Observation of Natural Resources

Conceptual model and research framework of supply and demand relationship of urban living space from the perspective of activities

  • SUN Hong-hu , 1 ,
  • ZHEN Feng 2, 3 ,
  • JIANG Yu-pei , 1 ,
  • ZHANG Zhen-long 1
Expand
  • 1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215011, Jiangsu, China
  • 2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 3. Provincial Engineering Research Center of Smart City Planning and Digital Governance, Nanjing 210093, China

Received date: 2024-07-15

  Revised date: 2025-01-20

  Online published: 2025-06-20

Abstract

The high-quality development of the supply-demand relationship in urban living space is related to the well-being of urban residents, but the imbalance and insufficiency of supply and demand contradictions still exist in the New Era. Based on this, combined with the shift towards humanization and intelligence in the field of research, and by drawing on the theories of spatio-temporal behavior and flow space, a diverse, dynamic, and interconnected perspective of activities is introduced to deepen the exploration of the supply and demand relationship of urban living space. By analyzing the connotation of the supply and demand relationship of urban living space, a conceptual model of the bottom-up translation and representation of the interactive relationship between "man and land" composed of the daily activities and the environment of urban residents is constructed. And combined with the support of multi-source geographic big data, a research framework covering key content and analysis ideas such as comprehensive evaluation, pattern recognition, mechanism revelation, and optimization mechanism is proposed. This research constructs a conceptual model and research framework from the perspective of activities, actively responding to the diverse forms of real life scenarios supported by elements such as "time, space, place, flow, virtuality, and entity". It improves the deconstruction and organizational reconstruction of the origin of the supply-demand relationship in living spaces, enriches the analysis path and comprehensive judgment of unilateral, bilateral, and systemic relationships inside and outside the supply and demand system, which provides useful insights and references for the transformation of urban living space services and governance.

Cite this article

SUN Hong-hu , ZHEN Feng , JIANG Yu-pei , ZHANG Zhen-long . Conceptual model and research framework of supply and demand relationship of urban living space from the perspective of activities[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2025 , 40(7) : 1759 -1772 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250703

[1]
联合国. 世界城市化展望(2018年修订版), http://www.ccud.org.cn/article/21044.html, 2023-01-28.

[United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects (2018 Revision), http://www.ccud.org.cn/article/21044.html, 2023-01-28.]

[2]
冯健, 钟奕纯. 基于居住环境的常州城市居民生活质量空间结构. 地理学报, 2020, 75(6): 1237-1255.

DOI

[FENG J, ZHONG Y C. The spatial structure of urban residents' quality of life in Changzhou based on residential environment. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(6): 1237-1255.]

DOI

[3]
张姗琪, 甄峰, 孔宇, 等. 基于虚实空间交互的社区生活圈服务设施评估与优化配置: 研究进展与展望. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(10): 2435-2446.

DOI

[ZHANG S Q, ZHEN F, KONG Y, et al. The evaluation and spatial optimization of community life circle service amenities from a perspective of virtual-physical space interaction: Research progress and agenda. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(10): 2435-2446.]

[4]
李春江, 柴彦威. 城市虚实活动系统的理论构建. 地理学报, 2024, 79(4): 837-853.

DOI

[LI C J, CHAI Y W. Theoretical construction of urban physical-virtual activity system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(4): 837-853.]

DOI

[5]
甄峰, 孔宇. “人—技术—空间”一体的智慧城市规划框架. 城市规划学刊, 2021, (6): 45-52.

[ZHEN F, KONG Y. An integrated "human-technology-space" framework of smart city planning. Urban Planning Forum, 2021, (6): 45-52.]

[6]
郑震. 列斐伏尔日常生活批判理论的社会学意义: 迈向一种日常生活的社会学. 社会学研究, 2011, 26(3): 191-217, 246.

[ZHENG Z. The sociological significance of Lefebvre's critique of everyday life: Toward a sociology of everyday life. Sociological Studies, 2011, 26(3): 191-217, 246.]

[7]
甄峰, 徐京天, 席广亮. 近十年来国内外城市地理研究进展与展望. 经济地理, 2021, 41(10): 87-96.

