JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES >
China's cropland scale operation: Influencing factors, realization pathways and future prospects
Received date: 2025-04-21
Revised date: 2025-09-15
Online published: 2026-04-07
The cropland scale operation is an important development direction of cropland utilization in China. This interview conducts an in-depth discussion on the definition, influencing factors and development pathways of cropland scale operation, with the main contents outlined as follows. Firstly, the concept of "five-in-one" cropland scale operation was proposed. The concept covers various connotations, characterizing cropland scale operation from five dimensions: area expansion, the concentration of cropland property rights, the organization of cropland operation, the specialization of production activities, and the agglomeration of landscapes. These dimensions are interrelated and influence each other. Among them, the concentration of cropland management rights serve as the foundation of other dimensions, which promotes the large-scale area, organization of operation, the specialization of production activities, and the agglomeration of landscapes. Secondly, the factors influencing the cropland scale operation were analyzed. From the perspective of per capita income, in order to keep up with the continuously increasing income of urban residents, farmers will mainly achieve this by increasing the scale of cropland operation. From this perspective, the rapid development of the urban economy determines that the cropland scale operation is a long-term development trend. However, the development of the cropland scale operation is also a complex and nonlinear process, and there are many factors affecting the operation, such as agricultural subsidies, technological development, changes in agricultural product prices, and the entry of elderly labor force. In addition, land resource endowment is also a key factor affecting the cropland scale operation. The large differences between the south and north parts of China clearly illustrate this point. Thirdly, the pathway of the cropland scale operation was analyzed. The operation is a combination of the "bottom-up" approach of farmers and the "top-down" approach of the governments at different levles. The "bottom-up" approach of farmers is the main pathway for promoting the cropland scale operation by the land transfers, but most of the transfers are spontaneous and disorderly among small-scale farmers, with high transaction costs, frequent breaches of agreements, and insufficient socialized land management services. The governments mainly influence the process of the cropland scale operation. Lastly, the future pattern of cropland use in China was discussed. Due to the various reasons, different-sized cropland use entities in China will coexist for a long time. (1) The different entities may have vast differences in their demand for cropland size. For example, the cropland scale of agricultural enterprises is definitely much larger than that of elderly laborers. The opportunity cost of elderly laborers is lower, and a smaller cropland scale can meet their farming needs. The small-scale agriculture by elderly laborers delays the process of large-scale management. (2) The cropland scale operation will vary greatly across regions (such as southern and northern regions, mountainous and plain areas).
TAN Ming-hong , XIE Hua-lin , SONG Xiao-qing , ZHONG Tai-yang , WANG Xue , XIN Liang-jie , ZHANG Bang-bang , LIU Cheng-wu , LI Xiu-bin , KONG Xiang-bin , YAN Jian-zhong . China's cropland scale operation: Influencing factors, realization pathways and future prospects[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2026 , 41(5) : 1293 -1306 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20260501
感谢土地利用沙龙承办单位江西财经大学的大力支持,感谢所有与会专家学者及同仁在研讨过程中贡献的宝贵见解,感谢中国自然资源学会名誉理事长成升魁研究员与副秘书王捷老师提供的建设性意见。
| [1] |
刘红升, 陈一. 农业补贴对中老年农户土地流转的影响: 基于2020年中国乡村振兴调查数据. 国土资源科技管理, 2025, 42(2): 121-130.
[
|
| [2] |
吕晓, 孙晓雯, 彭文龙. 耕地转入对耕地利用可持续集约化的影响: 基于经营规模、细碎化水平的作用路径分析. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(3): 620-639.
[
|
| [3] |
史常亮. 土地流转对农业高质量发展的影响: 基于绿色全要素生产率视角. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(6): 1418-1433.
[
|
| [4] |
谭淑豪, 王硕, 叶卓卉, 等. 土地流转会加剧耕地“非粮化”吗? 基于经营规模的异质性分析. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(11): 2841-2855.
[
|
| [5] |
曾敏. 乡村振兴背景下武威市农村土地流转问题研究. 农业技术与装备, 2025, (4): 29-31.
[
|
| [6] |
GRIGG D. An Introduction to Agricultural Geography. London: Routledge, 2003.
|
| [7] |
夏柱智. 半工半耕: 一个农村社会学的中层概念: 与兼业概念相比较. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2016, 16(6): 41-48, 153.
[
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
中粮信托. 热点一π: 关于“土地”的那些事儿之我国耕地流转主体情况. https://finance.sina.com.cn/trust/2024-11-15/doc-incwcqvh9524645.shtml, 2024-11-15.
