,是涉及到国民经济各部门如何协调发展,达到一个新的现代化和谐社会发展的根本问题;新型城镇化是中国城镇化健康稳定发展的基本保证,在当前的新形势下,探索中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题,具有重要的学术价值与实践意义。在过去一阶段,虽然城镇化推动了中国社会经济发展取得了巨大成就,并在城市现代化建设与城乡一体化方面也取得了惊人的发展,但在某个时期或一些地区,城镇化过速发展阶段,出现了无序的发展状态,大中城市边缘盲目扩展,水土资源日渐退化,生态环境遭受破坏,特别是有些政府决策人对城镇化的许多制约因素认识不足,甚至决策失误,导致了城市环境出现许多不安全、不舒适的问题。着重从地理空间与自然资源保护的角度,探索中国新型城镇化3个理论与实践问题:① 如何认知中国新型城镇化的基本特征与新的路径;② 在全球经济一体化形势下,如何构建新型城镇化的创新模式;③ 在新型城镇化实施过程中,如何认识中国城镇化本身的发展规律,走具有中国特色的新型城镇化道路。

[YAO S M, ZHANG P Y, YU C, et al.

The theory and practice of new urbanization in China

Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(6): 641-647.]

DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.06.641      [本文引用: 1]

Issue of urbanization is a comphrensive subject which is related to harmonious development of each department of national economy and building a harmonious society. New urbanization is the guarantee of healthy and stable development of urbanization. The research work of the thesis has higher academic meaning and practical value. Urbanization promoted social and economic development of China in the past decades. But some problems arised in the process of urbanization in some areas, such as the rapid pace and disordered state of development, the blind expansion on the edge of cities, degradation of land and water resources, destruction of the ecological environment, and many unsafe, uncomfortable problems in urban environment.From the geographical space and natural resource conservation point of view, this article focuses on three theoretical issues. 1) How to have a good understanding of the basic characteristics and realizing route of new urbanization; 2) How to build a innovation model of new urbanization; 3) In the process of implementing new urbanization, how to understand the development law of China's urbanization, and to take a new road of urbanization with Chinese characteristics.

戈大专, 陆玉麒.

面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径

地理学报, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437.

DOI:10.11821/dlxb202106008      [本文引用: 1]

城乡国土空间统一用途管制背景下,乡村空间治理成为国土空间治理体系的重要组成部分。从乡村空间治理的理论内涵出发,构建了乡村空间治理理论分析框架,探讨了乡村空间治理作用于国土空间规划的内在机制和可行路径。结论如下:① 乡村空间治理是以乡村空间为治理对象,通过规划和协商等方式,实现乡村空间用途有效管制,空间权利有序配置,凸显多元主体参与的“自上而下”和“自下而上”相结合的综合治理过程;② 通过“举措—效能—目标”体系,构建了刚性与弹性结合、物质空间与空间关系交互、空间权属与空间组织叠加的乡村空间“物质—组织—权属”综合治理分析框架;③ 多级尺度互联互通(区域—村域—地块)的乡村空间治理特征有利于完善乡村空间治理体系;④ 乡村空间治理通过多种手段并施、多元主体参与、多重价值共享,完善国土空间规划体系,推进多规融合,细化国土空间用途管制,促进乡村善治和生态治理;⑤ 乡村空间治理通过“自上而下”和“自下而上”相结合的动员和行动策略,构建新型村庄运营模式和组织机制,为落实实用性村庄规划和乡村振兴战略创造条件。

[GE D Z, LU Y Q.

Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path

Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(6): 1422-1437.]

DOI:10.11821/dlxb202106008      [本文引用: 1]

Under the background of unified management of urban and rural space, rural spatial governance has become an important part of the spatial governance system. Conducting in-depth theoretical and practical research on rural spatial governance and analyzing the mechanisms and path of rural spatial governance in national spatial planning will be conducive to improving the planning and control system of rural space. Starting from the connotation rural spatial governance, this paper constructs a theoretical analysis framework of rural spatial governance based on the comprehensive perspective of spatial governance, discusses the internal mechanism and feasible paths of rural spatial governance in territorial spatial planning, and then realizes the theoretical and practical research of rural spatial governance. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Rural spatial governance starts from the coordination theory of human-land relations in the rural regional system. Through planning and negotiation, it realizes effective control of rural space usage, and orderly allocation of space rights. Rural spatial governance highlights the comprehensive governance process that combines "top-down" and "bottom-up" participation by multiple subjects. (2) Through the "action-efficiency-target" system, the comprehensive governance analysis framework of "matter-organization-ownership" in rural space provides an effective scheme for the construction of multiple rural spatial governance that combines rigidity and flexibility, interaction between material space and space relationship, and superposition of spatial ownership and spatial organization. (3) The rural spatial governance features of interconnecting various scales (region-village-plot) are conducive to improving the rural spatial governance system. (4) The multiple governance means, participation modes and value-sharing mechanisms of rural spatial governance are conducive to enriching the territorial spatial planning system, promoting the integration of multiple regulations, refining the control of territorial space use, and ensuring good rural governance and ecological governance. (5) Rural spatial governance uses mobilization strategies of "top-down" and "bottom-up", and creates conditions for the implementation of practical village planning and revitalization strategies through the construction of new village operation models and reconstruction of organizational mechanisms.

戈大专, 龙花楼.

论乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展

地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.

DOI:10.11821/dlxb202006013      [本文引用: 1]

构建现代乡村治理体系成为推动城乡融合发展和乡村振兴的重要内容。破解乡村空间利用过程中出现的发展空间受限、权属关系不明和组织体系不畅等系统性问题,成为乡村空间治理的首要任务。本文从乡村空间“物质—权属—组织”综合治理的视角出发,尝试解析乡村空间治理在推动乡村空间重构、权属关系重塑和组织体系重建中的作用机制,并进一步探讨乡村空间治理优化城乡格局、改善城乡互动关系、推动城乡融合发展的可行路径。结论如下:物质空间治理可作为乡村空间结构和功能优化的重要手段,空间权属治理有助于保障乡村空间不同参与主体的发展权利,空间组织治理可提升乡村空间的组织效率;乡村空间治理导向的“人口—土地—产业”转型过程为“深化空间治理—活化乡村空间—优化人地关系—改善城乡格局”的分析思路创造条件;乡村空间治理推动城乡发展格局不断演化,城乡互动关系改善成为推动城乡融合发展和破解乡村发展困境的重要依据。最后,本文构建了乡村空间治理与城乡融合发展互动分析框架,并探讨了乡村空间治理与国土空间规划的内在关系及研究趋势。

[GE D Z, LONG H L.

Rural spatial governance and urban-rural integration development

Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1272-1286.]

