Content of Integrated Urban-Rural Development in our journal

  • Published in last 1 year
  • In last 2 years
  • In last 3 years
  • All

Please wait a minute...
  • Select all
    |
  • Integrated Urban-Rural Development
    SUN Jiu-xia, XU Xin-jian, WANG Ning, XIE Yan-jun, MA Bo, ZHANG Jin-he, YANG Yong, LI Fei, LIAO Jing-lin, WENG Shi-xiu
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 2021, 36(10): 2604-2614. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20211011

    How to integrate poverty alleviation with Rural Revitalization Strategy with the help of tourism development is an important issue in the development of rural areas in the new era. In order to achieve this goal, we need to fully understand the unbalanced and inadequate development problems left over in the past tourism poverty alleviation, adhere to the rural orientation, establish the equal "mutual feeding" relationship between urban and rural areas, clarify the dialectical relationship between traditional village protection and rural revitalization, clarify the multiple logical relationship between rural nature, rural tourism and rural revitalization, and distinguish the regional differences and development stages. It is necessary to coordinate multiple subjects, respect villagers' rationality, enhance the citizenship of rural residents, and explore innovative development paths such as slow tourism, digital economy and rural tourism integration.

  • Integrated Urban-Rural Development
    HUANG Zhen-fang, ZHANG Yuan-gang, JIA Wen-tong, HONG Xue-ting, YU Run-zhe
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 2021, 36(10): 2615-2633. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20211012

    This paper summarizes the research process of rural tourism in China through systematic literature review, which contains three stages: primary application research (1992-2005), diversified expansion research (2006-2015), and integration deepening research (2016-), as well as analyzes the background and research value orientation of each stage. Based on the analysis of knowledge map by CiteSpace, it reveals the changing process and characteristics of research topics. Combining the rural revitalization strategy and tourism development needs in the New Era, the research expounds the basic characteristics of rural tourism, constructs the research framework of rural tourism in the New Era, puts forward the main scientific issues, and proposes the research trends and academic innovations of rural tourism research. Moreover, the research emphasizes that rurality and recreation constitute the fundamental characteristics of rural tourism. Future research should focus on the national strategy and high-quality development requirements of the New Era, as well as keeping up with the international academic frontiers. Meanwhile, based on the local practice of rural tourism research in China, relevant research should concentrate on the "five-sphere integrated plan" basic framework for rural tourism, taking industry, ecology, culture, governance, and livelihood as the core elements. Under this research framework, it is essential to focus on the rural area system with its complexity and key tourism scientific issues, to strengthen research platforms and professional talents, to integrate multidisciplinary theories and technology methods, as well as to reinforce the ideas of data-driven and science-technology energization. It is also necessary to reveal the process, patten, mechanism, and rule of rural revitalization pushed by rural tourism in a deep-going way, to explore the development model and path of rural tourism revitalization with distinct Chinese characteristics, to continuously promote the deepening of theoretical research, practical application innovation and the development of rural tourism discipline, besides, to improve the academic research, innovation ability, service value, and internalization level of rural tourism.

  • Integrated Urban-Rural Development
    ZHOU De, QI Jia-ling, ZHONG Wen-yu
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 2021, 36(10): 2634-2651. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20211013

    The scientific evaluation of urban-rural integration is the core content of urban-rural integration, and it is the foundation for establishing and improving the institutional mechanism of urban-rural integration. Based on the logical line of "connotation identification-theoretical analysis-system reconstruction", this paper carries out the review of urban-rural integration evaluation including concept connotation, theoretical basis, evaluation index, evaluation method, evaluation scale, spatio-temporal differentiation, and mechanism analysis. At present, the academic understanding of the connotation of urban-rural integration is basically the same. The evaluation index selection of urban-rural integration shows multidimensional and multi-attribute characteristics, but the index system construction has not broken through the static characteristics. Quantitative evaluation method is relatively simple. Generally, current research still remains at the macro scale, but lacks quantitative research from a micro perspective and comparative studies of different fusion modes. The spatial and temporal differentiation pattern and its mechanism of urban-rural integration need to be further deepened. Finally, this paper puts forward five prospects: (1) strengthening the construction of basic theory system and perfecting system research framework; (2) optimizing the multidimensional evaluation index system and identifying the development model of urban-rural integration; (3) deepening the flow mechanism of urban and rural elements and promoting the balanced development of urban and rural space; (4) strengthening the exploration of micro-scale details and improving the promoting mechanism of urban-rural integration; (5) strengthening the empowering role of the digital economy and innovating the development mechanism of high-quality urban-rural integration.

  • Integrated Urban-Rural Development
    ZHANG Hai-peng, HE Ren-wei, LI Li-na, LI Guang-qin
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES. 2021, 36(10): 2652-2671. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20211014

    On the basis of constructing the urban-rural integration evaluation index system suitable for the county scale including economic development, social life and ecological environment, this paper analyzed the urban-rural integration at the county scale in the Capital Region from 1995 to 2018 by using the Theil index and the ESDA method. The study also identified the types of urban-rural integration and proposed differentiated rural revitalization paths. The results indicate that: (1) The urban-rural integration level at the county scale in the Capital Region, with the turning point of 2000, experienced a "U"-shaped change process of decreasing first and then increasing. The overall level of urban-rural integration tended to increase. The regional gap in urban-rural integration level increased first and then decreased, and the overall trend tended to shrink. The contribution rate to the overall urban-rural integration level difference between the two regions (Beijing and the three cities around Beijing) was slightly higher than the internal difference between the two types of regions, the internal difference in the three cities around Beijing was the main reason for the internal differences between the two types of regions. The internal differences between Zhangjiakou and Baoding were the main reasons that led to the overall difference in the level of urban-rural integration in the three cities around Beijing, and the internal difference in Baoding was dominant. (2) The number of low-level fusion zones was decreasing, and the high-level fusion zones continued to increase. The "core-edge" structure of high and low level urban-rural integration areas was prominent, and has experienced a dynamic evolution stage of "single-group single-core" to "multi-groups multi-cores" to "single-group multi-cores". The level of urban-rural integration showed a significant spatial positive correlation, and the agglomeration increased first and then decreased. The hot spots of urban-rural integration areas were clustered in Beijing, and the cold spots and sub-cold spots were arranged in a ring or strip shape outside the central urban district of Baoding, and its state was getting milder. The "cold and hot" spatial pattern of urban-rural integration level was closely related to the geographical environment and socio-economic development background. (3) The area around the Capital Region could be divided into five types of urban-rural integration areas: urban-rural integration leading demonstration area, urban-rural integration advance development area, urban-rural integration optimization and upgrading area, urban-rural integration transformation and promotion area and urban-rural integration underdeveloped area. According to the characteristics of each type of district, this paper proposed differentiated rural revitalization implementation paths.