Land system science under the goal of food security: Progress and implications

LIANG Ya-jia; CHEN Kun-qiu

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20250702

Abstract

Land system science is dedicated to addressing complex socio-economic and ecological challenges and developing sustainable land use solutions. Food inherently serves as a critical link between human societal systems and natural systems. Ensuring food security is not only a key component of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals but also a crucial task for China's agricultural production transformation and people's livelihoods improvement. This study systematically analyzes the research topics and key advancements in land system science related to food security goals. The findings reveal that, due to the land's position at the intersection of multiple interests associated with sustainable social development, the non-linear transformations and complex feedback mechanisms within land systems endow land system science with four prominent characteristics: interdisciplinarity, systematicity, sustainability, and complexity. In the realm of food security, land system science has achieved notable successes, encompassing five core research areas: land use strategies, land use transitions, land use telecoupling mechanisms, land use demand modelling, and the optimization of land management systems. These studies present the transformative trend towards emphasizing the significance of cross-spatiotemporal spillover effects, adopting systematic and holistic perspectives, and underscoring the sustainable development goals. Future research should be grounded in the logical foundation of food "flow spaces" and the food value chain, employing systems thinking to develop sustainable land use solutions and strengthen land system science in the areas of integrated research on multi-element coupling and interdisciplinary theoretical innovations, so as to contribute to the realization of food security goals.

Key words： land system science; food security; the greater food approach; farmland protection; sustainable development

Cite this article

LIANG Ya-jia , CHEN Kun-qiu . Land system science under the goal of food security: Progress and implications[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2025 , 40(7) : 1743 -1758 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250702

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	陈坤秋, 龙花楼. 土地系统优化助推乡村发展转型研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2022, 41(11): 2932-2945. DOI [CHEN K Q, LONG H L. The progress and prospects of land system optimization promoting rural development transformation. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(11): 2932-2945.]

[2]	刘彦随. 区域土地利用系统优化调控的机理与模式. 资源科学, 1999, 21(4): 60-65. [LIU Y S. Optimal regulation mechanism and models of regional land use system. Resources Science, 1999, 21(4): 60-65.]

[3]	龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309. DOI [LONG H L, CHEN K Q. Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 295-309.] DOI

[4]	VERBURG P H, ERB K H, MERTZ O, et al. Land system science: Between global challenges and local realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(5): 433-437. PMID

[5]	VERBURG P H, MERTZ O, ERB K H, et al. Land system change and food security: Towards multi-scale land system solutions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(5): 494-502. PMID

[6]	TURNER B L, LAMBIN E F, REENBERG A. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. PNAS, 2007, 104(52): 20666-20671. DOI PMID

[7]	MAUSER W, KLEPPER G, RICE M, et al. Transdisciplinary global change research: The co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(3-4): 420-431.

[8]	DE BREMOND A, EHRENSPERGER A, PROVIDOLI I, et al. What role for global change research networks in enabling transformative science for global sustainability? A global land programme perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2019, 38: 95-102.

[9]	NIELSEN J Ø, DE BREMOND A, ROY CHOWDHURY R, et al. Toward a normative land systems science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2019, 38: 1-6. DOI

[10]	LAMBIN E F, MEYFROIDT P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. PNAS, 2011, 108(9): 3465-3472. DOI PMID

[11]	SETO K C, REENBERG A, BOONE C G, et al. Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. PNAS, 2012, 109(20): 7687-7692. DOI PMID

[12]	EHRENSPERGER A, DE BREMOND A, PROVIDOLI I, et al. Land system science and the 2030 agenda: Exploring knowledge that supports sustainability transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2019, 38: 68-76.

[13]	VERBURG P H, ALEXANDER P, EVANS T, et al. Beyond land cover change: Towards a new generation of land use models. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2019, 38: 77-85. DOI

[14]	SALA S, CIUFFO B, NIJKAMP P. A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 2015, 119: 314-325.

[15]	LEROY J L, RUEL M, FRONGILLO E A, et al. Measuring the food access dimension of food security: A critical review and mapping of indicators. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 2015, 36(2): 167-195. DOI PMID

[16]	JONES A D, NGURE F M, PELTO G, et al. What are we assessing when we measure food security? A compendium and review of current metrics. Advances in Nutrition, 2013, 4(5): 481-505. DOI PMID

[17]	李鹏, 谭向勇, 王玉斌. 从食物保障状况看中国当前粮食安全. 中国农村经济, 2005, (6): 4-10. [LI P, TAN X Y, WANG Y B. Looking at the current food security in China from the food security situation. Chinese Rural Economy, 2005, (6): 4-10.]