DOI:10.11821/dlxb202006013      [本文引用: 1]

The construction of the modern rural governance system becomes an important part in promoting the urban-rural integration development and rural vitalization. Solving systemic problems such as limited development space, unclear ownership relationship and inefficient organization in the process of using rural space has become the primary task of rural spatial governance. Based on the breakthrough of the comprehensive governance of "matter-ownership-organization" in rural space, this paper attempts to analyze the mechanism of rural space governance in promoting rural space restructuring, ownership reshaping and organizational system reconstruction, and further explores the feasible path of rural space governance to optimize the urban-rural pattern, improve the urban-rural interaction, and promote the urban-rural integration development. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Physical space governance facilitates the optimization of rural spatial structure, the space ownership governance safeguards the development rights of different stakeholders, and the space organization governance enhances rural organizational capabilities. The comprehensive governance of "matter-ownership-organization" in rural space helps to impel the restructuring of rural space, the reshaping of ownership relations and the reconstructing of organizational system, to achieve the goals of the modern rural space governance system with clear rural space ownership. (2) The "population-land-industry" transformation path guided by rural space governance creates conditions for the analysis of "deepening space governance-activating rural space-optimizing human-land relationship-improving the urban-rural pattern". (3) Rural space governance promotes the continuous evolution of urban-rural development, and the improvement of urban-rural interaction becomes an important basis for upgrading urban-rural integration development and solving the dilemma of rural development. Finally, this paper constructs an analytical framework and feasible path for the interaction between rural space governance and the urban-rural integration development, and explores the internal relationship and research trends of rural space governance and territory spatial planning.

叶兴庆.

在畅通国内大循环中推进城乡双向开放

中国农村经济, 2020, (11): 2-12.

[本文引用: 1]

[YE X Q.

Promoting the two-way opening-up of urban and rural areas in the context of smoothing domestic circulation

Chinese Rural Economy, 2020, (11): 2-12.]

[本文引用: 1]

何仁伟.

城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径

地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj201811001      [本文引用: 1]

缩小城乡差距,促进城乡均衡发展,实现城乡居民生活质量等值,是乡村振兴和城乡融合发展的重要目标。通过基础理论的分析,探讨了城乡融合与乡村振兴科学内涵,剖析了城乡融合与乡村振兴的相互关系,构建了城乡空间均衡模型和定义城乡等值线,提出了中国城乡融合与乡村振兴实现途径及需要深入研究的方向。结果表明:① 城乡融合发展是基于空间布局优化和制度供给创新的经济、社会、环境全面融合发展,“乡村振兴五边形”和“人—地—钱—业”是乡村振兴的核心内涵;城乡融合与乡村振兴战略相互支撑,城乡融合和乡村振兴的过程是城乡空间动态均衡的过程。② 城乡发展的空间均衡模型可以较好地阐释促进城乡融合发展、实施乡村振兴的关键问题,通过城乡要素的重新优化配置和人口的流动,城乡人均综合发展效益逐渐趋于相等;城乡等值线可以进一步解释城乡发展空间均衡的动态过程与传导机理。③ 从政策制度构建、“点轴”渐进扩散、分区分类推进、典型发展模式提炼等方面探讨乡村振兴的科学路径,可以为中国乡村振兴战略实施提供理论参考。

[HE R W.

Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation

Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140.]

DOI:10.11821/dlyj201811001      [本文引用: 1]

Rural revitalization and urban-rural integration aim at narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas, promoting balanced development and realizing the equivalent life quality between urban and rural residents. Spatial equilibrium and its quantitative expression provide a new perspective to explain the pattern, process and mechanism of urban-rural integration and rural revitalization. Through the analysis of basic theory, this study discusses the scientific content and interaction between urban-rural integration and rural revitalization, sets up the urban-rural spatial equilibrium model, defines the urban-rural development isolines, works out the way to implement the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in China, and addresses the potential for further research. The results show that: (1) Theory of regional system of man-land relationship and theory of spatial structure are the important theoretical basis for urban-rural integration and rural revitalization. The urban-rural integrated development depends on the all-round development of economy, society and environment with optimized spatial layout and innovative system, and rural revitalization mainly refers to the "pentagon of rural revitalization" and "people-land-capital-industry"; Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization strategy support each other, and the process of urban rural integration and rural revitalization is a dynamic equilibrium process between urban and rural areas. (2) The key issues of implementing rural revitalization and urban-rural integration can be illustrated through the urban-rural spatial equilibrium model, and the overall per capita benefits in rural areas gradually tend to be the same as that in cities by the re-optimization of urban-rural factors and population mobility; the dynamic process and mechanism of urban-rural integration spatial equilibrium is further interpreted via the urban-rural development isolines. (3) Exploring the implementation path of scientific rural revitalization strategy can achieve the goal of urban-rural integration and urban-rural spatial equilibrium development. The scientific path of rural revitalization is discussed from the perspectives of policy system construction, "pole-axis" spatial progressive diffusion, sub-area classification and typical development pattern, and it can provide theoretical reference for the strategy implementation of China's rural revitalization.

SONG X P, HANSEN M C, STEHMAN S V, et al.

Global land change from 1982 to 2016

Nature, 2018, 569(2): 639-643.

[本文引用: 1]

董祚继, 韦艳莹, 任聪慧, .

面向乡村振兴的全域土地综合整治创新: 公共价值创造与实现

资源科学, 2022, 44(7): 1305-1315.

DOI:10.18402/resci.2022.07.01      [本文引用: 2]

全域土地综合整治近年来迅速发展,已成为推动乡村振兴战略实施的重要工具,但作为一项崭新而重大的土地制度供给,从理论到实践都有很大的探索空间。本文根据公共价值创造理论,认为由政府推动的乡村振兴成果具有公共产品属性,乡村振兴的过程就是公共价值创造和实现的过程。全域土地综合整治作为乡村振兴的重要手段,本质上就是通过土地制度创新促进乡村振兴中公共价值的创造和实现。为此,本文首先总结了中外土地整治实践经验,分析了全域土地综合整治的公共价值取向,以此为基础,深入探讨了全域土地综合整治的公共价值创造和实现问题,其中公共价值的创造需要推进理念创新、方法创新和科技创新,公共价值的实现需要推进产权创新、组织创新和监管创新。

[DONG Z J, WEI Y Y, REN C H, et al.

Comprehensive land improvement innovation for rural revitalization: Public value creation and realization

Resources Science, 2022, 44(7): 1305-1315.]

DOI:10.18402/resci.2022.07.01      [本文引用: 2]

Region-wide comprehensive land improvement has expanded greatly in recent years and has become a critical tool for promoting the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy. However, as a brand-new and substantial systematic land institution provision, it presents a big room for exploration both in theory and in practice. From the perspective of public value creation, this article argued that the achievements of the government-promoted rural revitalization have the attributes of public goods, and the rural revitalization is a process of creating and realizing public values. As an important means of rural revitalization, region-wide comprehensive land improvement is essential for promoting the creation and realization of public values in rural revitalization through land institution innovation. Therefore, this article first summarized the practical experiences of land regulation in China and internationally, and analyzed the public value orientation of region-wide comprehensive land improvement. On this basis, this article further discussed the creation of public value and the realization of region-wide comprehensive land improvement. Of all the related issues, the creation of public value calls for conceptual innovation, methodological innovation, and science-technological innovation; and the realization of public value needs to realize property rights innovation, organizational innovation, and regulatory innovation.

曲衍波, 张彦军, 朱伟亚, .

“三生”功能视角下全域土地综合整治格局与模式研究

现代城市研究, 2021, (3): 33-39.

[本文引用: 2]

[QU Y B, ZHANG Y J, ZHU W Y, et al.

Pattern and mode of comprehensive land consolidation from the perspective of production-life-ecological function

Modern Urban Research, 2021, (3): 33-39.]

[本文引用: 2]

龙花楼.

论土地整治与乡村空间重构

地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028.

