EN中文

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES >

2025 , Vol. 40 >Issue 6: 1468 - 1488

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20250603

Urban Renewal and Governance Reform

Cultivating innovation ecosystems around universities: Pathways and mechanisms of innovation-oriented urban regeneration in and around university campuses

  • CHEN Hao , 1 ,
  • ZHU Chang 1 ,
  • ZHOU Zhen 1 ,
  • LUO Xiao-long 1 ,
  • ZHANG Yun-peng , 2
Expand
  • 1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 2. School of Architecture, Planning and Environment Policy, University College Dublin, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland

Received date: 2024-09-18

  Revised date: 2025-01-20

  Online published: 2025-05-26

Fold

Abstract

The frontier of urban regeneration in some Chinese cities has shifted to university campuses and their surrounding areas, thereby co-producing innovation ecosystems that integrates ''innovation, production, and urbanisation''. This study draws on the Triple Helix Theory and develops an analytical framework to explain the formation and evolution of innovation ecosystems in China. Using this framework, it compares the trajectories and outcomes of two university-based innovation ecosystems: Nanjing University's Silicon Valley and the Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Innovation Bay Area. The study has three main findings. Firstly, in both cases, universities and local governments collaborated to adapt university campuses and regenerate surrounding areas to co-create innovation ecosystems. This suggests that urban regeneration and innovation-driven development have become new frontiers of town-gown interactions. Secondly, the development of both university-based innovation ecosystems was led and implemented by local governments and universities rather than by innovation businesses. This state-led feature, partly due to their early-stage status, diverges from Western theories on innovation, which place businesses at the core of innovation ecosystem formations. Thirdly, the innovation ecosystems developed in three stages: upgrading material spaces, creating an enabling environment, and densifying collaborative networks. The success of each stage depended on alignment between universities and local governments regarding goals, implementation, and sustaining mechanisms. The findings offer national and local governments insights into implementing innovation-driven development strategies, fostering new quality productive forces, and promoting sustainable urban regeneration.

Key words： innovation-driven development strategy; urban regeneration; innovation ecosystems; town-gown relations; Triple Helix Theory; Nanjing

Cite this article

CHEN Hao , ZHU Chang , ZHOU Zhen , LUO Xiao-long , ZHANG Yun-peng . Cultivating innovation ecosystems around universities: Pathways and mechanisms of innovation-oriented urban regeneration in and around university campuses[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2025 , 40(6) : 1468 -1488 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250603

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
[1]
吴晓波, 吴东. 论创新链的系统演化及其政策含义. 自然辩证法研究, 2008, 24(12): 58-62.

[WU X B, WU D. Systematic evolution of innovation chain and its policy implications. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2008, 24(12): 58-62.]

[2]
ANTTIROIKO A V. Science cities: Their characteristics and future challenges. International Journal of Technology Management, 2004, 28(3-6): 395-418.

[3]
CASTELLS M, HALL P. Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. London: Routledge, 1994.

[4]
KATZ B, WAGNER J. The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 2014.

[5]
YIGITCANLAR T, ADU-MCVIE R, EROL I. How can contemporary innovation districts be classified? A systematic review of the literature. Land Use Policy, 2020, 95: 104595, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104595.

[6]
KAYANAN C M. A critique of innovation districts: Entrepreneurial living and the burden of shouldering urban development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2022, 54(1): 50-66.

[7]
段一行. 从“经济效益”到“空间品质”: 构建适应未来中国发展的创新空间评价新体系. 城市规划, 2024, 48(5): 71-80.

[DUAN Y X. From ''Economic Benefits'' to ''Spatial Quality'': Build a new innovation space evaluation system that adapts to China's future development. City Planning Review, 2024, 48(5): 71-80.]

[8]
苏宁. 美国大都市区创新空间的发展趋势与启示. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(12): 50-55.

[SU N. The study of the trends for the development of innovation space in American metropolitan areas. Urban Development Studies, 2016, 23(12): 50-55.]

[9]
EHLENZ M M. Neighborhood revitalization and the anchor institution: Assessing the impact of the University of Pennsylvania's West Philadelphia Initiatives on university city. Urban Affairs Review, 2016, 52(5): 714-750.

[10]
VALVERDE M, BRIGGS J, TRAN G, et al. Public universities as real estate developers in the age of ''the art of the deal''. Studies in Political Economy, 2020, 101(1): 35-58.

[11]
PANCHOLI S, YIGITCANLAR T, GUARALDA M, et al. University and innovation district symbiosis in the context of placemaking: Insights from Australian cities. Land Use Policy, 2020, 99: 105109, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105109.

[12]
王开家, 徐伟铭, 李楚瑜, 等. 空间治理视角下的城市建成区土地混合利用功能与结构. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(6): 1496-1516.

DOI

[WANG K J, XU W M, LI C Y, et al. A study on the function and structure of mixed land use in urban built-up areas from the perspective of spatial governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(6): 1496-1516.]

[13]
黄昕, 陈浩, 沈春竹, 等. 创新空间导向的城市更新基本特征与行动逻辑解析: 以南京市“城市硅巷”项目为例. 上海城市规划, 2024, (3): 65-71.

[HUANG X, CHEN H, SHEN C Z, et al. Analysis on basic characteristics and behavioral logic of urban renewal oriented by innovative space: A case study of "urban silicon alley" renewal projects in Nanjing. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2024, (3): 65-71.]

[14]
YOUTIE J, SHAPIRA P. Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 2008, 37(8): 1188-1204.

[15]
BROCKLISS L. Gown and town: The university and the city in Europe,1200-2000. Minerva, 2000, 38(2): 147-170.

[16]
ALLEN J, COCHRANE A. Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies, 2007, 41(9): 1161-1175.

[17]
BENNEWORTH P, CHARLES D, MADANIPOUR A. Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university spatial development. European Planning Studies, 2010, 18(10): 1611-1629.

[18]
BEAVERSTOCK J V, SMITH R G, TAYLOR P J. World-city network: A new metageography?. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2000, 90(1): 123-134.

[19]
MELHUISH C. Case Studies in University-led Urban Regeneration. London: UCL Urban Laboratory, 2015.

[20]
FERNÁNDEZ-ESQUINAS M, PINTO H. The role of universities in urban regeneration: Reframing the analytical approach. European Planning Studies, 2014, 22(7): 1462-1483.

[21]
ENGELEN E, FERNANDEZ R, HENDRIKSE R. How finance penetrates its other: A cautionary tale on the financialization of a Dutch University. Antipode, 2014, 46(4): 1072-1091.

[22]
EATON C, HABINEK J, GOLDSTEIN A, et al. The financialization of US higher education. Socio-Economic Review, 2016, 14(3): 507-535.

[23]
OH D Y, SHIN H B. University as real estate developer: Comparative perspectives from the Global East. Geoforum, 2023, 144: 103764, Doi: 10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2023.103764.

[24]
VÁSQUEZ-URRIAGO Á R, BARGE-GIL A, MODREGO RICO A. Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 137-147.

[25]
HALL P. The university and the city. GeoJournal, 1997, 41(4): 301-309.

[26]
ETZKOWITZ H, ZHOU C Y. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. London: Routledge, 2017.

[27]
孙家明, 廖益, 李寒梅. 历史制度主义视角下中国政府与高校治理结构变迁的发展逻辑. 高教探索, 2021, (8): 5-11.

[SUN J M, LIAO Y, LI H M. The development logic of Chinese government and university governance structure change from the perspective of historical institutionalism. Higher Education Exploration, 2021, (8): 5-11.]

[28]
WANG Q H. ''Afterlives'' of the Danwei in 21st-century China: The case of the university sector. China, 2023, 21(4): 170-190.

[29]
EUN J H, LEE K, WU G S. Explaining the ''university-run enterprises'' in China: A theoretical framework for university-industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy, 2006, 35(9): 1329-1346.

[30]
卢波, 段进. 国内“大学城”规划建设的战略调整. 规划师, 2005, 21(1): 84-88.

[LU B, DUAN J. Strategic adjustment on planning and construction of "university towns" in China. Planners, 2005, 21(1): 84-88.]

[31]
NIE X Y. The ivory tower in China's speculative urbanism: Instrumentalizing the university-healthcare nexus. Urban Geography, 2023, 45(6): 966-985.

[32]
郑德高, 袁海琴. 校区、园区、社区:三区融合的城市创新空间研究. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(4): 67-75.

[ZHENG D G, YUAN H Q. Campus, industrial park and community: Urban innovation space research on the integration of three zones. Urban Planning International, 2017, 32(4): 67-75.]

[33]
翟天任, 李源. 高校科技成果转化的协同管理路径研究. 科技进步与对策, 2012, 29(22): 44-47.

DOI

[ZHAI T R, LI Y. The path analysis of collaborative management on transformation of university scientific and technological achievements. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2012, 29(22): 44-47.]

[34]
王健. 高校科技成果转化研究综述. 中国高校科技, 2018, (8): 72-75.

[WANG J. A review of the research on the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in universities. China University Science & Technology, 2018, (8): 72-75.]

[35]
罗茜, 汪若尘. 创新生态视域下高校科技成果转化的驱动机制探讨: 以江苏大学为例. 中国高校科技, 2020, (11): 92-96.

[LUO Q, WANG R C. On the driving mechanism of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in colleges and universities from the perspective of innovation ecology: Taking Jiangsu University as an example. Chinese University Science & Technology, 2020, (11): 92-96.]

[36]
石钰, 王兴平, 胡畔. 从大学城到环高校创新圈: 环高校地区规划的嬗变与启示. 规划师, 2021, 37(20): 22-28.

[SHI Y, WANG X P, HU P. From university town to innovation circle around university: Evolution and enlightenment of university area planning. Planners, 2021, 37(20): 22-28.]

[37]
宋霞. “萨瓦托三角”创新模式的运行机制及历史地位. 拉丁美洲研究, 2021, 43(4): 77-95, 156-157.

[SONG X. The operating mechanism and historical value of the ''Sábato triangle'' model. Journal of Latin American Studies, 2021, 43(4): 77-95, 156-157.]

[38]
BALZAT M, HANUSCH H. Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2004, 14(2): 197-210.

[39]
COOKE P. Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 1992, 23(3): 365-382.

[40]
ETZKOWITZ H, LEYDESDORFF L. The Triple Helix-university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 1995, 14(1): 14-19.

[41]
蔡翔, 王文平, 李远远. 三螺旋创新理论的主要贡献、待解决问题及对中国的启示. 技术经济与管理研究, 2010, (1): 26-29.

[CAI X, WANG W P, LI Y Y. Contribution and problems of triple helix innovation theory and the implications for China. Technoeconomics & Management Research, 2010, (1): 26-29.]

[42]
ASHEIM B T, SMITH H L, OUGHTON C. Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 2011, 45(7): 875-891.

[43]
方卫华. 创新研究的三螺旋模型: 概念、结构和公共政策含义. 自然辩证法研究, 2003, 19(11): 69-72, 78.

[FANG W H. Triple helix model in innovation research: Concept, structure and public policy implication. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2003, 19(11): 69-72, 78.]

[44]
周春彦, 李海波, 李星洲, 等. 国内外三螺旋研究的理论前沿与实践探索. 科学与管理, 2011, 31(4): 21-27.

[ZHOU C Y, LI H B, LI X Z, et al. Theory forefront & practice exploration of research on the triple helix at home and abroad. Science and Management, 2011, 31(4): 21-27.]

[45]
MARCOVICH A, SHINN T. From the triple helix to a quadruple helix? The case of dip-pen nanolithography. Minerva, 2011, 49(2): 175-190.

[46]
CAI Y Z. Implementing the Triple Helix model in a non-western context: An institutional logics perspective. Triple Helix, 2014, 1(1): 1-20.

[47]
CAI Y Z, ETZKOWITZ H. Theorizing the triple helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix Journal, 2020: 1-38.

[48]
LEYDESDORFF L. The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(2): 445-467.

[49]
ETZKOWITZ H, LEYDESDORFF L. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and ''Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 2000, 29(2): 109-123.

[50]
ZHOU C Y. Emergence of the entrepreneurial university in evolution of the triple helix. Journal of Technology Management in China, 2008, 3(1): 109-126.

[51]
宋伟轩, 刘春卉, 汪毅, 等. 基于“租差”理论的城市居住空间中产阶层化研究: 以南京内城为例. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12): 2115-2130.

DOI

[SONG W X, LIU C H, WANG Y, et al. Rent gap and gentrification in the inner city of Nanjing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12): 2115-2130.]

DOI

[52]
何深静, 刘玉亭. 市场转轨时期中国城市绅士化现象的机制与效应研究. 地理科学, 2010, 30(4): 496-502.

[HE S J, LIU Y T. Mechanism and consequences of China's gentrification under market transition. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2010, 30(4): 496-502.]

[53]
CHEN H, WANG L L, WALEY P. The right to envision the city? The emerging vision conflicts in redeveloping historic Nanjing, China. Urban Affairs Review, 2020, 56(6): 1746-1778.

[54]
崔璨, 于程媛, 王强. 人才流动的空间特征、驱动因素及其对长三角一体化高质量发展的启示: 基于高校毕业生的分析. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(6): 1440-1454.

DOI

[CUI C, YU C Y, WANG Q. Spatial patterns and underlying forces of talent migration and their implications on integrated high-quality development of the Yangtze River Delta: An analysis of university graduates. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(6): 1440-1454.]

DOI

[55]
闫东升, 韩孟孟, 孙伟. 长江三角洲创新发展空间溢出效应的测度与分解. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(6): 1455-1466.

DOI

[YAN D S, HAN M M, SUN W. Measurement and decomposition of the spatial spillover effect of innovation development in the Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(6): 1455-1466.]

[56]
曹可心, 邓羽. 可持续城市更新的时空演进路径及驱动机理研究进展与展望. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1942-1955.

DOI

[CAO K X, DENG Y. Spatio-temporal evolution path and driving mechanisms of sustainable urban renewal: Progress and perspective. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(11): 1942-1955.]

DOI

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