EN中文

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES >

2025 , Vol. 40 >Issue 6: 1555 - 1568

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20250608

Urban Renewal and Governance Reform

Integrating technology and economic rationality: Reflection and optimization of Shenzhen's urban renewal capacity policy

  • LIN Qiang ,
  • LI Qian ,
  • LI Meng-hui ,
  • WANG Qi
Expand
  • Shenzhen Urban Planning & Land Resource Research Center, Shenzhen 518040, Guangdong, China

Received date: 2024-05-20

  Revised date: 2025-01-20

  Online published: 2025-05-26

Fold

Abstract

Floor area is vital influencing factor of urban regeneration development gains. The article, based on Shenzhen experience analyzing the rule of floor area determination in urban regeneration, presents the evidence for the strong conflict between market-oriented and planning technology-oriented floor area determination, which brings the unequal development right among the subjects, the huge profit gap among different projects, the higher floor area ratio, and the subordinate functional type of urban construction, etc. The conflict has been proved not good for improving the quality and efficiency of floor area allocation. Therefore, this article analyzes the cooperative transformation mode of urban renewal,and uses an economic benefit analysis model based on four indicators: demolition and construction ratio, demolition and compensation ratio, saleable housing price unit price, and profit margin. It analyzes the mathematical relationship between various indicators in different types of renovation projects and examines the economic relationship between the government, market entities, and original rights holders in urban renewal. As a result of these investigations, suggestions, for instance, separating the market-oriented floor area and planning technology-oriented floor area, developing the demolition and construction ratio-based rule of floor area determination, enhancing the guidance of the demolition and compensation negotiation, are identified for improving the rule of floor area determination in urban regeneration at the end of this article.

Key words： urban renewal; floor area; balance of benefits; demolition and construction ratio; demolition and compensation ratio; Shenzhen

Cite this article

LIN Qiang , LI Qian , LI Meng-hui , WANG Qi . Integrating technology and economic rationality: Reflection and optimization of Shenzhen's urban renewal capacity policy[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2025 , 40(6) : 1555 -1568 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250608

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
[1]
邹兵. 增量规划、 存量规划与政策规划. 城市规划, 2013, 37(2): 35-37, 55.

[ZOU B. Increment planning, inventory planning and policy planning. City Planning Review, 2013, 37(2): 35-37, 55.]

[2]
赵燕菁. 存量规划: 理论与实践. 北京规划建设, 2014, (4): 153-156.

[ZHAO Y J. Stock planning: Theory and practice. Beijing Planning Review, 2014, (4): 153-156.]

[3]
赵楠楠, 刘玉亭, 刘铮. 新时期“共智共策共享”社区更新与治理模式: 基于广州社区微更新实证. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(4): 117-124.

[ZHAO N N, LIU Y T, LIU Z. Co-wisdom, co-strategy, and co-benefit: Urban regeneration and community governance in Guangzhou city. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(4): 117-124.]

[4]
田莉. 摇摆之间: 三旧改造中个体、集体与公众利益平衡. 城市规划, 2018, 42(2): 78-84.

[TIAN L. Exploring the path of balancing individual benefits, collective benefits, and public interests in the three olds renewal. City Planning Review, 2018, 42(2): 78-84.]

[5]
林坚, 高远, 赵晔. 空间开发权视角下的国土空间治理探析. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(6): 1393-1402.

DOI

[LIN J, GAO Y, ZHAO Y. Exploration of national territory spatial governance from the perspective of spatial development rights. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(6): 1393-1402.]

DOI

[6]
谷晓坤, 周小平, 刘博研, 等. 基于“情境—结构—行为—结果”分析的上海市低效工业用地减量化治理. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(6): 1413-1424.

DOI

[GU X K, ZHOU X P, LIU B Y, et al. Using "Situation-Structure-Implementation-Outcome" framework to analyze the reduction governance of the inefficient industrial land in Shanghai. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(6): 1413-1424.]

