JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES

On mine ecological restoration mechanisms based on multi-stakeholder cooperative game theory

MA De-bin, WANG Yan-yun, GE Da-zhuan, ZHOU Li

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2025, 40(7): 1993-2008. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250715

$S M$	含有企业的组合	M	Z&M	Q&M	Z&Q&M
$v (S M)$	各组合的收益	4.7802	17.6302	4.8482	18.9682
$v (S M - (M))$	各组合中除去企业的收益	0	12.85	0.049	14.169
$v (S M) - v (S M - (M))$	各组合中企业的收益	4.7802	4.7802	4.7792	4.7792
$\| S M \|$	各组合中的主体数量/个	1	2	2	3
$w (\| S M \|)$	所占权重	1/3	1/6	1/6	1/3
$w (\| S M \|) [v (S M) - v (S M - (M))]$	加入权重后各组合中企业的收益	1.5934	0.8	0.8	1.5931

Table 5 The profit value of mining enterprises in the tripartite cooperation of ecological restoration of Qidong Jiachong Iron Mine （亿元）

Other figure/table from this article

Table 1 Comparison of ecological restoration models for single center mines
Fig. 1 Policy evolution of mine ecological restoration in China
Fig. 2 Mechanism for ecological restoration and governance of mines through multi-stakeholder cooperation
Fig. 3 The game relationship among stakeholders in mine ecological restoration
Table 2 Summary of cooperation alliance situation
Table 3 Basic benefit distribution under the cooperation mode of various stakeholders
Table 4 The government revenue value in the tripartite cooperation on ecological restoration of Qidong Jiachong Iron Mine (亿元)
Table 6 The benefit value of residents in the mining area during the tripartite cooperation on ecological restoration of Qidong Jiachong Iron Mine （亿元）