[18]	陈志钢, 毕洁颖, 聂凤英, 等. 营养导向型的中国食物安全新愿景及政策建议. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(18): 3097-3107. [CHEN Z G, BI J Y, NIE F Y, et al. New vision and policy recommendations for nutrition-oriented food security in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(18): 3097-3107.] DOI

[19]	樊胜根, 张玉梅. 践行大食物观促进全民营养健康和可持续发展的战略选择. 农业经济问题, 2023, 44(5): 11-21. [FAN S G, ZHANG Y M. The strategic options of implementing the greater food approach for national nutrition and health and sustainable development. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2023, 44(5): 11-21.]

[20]	辛良杰. 粮食安全概念、评价体系与地理学优先研究主题. 地理科学, 2024, 44(3): 451-462. DOI [XIN L J. Concepts, measurement indicators of food security and research directions of Geography. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2024, 44(3): 451-462.] DOI

[21]	孙倩, 李晓云, 杨志海, 等. 粮食与营养安全研究评述及展望. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(8): 1782-1796. DOI [SUN Q, LI X Y, YANG Z H, et al. Food and nutrition security: A literature review and prospects for research. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(8): 1782-1796.] DOI

[22]	EL BILALI H, CALLENIUS C, STRASSNER C, et al. Food and nutrition security and sustainability transitions in food systems. Food and Energy Security, 2019, 8(2): e00154, Doi: 10.1002/fes3.154.

[23]	BERRY E M, DERNINI S, BURLINGAME B, et al. Food security and sustainability: Can one exist without the other?. Public Health Nutrition, 2015, 18(13): 2293-2302. DOI PMID

[24]	VERMEULEN S J, CAMPBELL B M, INGRAM J S I. Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2012, 37: 195-222. DOI

[25]	CRIPPA M, SOLAZZO E, GUIZZARDI D, et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food, 2021, 2(3): 198-209. DOI PMID

[26]	马恩朴, 叶玮怡, 龙花楼, 等. 城市食物系统全程耦合下的农地利用转型. 地理学报, 2023, 78(12): 3058-3077. DOI [MA E P, YE W Y, LONG H L, et al. Agricultural land use transition under the metacoupling framework of urban food system. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(12): 3058-3077.] DOI

[27]	樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 597-607. DOI [FAN J. "Territorial System of Human-environment Interaction": A theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 597-607.] DOI

[28]	CLAPP J, MOSELEY W G, BURLINGAME B, et al. Viewpoint: The case for a six-dimensional food security framework. Food Policy, 2022, 106: 102164, Doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102164.

[29]	FISCHER J, ABSON D J, BUTSIC V, et al. Land sparing versus land sharing: Moving forward. Conservation Letters, 2014, 7(3): 149-157.

[30]	KREMEN C. Reframing the land-sparing/land-sharing debate for biodiversity conservation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2015, 1355: 52-76.

[31]	DO CARMO PÔNZIO M, PASQUALOTTO N, ZANIN M, et al. Landscape heterogeneity can partially offset negative effects of habitat loss on mammalian biodiversity in agroecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 61(1): 120-133.

[32]	FISCHER J, HARTEL T, KUEMMERLE T. Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conservation Letters, 2012, 5(3): 167-175.

[33]	RUDEL T K, SCHNEIDER L, URIARTE M, et al. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005. PNAS, 2009, 106(49): 20675-20680. DOI PMID

[34]	TSCHARNTKE T, CLOUGH Y, WANGER T C, et al. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation, 2012, 151(1): 53-59.

[35]	BLITZER E J, DORMANN C F, HOLZSCHUH A, et al. Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2012, 146(1): 34-43.

[36]	EDWARDS D P, GILROY J J, THOMAS G H, et al. Land-sparing agriculture best protects avian phylogenetic diversity. Current Biology, 2015, 25(18): 2384-2391. DOI PMID

[37]	GIBSON L, LEE T M, KOH L P, et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature, 2011, 478(7369): 378-281.

[38]	GRASS I, LOOS J, BAENSCH S, et al. Land-sharing/-sparing connectivity landscapes for ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. People and Nature, 2019, 1(2): 262-272.

[39]	GRAU R, KUEMMERLE T, MACCHI L. Beyond 'land sparing versus land sharing': Environmental heterogeneity, globalization and the balance between agricultural production and nature conservation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(5): 477-483.

[40]	LAMBIN E F, MEYFROIDT P. Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(2): 108-118.

[41]	LONG H L, QU Y. Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective. Land Use Policy, 2018, 74: 111-120.

