In recent years, the exacerbation of climate change poses a significant threat to cultural heritage protection in China. It is of both theoretical and practical significance to study the influencing mechanism and response mechanism of climate change influence on cultural heritage protection. This study analyzes the mechanism and process of mutual interaction of climate factors on cultural heritage, evaluates the influence and trend of future climate change on Chinese cultural heritage, and finally explores the interactive relationship among different stakeholders of Chinese cultural heritage protection. The results show the mechanism and process that the changes of various climate factors acting on cultural heritage are complex and diverse. The change of individual climate factors, the chain reaction triggered by the change of climate factor, and the interaction of different climate factors generally have a direct or indirect impact on cultural heritage. Moreover, solar radiation, temperature, humidity, air pollutants, precipitation and other climatic factors have affected Chinese cultural heritage to a certain extent, admittedly, but it is necessary to dialectically explore the impact of future climate change on Chinese cultural heritage. With the intensification of global warming and the appearance of extreme weather, the destruction of cultural heritage caused by the difference in temperature and freezing will be reduced, but the cultural heritage represented by ancient wooden buildings and grottoes will still face severe threats. Finally, the establishment of a network of stakeholders is beneficial to administrative departments, local governments, local communities, enterprises, tourists, researchers, and external pressure groups to play respective roles to jointly protect cultural heritage. Under the dual backgrounds of the intensification of climate change and the strategy of "cultural power", this paper is helpful to deepen the understanding of all circles on cultural heritage protection, and enrich the theoretical discussion about protection and utilization of cultural heritage.

National parks and national cultural parks are great practices to protect natural heritage and cultural heritage, explore long-term mechanism of biodiversity conservation and create important symbols of Chinese culture in China. This paper used systematic literature review to sort out the background and history of national parks and national cultural parks development in China. From the perspective of management system, this research compared and analyzed these two parks' management regimes, regulations, funding and regional coordination mechanism, and summarized the differences in conservation principles, functional zoning and operation mechanism from the perspective of sustainable operation. Finally, based on the problems faced by national parks and national cultural parks in China, such as overlap management, unclear zoning boundaries, ambiguous rights and responsibilities, declined species richness, and conflicts between protection and development, this paper proposed to establish a biodiversity protection system with national parks as the main part and a cultural heritage protection system with national cultural parks as the subject, and adhere to the development principles of integrated conservation and compatible operation, so as to contribute to global biodiversity and cultural heritage conservation with Chinese solutions.

The natural villages that carry the memory of the countryside are valuable cultural heritage of human beings. Facing the wave of rural urbanization construction and transformation in the rapid social and economic development, how to use the spatial characteristics of the rural landscape to locate and clarify the transformation method of village culture conservation has become the key to the flexible conservation of natural village cultural heritage. This paper discusses the feasibility of introducing the traditional "source-sink" theory into rural cultural conservation and then innovating it into a landscape "source-convergence" analysis method, and takes the typical village in Northeast China, Binzhou town of Harbin city, which is in need of transformation, as an example to develop a landscape "source-convergence" theory. The empirical analysis of the application of the "source-convergence" theory is carried out in Binzhou town. The research results show that: (1) The innovative landscape "source-convergence" method breaks through the limitation of one-sided attention to single elements and information, and can explore the zoning characteristics of cultural space by means of spatial zoning to support the construction of cultural patterns. (2) The results of the landscape "source-convergence" analysis show that Binzhou town is mainly a settlement living area with humanistic attributes, and the radiation effect of the main city center on the surrounding area is obvious, and the cultural connection between villages is close, which can build a "center-affiliated-periphery. The "center-affiliated-periphery" mode of cascading and regional linkage can be built to realize a systematic protection and collaborative development of rural cultural space. The study excavates the cultural significance behind the natural structure of village vernacular landscape, and explores the living path of natural village cultural conservation in terms of concept construction and practical application.

The construction of the Grand Canal National Cultural Park, as a key task in China's "14th Five-Year Plan" period (2021-2025), has formed a regional specialized planning system covering the national, provincial and municipal levels, including heritage utilization planning, construction protection planning, cultural tourism integration planning, ecological restoration planning and other kinds of special planning. However, these plans are mostly development blueprints, which lack effective interface with the current territorial spatial planning system as the legal basis for territorial spatial development and protection activities, and various spatial needs and control requirements are not incorporated into the "one map" of territorial spatial planning, resulting in institutional barriers to the implementation and supervision of subsequent plans, and making it difficult to form effective support for construction projects. Based on the results of the published Grand Canal-related planning and territorial spatial planning, this paper composes the existing planning system of the Grand Canal into "two systems, three types and four levels", and analyzes the spatial content of the development plan with five major sections and four types of elements to explore the existing planning with "missing planning levels, unknown articulation mechanism and overlapping core content. The spatial articulation problem of "missing planning levels, unclear articulation mechanism and overlapping core contents" is discussed. This paper proposes three core paths: (1) strengthen the spatial special planning to improve the special planning system, (2) clarify the unified planning preparation and approval process management process to achieve effective interface between plans, and (3) combined with the current "province-city-county-township" three-level preparation of technical provisions and stage progress, clarify the preparation of technical points in the national spatial planning to strengthen the implementation of space class content conduction. The purpose of this paper is to explore the specific path of implementing the spatial demand for the construction of the Grand Canal National Cultural Park and the articulation of the territorial spatial planning, and at the same time to enhance the operability of the effective conduction of special planning and territorial spatial planning.

To build national cultural parks well needs strong legal guarantee. The legislative level of existing national cultural parks is low and the legislative process is slow. The legislative philosophy is mainly rescue protection, and preventive protection is insufficient. The key contents of the protection of national cultural parks, such as the spatial scope, management system and cross-administrative regional cooperation, are not available. In order to solve these problems, the legislation of national cultural parks should be perfected in different situations. First, the State Council shall, in the form of "one park, one regulation", amend the Regulations on the Protection of the Great Wall, formulate special regulations for national cultural parks in large linear spaces such as the Grand Canal, the Long March, the Yangtze River and the Yellow River, clarify the spatial boundaries of each national cultural park, and establish systems and systems such as management system, planning, control and standards, and cross-administrative regional cooperation according to actual needs, so as to achieve differentiated and targeted management. Secondly, provincial local laws and regulations should be formulated for the dotted or planar cultural heritages such as the Mausoleum of the Yellow Emperor, the Palace of Confucius, and the Lugou Bridge to give full play to local initiative and local characteristics. Third, the National Park Law regulates the cultural landscape in national parks, and protects the natural ecosystem and historical and cultural resources as a whole.