[7]
田莉, 陶然, 梁印龙. 城市更新困局下的实施模式转型:基于空间治理的视角. 城市规划学刊, 2020, (3): 41-47.

[TIAN L, TAO R, LIANG Y L. Transition of implementation pattern in the predicament of urban renewal: A perspective of spatial governance. Urban Planning Forum, 2020, (3): 41-47.]

[8]
王嘉, 白韵溪, 宋聚生. 我国城市更新演进历程、挑战与建议. 规划师, 2021, 37(24): 21-27.

[WANG J, BAI Y X, SONG J S. The evolution, challenges and suggestions of urban renewal in China. Planners, 2021, 37(24): 21-27.]

[9]
黄卫东. 城市治理演进与城市更新响应: 深圳的先行试验. 城市规划, 2021, 45(6): 19-29.

[HUANG W D. Response of urban regeneration to the evolution of urban governance: A pioneering experiment of Shenzhen. City Planning Review, 2021, 45(6): 19-29.]

[10]
邹兵. 存量发展模式的实践、成效与挑战: 深圳城市更新实施的评估及延伸思考. 城市规划, 2017, 41(1): 89-94.

[ZOU B. Practices, effects, and challenges of the inventory development pattern: The assessments and extended thoughts of urban renewal implementation in Shenzhen. City Planning Review, 2017, 41(1): 89-94.]

[11]
林坚, 叶子君, 杨红. 存量规划时代城镇低效用地再开发的思考. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(9): 1-8.

[LIN J, YE Z J, YANG H. Thoughts on the underused urban land redevelopment in the era of inventory planning. China Land Science, 2019, 33(9): 1-8.]

[12]
陈浩, 张京祥, 吴启焰. 转型期城市空间再开发中非均衡博弈的透视: 政治经济学的视角. 城市规划学刊, 2010, (5): 33-40.

[CHEN H, ZHANG J X, WU Q Y. The imbalance of powers and politics: Political economy in urban redevelopment projects during the period of institutional transition. Urban Planning Forum, 2010, (5): 33-40.]

[13]
黄军林. 产权激励: 面向城市空间资源再配置的空间治理创新. 城市规划, 2019, 43(12): 78-87.

[HUANG J L. Property rights incentive: Innovation of spatial governance towards urban spatial resource reallocation. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(12): 78-87.]

[14]
何冬华, 高慧智, 刘玉亭, 等. 土地再资本化视角下城市更新的治理过程与干预: 对广州旧村改造实施的观察. 城市发展研究, 2022, 29(1): 95-103.

[HE D H, GAO H Z, LIU Y T, et al. Research on governance process of urban renewal from the perspective of land recapitalization: A case of implementation of Guangzhou old village transformation research on governance. Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(1): 95-103.]

[15]
姜凯凯. 空间资源配置视角下城市规划的转型策略研究: 基于我国市场经济实践的思考. 城市规划, 2021, 45(1): 30-38.

[JIANG K K. Research on the transformation strategy of urban planning from the perspective of spatial resource allocation: Based on the practice of China's market economy. City Planning Review, 2021, 45(1): 30-38.]

[16]
姜凯凯. 城市更新背景下土地产权的退出障碍与治理对策: 基于空间要素循环的视角. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(8): 100-106.

[JIANG K K. The obstacles on the withdrawal of property rights and the discussion on governance countermeasures under the background of urban renewal: Based on the circulation of urban spatial elements. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(8): 100-106.]

[17]
朱介鸣. 发展规划: 重视土地利用的利益关系. 城市规划学刊, 2011, (1): 30-37.

[ZHU J M. Developmental planning: Landed interests in land uses. Urban Planning Forum, 2011, (1): 30-37.]

[18]
林晓捷. 深圳: 城市更新单元规划的容积率管理实践与思考. 城乡建设, 2022, (22): 34-37.

[LIN X J. Shenzhen: Practice and thinking on floor area ratio management of urban renewal unit planning. Urban and Rural Development, 2022, (22): 34-37.]