[42]	姚冠荣, 刘桂英, 谢花林. 中国耕地利用投入要素集约度的时空差异及其影响因素分析. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(11): 1836-1848. DOI [YAO G R, LIU G Y, XIE H L. Spatiotemporal difference and driving forces of input factors intensity for arable land-use in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(11): 1836-1848.]

[43]

张英男, 龙花楼, 李裕瑞, 等. 平原农区农业生产系统转型及其环境效应的耦合类型划分. 地理研究, 2022, 41(6): 1623-1636.

DOI

[ZHANG

Y N

, LONG

H L

, LI

Y R

, et al. Classification of the coupling patterns between agricultural production system transition and their environmental effects in the plain farming regions. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(6): 1623-1636.]

[44]	梁鑫源, 金晓斌, 孙瑞, 等. 粮食安全视角下的土地资源优化配置及其关键问题. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(12): 3031-3053. DOI [LIANG X Y, JIN X B, SUN R, et al. Optimal allocation of land resources and its key issues from a perspective of food security. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(12): 3031-3053.]

[45]	XU Y, LIANG Y J, CHEN K Q. Recessive transition of farmland use and food security: Evidence from China. Journal of Rural Studies, 2025, 113: 103484, Doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103484.

[46]	QU Y B, ZHAN L Y, WEI C C, et al. Interactive transition of cultivated land and construction land during China's urbanization: A coordinated analytical framework of explicit and implicit forms. Land Use Policy, 2024, 138: 107049, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107049.

[47]	龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2547-2559. [LONG H L, GE D Z, WANG J Y. Progress and prospects of the coupling research on land use transitions and rural transformation development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2547-2559.]

[48]	BUSCK-LUMHOLT L M, COENEN J, PERSSON J, et al. Telecoupling as a framework to support a more nuanced understanding of causality in land system science. Journal of Land Use Science, 2022, 17(1): 386-406.

[49]	YU Y, FENG K S, HUBACEK K. Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environmental Change, 2013, 23(5): 1178-1186.

[50]	RICHARDS P. What drives indirect land use change? How Brazil's agriculture sector influences frontier deforestation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2015, 105(5): 1026-1040. PMID

[51]	JADIN I, MEYFROIDT P, LAMBIN E F. International trade, and land use intensification and spatial reorganization explain Costa Rica's forest transition. Environmental Research Letters, 2016, 11(3): 035005, Doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035005.

[52]	WU X D, GUO J L, HAN M Y, et al. An overview of arable land use for the world economy: From source to sink via the global supply chain. Land Use Policy, 2018, 76: 201-214.

[53]	MARSELIS S M, FENG K S, LIU Y, et al. Agricultural land displacement and undernourishment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 619-628.

[54]	MÜLLER M F, PENNY G, NILES M T, et al. Impact of transnational land acquisitions on local food security and dietary diversity. PNAS, 2021, 118(4): e2020535118, Doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020535118.

[55]	LAVERS T. 'Land grab' as development strategy? The political economy of agricultural investment in Ethiopia. Journal of Peasant Studies, 2012, 39(1): 105-132.

[56]	BORRAS S M, FRANCO J C. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2012, 12(1): 34-59.

[57]	ZOOMERS A. Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: Seven processes driving the current global land grab. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2010, 37(2): 429-447.

[58]

马恩朴, 叶玮怡, 廖柳文, 等. 城市食物系统演化的人地耦合启示及驱动力: 以北京食物系统为例. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(10): 2617-2635.

DOI

[MA

E P

, YE

W Y

, LIAO

L W

, et al. Human-land coupling enlightenment and driving forces of urban food system evolution: A case study of Beijing food system. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(10): 2617-2635.]

[59]	李文博, 闫卓冉, 张英男, 等. 食物系统韧性视角下的城市区域耕地利用再地化转型. 中国土地科学, 2023, 37(11): 63-72. [LI W B, YAN Z R, ZHANG Y N, et al. Resilience of food systems: Relocalized transition of cultivated land use in the city-region. China Land Science, 2023, 37(11): 63-72.]

[60]	DURAM L, OBERHOLTZER L. A geographic approach to place and natural resource use in local food systems. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2010, 25(2): 99-108.

[61]	KINNUNEN P, GUILLAUME J H A, TAKA M, et al. Local food crop production can fulfil demand for less than one-third of the population. Nature Food, 2020, 1: 229-237.

[62]	LORING P A, GERLACH S C. Food, culture, and human health in Alaska: An integrative health approach to food security. Environmental Science & Policy, 2009, 12(4): 466-478.

[63]	PETERS C J, BILLS N L, LEMBO A J, et al. Mapping potential foodsheds in New York State:A spatial model for evaluating the capacity to localize food production. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2009, 24(1): 72-84.

[64]	EDWARDS-JONES G, MILÀ I CANALS L, HOUNSOME N, et al. Testing the assertion that 'local food is best': The challenges of an evidence-based approach. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2008, 19(5): 265-274.

[65]	BORN B, PURCELL M. Avoiding the local trap. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2006, 26(2): 195-207.

[66]	HEISTERMANN M, MÜLLER C, RONNEBERGER K. Land in sight? Achievements, deficits and potentials of continental to global scale land-use modeling. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2006, 114(2-4): 141-158.

[67]	SUŠNIK J, MASIA S, INDRIKSONE D, et al. System dynamics modelling to explore the impacts of policies on the water-energy-food-land-climate nexus in Latvia. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 775: 145827, Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145827.

[68]	KOTIR J H, JAGUSTOVIC R, PAPACHRISTOS G, et al. Field experiences and lessons learned from applying participatory system dynamics modelling to sustainable water and agri-food systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434: 140042, Doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140042.

[69]	EWERT F, RÖTTER R P, BINDI M, et al. Crop modelling for integrated assessment of risk to food production from climate change. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2015, 72: 287-303.

[70]	VALIN H, SANDS R D, VAN DER MENSBRUGGHE D, et al. The future of food demand: Understanding differences in global economic models. Agricultural Economics, 2014, 45(1): 51-67.

[71]	DOELMAN J C, STEHFEST E, TABEAU A, et al. Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Change, 2018, 48: 119-135.

[72]	KRIEGLER E, O'NEILL B C, HALLEGATTE S, et al. The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: A new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(4): 807-822.

[73]	ARNELL N W, LIVERMORE M J L, KOVATS S, et al. Climate and socio-economic scenarios for global-scale climate change impacts assessments: Characterising the SRES storylines. Global Environmental Change, 2004, 14(1): 3-20.

[74]	PERIGNON M, MASSET G, FERRARI G, et al. How low can dietary greenhouse gas emissions be reduced without impairing nutritional adequacy, affordability and acceptability of the diet? A modelling study to guide sustainable food choices. Public Health Nutrition, 2016, 19(14): 2662-2674. DOI PMID

[75]	MASON-D'CROZ D, BOGARD J R, SULSER T B, et al. Gaps between fruit and vegetable production, demand, and recommended consumption at global and national levels: An integrated modelling study. The Lancet Planetary Health, 2019, 3(7): e318-e329.

[76]	WIRSENIUS S, AZAR C, BERNDES G. How much land is needed for global food production under scenarios of dietary changes and livestock productivity increases in 2030?. Agricultural Systems, 2010, 103(9): 621-638.

[77]	ROCKSTRÖM J, EDENHOFER O, GAERTNER J, et al. Planet-proofing the global food system. Nature Food, 2020, 1: 3-5.

[78]	NELSON G C, VAN DER MENSBRUGGHE D, AHAMMAD H, et al. Agriculture and climate change in global scenarios: Why don't the models agree. Agricultural Economics, 2014, 45(1): 85-101.

[79]	AGARWAL B. Food sovereignty, food security and democratic choice: Critical contradictions, difficult conciliations. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2014, 41(6): 1247-1268.

[80]	DOSS C, KOVARIK C, PETERMAN A, et al. Gender inequalities in ownership and control of land in Africa: Myth and reality. Agricultural Economics, 2015, 46(3): 403-434.

[81]	汪晖, 陶然. 论土地发展权转移与交易的“浙江模式”: 制度起源、操作模式及其重要含义. 管理世界, 2009, 25(8): 39-52. [WANG H, TAO R. On the "Zhejiang model" of transfer and transaction of land development rights: Institutional origins, operational model, and its significant implications. Journal of Management World, 2009, 25(8): 39-52.]

[82]	王文旭, 曹银贵, 苏锐清, 等. 基于政策量化的中国耕地保护政策演进过程. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(7): 69-78. [WANG W X, CAO Y G, SU R Q, et al. Evolution characteristics and laws of cultivated land protection policy in China based on policy quantification. China Land Science, 2020, 34(7): 69-78.]

[83]	KUANG B, HAN J, LU X H, et al. Quantitative evaluation of China's cultivated land protection policies based on the PMC-Index model. Land Use Policy, 2020, 99: 105062, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105062.

