JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES >
Research progress of green infrastructure oriented by landscape planning: From the perspective of "pattern-process-services-sustainability"research paradigm
Received date: 2019-06-27
Request revised date: 2020-02-03
Online published: 2021-04-28
Copyright
China is in the important period of New-type Urbanization and ecological civilization construction, and introducing green infrastructure planning framework is of great significance in urban development and ecological protection. Based on "pattern-process-services-sustainability" landscape ecology paradigm, this study reviewed Chinese and international research on green infrastructure (GI) in the landscape scale in recent years. Results show that, in terms of the research on GI pattern, landscape pattern metric method is still the most common one. For landscape connectivity, the structural connectivity method such as Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis has advantages of calculating simplification and high applicability, but it lacks clear ecological meanings. However, the functional connectivity method including graph theory serves specific ecological process, which will be research core in the future. Research on GI process focuses on biological migration based on the theory and method of ecological network, and its planning process can be divided into 3 parts: selection of core areas, construction of resistance surface and identification of potential corridors. In terms of research on GI ecosystem services, biophysical model and economic value model are widely used in the evaluation of regulating, provisioning and supporting services, and cultural services evaluation takes human feeling derived from questionnaire surveys as the basic data. Additionally, research on demand for ecosystem services involves real consumption and preference of ecosystem services, and its quantitative evaluation and planning application should be further explored. In terms of research on GI landscape sustainability, based on identification of the total amount of ecosystem services provided by GI, trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services have been taken into consideration in GI planning, and scenario planning can simulate dynamics of GI ecosystem services. Finally, landscape sustainability should be set as the ultimate objective of GI planning, and then 4 research prospects were put forward, including: paying attention to basic research on interaction of pattern and process, deepening research on demand of GI ecosystem services, identifying trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services and connecting GI with practical planning.
LI Kai , HOU Ying , HANS Skov-Petersen , PETER S. Andersen . Research progress of green infrastructure oriented by landscape planning: From the perspective of "pattern-process-services-sustainability"research paradigm[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2021 , 36(2) : 435 -448 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210213
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
裴丹. 绿色基础设施构建方法研究述评. 城市规划, 2012,36(5):84-90.
[
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
王云才, 申佳可, 彭震伟, 等. 适应城市增长的绿色基础设施生态系统服务优化. 中国园林, 2018,34(10):45-49.
[
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
赵文武, 王亚萍. 1981—2015年我国大陆地区景观生态学研究文献分析. 生态学报, 2016,36(23):7886-7896.
[
|
[13] |
杨锐. 风景园林学科建设中的9个关键问题. 中国园林, 2017,33(1):13-16.
[
|
[14] |
王云才. 风景园林生态规划方法的发展历程与趋势. 中国园林, 2013,29(11):46-51.
[
|
[15] |
于冰沁, 田舒, 车生泉. 从麦克哈格到斯坦尼兹: 基于景观生态学的风景园林规划理论与方法的嬗变. 中国园林, 2013,29(4):67-72.
[
|
[16] |
邬建国. 景观生态学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2007: 11-12.
[
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
方仁建, 沈永明. 围垦对海滨地区景观演变及其质心移动的影响: 以盐城保护区部分区域为例. 自然资源学报, 2015,30(5):772-783.
[
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
杨志广, 蒋志云, 郭程轩, 等. 基于形态空间格局分析和最小累积阻力模型的广州市生态网络构建. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(10):3367-3376.
[
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
陈弘志, 刘雅静. 高密度亚洲城市的可持续发展规划香港绿色基础设施研究与实践. 风景园林, 2012,3:55-61.
[
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
吴琳娜, 杨胜天, 刘晓燕, 等. 1976年以来北洛河流域土地利用变化对人类活动程度的响应. 地理学报, 2014,69(1):54-63.
[
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
于亚平, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 等. 基于MSPA的南京市绿色基础设施网络格局时空变化分析. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(6):1608-1616.
[
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
张远景, 俞滨洋. 城市生态网络空间评价及其格局优化. 生态学报, 2016,36(21):6969-6984.
[
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
陈利顶, 傅伯杰. 景观连接度的生态学意义及其应用. 生态学杂志, 1996, (4):37-42, 73.
[
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
苏常红, 傅伯杰. 景观格局与生态过程的关系及其对生态系统服务的影响. 自然杂志, 2012,34(5):277-283.
[
|
[43] |
尹海伟, 孔繁花, 祈毅, 等. 湖南省城市群生态网络构建与优化. 生态学报, 2011,31(10):2863-2874.
[
|
[44] |
郝月, 张娜, 杜亚娟, 等. 基于生境质量的唐县生态安全格局构建. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(3):1015-1024.
[
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
丛佃敏, 赵书河, 于涛, 等. 综合生态安全格局构建与城市扩张模拟的城市增长边界划定: 以天水市规划区(2015—2030年)为例. 自然资源学报, 2018,33(1):14-26.
[
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
刘佳, 尹海伟, 孔繁花, 等. 基于电路理论的南京城市绿色基础设施格局优化. 生态学报, 2018,38(12):4363-4372.
[
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
罗坤. 大都市区绿道选线规划与建设策略研究: 以上海市徐汇区绿道为例. 城市规划学刊, 2018, (3):77-85.
[
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
李奇, 朱建华, 肖文发. 生物多样性与生态系统服务: 关系, 权衡与管理. 生态学报, 2019,39(8):2655-2666.
[
|
[56] |
毛齐正, 黄甘霖, 邬建国. 城市生态系统服务研究综述. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(4):1023-1033.
[
|
[57] |
韩依纹, 戴菲. 城市绿色空间的生态系统服务功能研究进展: 指标, 方法与评估框架. 中国园林, 2018,34(10):55-60.
[
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估. 自然资源学报, 2003,18(2):189-196.
[
|
[61] |
彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017,36(3):407-419.
[
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
李凯, 沈雯, 黄宗胜. 城市绿色空间生态系统文化服务绩效评价: 以贵阳市黔灵山公园为例. 城市问题, 2019, (3):44-50.
[
|
[64] |
李想, 雷硕, 冯骥, 等. 北京市绿地生态系统文化服务功能价值评估. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, (6):33-39.
[
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
霍思高, 黄璐, 严力蛟. 基于SolVES模型的生态系统文化服务价值评估: 以浙江省武义县南部生态公园为例. 生态学报, 2018,38(10):3682-3691.
[
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区. 生态学报, 2017,37(13):4562-4572.
[
|
[70] |
石忆邵, 史东辉. 洞庭湖生态经济区生态服务供需平衡研究. 地理研究, 2018,37(9):1714-1723.
[
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
[74] |
|
[75] |
|
[76] |
|
[77] |
|
[78] |
戴菲, 陈明, 朱晟伟, 等. 街区尺度不同绿化覆盖率对PM10、PM2.5的消减研究: 以武汉主城区为例. 中国园林, 2018,34(3):105-110.
[
|
[79] |
马瑞明. 基于“源—汇”景观格局分析的城市温度调节服务定量研究. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2016.
[
|
[80] |
韩士杰, 袁志友, 方运霆, 等. 中国北方森林和草地生态系统碳氮耦合循环与碳源汇效应研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2016,38(12):128-130.
[
|
[81] |
|
[82] |
韦飚, 戴哲敏. 比较视域下中英两国的公众参与城市规划活动: 基于杭州和伦敦实践的分析及启示. 城市规划, 2015, (5):32-37.
[
|
[83] |
|
[84] |
|
[85] |
李咏华, 马淇蔚, 范雪怡. 基于绿色基础设施评价的城市生态带划定: 以杭州市为例. 地理研究, 2017,36(3):583-591.
[
|
[86] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |