EN中文

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES >

2025 , Vol. 40 >Issue 6: 1620 - 1643

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20250612

Construction of Nature Reserve System

A comprehensive spatial decision model and its application of ecological compensation for agricultural land in reserve areas

  • ZHENG Yu-mei , 1, 2, 3
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
  • 2. Research Base for Ecological Civilization Construction of Hunan Province, Changsha 410001, China
  • 3. Institute of Green Development of Hunan Province, Changsha 410004, China

Received date: 2024-10-21

  Revised date: 2025-01-26

  Online published: 2025-05-26

Fold

Abstract

Reserve areas are the key coverage areas of ecological protection compensation in China. In this paper, the generality and particularity of eco-compensation decision in reserve areas were analyzed, and a decision framework for eco-compensation was built considering the systematicness of decision and multi-dimensional effects. Based on the emphasis on expressing uncertainty in decision information, a decision model with "GIS (Geographic Information System)-BN (Bayesian Network)" as the core was constructed. The Maoli Lake Watershed, where the Hunan Maoli Lake National Wetland Park is located, was selected as a case area to design four agricultural land-use adjustment measures aimed at improving the water environment of the Maoli Lake, such as the reduction of chemical fertiliser application, and to form a number of eco-compensatory schemes to be selected. The decision tools were developed by self-programming to realize the fine decision of priority scheme and implementation area of agricultural land eco-compensation in the case area. The results showed that: (1) Ecological compensation for agricultural land in nature reserve areas had a multidimensional effect, and its decision-making should seek synergies between the conservation needs of the reserve and regional economic and social stability and development. (2) Ecological compensation for agricultural land comprised multiple key components, such as land use adjustment measures, target land types, compensation standards, and implementation areas. These elements could be combined in various ways to form comprehensive decision-making plans. This multi-component approach offerd a more systematic and holistic framework compared to single-factor decision-making models. (3) The priority programme for ecological compensation of agricultural land in the case area was the implementation of crop rotation and fallow for paddy fields and drylands, with compensation rates at the second level; regional preferences at the village level of the administrative districts could be implemented more efficiently. (4) The decision model in this paper could entirely transfer uncertainty information from the microscale of plot to the mesoscale of watershed, and the assessment results could simultaneously suggest the potential benefits and possible risks of the decision.

Key words： reserves eco-compensation; fine spatial scale; multi-objective comprehensive effect; fund utilization efficiency; Bayesian Network; decision tool development

Cite this article

ZHENG Yu-mei . A comprehensive spatial decision model and its application of ecological compensation for agricultural land in reserve areas[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2025 , 40(6) : 1620 -1643 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250612

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
[1]
蔡晓梅, 苏杨, 吴必虎, 等. 生态文明建设背景下中国自然保护地发展的理论思考与创新实践. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(4): 839-861.

DOI

[CAI X M, SU Y, WU B H, et al. Theoretical debates and innovative practices of the development of China's nature protected area under the background of ecological civilization construction. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(4): 839-861.]

[2]
欧阳志云, 杜傲, 徐卫华. 中国自然保护地体系分类研究. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20): 7207-7215.

[OUYANG Z Y, DU A, XU W H. Research on China's protected area system classification. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20): 7207-7215.]

[3]
中国生态环境部. 中国生态环境状况公报. 北京: 中国生态环境部, 2023. https://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/202406/P020240604551536165161.pdf.

[Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China. China Ecological and Environmental Status Bulletin. Beijing: Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, 2023. https://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/202406/P020240604551536165161.pdf.]

[4]
蔡晓梅, 苏杨. 从冲突到共生: 生态文明建设中国家公园的制度逻辑. 管理世界, 2022, 38(11): 131-154.

[CAI X M, SU Y. From conflict to mutualism: The institutional logic of national parks in the construction of ecological civilization. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(11): 131-154.]

[5]
杨君杰, 杨茜好. 生态旅游语境下自然保护地人与野生动物关系的重构研究. 旅游学刊, 2023, 38(4): 10-12.

[YANG J J, YANG X H. Study on the reconstruction of the relationship between human and wild animals in nature reserve in the context of eco-tourism. Tourism Tribune, 2023, 38(4): 10-12.]

[6]
王宇飞, 刘婧一. 中国自然保护地的发展历程、研究进展及前瞻. 环境保护, 2023, 51(8): 17-24.

[WANG Y F, LIU J Y. Development history, research process and prospects on protected areas in China. Environmental Protection, 2023, 51(8): 17-24.]

[7]
BLICHARSKA M, HEDBLOM M, JOSEFSSON J, et al. Operationalisation of ecological compensation-obstacles and ways forward. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 304: 114277, Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114277.

[8]
SUN W Y, SONG X Y, MU X M, et al. Spatiotemporal vegetation cover variations associated with climate change and ecological restoration in the Loess Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2015, 209: 87-99.

[9]
赵安周, 张安兵, 刘海新, 等. 退耕还林(草)工程实施前后黄土高原植被覆盖时空变化分析. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(3): 449-460.

DOI

[ZHAO A Z, ZHANG A B, LIU H X, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of vegetation coverage before and after implementation of grain for green project in the Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(3): 449-460.]

[10]
宋戈, 张红梅. 东北典型黑土区耕地轮作休耕的空间重构. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(9): 2231-2246.

DOI

[SONG G, ZHANG H M. Spatial reconstruction of farmland rotation and fallow in the typical black soil region of Northeast China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(9): 2231-2246.]

DOI

[11]
樊杰. “人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 597-607.

DOI

[FAN J. "Territorial system of human-environment interaction": A theoretical cornerstone for comprehensive research on formation and evolution of the geographical pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 597-607.]

DOI

[12]
郎宇, 王桂霞. 农户分化、价值认知与农户融入市场化生态补偿: 以化肥减量施用为例. 山西财经大学学报, 2024, 46(2): 68-83.

[LANG Y, WANG G X. Farmers' differentiation, value cognition and farmers' integration into market-oriented ecological compensation: Taking the reduced amount of chemical fertilizer application as an example. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2024, 46(2): 68-83.]

[13]
罗万云, 周杨, 王福博. 生计资本对国家重点生态功能区农户受偿意愿的影响. 生态学报, 2023, 43(10): 3971-3983.

[LUO W Y, ZHOU Y, WANG F B. Impact of livelihood capital on farmers' willingness to receive compensation in national key ecological function areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(10): 3971-3983.]

[14]
胥梦娇, 赵伟, 蔡俊飞, 等. 基于土地利用变化的四川省凉山州移民生态效应研究. 生态学报, 2024, 44(8): 3241-3252.

[XU M J, ZHAO W, CAI J F, et al. Ecological effects of resettlement based on land use change in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(8): 3241-3252.]

[15]
范庆泉, 刘惠, 刘祎男, 等. 京津冀生态补偿是否具有“增绿”效应: 来自国家重点生态功能区转移支付重点补助的证据. 经济学报, 2024, 11(1): 416-444.

[FAN Q Q, LIU H, LIU Y N, et al. Does ecological compensation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region affect eco-environmental protection: Evidence from the key subsidies for transfer payment in national key ecological functional areas. China Journal of Economics, 2024, 11(1): 416-444.]

[16]
徐珂, 庞洁, 尹昌斌. 生态公益林补偿标准及其影响因素：基于农户受偿意愿视角. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(6): 76-87.

[XU K, PANG J, YIN C B. Eco-compensation standard and its influencing factors of ecological forests: From the perspective of farmers' willingness to accept. China Land Science, 2022, 36(6): 76-87.]

[17]
任以胜, 陆林, 程豪, 等. 流域生态补偿与乡村居民可持续生计互动的研究进展与展望. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(5): 1039-1052.

DOI

[REN Y S, LU L, CHENG H, et al. Research progress and prospect of the interaction between watershed eco-compensation and sustainable livelihoods of rural residents. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(5): 1039-1052.]

[18]
陈廷贵, 刘芳, 杨杨. 长江流域禁捕生态补偿政策绩效评价及影响因素分析: 以湖北和贵州为例. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(12): 3144-3155.

DOI

[CHEN T G, LIU F, YANG Y. Performance evaluation and influence factors of ecological compensation policy in the Yangtze River Basin: The case study of Hubei and Guizhou provinces. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(12): 3144-3155.]

[19]
陈海江, 司伟, 赵启然. 粮豆轮作补贴: 规模导向与瞄准偏差: 基于生态补偿瞄准性视角的分析. 中国农村经济, 2019, (1): 47-61.

[CHEN H J, SI W, ZHAO Q R. The scale orientation and targeting deviation of grain-soybean rotation subsidy: An analysis based on the targeting perspective of ecological compensation. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019, (1): 47-61.]

[20]
杨小军, 费梓萱, 任林静. 组态视角下流域多元化生态补偿的差异化驱动路径分析. 中国农村经济, 2023, (12): 106-125.

[YANG X J, FEI Z X, REN L J. Differentiated driving path of diversified watershed eco-compensation from the perspective of configuration. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023, (12): 106-125.]

[21]
ZHENG Y M, LEI G C, YU P. Eco-compensation schemes for controlling agricultural non-point source pollution in Maoli Lake watershed. Water, 2021, 13(11): 1536, Doi: 10.3390/w13111536.

[22]
HAVINGA I, HEIN L, VEGA-ARAYA M, et al. Spatial quantification to examine the effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services: A case study of Costa Rica's Pago de Servicios Ambientales. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 108: 105766, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105766.

[23]
DANG K B, WINDHORST W, BURKHARD B, et al. A Bayesian Belief Network-based approach to link ecosystem functions with rice provisioning ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 100: 30-44.

[24]
DEAN A J, EBERHARD R, BARESI U, et al. Scrutinizing the impact of policy instruments on adoption of agricultural conservation practices using Bayesian expert models. Conservation Letters, 2023, 16(6): e12988, Doi: 10.1111/conl.12988.

[25]
CARRIGER J F, BARRON M G, NEWMAN M C. Bayesian networks improve causal environmental assessments for evidence-based policy. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(24): 13195-13205.

[26]
BRUEN M, HALLOUIN T, CHRISTIE M, et al. A Bayesian modelling framework for integration of ecosystem services into freshwater resources management. Environmental Management, 2022, 69(4): 781-800.

DOI PMID

[27]
ZHANG L Y, YU Y, GUO Z K, et al. Investigating agricultural water sustainability in arid regions with Bayesian network and water footprint theories. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 951: 175544, Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175544.

[28]
BENNETT D E, GOSNELL H. Integrating multiple perspectives on payments for ecosystem services through a social-ecological systems framework. Ecological Economics, 2015, 116: 172-181.

[29]
丁佳佳, 蔡庆, 牛晋兰, 等. 基于组合赋权模型的重庆市流域生态补偿政策绩效评价. 环境生态学, 2023, 5(6): 21-26, 46.

[DING J J, CAI Q, NIU J L, et al. Performance evaluation of basin ecological compensation policy in Chongqing city based on combination weighting model. Environmental Ecology, 2023, 5(6): 21-26, 46.]

[30]
RAMANKUTTY N, MEHRABI Z, WAHA K, et al. Trends in global agricultural land use: Implications for environmental health and food security. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2018, 69: 789-815.

DOI PMID

[31]
唐秀美, 蔡玉梅, 刘玉, 等. 可持续发展视角下自然资源综合利用效益评估方法与实证. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(9): 2418-2428.

DOI

[TANG X M, CAI Y M, LIU Y, et al. The evaluation of natural resources comprehensive utilization benefits from the perspective of sustainable development. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(9): 2418-2428.]

[32]
钟敬秋, 高梦凡, 韩增林, 等. 基于生态系统文化服务的人地关系空间重构. 地理学报, 2024, 79(7): 1682-1699.

DOI

[ZHONG J Q, GAO M F, HAN Z L, et al. Spatial reconstruction of the human-land relationship based on cultural ecosystem services. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(7): 1682-1699.]

DOI

[33]
赵文飞, 宗路平, 王梦君. 中国自然保护区空间分布特征. 生态学报, 2024, 44(7): 2786-2799.

[ZHAO W F, ZONG L P, WANG M J. Spatial distribution of nature reserves in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(7): 2786-2799.]

[34]
雷光春, 曾晴. 世界自然保护的发展趋势对我国国家公园体制建设的启示. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(4): 423-425.

DOI

[LEI G C, ZENG Q. Perspectives on national parks: Enlightenment from the development of global nature conservation. Biodiversity Science, 2014, 22(4): 423-425.]

DOI

[35]
史培军, 宋长青, 程昌秀. 地理协同论: 从理解“人—地关系”到设计“人—地协同”. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 3-15.

DOI

[SHI P J, SONG C Q, CHENG C X. Geographical synergetics: From understanding human-environment relationship to designing human-environment synergy. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(1): 3-15.]

[36]
刘婷, 郑宇梅. 中国退耕还林生态补偿研究. 林业经济问题, 2020, 40(1): 21-28.

[LIU T, ZHENG Y M. Analysis of ecological compensation for returning farmland to forests in China. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2020, 40(1): 21-28.]

[37]
LANDUYT D, BROEKX S, GOETHALS P L M. Bayesian belief networks to analyse trade-offs among ecosystem services at the regional scale. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 71: 327-335.

[38]
郑涛, 陈爽, 张童, 等. 基于贝叶斯网络的生态用地流失机制研究. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2980-2994.

DOI

[ZHENG T, CHEN S, ZHANG T, et al. Research on driving mechanism of ecological land loss based on Bayesian network. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(12): 2980-2994.]

DOI

[39]
STOECKLI S, BIRRER S, ZELLWEGER-FISCHER J, et al. Quantifying the extent to which farmers can influence biodiversity on their farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2017, 237: 224-233.

[40]
王建, 赵牡丹, 樊艺, 等. 黄土高原人类活动与生物多样性的演变及关联性. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(6): 154-160.

[WANG J, ZHAO M D, FAN Y, et al. Evolution and correlation of human activities and biodiversity in the Loess Plateau. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(6): 154-160.]

[41]
王立, 陆林, 杨永峰, 等. 基于生态系统服务权衡的自然保护区功能区划: 以安徽升金湖国家级自然保护区为例. 国家公园(中英文), 2023, (3): 151-162.

[WANG L, LU L, YANG Y F, et al. Functional zoning of nature reserves based on ecosystem service trade-offs: A case study of Anhui Shengjin Lake National Nature Reserve. National Park, 2023, (3): 151-162.]

[42]
马克明, 孔红梅, 关文彬, 等. 生态系统健康评价: 方法与方向. 生态学报, 2001, 21(12): 2106-2116.

[MA K M, KONG H M, GUAN W B, et al. Ecosystem health assessment: Methods and directions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(12): 2106-2116.]

[43]
李晓平, 谢先雄, 赵敏娟. 资本禀赋对农户耕地面源污染治理受偿意愿的影响分析. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(7): 93-101.

[LI X P, XIE X X, ZHAO M J. Analysis about the influence of capital on the willingness to accept for controlling the nonpoint pollution of cultivated land. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(7): 93-101.]

[44]
李辉婕, 鲁盼, 汪兴东. 农村居民生态产品购买受偿水平影响因素及补偿标准研究:基于江西省的调查. 中国农业资源与区划, 2023, 44(4): 140-149.

[LI H J, LU P, WANG X D. The research on influencing factors of the level of compensation and the measurement of the compensation standards for ecological products purchased by rural residents: Survey based on Jiangxi province. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023, 44(4): 140-149.]

[45]
赵晶晶, 葛颜祥, 李颖. 公平感知、 社会信任与流域生态补偿的公众参与行为. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2023, 33(6): 196-205.

[ZHAO J J, GE Y X, LI Y. Fairness perception, social trust, and public participation in watershed eco-compensation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2023, 33(6): 196-205.]

[46]
朱庆莹, 陈银蓉, 胡伟艳, 等. 参照依赖、公平感知与农户农地转出满意度. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(10): 84-92.

[ZHU Q Y, CHEN Y R, HU W Y, et al. A study on the relationship between reference dependence, perceived fairness and farmers' satisfaction with farmland transfer. China Land Science, 2019, 33(10): 84-92.]

[47]
俞振宁. 农户参与耕地休耕行为研究进展与展望. 中国国土资源经济, 2023, 36(7): 79-88.

[YU Z N. Research progress and prospects on farm households' participation in fallow land behavior. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2023, 36(7): 79-88.]

[48]
郑宇梅, 沈洁, 雷光春. 湿地生态系统管理: 热点领域与研究方法. 世界林业研究, 2022, 35(6): 1-9.

[ZHENG Y M, SHENG J, LEI G C. Wetland ecosystem management: Focus area and research methods. World Forestry Research, 2022, 35(6): 1-9.]

[49]
曹娴. 毛里湖: 从浊到清的蜕变. 湖南日报, 2015-10-20.

[CAO X. Maoli Lake: Transformation from turbidity to cleanliness. Hunan Daily, 2015-10-20.]

[50]
SMITH L E D, SICILIANO G. A comprehensive review of constraints to improved management of fertilizers in China and mitigation of diffuse water pollution from agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 209: 15-25.

[51]
文高辉, 王子诚, 何庆, 等. 洞庭湖平原化肥面源污染生态环境风险及脱钩效应. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(4): 301-308.

[WEN G H, WANG Z C, HE Q, et al. Eco-environmental risks and decoupling effects of fertilizer non-point source pollution in Dongting Lake Plain. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(4): 301-308.]

[52]
ABBASPOUR K C. SWAT-CUP 2012: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs: A user manual. Science and Technology, 2014, Doi: 10.4236/ce.2019.1010160.

[53]
张展羽, 司涵, 孔莉莉. 基于SWAT模型的小流域非点源氮磷迁移规律研究. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(2): 93-100.

[ZHANG Z Y, SI H, KONG L L. Migration of non-point source nitrogen and phosphorus in small watershed based on SWAT model. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013, 29(2): 93-100.]

[54]
宋晓明, 柳王荣, 姜珊, 等. 湖南省农业面源污染与农村水环境质量的响应关系分析. 农业环境科学学报, 2022, 41(7): 1509-1519.

[SONG X M, LIU W R, JIANG S, et al. Analysis on response relationship between agricultural non-point source pollution and rural water environmental quality in Hunan province, China. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2022, 41(7): 1509-1519.]

[55]
RAHBEH M, CHANASYK D, MILLER J. Two-way calibration-validation of SWAT model for a small prairie watershed with short observed record. Revue Canadienne Des Ressources Hydriques, 2011, 36(3): 247-270.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