[84]

梁坤宇, 金晓斌, 王世磊, 等. 综合“同质等效—流补平衡”的耕地“进出平衡”管制: 方法与实证. 中国土地科学, 2023, 37(7): 77-88.

[LIANG

K Y

, JIN

X B

, WANG

S L

, et al. Control of balancing cultivated land conversion by integrating "homogeneous equivalence" and "loss-supplement balance": Methodology and empirical study. China Land Science, 2023, 37(7): 77-88.]

[85]	袁源, 王亚华, 徐萍. “非粮化”治理视角下的耕地用途管制: 应对逻辑与体系构建. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(4): 942-959. DOI [YUAN Y, WANG Y H, XU P. Cultivated land use control from the perspective of "non-grain"governance: Response logic and framework construction. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(4): 942-959.] DOI

[86]	韩德军, 朱道林. 中国农村土地制度历史变迁的进化博弈论解释. 中国土地科学, 2013, 27(7): 21-27. [HAN D J, ZHU D L. Game-theory analysis on the evolution of rural land institutions in China. China Land Sciences, 2013, 27(7): 21-27.]

[87]	李名峰, 曹阳, 王春超. 中央政府与地方政府在土地垂直管理制度改革中的利益博弈分析. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(6): 9-13. [LI M F, CAO Y, WANG C C. Analysis on the benefit game between central and local governments in the reform of direct top-down land administration system. China Land Science, 2010, 24(6): 9-13.]

[88]	谭术魁, 涂姗. 征地冲突中利益相关者的博弈分析: 以地方政府与失地农民为例. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(11): 27-31, 37. [TAN S K, TU S. The game theory analysis on the stakeholders involved in farmland-acquisition conflicts: Taking the local government and land-lost peasants as an example. China Land Science, 2009, 23(11): 27-31, 37.]

[89]	段岩燕, 申静. 从各利益主体间博弈关系谈我国耕地保护制度. 城市发展研究, 2010, 17(10): 107-112. [DUAN Y Y, SHEN J. Farm land protection regulation in China based on the bargaining among multiple stakeholders. Urban Studies, 2010, 17(10): 107-112.]

[90]	郑兴明. 地权逻辑下乡村治理困境的生成、动因与化解路径: 基于博弈式共生的理论分析框架. 农村经济, 2019, (12): 106-113. [ZHENG X M. The formation, reasons and solution paths for the dilemma in rural governance under the logic framework of land right. Rural Economy, 2019, (12): 106-113.]

[91]

陈浮, 沈春竹, 郭维红, 等. 大食物观下多元化食物供给和耕地保护协同推进: 逻辑、机制与路径. 中国土地科学, 2024, 38(6): 1-10.

[CHEN

F

, SHEN

C Z

, GUO

W H

, et al. Synergistic promotion of diversified food supply and cultivated land protection from an integrated food security perspective: Logics, mechanisms and pathways. China Land Science, 2024, 38(6): 1-10.]

[92]

杨巨声, 兰雨潇, 闫茹. 分权时序对耕地保护的影响: 基于地方政府财政收支的视角. 地理研究, 2024, 43(10): 2558-2579.

DOI

[YANG

J S

, LAN

Y X

, YAN

R

. The impact of sequence of decentralization on cropland protection: An analysis from the perspective of local government fiscal revenue and expenditure. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(10): 2558-2579.]

[93]	MARSH D, MCCONNELL A. Towards a framework for establishing policy success: A reply to bovens. Public Administration, 2010, 88(2): 586-587.

[94]	LIU T Z, MELOT R, WALLET F. Integrating land and food policy to transform territorial food systems in the context of coexisting agri-food models: Case studies in France. Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene, 2024, 12(1): 00063, Doi: 10.1525/elementa.2023.00063.

[95]	马恩朴, 蔡建明, 林静, 等. 远程耦合视角下的土地利用/覆被变化解释. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 421-431. DOI [MA E P, CAI J M, LIN J, et al. Explanation of land use/cover change from the perspective of tele-coupling. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(3): 421-431.] DOI

[96]	MEYER M A, FRÜH-MÜLLER A, LEHMANN I, et al. Linking food and land system research in Europe. Land Use Policy, 2023, 131: 106692, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106692.

[97]	DOLAN F, LAMONTAGNE J, CALVIN K, et al. Modeling the economic and environmental impacts of land scarcity under deep uncertainty. Earths Future, 2022, 10(2): e2021EF002466, Doi: 10.1029/2021ef002466.

[98]	BOILLAT S, SCARPA F M, ROBSON J P, et al. Land system science in Latin America: Challenges and perspectives. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2017, 26: 37-46.

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References