[本文引用: 1]

目前,中国新型工业化、城镇化和农业现代化的推进仍缺乏重要抓手和空间支撑平台,严重影响了城乡一体化发展进程。亟需通过开展农村土地综合整治,重构乡村生产、生活和生态空间,为推进新农村建设和城乡一体化发展搭建新平台。本文在界定了乡村空间重构,即在快速工业化和城镇化进程中,伴随乡村内生发展需求和外源驱动力综合作用下导致的农村地区社会经济结构重新塑造,乡村地域上生产空间、生活空间和生态空间的优化调整乃至根本性变革的过程,及其产业发展集聚、农民居住集中和资源利用集约3 个方面内涵的基础上,分析了工业化和城镇化进程对乡村生产、生活和生态空间的影响;探讨了乡村空间重构的土地整治类型及助推机制;结合农用地整治、"空心村"整治和工矿用地整治提出了乡村生产、生活和生态空间重构的模式与途径,以及依托土地整治的以"自下而上"为主、"自上而下"为辅的乡村空间重构战略。作为城乡一体化发展根基的乡村空间其重要性和基础平台作用应受到足够重视,乡村集约高效的生产空间、宜居适度的生活空间和山清水秀的生态空间的优化重构,有赖于区域农村土地整治工程技术、政策机制与模式的创新。

[LONG H L.

Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring

Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028.]

[本文引用: 1]

Currently, the implementation of new type industrialization, new type urbanization and agricultural modernization strategy lacks of a major hand grip and spatial sustain platform, due to long-term existed "dual-track" structure of rural-urban development in China as well as unstable rural development institution and mechanism and backward rural and agricultural infrastructures, which greatly affects the advancement of urban-rural integration development. It is necessary to restructure rural production, living and ecological space by carrying out land consolidation, so as to establish a new platform for building new countryside and realize urban-rural integration development in China. This paper develops the concept and connotation of rural spatial restructuring, i.e., an optimization and adjustment even utterly changing process of rural production, living and ecological space accompanied by rural socio-economic structure reshaping under the pressure of rapid industrialization and urbanization. The connotations of rural spatial restructuring involve three aspects of assembling industrial development, centralizing farmers' living and intensive resources utilization. Based on the effects analysis of industrialization and urbanization on rural production, living and ecological space, this paper also probes the mechanism which push forward rural spatial restructuring by carrying out land consolidation, an important approach to supplying cultivated land, revitalizing the stock land, optimizing rural-urban land, utilizing land intensively, and increasing land productivity. A conceptualization of the models of rural production, living and ecological environment spatial restructuring is analyzed in combination with agricultural land consolidation, hollowed villages consolidation and industrial and mining land consolidation. Finally, the author argues that a "bottom-up" restructuring strategy accompanied by a few "top-down" elements is helpful for smoothly pushing forward current rural spatial restructuring in China. The optimization and restructuring of rural intensive and high-efficient production space, suitable living space with amenity and ecological space with beautiful mountain and clean water will rely on the innovation of regional engineering technology, policy mechanism and mode of rural land consolidation, and more attentions should be paid to rural space, the foundation base and platform for realizing urban-rural integration development.

FANG Y, SHI K, NIU C.

A comparison of the means and ends of rural construction land consolidation: Case studies of villagers' attitudes and behaviours in Changchun city, Jilin province, China

Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 47: 459-473.

DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.04.007      URL     [本文引用: 1]

信桂新, 杨朝现, 魏朝富, .

人地协调的土地整治模式与实践

农业工程学报, 2015, 31(19): 262-275.

[本文引用: 1]

[XIN G X, YANG C X, WEI C F, et al.

Mode and practice of land consolidation based on human-earth harmonization

Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(19): 262-275.]

[本文引用: 1]

夏方舟, 杨雨濛, 严金明.

中国国土综合整治近40年内涵研究综述: 阶段演进与发展变化

中国土地科学, 2018, 32(5): 78-85.

[本文引用: 1]

[XIA F Z, YANG Y M, YAN J M.

The connotation research review on integrated territory consolidation of China in recent four decades: Staged evolution and developmental transformation

China Land Science, 2018, 32(5): 78-85.]

[本文引用: 1]

李小建, 胡雪瑶, 史焱文, .

乡村振兴下的聚落研究: 来自经济地理学视角

地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 3-14.

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.001      [本文引用: 1]

论文首先从人地关系视角分析了乡村问题的背景及乡村振兴的内容逻辑,提出乡村衰退是人地关系调整滞后于社会经济发展进程的结果,乡村振兴最终目的就是调整人地关系以适应社会经济发展新阶段的生产要素价值变化。对乡村振兴地理研究的评述发现,多数关注其战略内容的实施,而对乡村人口重要载体的乡村聚落重视不够。事实上,乡村聚落与乡村振兴的关系密切,乡村聚落是乡村地区人类社会经济活动的集中场所,是乡村人地关系调整的核心和关键抓手,在乡村振兴中起关键作用。而已有的乡村聚落地理研究多聚焦空间变化,并且重实证轻机理,尤其是与乡村振兴相关联的聚落演变机理研究尚无成果问世。最后,基于乡村聚落在乡村振兴中关键作用,提出从人地关系协调出发,加强乡村聚落演变理论、乡村聚落空间结构变化趋势、乡村聚落专业化转型、乡村聚落整治优化及乡村聚落风貌景观等5个方面的研究。

[LI X J, HU X Y, SHI Y W, et al.

The role of rural settlements in rural revitalization: Perspective of economic geography

Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 3-14.]

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.001      [本文引用: 1]

This article started with an analysis of the background of rural decline, and the content and logic of the national strategy of rural revitalization from the perspective of human-land relationship. We proposed that rural recession is the result of the adjustment of human-land relationship lagging behind the process of social and economic development. The ultimate purpose of rural revitalization is to adjust the relationship between human and land to adapt to the change of the value of production factors in the new stage of social and economic development. Then, the review of the literature on rural revitalization found that the existing research has paid more attention to the implementation of its strategic content, but not enough attention to rural settlements that have been the important carrier of rural population. There is a close relationship between rural settlement and rural revitalization. Rural settlements are the focus of human social and economic activities in rural areas, and are the core and starting point of rural human-land relationship adjustment. But in the existing literature on rural settlements, emphasis is placed on development cases and neglecting mechanisms, especially the mechanism of change of rural settlements, which is closely associated with rural revitalization. Therefore, bearing in mind the key role of rural settlements in rural revitalization, this article finally put forward five focus areas of future research: the theory of rural settlement evolution, changing trend of spatial structure in rural settlements, specialization transformation of rural settlements, optimization of rural settlements, and landscape of rural settlements.

龙花楼, 陈坤秋.

基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展

地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.

DOI:10.11821/dlxb202102004      [本文引用: 1]

土地系统科学的研究视角可为促进城乡融合发展的土地利用转型研究提供参考借鉴。本文在梳理国际上土地系统科学发展历程基础上,基于土地系统科学研究视角探讨了土地利用转型影响城乡融合发展的理论框架、方式与路径以及促进城乡融合发展的土地利用转型调控途径与措施。土地系统科学致力于监测土地变化,解释驱动因素和反馈机制,理解发生于土地上的人类—环境相互作用,实现将对土地系统的科学发现转化为可持续土地利用解决方案。土地系统运行以土地可持续利用与人类福祉为准绳,显化为土地利用的多维效应。通过科学管控土地利用转型实现土地系统的良好运行能够影响城乡融合发展进程。土地利用转型通过效率提升、价值显化、要素流通与结构优化4大渠道,在“强整体”效应与“补短板”效应的作用下助推城乡融合发展。基于土地系统科学视域下促进城乡融合发展的土地利用转型调控需要重塑土地权能体系,推进国土空间综合整治,健全土地利用转型管控体系。

[LONG H L, CHEN K Q.

Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science

Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.]

DOI:10.11821/dlxb202102004      [本文引用: 1]

The research perspective of land system science can provide a reference for the study of urban-rural integrated development promoted by land use transitions. Based on the review of the development of land system science, this paper discusses the theoretical framework concerning land use transitions affecting urban-rural integrated development guided by land system science, the influential ways and paths of land use transitions on urban-rural integrated development, and the measures of promoting urban-rural integrated development via adjusting and controlling land use transitions. Land system science is committed to monitoring land use change, explaining the driving forces and feedback mechanism, understanding the human-environment interactions occurring on land, and translating scientific findings on land system into solutions for sustainable land use. The operating of land system takes sustainable land use and human well-being as the criterions, and manifests as multi-dimensional effects of land use. Operating well the land system via scientifically adjusting and controlling land use transitions can affect the process of urban-rural integrated development. Land use transitions promote the integrated development of urban and rural areas under the effects of strengthening the whole and reinforcing weak links through four channels, i.e., efficiency improvement, value embodiment, development elements circulation and structure optimization. In order to promote the integrated development of urban and rural areas from the perspective of land system science, the adjustment and control of land use transitions need to reshape the land use rights system, to promote the integrated consolidation of territorial space, and to improve the management and control system of land use transitions.

杨忍, 张菁, 徐茜, .

城乡融合视角下农村闲置建设用地拆旧复垦的资本化效应: 以广东省为例

地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 114-123.

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.011      [本文引用: 1]

土地问题是乡村振兴战略落实的关键。土地整治和资本化作为提升土地质量、促进城乡融合的重要手段,一直是各方探讨的热点。论文以广东省实施的农村拆旧复垦政策为切入点,分析农村建设用地拆旧复垦模式资本化效应的形成机制,梳理其与乡村振兴、城乡联动的关系。研究发现:首先,在农村建设用地拆旧复垦模式实施中,以市场机制为主的“弱关系”和土地流转为主的“强关系”分别在整治腾退建设用地和复垦农业用地中发挥重要作用,是实现土地资本化的主要路径;其次,农村建设用地拆旧复垦模式主要通过结构重组、空间重构、生产方式变革和生态环境优化等推动乡村振兴;最后,农村建设用地拆旧复垦模式以跨地区市场交易平台为载体,引导城乡之间土地、资金等要素流通,通过设置最低保护价和优先购买权等方式保障乡村的发展权利,实现城乡等价要素联动。

[YANG R, ZHANG J, XU Q, et al.

Capitalization effect of rural land reclamation from the perspective of rural-urban integration: A case study of Guangdong province

Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 114-123.]

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.011      [本文引用: 1]

Addressing the land issue is the key for implementing the rural revitalization strategy. Land consolidation and capitalization as important means to improve land quality and promote rural-urban integration have been the hot topic of discussion. This study took the demolition and reclamation policy in Guangdong Province as a case, analyzed the mechanism of capitalization effect of rural construction land reclamation, and clarified its influence on rural revitalization as well as rural-urban integration. First, during the implementation of rural construction land reclamation, the "weak relationship" dominated by market mechanism and the "strong relationship" dominated by land circulation play important roles in the renovation and reclamation, which are the main ways to realize land capitalization. Second, rural construction land reclamation mainly promotes rural revitalization through structural reconstruction, spatial reorganization, production mode transformation, and ecological environment optimization. Finally, rural construction land reclamation takes cross-regional market trading platforms as the carrier to guide the circulation of land, capital, and other factors between urban and rural areas. Meanwhile, it guarantees the development right of rural areas by setting the protection price and the right of preemption, which realizes the smooth flow of factors between urban and rural areas.

王婧, 方创琳, 王振波.

我国当前城乡建设用地置换的实践探索及问题剖析

自然资源学报, 2011, 26(9): 1453-1466.

[本文引用: 1]

[WANG J, FANG C L, WANG Z B.

China's contemporary urban-rural construction land replacement: Practices and problems

Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(9): 1453-1466.]

[本文引用: 1]

范垚, 杨庆媛, 张瑞頠, .

基于城乡统筹发展的农村土地综合整治绩效研究: 以重庆市典型项目区为例

中国土地科学, 2016, 30(11): 68-77.

[本文引用: 1]

[FAN Y, YANG Q Y, ZHANG R W, et al.

Performance evaluation of rural land comprehensive consolidation on urban-rural integrated development: A case study of typical projects in Chongqing

China Land Science, 2016, 30(11): 68-77.]

[本文引用: 1]

周小平, 申端帅, 谷晓坤, .

大都市全域土地综合整治与耕地多功能: 基于“情境—结构—行为—结果”的分析

中国土地科学, 2021, 35(9): 94-104.

[本文引用: 1]

[ZHOU X P, SHEN D S, GU X K, et al.

Comprehensive land consolidation and multifunctional cultivated land in metropolis: The analysis based on the "situation-structure-implementation-outcome"

China Land Science, 2021, 35(9): 94-104.]

[本文引用: 1]

范业婷, 金晓斌, 张晓琳, .

乡村重构视角下全域土地综合整治的机制解析与案例研究

中国土地科学, 2021, 35(4): 109-118.

[本文引用: 1]

[FAN Y T, JIN X B, ZHANG X L, et al.

Mechanism analysis and case study of comprehensive land consolidation from the perspective of rural restructuring

China Land Science, 2021, 35(4): 109-118.]

[本文引用: 1]

马晓冬, 李鑫, 顾晓波, .

城乡融合视角下淮海经济区城乡转型特征与路径

自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1853-1866.

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200808      [本文引用: 1]

城乡融合不仅是社会经济结构的转换过程,也是城乡持续转型过程。以淮海经济区为研究区,剖析了城乡融合发展面临的困境,通过城乡转型多维定量评价与比较,诊断了研究区城乡融合状态,提出了推进城乡融合发展的路径。结果表明:(1)淮海经济区城乡融合发展面临“两分离一切变”而导致的“三不足”的困境,即传统农区的“居业分离”、资源型城市的“产城分离”和省际交界区的“切变效应”,导致乡村转型的内在动力不足、城市对乡村的辐射带动力不足和城乡公共服务供给的区域协同力不足。(2)城乡转型状态呈现出经济、社会和空间多维相关的特征,转型过程的城乡异速不同步和转型格局的城乡异构非均衡现象并存;采用对比聚类法,划分出城乡转型滞后型、乡村转型滞后型、城市转型滞后型和城乡转型同步型四种类型。(3)推进淮海经济区城乡融合发展的关键是要突破城乡二元结构和区域发展“碎片化”困境,分类推进城乡协同转型发展,加强省际交界区城乡发展的跨域协同。

[MA X D, LI X, GU X B, et al.

The characteristics and path of urban-rural transition in Huaihai Economic Zone from the perspective of urban-rural integration

Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1853-1866.]

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200808      URL     [本文引用: 1]

刘彦随, 刘玉, 翟荣新.

中国农村空心化的地理学研究与整治实践

地理学报, 2009, 64(10): 1193-1202.

[本文引用: 1]

[LIU Y S, LIU Y, ZHAI R X.

Geographical research and optimizing practice of rural hollowing in China

Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(10): 1193-1202.]