[COFCO TRUST. Hot Topic 1 π: "Land" Matters: The current situation of land use rights transfers in China. https://finance.sina.com.cn/trust/2024-11-15/doc-incwcqvh9524645.shtml, 2024-11-15.]
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
邹承东. 让小农户走上现代农业的康庄大道: 促进小农户和现代农业发展有机衔接综述. 农村经营管理, 2021, (6): 7-9.
[
|
| [12] |
农村土地网. 深耕17年土地经纪人视角: 中国农村土地流转30大痛点与破解路径. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s__biz=MzI5NDAwMTU4NQ==&mid=2650463014&idx=3&sn=f9b01bfd8d1c1401dbf46a5661cf8632&chksm=f54116dd17560b1efc0036144bbf431867f71e30ee3c40082987758f3249c13754d5673c707a&scene=27, 2025-03-17.
[Rural Land Network. 17 years of deep research from the perspective of land brokers: 30 major pain points and solutions for rural land circulation in China. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s__biz=MzI5NDAwMTU4NQ==&mid=2650463014&idx=3&sn=f9b01bfd8d1c1401dbf46a5661cf8632&chksm=f54116dd17560b1efc0036144bbf431867f71e30ee3c40082987758f3249c13754d5673c707a&scene=27, 2025-03-17.]
|
| [13] |
内蒙古自治区农牧厅. 高标准农田建设14种模式. http://nmt.nmg.gov.cn/villageDevelopment/DPdi/zdgzdt_di/202502/t20250206_2662448.html, 2024-11-20.
[Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. 14 models of high-standard farmland construction. http://nmt.nmg.gov.cn/villageDevelopment/DPdi/zdgzdt_di/202502/t20250206_2662448.html, 2024-11-20.]
|
| [14] |
金晓斌, 罗秀丽, 周寅康. 试论全域土地综合整治的基本逻辑、关键问题和主要关系. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(11): 1-12.
[
|
| [15] |
张蚌蚌, 牛文浩, 左旭阳, 等. 广西农民自主型细碎化耕地归并整治模式及效果评价. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(9): 265-274.
[
|
| [16] |
张蚌蚌, 郭芬, 黄丹, 等. 陕北“一户一田”和“一组一田”耕地细碎化整治模式与绩效评价. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(15): 28-36.
[
|
| [17] |
新疆新闻网. 新疆昌吉: 加快智慧农业发展赋能乡村振兴. http://nmt.nmg.gov.cn/villageDevelopment/DPdi/, 2025-02-06.
[Xinjiang News Network. Changji, Xinjiang: Accelerating the development of smart agriculture and empowering rural revitalization. http://nmt.nmg.gov.cn/villageDevelopment/DPdi/, 2025-02-06.]
|
| [18] |
夏方舟, 杨雨濛, 严金明. 中国国土综合整治近40年内涵研究综述: 阶段演进与发展变化. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(5): 78-85.
[
|
| [19] |
龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 乡村重构的理论认知. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 581-590.
[
|
| [20] |
刘晶, 金晓斌, 徐伟义, 等. 耕地细碎化对可持续集约利用的影响机理与治理框架. 地理学报, 2022, 77(11): 2703-2720.
[
|
| [21] |
谢花林, 欧阳振益, 陈倩茹. 耕地细碎化促进了耕地“非粮化”吗: 基于福建丘陵山区农户的微观调查. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(1): 47-56.
[
|
| [22] |
郑淋议, 陈紫微. 耕地细碎化对农户耕地撂荒的影响及其治理优化. 地理研究, 2024, 43(1): 200-213.
[
|
| [23] |
胡新艳, 黄婕, 许金海. “小田并大田”政策对三重农地规模经营的影响: 以广东省阳山县为例. 资源科学, 2024, 46(8): 1540-1553.
[
|
| [24] |
胡豹, 顾益康, 文长存. “千万工程”造就万千和美乡村: 浙江“千村示范、万村整治”工程20年经验总结. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(7): 1585-1589.
[
|
| [25] |
谈明洪, 闫紫艳, 李秀彬, 等. 试论中国耕地增减的地理分界线: 40°N. 地理科学, 2025, 45(5): 941-949.
[
|
| [26] |
黄宗智. 我是如何思考中国小农的. 文化纵横, 2022, (5): 68-76.
[
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
丹尼尔·W·布罗姆利. 经济利益与经济制度:公共政策的理论基础. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2012.
[
|
| [29] |
温铁军. 八次危机: 中国的真实经验1949—2009. 北京: 东方出版社, 2013.
[
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |