Urban Renewal and Governance Reform

Evaluation of the cultural and tourism development potential of urban built heritage and its renewal mechanism: A case study of the main urban area of Dalian

  • ZHANG Hong-chi ,
  • PENG Hai-yang ,
  • GAO Jia-lu ,
  • WANG Feng-lin ,
  • ZHU Pei-sheng
Expand
  • School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China

Received date: 2024-10-21

  Revised date: 2025-01-22

  Online published: 2025-05-26

Abstract

The integration of culture and tourism is becoming a new engine for boosting domestic demand in China, and the assessment of the potential for cultural and tourism development can help to reuse the built heritage of the city and renew it with high quality. Under the heritage conservation policy of integrated management, how to quickly identify and categorize built heritage with potential for enhancement, and how to gather multiple heritage resources to build a cultural and tourism network has become a key issue in cultural heritage renewal. Taking built heritage in the main urban area of Dalian as the object of study, combining field research scoring, geospatial, socio-economic, demographic and streetscape image data, we constructed an evaluation system of built heritage regeneration potential from three levels, namely supply potential, demand potential and regional security power, and further refined it with six elements, namely environmental value, ontological value, market demand, cultural renewal demand, regional resource conditions and tourism resource extensibility. Through the collection and sorting of heritage lists, the existing built heritage with development value was screened and identified, and the improved CRITIC and TOPSIS integrated evaluation models were used to comprehensively evaluate the development potential of built heritage sites, and the data of each element and criterion layer were visualized and analyzed. Based on the kernel density analysis, the joint heritage renewal areas were divided and the renewal priority of each area was determined. The results show that: (1) The differences in the development value of each built heritage are concentrated in the two aspects of supply potential and regional security power. (2) The demand potential, especially the demand for cultural renewal, is less different from region to region. (3) The higher comprehensive development value is observed in the urban core area. Based on the evaluation results of each element and the comprehensive analysis, we put forward the renewal mechanisms for the heritage development models in various regions. Finally, we select the most representative heritage sites with priority for renewal in each region, providing references for the protection and development practices of existing urban built heritage.

Cite this article

ZHANG Hong-chi , PENG Hai-yang , GAO Jia-lu , WANG Feng-lin , ZHU Pei-sheng . Evaluation of the cultural and tourism development potential of urban built heritage and its renewal mechanism: A case study of the main urban area of Dalian[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2025 , 40(6) : 1504 -1522 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250605

[1]
中国政府网. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗:在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2022/content_5722378.htm, 2022-10-25.

[The State Council of the People's Republic of China. Holding high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and unitedly striving for building a modern socialist country in all respects:Report at the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2022/content_5722378.htm, 2022-10-25.]

[2]
中国旅游报. 《2023年中国旅游经济运行分析与2024年发展预测》:2024年旅游市场主要指标或超历史最高水平. https://www.mct.gov.cn/whzx/zsdw/zglyyjy/202402/t20240205_951187.html, 2024-02-05.

[China Travel News. Analysis of China's Tourism Economic Operation in 2023 and Development Forecast in 2024: Key Indicators of the Tourism Market in 2024 May Exceed Historical Highest Levels. https://www.mct.gov.cn/whzx/zsdw/zglyyjy/202402/t20240205_951187.html, 2024-02-05.]

[3]
中国政府网. 2023年全国文化和旅游产业发展工作会议召开. https://www.mct.gov.cn/whzx/whyw/202303/t 20230328_941001.htm, 2023-03-28.

[The State Council of the People's Republic of China. 2023 National Conference on the Development of Culture and Tourism Industry. https://www.mct.gov.cn/whzx/whyw/202303/t20230328_941001.htm, 2023-03-28.]

[4]
张松. 城市建成遗产概念的生成及其启示. 建筑遗产, 2017, (3): 1-14.

[ZHANG S. On the invention of urban built heritage concept in Europe and its reference significance for China. Heritage Architecture, 2017, (3): 1-14.]

[5]
安庆龙. 中东铁路黑龙江段沿线城镇工业遗产旅游开发评价与策略. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021.

[AN Q L. Evaluation and strategy of industrial heritage tourism development in cities and towns along the Heilongjiang section of the Middle East Railway. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021.]

[6]
徐琴. 有机更新: 历史文化名城走出保护性衰败与建设性破坏困境之路. 城市观察, 2011, (3): 62-69.

[XU Q. The way out of the dilemma between protective decay and constructive destruction. Urban Insight, 2011, (3): 62-69.]

[7]
孙永生. 广州历史建筑和历史风貌区保护制度研究. 建筑学报, 2017, (8): 105-107.

[SUN Y S. A study on the preservation system of historic buildings and historic districts in Guangzhou. Architectural Journal, 2017, (8): 105-107.]

[8]
杨璇. 城市更新中遗产保护的市场、权威与价值机制. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(9): 43-51.

[YANG X. Market authority and value mechanism of heritage protection in urban renewal. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(9): 43-51.]

[9]
陈许慎, 沈瑶. “留改拆”背景下北京综合整治实践分析及策略研究: 基于中国招标投标公共服务平台公开案例的信息提取分析. 世界建筑, 2024, (10): 106-113.

[CHEN X S, SHEN Y. Research on practical analysis and strategies of comprehensive improvement in Beijing under the background of "preservation, transformation and demolition": Information extraction analysis based on public cases of China's tendering and bidding public service platform. World Architecture, 2024, (10): 106-113.]

[10]
佘海超, 张菁. 从历史到社会: 近百年西方建成遗产价值理论发展与当代思考. 城市建筑, 2024, 21(15): 122-127.

[SHE H C, ZHANG J. From history to society: The development of the western built heritage value theory over the past century and its contemporary reflection. Urbanism and Architecture, 2024, 21(15): 122-127.]

[11]
王雪. 山西红色文化遗产的空间分布及分异格局形成机制. 中国文化遗产, 2024, (4): 51-57.

[WANG X. Spatial distribution and forming mechanism of differentiation pattern of Shanxi's red cultural heritage. China Cultural Heritage, 2024, (4): 51-57.]

[12]
肖竞, 张芮珠, 刘环宁, 等. 基于多尺度价值链接的城市遗产统筹保护与文化空间系统组构. 上海城市规划, 2024, (2): 124-132.

[XIAO J, ZHANG R Z, LIU H N, et al. Coordinating preservation of urban heritages and systematic construction of urban cultural spaces based on multi-scale value linking. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2024, (2): 124-132.]

[13]
SCHIEFELBUSCH M, JAIN A, SCHÄFER T, et al. Transport and tourism: Roadmap to integrated planning developing and assessing integrated travel chains. Journal of Transport Geography, 2007, 15(2): 94-103.

[14]
JIANG H. The impact of ice and snow sports on regional tourism economy and social development: A case study of Northeast China. Tourism Management and Technology Economy, 2024, 7(1): 154-158.

[15]
ZHANG H C, WANG F L, GUO F, et al. Urban built heritage protection and realistic dilemmas: The development process, protection system, and critical thinking of historic districts in Dalian. Built Heritage, 2023, 7(1): 25, Doi: 10.1186/S43238-023-00106-Z.

[16]
马丽, 龚忠杰, 陈琳琳. 工业遗产旅游资源布局与开发的工业地理学基础与启示. 中国生态旅游, 2023, 13(2): 268-278.

DOI

[MA L, GONG Z J, CHEN L L. The application and prospect of industrial geography in the industrial heritage tourism practices and researches. Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2023, 13(2): 268-278.]

DOI

[17]
何韶颖, 吴楚槟, 张任驰, 等. 消费4.0时代历史文化街区新型文化消费空间构建研究. 城市发展研究, 2024, 31(5): 21-25.

[HE S Y, WU C B, ZHANG R C, et al. Study on the construction of new cultural consumption space in historical and cultural neighborhoods in the era of consumption 4.0. Urban Development Studies, 2024, 31(5): 21-25.]

[18]
王庆馨, Yong See Chen. 历史建筑活化利用与城市振兴的可持续发展之研究: 以马来西亚Think City城市活化机构为例. 中国文化产业评论, 2021, (2): 198-213.

[WANG Q X, CHEN Y S. A research of sustainable development for historic building activation and urban revitalization a case study of "think city", a Malaysian social organization. Commentary on Cultural Industry in China, 2021, (2): 198-213.]

[19]
OGAWA Y, OKI T, ZHAO C B, et al. Evaluating the subjective perceptions of streetscapes using street-view images. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2024, 247: 105073, Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105073.

[20]
刘艳晓, 宋飏, 马美娜, 等. 工业遗产旅游价值评估指标体系构建与实证: 以东北地区为例. 中国生态旅游, 2023, 13(2): 293-304.

DOI

[LIU Y X, SONG Y, MA M N, et al. Construction and empirical test of the index system for assessing the tourism value of industrial heritage: A case study of Northeast China. Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2023, 13(2): 293-304.]

DOI

[21]
温乃欣. 大运河杭州段建筑遗产旅游开发适宜性评价及规划策略. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2023.

[WEN N X. Suitability evaluation and planning strategy of architectural heritage tourism development in Hangzhou section of the Grand Canal. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2023.]

[22]
李子莹, 杨晓翔. 采用层次分析法的香港地区历史建筑遗产保护价值评价. 华侨大学学报: 自然科学版, 2024, 45(4): 487-493.

[LI Z Y, YANG X X. Evaluation of conservation value of historical building heritage in Hong Kong region using analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Huaqiao University: Natural Science, 2024, 45(4): 487-493.]

[23]
WANG Y, XIU C L. Spatial quality evaluation of historical blocks based on street view image data: A case study of the Fangcheng district. Buildings, 2023, 13(7): 1612, Doi: .

[24]
LIU F Y, LU Z L, WANG Y. Research on the spatiotemporal distribution of railway architectural heritages based on heritage database: Taking the Jinqin section of the Peking-Mukden railway as an example. Sustainability, 2024, 16(6): 2466, Doi: 10.3390/SU16062466.

[25]
WANG C, TAN L F, QIU X, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of relationship network of Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal water engineering facilities based on Gephi. Heritage Science, 2024, 12(1): 298, Doi: 10.1186/S40494-024-01412-0.

[26]
时少华, 孙媛媛, 许启昌. 基于TCIA和CVM的皇家园林游憩价值评估研究: 以北京市颐和园为例. 北京联合大学学报, 2024, 38(3): 62-70.

[SHI S H, SUN Y Y, XU Q C. Recreational value assessment of royal gardens based on TCIA and CVM: Taking the Summer Palace in Beijing as an example. Journal of Beijing Union University, 2024, 38(3): 62-70.]

[27]
王苗, 吴征忆, 林嘉玥, 等. 天津红色文化遗产空间价值评估研究. 南方建筑, 2024, (6): 1-9.

[WANG M, WU Z Y, LIN J Y, et al. Research on the value assessment of red cultural heritage spaces in Tianjin. South Architecture, 2024, (6): 1-9.]

DOI

[28]
顾大治, 张袁, 陈刚, 等. “非典型名城”历史建筑价值评估与适应性保护研究. 工业建筑, 2020, 50(2): 82-88.

[GU D Z, ZHANG Y, CHEN G, et al. Research on value assessment and adaptive protection of historical buildings in "Atypical Historical Cities". Industrial Construction, 2020, 50(2): 82-88.]

[29]
FAN X X, WANG Z, LI S F. Value evaluation model (VEM) of ancient Chinese military settlement heritage: A case study of Liaoxi Corridor in the Ming Dynasty. Heritage Science, 2024, 12(1): 97, Doi: 10.1186/S40494-024-01210-8.

[30]
ZHANG S Y, LIN J Y, FENG Z X, et al. Construction of cultural heritage evaluation system and personalized cultural tourism path decision model: An international historical and cultural city. Journal of Urban Management, 2023, 12(2): 96-111.

[31]
马斌, 赵晨, 何双男. 工业遗产旅游价值评价及开发对策研究: 以辽宁省为例. 工业建筑, 2024, 54(3): 46-53.

[MA B, ZHAO C, HE S N. Research on the evaluation of tourism value of industrial heritage and its development countermeasures: Taking Liaoning province as an example. Industrial Construction, 2024, 54(3): 46-53.]

[32]
董菁, 郭若男, 郭飞. 城市废弃铁路再生潜力评估与更新策略: 以大连机车厂废弃铁路为例. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(10): 2672-2686.

DOI

[DONG J, GUO R N, GUO F. Potential assessment and renewal strategy for regenerating urban abandoned railways: The case study of the Dalian Locomotive Factory Railway Line. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(10): 2672-2686.]

DOI

[33]
高云洲. 拉萨八廓历史街区文脉空间价值评估及保护策略研究. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2023.

[GAO Y Z. Study on spatial value evaluation and conservation strategy of context in bakuo historic district of Lhasa. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2023.]

[34]
陈炜, 陈能幸. 西部地区非物质文化遗产旅游开发适宜性评价指标体系与评价模型构建. 社会科学家, 2011, (10):83-86.

[CHEN W, CHEN N X. Tourism development of intangible cultural heritage in western region suitability evaluation indicator system and evaluation model construction. Social Scientist, 2011, (10): 83-86.]

[35]
朱鹤, 高翔宇, 张生瑞, 等. 旅游资源区域组合: 内涵、识别技术与关键问题. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(7): 1493-1511.

DOI

[ZHU H, GAO X Y, ZHANG S R, et al. Regional tourism resources combination: Connotation, identification technology and key issues. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(7): 1493-1511.]

DOI

[36]
程朋根, 韩佳宇, 吴静, 等. 基于多源数据的城市休闲旅游空间特征及时空演变分析: 以南昌市为例. 桂林理工大学学报, 2021, 41(2): 362-369.

[CHENG P G, HAN J Y, WU J, et al. Spatial characteristics and spatial-temporal evolution of urban leisure tourism based on multi-source data: A case study of Nanchang. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2021, 41(2): 362-369.]

[37]
徐苏斌, 吕志宸, 王若然, 等. 行动者网络理论视角下工业遗产更新优化路径研究: 以天津中心城区为例. 城市发展研究, 2023, 30(11): 65-74.

[XU S B, LYU Z C, WANG R R, et al. Research on the optimisation path of industrial heritage regeneration from the perspective of actor network theory: Taking Tianjin central city as an example. Urban Development Studies, 2023, 30(11): 65-74.]

[38]
辛东键, 张险峰, 于世伟. 工业遗产衔接区域更新设计策略: 以大连冷冻机厂为例. 城市建筑, 2023, 20(1): 195-199, 220.

[XIN D J, ZHANG X F, YU S W. The design strategies for the renewal of industrial heritage articulated areas: A case of Dalian refrigerator plant. Urbanism and Architecture, 2023, 20(1): 195-199, 220.]

[39]
高德宏, 曹静, 白鸣轩, 等. 基于城市形态类型学对历史街区保护更新的可行性探究: 以大连连锁街为例. 建筑与文化, 2024, (1): 154-156.

[GAO D H, CAO J, BAI M X, et al. Feasibility study on the preservation and renewal of historic districts based on urban morphological typology: Taking Dalian chain street as an example. Architecture & Culture, 2024, (1): 154-156.]

[40]
李静. 汉墓视角下的大连汉代建筑地域文化特征研究. 江苏建筑职业技术学院学报, 2019, 19(4): 99-102.

[LI J. Study on regional cultural characteristics of architecture in Han Dynasty in Dalian from perspective of Han Tombs. Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, 2019, 19(4): 99-102.]

[41]
APPENDINO F. Balancing heritage conservation and sustainable development:The case of Bordeaux. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017, 245(6): 062002, Doi:10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062002.

[42]
潘竟虎, 从忆波. 基于景点空间可达性的中国旅游区划. 地理科学, 2014, 34(10): 1161-1168.

DOI

[PAN J H, CONG Y B. Tourism regionalization in China based on spatial accessibility of A-grade scenic spots. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(10): 1161-1168.]

[43]
谢庆哲, 赵翠薇. 基于POI和AOI数据的贵阳市生活圈便捷性测度. 西部人居环境学刊, 2024, 39(2): 133-138.

[XIE Q Z, ZHAO C W. Convenience measurement of Guiyang city living circle based on POI and AOI data. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 2024, 39(2): 133-138.]

[44]
穆雅晴, 吴宜进, 田培, 等. 长江中游经济区“水—能源—粮食”系统与城市绿色转型适配性研究. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(9): 2140-2154.

DOI

[MU Y Q, WU Y J, TIAN P, et al. The adaptability of "water-energy-food" system and urban green transformation in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Zone. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(9): 2140-2154.]

DOI

[45]
蔡礼彬, 程晓盈. 情感认知评价视角下文化遗产城市游客遗产责任行为形成机制. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(6): 1278-1298.

DOI

[CAI L B, CHENG X Y. Formation mechanism of heritage responsibility behaviour of tourists in cultural heritage cities from the perspective of affective-cognitive evaluation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(6): 1278-1298.]

Outlines

/