DOI

[ZHEN F, XU J T, XI G L. Domestic and international urban geography researches in recent 10 years: Progress and perspectives. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(10): 87-96.]

DOI

[8]
黄安, 许月卿, 卢龙辉, 等. “生产—生活—生态”空间识别与优化研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 503-518.

DOI

[HUANG A, XU Y Q, LU L H, et al. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production-living-ecological spaces. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(3): 503-518.]

DOI

[9]
王开泳. 城市生活空间研究述评. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(6): 691-698.

[WANG K Y. Review and prospect of the researches on urban living space. Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(6): 691-698.]

DOI

[10]
李雪铭, 徐梁, 田深圳, 等. 基于地理尺度的中国人居环境研究进展. 地理科学, 2022, 42(6): 951-962.

DOI

[LI X M, XU L, TIAN S Z, et al. Human settlements in China based on the geographical scale. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(6): 951-962.]

DOI

[11]
李兆中, 甄峰. 多源数据结合的城市生活空间质量评价: 以南京为例. 人文地理, 2019, 34(6): 53-61.

[LI Z Z, ZHEN F. Evaluation of urban life space quality based on multi-source data: A case study of Nanjing. Human Geography, 2019, 34(6): 53-61.]

[12]
高巍, 欧阳玉歆, 赵玫, 等. 公共服务设施可达性度量方法研究综述. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2023, 59(2): 344-354.

[GAO W, OUYANG Y X, ZHAO M, et al. A review on accessibility measurements of public service facilities. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2023, 59(2): 344-354.]

[13]
方创琳, 王岩. 中国城市脆弱性的综合测度与空间分异特征. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 234-247.

DOI

[FANG C L, WANG Y. A comprehensive assessment of urban vulnerability and its spatial differentiation in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 234-247.]

DOI

[14]
贺小荣, 石彩霞, 周国华. 长江经济带城市规模与城市宜居性的时空演化及适配关系. 地理研究, 2024, 43(7): 1769-1789.

DOI

[HE X R, SHI C X, ZHOU G H. Spatio-temporal evolution and adaptation relationship between urban scale and urban livability in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(7): 1769-1789.]

[15]
李雪铭, 刘凯强, 田深圳, 等. 基于DPSIR模型的城市人居环境韧性评价: 以长三角城市群为例. 人文地理, 2022, 37(1): 54-62.

[LI X M, LIU K Q, TIAN S Z, et al. Evaluation of urban human settlements resilience based on DPSIR model: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban systems. Human Geography, 2022, 37(1): 54-62.]

[16]
李航, 李雪铭, 田深圳, 等. 城市人居环境的时空分异特征及其机制研究: 以辽宁省为例. 地理研究, 2017, 36(7): 1323-1338.

DOI

[LI H, LI X M, TIAN S Z, et al. Temporal and spatial variation characteristics and mechanism of urban human settlements: Case study of Liaoning province. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(7): 1323-1338.]

[17]
张文忠. 中国宜居城市建设的理论研究及实践思考. 国际城市规划, 2016, 31(5): 1-6.

[ZHANG W Z. Theoretical research of the livable city construction and its practice reflection in China. Urban Planning International, 2016, 31(5): 1-6.]

[18]
张文忠. 中国城市体检评估的理论基础和方法. 地理科学, 2021, 41(10): 1687-1696.

DOI

[ZHANG W Z. Theoretical basis and methods of city health examination evaluation in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 1687-1696.]

DOI

[19]
牛强, 朱玉蓉, 姜祎笑, 等. 城市活动的线上线下化趋势、特征和对城市的影响. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(12): 45-54.

[NIU Q, ZHU Y R, JIANG Y X, et al. Trends characteristics of online and offline urban activities and its impacts on cities. Urban development studies, 2021, 28(12): 45-54.]

[20]
张春梅, 李雪铭. 辽宁省老年宜居社区人居环境评价. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 92-99.

DOI

[ZHANG C M, LI X M. The evaluation index system of human settlements on livable community for the elderly in Liaoning province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(1): 92-99.]

DOI

[21]
杨晴青, 陈佳, 李伯华, 等. 长江中游城市群城市人居环境演变及驱动力研究. 地理科学, 2018, 38(2): 195-205.