[19]
梁鹤年. 合理确定容积率的依据. 城市规划, 1992, 16(2): 58-60, 64.

[LIANG H N. Basis for rational determination of plot ratio. City Planning Review, 1992, 16(2): 58-60, 64.]

[20]
唐子来, 付磊. 城市密度分区研究: 以深圳经济特区为例. 城市规划汇刊, 2003, (4): 1-9, 95.

[TANG Z L. FU L, A rational approach to urban density zoning: The case of Shenzhen special economic zone. Urban Planning Forum, 2003, (4): 1-9, 95.]

[21]
黄大田. 利用非强制型城市设计引导手法改善城市环境: 浅析美、日两国的经验, 兼论我国借鉴的可行性. 城市规划, 1999, 23(6): 40-43.

[HUANG D T. Improving the urban environment by means of non-compulsory design guiding an analysis into the experience from usa and Japan and China's possibility in this area. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(6): 40-43.]

[22]
张培峰, 胡远满. 不同空间尺度三维建筑景观变化. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(5): 1319-1325.

[ZHANG P F. HU Y M. Variations of three-dimensional architecture landscape at different spatial scales. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(5): 1319-1325.]

[23]
周军, 谭泽芳. 交通承载力评估在密度分区及容积率测算中的方法研究及应用实践: 以深圳为例. 城市规划学刊, 2020, (1): 85-92.

[ZHOU J, TAN Z F. A research on method and application of traffic carrying capacity evaluation in density zoning and FAR measurement: Taking Shenzhen as an example. Urban Planning Forum, 2020, (1): 85-92.]

[24]
黄明华, 杜倩, 易鑫, 等. 强制性、开放性、引导性: 以公共利益为核心的居住地块(街坊)开发强度指标体系构建. 城市规划, 2020, 44(1): 24-34.

[HUANG M H, DU Q, YI X, et al. Mandatory, open, and guiding: Construction of residential plot (neighborhood) development density index system with public interest as its core. City Planning Review, 2020, 44(1): 24-34.]

[25]
邱鹍, 牛强, 夏源. 公共利益视角的居住用地容积率确定方法研究. 城市发展研究, 2017, 24(8): 14-19, 56.

[QIU K, NIU Q, XIA Y. A research on the method of residential floor area ratio determining from the perspective of public interest. Urban Development Studies, 2017, 24(8): 14-19, 56.]

[26]
唐子来, 田宝江, 张月. 城市规划中密度分区管控的基本特征和实践案例. 国际城市规划, 2023, 38(2): 8-14.

[TANG Z L, TIAN B J, ZHANG Y. Essential features and practical examples of density zoning control in urban planning. Urban Planning International, 2023, 38(2): 8-14.]

[27]
曲冰. 从增量发展到存量更新: 我国容积率管控技术的发展与挑战. 规划师, 2023, 39(1): 48-55.

[QU B. From incremental development to built environment renewal: Evolution and challenge of floor area ratio control in China. Planners, 2023, 39(1): 48-55.]

[28]
金月赛, 张美亮, 张金荃. 存量规划的容积率管控机制研究. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(3): 79-84.

[JIN Y S, ZHANG M L, ZHANG J Q. Floor area ratio (FAR) control mechanism of redevelopment planning. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(3): 79-84.]

[29]
林强. 城市更新的制度安排与政策反思: 以深圳为例. 城市规划, 2017, 41(11): 52-55.

[LIN Q. Institution of urban renewal and policy reflections: A case study of Shenzhen. City Planning Review, 2017, 41(11): 52-55.].

[30]
田莉, 夏菁. 土地发展权与国土空间规划: 治理逻辑、政策工具与实践应用. 城市规划学刊, 2021, (6): 12-19.

[TIAN L, XIA J. Land development rights and territorial spatial planning: Governance logic, policy tools and practical applications. Urban Planning Forum, 2021, (6): 12-19.]

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