DOI:10.11821/xb200910005      [本文引用: 1]

Rural hollowing is a widespread phenomenon all over China, especially in traditional agricultural areas. From the dynamic viewpoint, rural hollowing is a special evolution form of rural areal system during the process of urban-rural transformation development. In terms of its natural function and task, rural geography has unique advantages to research rural hollowing. From the comprehensive, dynamic and regional perspectives, these advantages of rural geography are mainly the phenomenon description and spatial models establishment of rural hollowing, formation mechanism and dynamic force simulation, response mechanism and comprehensive effect, as well as potential types and its optimal regulation This paper puts forward a series of propositions which should be studied based on theoretical disciplinary system of rural geography. Therefore this paper refines and develops the theoretical foundation of rural geography for rural hollowing research. The theoretical system includes the lifecycles of rural hollowing evolvement, spatial pattern of generation development, mechanics theory of rural hollowing and "Three Integration" model. Then based on the theory research of rural space reconstructions and rural hollowing regulation, integrating with analysis of influencing factors on spatial pattern and evolvement of rural settlement, this paper develops a framework for the succession, evaluation and regulation of rural hollowing. Finally, taking Yucheng city in Shandong province as a typical case, this paper constructs the basic criterion, development concept and planning schemes for the regulation of hollowed villages in Yucheng city, which is the theoretical practice of rural geography. In order to guide new countryside construction, ensure warning line of cultivated land and co-ordinate land use allocation between urban and rural areas in China, it is necessary to conduct a through investigation on the mechanism, policy and mode innovation involved "trinity" by implementing village renovation demonstration project.

韩博, 金晓斌, 孙瑞, .

新时期国土综合整治分类体系初探

中国土地科学, 2019, 33(8): 79-88.

[本文引用: 1]

[HAN B, JIN X B, SUN R, et al.

Research on the classification system of integrated territory consolidation in the New Era

China Land Science, 2019, 33(8): 79-88.]

[本文引用: 1]

叶超, 于洁, 张清源, .

从治理到城乡治理: 国际前沿、发展态势与中国路径

地理科学进展, 2021, 40(1): 15-27.

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002      [本文引用: 1]

治理已经成为多学科关注的重要理论与现实问题。在快速城镇化和城乡差距居高不下的背景下,城乡治理对中国而言尤为重要。论文通过梳理国内外治理理论,概括治理的要点为开放系统、自组织、权力与权利的交织3个方面。国际研究强调社会生态系统的治理,城市治理增势显著,乡村治理研究开始兴起。中国在顶层设计上经历了从管理到治理的全面转型,城乡治理逐渐成为研究和政策实践的关键议题。未来中国城乡治理的主要路径在于:从权力导向转向权利导向;从只注重社会维度、一元化的、城市偏向的治理模式转向生态环境与社会治理并重,形成多元主体参与的城乡共治体系;积极开展城乡弱势群体的扶持救助工作。城乡共治将会成为新的理论增长点,需要进行多学科、多主体、多部门的协同工作。

[YE C, YU J, ZHANG Q Y, et al.

From governance to rural-urban co-governance: Research frontiers, trends, and the Chinese paths

Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1): 15-27.]

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.002      [本文引用: 1]

Governance has become an important theoretical and practical issue of multi-disciplinary concern. In the context of rapid urbanization and wide rural-urban disparity, rural-urban governance is particularly important for China. Based on the Chinese and international governance theories, the key aspects of governance include: an open system, self-organization, and the interactive relationship between power and rights. Internationally the research frontier focuses on the governance of social-ecological systems, while urban governance has grown significantly, and rural governance has also risen in recent years. The research trend and policy evolution of governance in China indicate that China has undergone a comprehensive transformation from management to governance by top-level design, and rural-urban governance is becoming a key issue. The main path of China's rural-urban governance in the future lies in three aspects. First, it is necessary to shift from power-oriented to rights-oriented governance. Second, equal attention needs to be paid to both ecological environment and social governance instead of focusing only on social, single-dimensional, and urban governance systems, and form a rural-urban co-governance system with the participation of multiple subjects. Third, it should be launched to assist rural and urban vulnerable groups actively. Rural-urban co-governance will become a new growth point for theories, and multi-disciplinary, multi-subject, and multi-department collaboration is much needed.

王军, 应凌霄, 钟莉娜.

新时代国土整治与生态修复转型思考

自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 26-36.

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200104      [本文引用: 1]

针对全球变化影响下的国土空间和生态系统,生态文明建设和国土空间规划是中国在新时代的积极响应,国土整治与生态修复的转型和提升成为必然要求。在介绍国土整治与生态修复概念内涵的基础上,指出中国国土空间生态环境问题的复杂性和生态文明建设的新理念要求决定了国土整治与生态修复的转型。从工作理念、理论基础、技术体系和制度建设等方面,分析了当前国土整治与生态修复工作中存在的不足,主要包括整体综合理念滞后、理论基础体系欠缺、技术支撑相对薄弱、体制机制不尽完善等方面。针对这些不足,提出了新时代国土整治与生态修复转型的路径和策略,主要策略包括强化系统思维、提升理论体系、加强技术支撑、完善机制建设等内容,以期为国土整治与生态修复推进美丽中国建设提供科学依据。

[WANG J, YING L X, ZHONG L N.

Thinking for the transformation of land consolidation and ecological restoration in the New Era

Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1): 26-36.]

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200104      [本文引用: 1]

As the national land space and ecosystems are affected by global change nowadays, ecological civilization construction and land spatial planning must be the positive responses of China in the new era. Great achievements have been made in the restorations of ecological space and ecosystems through projects for land consolidation and ecological restoration. However, the degradation of some regional ecosystems still exists, and the interference of unreasonable traditional human activities has not been completely eliminated in China. Meanwhile, China faces a large number of challenges in the economic and social developments of the new era. The transformation and improvement of land consolidation and ecological restoration therefore become the inevitable requirement. Through introducing the concepts, connotations of land consolidation, ecological restoration and relationships between them in the new era, this paper suggested that the transformation should be determined by the variations and complexities of regional ecological and environmental issues, the new requirements of ecological civilization construction and land spatial planning. We also indicated the four shortcomings of land consolidation and ecological restoration at present, including working perception, theoretical basis, technological system, and institutional construction. Specifically in recent practices, the integrated and comprehensive concepts are lagging behind, the key theoretical systems are deficient, the technological supports are instable, and the related institutions are insufficient. Therefore, we proposed the strategies for the corresponding transformation, which mainly included: (1) intensifying the systematic thinking and concept to promote the implementation of land consolidation and ecological restoration on a regional basis; (2) upgrading the theoretical system to stimulate the new motivation for land consolidation and ecological restoration; (3) enhancing the technical support to improve the effectiveness of land consolidation and ecological restoration works; (4) improving the institution construction to reinforce the support foundation for land consolidation and ecological restoration implementations.

白中科, 周伟, 王金满, .

试论国土空间整体保护、系统修复与综合治理

中国土地科学, 2019, 33(2): 1-11.

[本文引用: 1]

[BAI Z K, ZHOU W, WANG J M, et al.

Overall protection, systematic restoration and comprehensive management of land space

China Land Science, 2019, 33(2): 1-11.]

[本文引用: 1]

韩博, 金晓斌, 孙瑞, .

土地整治项目区耕地资源优化配置研究

自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 718-731.

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20190404      [本文引用: 1]

耕地细碎化会导致农业生产效率降低、土地利用可持续性下降、耕地撂荒增多等多种农业问题,土地整治是当前中国改善耕地细碎化的重要途径之一。为探索适宜的土地整治计量模型以解决耕地资源优化配置问题,基于多目标线性规划,从工程设计、权属调整、地块分配三方面构建土地整治项目区耕地资源优化配置模型,并选取典型土地整治项目进行案例分析。研究结果表明:通过模型优化,案例区农业生产消耗降低了20.41%、地块平均规模增大了53.72%、户均地块数降低了34.92%,平均耕作距离减小了68.17%,可促进耕地细碎化问题的改善,有利于农业生产效率的提升。研究对丰富土地整治规划设计方法,推动耕地细碎化问题解决具有参考和借鉴意义。

[HAN B, JIN X B, SUN R, et al.

Optimized allocation of cultivated land in land consolidation project area based on multi-objective linear programming

Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 718-731.]

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20190404      [本文引用: 1]

Fragmentation of cultivated land will lead to the reduction of agricultural production efficiency, the decline of land use sustainability and the shortage of cultivated land. Land consolidation is one of the important ways to improve the fragmentation of cultivated land in China. In order to explore suitable land consolidation model to solve the problem of optimal allocation of cultivated land resources, this study constructs a model of optimal allocation of cultivated land resources based on multi-objective linear programming model from three aspects: engineering design, ownership adjustment and plots allocation, and selects a typical land consolidation project for case analysis. Then it compares the model optimization and actual land consolidation results with the pre-consolidation from the aspects of agricultural production consumption, improvement of arable land morphology and location, and ownership status. The results show that: (1) Through the optimization of the model, the agricultural cost in the project area, the average number of plots per farmer, and the average cultivation distance decreased by 20.41%, 34.92%, and 68.17%, respectively, while the average size of the plot increased by 53.72%. The fragmentation of cultivated land is reduced and the agricultural production efficiency is improved. However, compared with the typical foreign land consolidation project, there is still much room for improvement in the allocation of cultivated land. (2) The current land consolidation methods have played a positive role in increasing the average size of plots and improving the shape of plots. However, there are still deficiencies in reducing the farming distance of farmers, increasing the adjacency of cultivated roads, and promoting the concentration of cultivated land property rights. (3) Combining land consolidation with land ownership adjustment plays an important role in reducing the agricultural production consumption caused by land fragmentation and inconvenient farming and improving agricultural production efficiency. The research is of significance for enriching planning and designing methods of land consolidation and promoting the solution to the issue of fragmentation of cultivated land.

WESTLUND H, NILSSON P.

Agriculture's transformation and land-use change in a post-urban world: A case study of the Stockholm Region

Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, 93: 345-358.

DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.07.002      URL     [本文引用: 2]

ROCHA J C, PETERSON G, BODIN R, et al.

Cascading regime shifts within and across scales

Science, 2018, 362: 1379-1383.

DOI:10.1126/science.aat7850      PMID:30573623      [本文引用: 2]

Regime shifts are large, abrupt, and persistent critical transitions in the function and structure of ecosystems. Yet, it is unknown how these transitions will interact, whether the occurrence of one will increase the likelihood of another or simply correlate at distant places. We explored two types of cascading effects: Domino effects create one-way dependencies, whereas hidden feedbacks produce two-way interactions. We compare them with the control case of driver sharing, which can induce correlations. Using 30 regime shifts described as networks, we show that 45% of regime shift pairwise combinations present at least one plausible structural interdependence. The likelihood of cascading effects depends on cross-scale interactions but differs for each type. Management of regime shifts should account for potential connections.Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

SEARCHINGER T D, WIRSENIUS S, BERINGER T, et al.

Assessing the efficiency of changes in land use for mitigating climate change

Nature, 2018, 564(7735): 249-253.

DOI:10.1038/s41586-018-0757-z      [本文引用: 1]

PRIBADI D O, ZASADA I, MÜLLER K, et al. Multifunctional adaption of farmers as response to urban growth in the Jabodetabek Metropolitan Area, Indonesia. Journal of Rural Studies, 2017, 55: 100-111.

[本文引用: 1]

BIZIKOVA L, NKONVA E, MINAH M, et al.

A scoping review of the contributions of farmers' organizations to smallholder agriculture

Nature Food, 2020, 1(10): 620-630.

DOI:10.1038/s43016-020-00164-x      PMID:37128116      [本文引用: 1]

Farmers' organizations (FOs), such as associations, cooperatives, self-help and women's groups, are common in developing countries and provide services that are widely viewed as contributing to income and productivity for small-scale producers. Here, we conducted a scoping review of the literature on FO services and their impacts on small-scale producers in sub-Saharan Africa and India. Most reviewed studies (57%) reported positive FO impacts on farmer income, but much fewer reported positive impacts on crop yield (19%) and production quality (20%). Environmental benefits, such as resilience-building and improved water quality and quantity were documented in 24% of the studies. Our analysis indicates that having access to markets through information, infrastructure, and logistical support at the centre of FO design could help integrate FOs into policy. Natural resource management should also be more widely incorporated in the services provided by FOs to mitigate risks associated with environmental degradation and climate change. Finally, farmers who are already marginalized because of poor education, land access, social status and market accessibility may require additional support systems to improve their capacities, skills and resources before they are able to benefit from FO membership.© 2020. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

黄贤金.

论构建城乡统一的建设用地市场体系: 兼论“同地、同权、同价、同责”的理论圈层特征

中国土地科学, 2019, 33(8): 1-7.

[本文引用: 1]

[HUANG X J.

Establishment of the integrated urban-rural construction land market system

China Land Science, 2019, 33(8): 1-7.]

[本文引用: 1]

吴次芳, 费罗成, 叶艳妹.

土地整治发展的理论视野、理性范式和战略路径

经济地理, 2011, 31(10): 1718-1722.

[本文引用: 1]

[WU C F, FEI L C, YE Y M.

The theoretical perspective, rational paradigm and strategic solution of land consolidation

Economic Geography, 2011, 31(10): 1718-1722.]

[本文引用: 1]

龙花楼, 张英男, 屠爽爽.

论土地整治与乡村振兴

地理学报, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849.

DOI:10.11821/dlxb201810002      [本文引用: 1]

乡村振兴的核心目的是系统构建人口、土地、产业等多种发展要素的耦合格局。土地整治在乡村振兴过程中肩负着为人口集聚、产业发展提供资源支撑的基础性作用。本文基于影响乡村发展的关键要素阐释了新时代乡村振兴和土地整治的内涵及其互馈关系,剖析了乡村振兴背景下土地整治的区域实施路径。最后,就未来乡村振兴视角下土地整治的方向进行了展望与讨论。结论如下:① 乡村振兴的内涵在于为应对乡村内部要素的流失与衰退,通过经济、政治及文化建设等手段激发内部动力和吸纳外部资源来重新组合、优化配置和高效利用乡村人口、土地和产业等发展要素,从而优化要素结构、提升地域功能、重塑乡村形态,实现乡村地域经济、社会及生态的全面复兴和城乡融合发展的新格局;② 乡村振兴视角下土地整治要激活乡村人口、土地和产业等关键发展要素,统筹物质空间振兴与精神内核提升;③ 开展农村土地整治要与区域自然本底条件和社会经济发展阶段相适应,按照分区统筹、分类施策的原则在国土空间开发格局的框架下因地制宜地采取相应的模式与路径;④ 未来有必要重塑土地整治的价值取向,在统一空间规划体系下统筹土地整治规划与乡村振兴规划,大力发展土地整治与多功能农业相结合的新模式。

[LONG H L, ZHANG Y N, TU S S.

Land consolidation and rural vitalization

Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(10): 1837-1849.]

DOI:10.11821/dlxb201810002      [本文引用: 1]

The core objective of rural vitalization is to systemically establish a coupling pattern of various rural development elements including population, land and industry. As one of the prerequisites, land resources is required to be optimally allocated via land consolidation. Consequently, land consolidation contributes greatly in population agglomeration, industry development and resources support under the context of combating rural decline. In light of these facts, this paper conducts an elementary analysis on the connotation of land consolidation and rural vitalization in the new era, as well as their relationships. Furthermore, the issues on the alternative paths for achieving rural vitalization via land consolidation in different regions were also discussed. Main conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) It is manifested that rural vitalization in the new era can be explained as a comprehensive process of tackling the loss and decline of rural development elements through political, economic and cultural means. Most importantly, vitalizing the interior motivation and absorbing the external power are essential for the efficient reconfiguration and utilization of rural population, land and industry, thus achieving the goals of arousing rural vitality, optimizing elements structure, enhancing territorial function and restructuring rural morphology. (2) From the perspective of rural vitalization, land consolidation, which adheres to the path of connotative development, should not only target at stimulating the key elements of rural development, but also place emphasis on the coordination of material space and spirit core, so as to realize the co-prosperity of the urban and the rural areas. (3) Regional natural indigenous factors and the corresponding phases of socio-economic development should be both taken into account in the process of implementing rural land consolidation. Following the principle of adjusting measures to local conditions, appropriate paths or modes are supposed to be chosen in different regions constrained by the territorial development pattern. Finally, focusing on a series of problems and new concepts, which is aimed at achieving urban-rural integration development and boosting socio-economic growth in rural areas, we propose further discussions.

LONG H L, LIU Y S, LI X B, et al.

Building new countryside in China: A Geographical perspective

Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(2): 457-470.

DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.06.006      URL     [本文引用: 1]

曲衍波, 刘敏, 朱伟亚, .

农村居民点多功能空间格局与协调性优化模式

自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 659-673.

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210310      [本文引用: 1]

随着城乡融合发展和农户需求的不断提高,探讨农村居民点多功能及其协调关系,是推进农村人居环境整治和乡村振兴的重要依据。以山东省王村镇为例,基于“识别—诊断—优化”的逻辑思路,从生活—生产—生态角度构建农村居民点多功能评价指标体系,利用空间自相关、协调度和障碍诊断等模型,剖析农村居民点多功能空间格局、协调关系及其障碍因子,进而提出农村居民点多功能提升与协调的优化模式。研究发现:(1)王村镇农村居民点总体上呈现出“生产功能较好,生活功能一般,生态功能较差”的特征,且不同功能具有显著的空间异质性;(2)王村镇农村居民点“三生”功能整体协调性相对较高,但协调类型存在明显的复杂性和不均衡性;(3)王村镇农村居民点“三生”功能协调性障碍因素表现为大体相似且个别村庄无障碍性,用地强度、交通条件、资源禀赋、基础设施建设和生态环境状况是农村居民点多功能高强度协调的主要障碍因素;(4)基于障碍因子组合提出的农村居民点多功能协调性优化模式,为可持续性乡村发展提供理论借鉴。

[QU Y B, LIU M, ZHU W Y, et al.

Spatial pattern and coordination optimization mode of multifunction of rural settlements

Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(3): 659-673.]

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210310      URL     [本文引用: 1]

刘永强, 龙花楼, 李加林.

农业转型背景下土地整治流转耦合模式与保障机制辨析

经济地理, 2020, 40(10): 50-57.

[本文引用: 1]

[LIU Y Q, LONG H L, LI J L.

Analysis of coupling model and guarantee mechanism of land consolidation and transfer under the background of agriculture transition

Economic Geography, 2020, 40(10): 50-57.]

[本文引用: 1]

杨忍, 刘芮彤.

珠三角城市群地区都市农业功能演变及其协同—权衡关系

地理研究, 2022, 41(7): 1995-2015.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj020210654      [本文引用: 1]

以珠三角城市群地区的县(区)为研究单元,从生产供给、经济发展、社会保障和生态保育四个维度构建都市农业功能评价指标体系,利用熵值法、时空差异诊断模型、Spearman秩相关系数法和双变量局部空间自相关模型等对2005年、2012年和2019年珠三角地区都市农业多维功能演变及协同-权衡关系进行测度。结果表明:① 2005—2019年,珠三角地区都市农业的生产供给、经济发展和社会保障功能均值先下降后上升而生态保育功能反之;生产供给和生态保育功能总体呈现稳定的外部较强而中心偏弱的空间格局,经济发展和社会保障功能的空间分布格局变化较大。② 时间上,2005年珠三角都市农业经济发展功能较其他功能相对独立发展,2012年功能之间权衡关系显现,2019年各功能之间以协同关系为主;空间上,珠三角地区都市农业生态保育功能与其他三项功能的协同-权衡关系较为稳定,社会保障功能与生产供给、经济发展功能的协同-权衡关系较为稳定。③ 都市农业功能演变及协同-权衡关系发展具有阶段性特征,大致呈现“相互独立/低位协同-相互权衡-高位协同”的演化规律。

[YANG R, LIU R T.

Functional evolution and collaboration/trade-off relationship of urban agriculture in the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration

Geographical Research, 2022, 41(7): 1995-2015.]

DOI:10.11821/dlyj020210654      [本文引用: 1]

Urban-rural integration is a new demand for the development of urban-rural relations, and urban agriculture is a new format for coordinating the development of urban-rural integration. Its functional evolution and collaboration/trade-off relationship are worthy of attention. Constructing an evaluation index system from four dimensions of production supply, economic development, social security and ecological conservation, and using entropy weight method, spatio-temporal differences identifying model, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient method and bivariate local spatial autocorrelation model, this study comprehensively evaluated the multifunctional evolution and collaboration/trade-off relationship of urban agriculture at the county level in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) urban agglomeration from 2000 to 2015. The main results are as follows: (1) From 2000 to 2019, the average value of the production supply, economic development and social security functions of urban agriculture decreased first and then increased, while that of the ecological conservation function went the other way in the PRD urban agglomeration. The production supply and ecological conservation functions presented a stable spatial pattern with strong externality and weak centre, while the spatial distribution pattern of economic development and social security functions changed greatly. (2) In terms of temporal pattern, urban agricultural economic development functions developed relatively independently compared with other functions in 2005, the trade-off relationship among functions appeared in 2012, the collaboration between functions was the main relationship in 2019. As for spatial pattern, the collaboration/trade-off relationship between urban agricultural ecological conservation function and the other three functions are relatively stable, and the collaboration/trade-off relationship between urban agricultural social security, production supply and economic development function are relatively stable in the study area. (3) Functional evolution and collaboration/trade-off relationship of urban agriculture are characterized by stages, and the evolution law is "mutual independence/low level collaboration—mutual trade-off—high level collaboration". By revealing the spatio-temporal evolution pattern of multi-functional trade-offs and synergies of urban agriculture in the PRDelta urban agglomeration, and summarizing the internal logic mechanism and phased law of its evolution, the paper aims to provide scientific support for the coordinated development of agricultural multi-functional development and green development in metropolitan areas.

庄大方, 刘纪远.

中国土地利用程度的区域分异模型研究

自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2): 10-16.

[本文引用: 1]

[ZHUANG D F, LIU J Y.

Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China

Journal of Natural Resources, 1997, 12(2): 10-16.]

[本文引用: 1]

CHEN J D, GAO M, CHENG S L, et al. County-level CO2 emissions and sequestration in China during 1997-2017. Scientific Data, 2020, 7(1): 391.

[本文引用: 1]

WANG J F, LI X H, CHRISTAKOS G, et al.

Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun Region, China

International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24(1): 107-127.

DOI:10.1080/13658810802443457      URL     [本文引用: 1]

嘉善县统计局. 2021年嘉善县国民经济和社会发展统计公报, www.jiashan.gov.cn/art/2022/4/14/art_1229373860_4912489.html, 2022-04-14.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

[Jiashan Statistical Bureau. Statistical bulletin of the national economic and social development of Jiashan country in 2021, www.jiashan.gov.cn/art/2022/4/14/art_1229373860_4912489.html, 2022-04-14.]

URL     [本文引用: 1]

KAN K.

Creating land markets for rural revitalization: Land transfer, property rights and gentrification in China

Journal of Rural Studies, 2021, 81: 68-77.

DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.006      URL     [本文引用: 1]

陈坤秋, 龙花楼.

中国土地市场对城乡融合发展的影响

自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20190201      [本文引用: 1]

城乡融合发展是实现乡村振兴与推进新型城镇化建设的关键举措,土地市场则是实现城乡要素流通的重要渠道,也是连接城乡发展的关键纽带。本文阐释了城乡融合发展的科学内涵与本质特征,探究了土地市场对城乡融合发展的作用机理,在此基础上,量化分析了中国273个地级及以上行政单元土地市场与城乡融合发展的演进规律,并运用面板数据模型对土地市场与城乡融合关系进行了实证检验,以期从土地市场视角为城乡融合发展提供一条可实现路径。结论如下:(1)城乡融合发展是城乡价值重塑的过程,旨在消除阻碍城乡发展的因素,推动城乡要素自由流动与平等交换,实现城乡发展要素回报趋同,本质是通过城乡互动互补实现城乡地域功能的整体优化。(2)土地市场对城乡融合的作用是利弊双轨的权衡,作用方向取决于土地市场是否是良性市场。城乡二元分配体制与社会融入受阻背景下,扭曲土地市场掣肘城乡融合发展。(3)2005-2013年中国土地市场稳步发展,城乡融合发展水平略低,土地市场规模、土地市场价格与土地市场化程度分别提升113.66%、274.09%与37.07%,59.34%城市的城乡融合发展水平下滑,二者反差明显,且均具时空分异特征。(4)现阶段,土地市场对城乡融合发展更多体现为滞碍作用,但土地市场对城乡融合存在“低水平陷阱”,突破88.64%的抑制拐点,即可发挥土地市场对城乡融合的促进作用。重塑土地市场发展价值取向,加快推进土地市场化改革,探索人口—土地挂钩机制是后续工作的重要方向。

[CHEN K Q, LONG H L.

Impacts of land market on urban-rural integrated development in China

Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(2): 221-235.]

DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20190201      URL     [本文引用: 1]

刘彦随.

现代人地关系与人地系统科学

地理科学, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234.

DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001      [本文引用: 1]

人地关系地域系统理论系统提出30 a来,对促进地理学综合研究、学科建设和服务国家重大战略决策发挥了重要的科学支撑与导向作用。深入解析了人地关系地域系统理论的科学内涵及时代价值,诠释了现代人地系统的类型与环境,提出了“人地圈”与人地系统科学研究的主要内容和前沿领域。初步研究表明:① 现代人地系统具有复杂性、地域性和动态性特征,人?地交互作用过程、格局及其综合效应正在发生深刻变化,地球表层人地系统成为现代地学综合研究的核心内容和重要主题。② 科学认知和有效协调人地关系,亟需深入探究人地系统耦合格局与机理,探明人地关系地域系统类型、结构及其动力机制。依据城乡关系将人地关系地域类型划分为城市地域系统、城乡融合系统、乡村地域系统。乡村地域系统可细分为农业系统、村庄系统、乡域系统、城镇系统等子系统,分别对应于作土关系、人居关系、居业关系、产城关系。③ 现代人类活动强烈地作用于地球表层人地系统,形成了人地系统耦合与交互作用的地表圈层——“人地圈”,其实质是现代人类活动与地表环境相互联系、耦合渗透而形成的自然–经济–技术综合体或人地协同体。④ 人地系统科学或人地科学是研究人地系统耦合机理、演变过程及其复杂交互效应的新型交叉学科。它是现代地理科学与地球系统科学的深度交叉和聚焦,以现代人地圈系统为对象,致力于探究人类活动改造和影响地表环境系统的状态,以及人地系统交互作用与耦合规律、人地协同体形成机理与演化过程。人地系统耦合与可持续发展是人地系统科学的研究核心。传承创新人地关系地域系统理论和发展人地系统科学,更能凸显地球表层人类的主体性、人地协同的过程性和可持续发展的战略性,为人地系统协调与可持续发展决策提供科学指导。

[LIU Y S.

Modern human-earth relationship and human-earth system science

Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 1221-1234.]

DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.08.001      [本文引用: 1]

In the past 30 years, the theory of human-earth areal system has played an important support and guidance role in promoting the comprehensive research, disciplinary development and serving national strategic decision of geography. This study analyzes the scientific connotation and era value of human-earth areal system, explores the types and environment of modern human-earth system, and puts forward 'human-earth sphere' and the main contents and frontier fields of human-earth system science. The results show that: 1) The modern human-earth system is characterized by complexity, regionalism and dynamicity. The processes, pattern and comprehensive effect of human-earth interaction are undergoing profound changes, and the human-earth system on the surface of the earth has become the critical content and important theme of modern geosciences. 2) To scientifically understand and effectively coordinate the human-earth relationship, it is urgent to explore the coupling pattern and mechanism of human-earth relationship and to analyze the type, structure and dynamic mechanism of human-earth areal system. Based on the urban-rural relationship, the human-earth areal system can be divided into urban regional system, urban-rural integration system and rural regional system. Furthermore, the rural regional system is subdivided into agricultural system, village system, rural system and township system. 3) Modern human activities strongly affect the human-earth system on the surface of the earth, forming a new surface with the coupling and interaction between human and earth. In essence, it is a natural-economic-technological synthesis or human-earth coordination. They are also the main contents of deepening the researches on the coupling of human-earth system and supporting decision-making for coordinated development of human-earth system. 4) Human-earth system science or human-earth science is a new interdisciplinary subject which studies the coupling mechanism, evolution process and complex interaction effect of man earth system. It is the deep intersection and focus of modern geographic science and earth system science. Taking the modern human-earth sphere system as the research object, it is committed to exploring the state of human activities transforming and affecting the surface environment system, the interaction and coupling law of human-earth system, the formation mechanism and evolution process of human-earth coordination.Human-earth system coupling and sustainable development is the core of human-earth system science. Inheriting and innovating the theory of human-earth areal system and developing the human-earth system science will highlight the subjectivity of human on the earth surface, the process of human-earth coordination and the strategy of sustainable development, thus providing scientific guidance for the coordination of human-earth system and sustainable development decision-making.

/