DOI

[YANG Q Q, CHEN J, LI B H, et al. Evolution and driving force detection of urban human settlement environment at urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 195-205.]

DOI

[22]
宋伟轩, 黄琴诗, 谷跃, 等. 宁杭城市多时空尺度居住空间分异与比较. 地理学报, 2021, 76(10): 2458-2476.

DOI

[SONG W X, HUANG Q S, GU Y, et al. A comparison study on residential differentiation at multiple spatial and temporal scales in Nanjing and Hangzhou. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(10): 2458-2476.]

DOI

[23]
王丽艳, 季奕, 王咿瑾. 城市生活质量测度及影响因素研究: 基于天津市微观调查与大数据的实证分析. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(4): 79-86, 94.

[WANG L Y, JI Y, WANG Y J. Measurement, preference and optimizing path of urban quality of life: An empirical analysis based on microscopic survey and big data of Tianjin. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(4): 79-86, 94.]

[24]
MOURATIDIS K, YIANNAKOU A. What makes cities livable? Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood happiness in different contexts. Land Use Policy, 2022, 112: 105855, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105855.

[25]
CAO Y, HUA Z S, CHEN T, et al. Understanding population movement and the evolution of urban spatial patterns: An empirical study on social network fusion data. Land Use Policy, 2023, 125: 106454, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106454.

[26]
YUAN F, WEI Y D, WU J W. Amenity effects of urban facilities on housing prices in China: Accessibility, scarcity, and urban spaces. Cities, 2020, 96: 102433, Doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102433.

[27]
XIAO J, ZHAO J F, LUO Z W, et al. The impact of built environment on mental health: A COVID-19 lockdown perspective. Health & Place, 2022, 77, 102889, Doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102889.

[28]
WOLDAY F. The effect of neighbourhood and urban center structures on active travel in small cities. Cities, 2023, 132: 104050, Doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104050.

[29]
湛东升, 张文忠, 谌丽, 等. 城市公共服务设施配置研究进展及趋向. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(4): 506-519.

DOI

[ZHAN D S, ZHANG W Z, CHEN L, et al. Research progress and its enlightenment of urban public service facilities allocation. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(4): 506-519.]

DOI

[30]
张敏. 全球城市公共服务设施的公平供给和规划配置方法研究: 以纽约、伦敦、东京为例. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(6): 69-76.

[ZHANG M. Research on equal supply and planning of global cities' public service facilities: Case studies on New York, London and Tokyo. Urban Planning International, 2017, 32(6): 69-76.]

[31]
李亚洲, 张佶, 毕瑜菲, 等. “人口—设施”精准匹配下的公共服务设施配置策略. 规划师, 2022, 38(6): 64-69, 87.

[LI Y Z, ZHANG J, BI Y F, et al. ''Human oriented'' public service facilities configuration. Planners, 2022, 38(6): 64-69, 87.]

[32]
李萌. 基于居民行为需求特征的“15分钟社区生活圈”规划对策研究. 城市规划学刊, 2017, (1): 111-118.

[LI M. The planning strategies of a 15-minute community life circle based on behaviors of residents. Urban Planning Forum, 2017, (1): 111-118.]

[33]
钱征寒, 刘泉, 黄丁芳. 15分钟生活圈的三个尺度和规划趋势. 国际城市规划, 2022, 37(5): 63-70.

[QIAN Z H, LIU Q, HUANG D F. Three scales and planning trends of 15-minute life circle. Urban Planning International, 2022, 37(5): 63-70.]

[34]
柴彦威, 李春江. 城市生活圈规划: 从研究到实践. 城市规划, 2019, 43(5): 9-16, 60.

[CHAI Y W, LI C J. Urban life cycle planning: From research to practice. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(5): 9-16, 60.]

[35]
塔娜, 柴彦威. 行为地理学的学科定位与前沿方向. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(1): 1-15.

DOI

[TA N, CHAI Y W. Disciplinary position and research frontiers of behavioral geography. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(1): 1-15.]

DOI

[36]
柴彦威, 塔娜. 中国地理学的行为革命及其理论内涵. 地理研究, 2024, 43(9): 2259-2270.

DOI

[CHAI Y W, TA N. The behavioral revolution in Chinese geography and its theoretical connotation. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(9): 2259-2270.]

[37]
申悦, 张雪洁. 城市社会空间分异研究的进展与展望: 行为视角的融入与主题转变. 地理研究, 2024, 43(9): 2308-2326.

DOI

[SHEN Y, ZHANG X J. Progress and prospect of research on urban sociospatial segregation: Integration of behavioral perspective and theme transition. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(9): 2308-2326.]

[38]
孙九霞, 周尚意, 王宁, 等. 跨学科聚焦的新领域: 流动的时间、空间与社会. 地理研究, 2016, 35(10): 1801-1818.

DOI

[SUN J X, ZHOU S Y, WANG N, et al. Mobility in geographical research: Time, space and society. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(10): 1801-1818.]

[39]
URRY J. Mobilities: New Perspectives on Transport and Society. London: Routledge, 2016.

[40]
CASTELLS M. The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.

[41]
BATTEN D F. Network cities: Creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century. Urban Studies, 1995, 32(2): 313-327.

[42]
方辰昊, 赵民. “双循环”新格局下的城市发展趋势及规划应对. 城市规划学刊, 2022, (1): 18-26.

[FANG C H, ZHAO M. China's new "dual circulation economy": Trend of urban development and corresponding planning strategies. Urban Planning Forum, 2022, (1): 18-26.]

[43]
孙鸿鹄, 甄峰. 面向日常活动与环境供需矛盾的城市韧性综合评估及空间特征研究: 以南京为例. 地理研究, 2022, 41(10): 2697-2711.

DOI

[SUN H H, ZHEN F. Comprehensive evaluation and spatial characteristics of urban resilience under the scenario of supply-demand contradictions between daily activities and the environment: A case study of Nanjing city. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(10): 2697-2711.]

[44]
贺玉晓, 杨璐, 杜颖, 等. 基于改进组合赋权-TOPSIS模型的农村污水处理设施效果评价. 环境科学学报, 2024, 44(4): 421-428.

[HE Y X, YANG L, DU Y, et al. Effect evaluation of rural sewage treatment facilities based on improved combination weighting-TOPSIS model. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2024, 44(4): 421-428.]

[45]
杨宜男, 李敬, 王立, 等. 长三角地区城市化对典型生态系统服务供需的影响. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(6): 1555-1571.

DOI

[YANG Y N, LI J, WANG L, et al. Impact of urbanization on supply and demand of typical ecosystem services in Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(6): 1555-1571.]

[46]
李雪铭, 郭玉洁, 田深圳, 等. 辽宁省城市人居环境系统耦合协调度时空格局演变及驱动力研究. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1208-1218.

DOI

[LI X M, GUO Y J, TIAN S Z, et al. The spatio-temporal pattern evolution and driving force of the coupling coordination degree of urban human settlements system in Liaoning province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 1208-1218.]

[47]
沈体雁, 于瀚辰, 周麟, 等. 北京市二手住宅价格影响机制: 基于多尺度地理加权回归模型(MGWR)的研究. 经济地理, 2020, 40(3): 75-83.

DOI

[SHEN T Y, YU H C, ZHOU L, et al. On hedonic price of second-hand houses in Beijing based on multi-scale geographically weighted regression: Scale law of spatial heterogeneity. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(3): 75-83.]

[48]
HOLLING C S. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 2001, 4(5): 390-405.

[49]
宋爽, 王帅, 傅伯杰, 等. 社会—生态系统适应性治理研究进展与展望. 地理学报, 2019, 74(11): 2401-2410.

DOI

[SONG S, WANG S, FU B J, et al. Study on adaptive governance of social-ecological system: Progress and prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(11): 2401-2410.]

DOI

[50]
高云嵩, 张沛, 张中华. 都市圈视域下区域生活空间理论框架构建及未来趋势. 西北大学学报: 自然科学版, 2023, 53(5): 684-695.

[GAO Y S, ZHANG P, ZHANG Z H. Research on the theoretical framework and future trends of regional living space in the perspective of metropolitan area. Journal of Northwest University: Natural Science Edition, 2023, 53(5): 684-695.]

Outlines

/