EN中文

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES >

2020 , Vol. 35 >Issue 8: 1940 - 1957

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200814

Special Forum of "Theory and Practice of Urban Rural Integration Development in Huaihai Economic Zone"

Research of rural system development potential in Huaihai Economic Zone: A case study of Northern Jiangsu province under the background of urban-rural integration

Expand
  • 1. College of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Land and Resources, Nanjing 210023, China;
    3. Jiangsu Provincial Land Development and Consolidation Technology and Engineering Center, Nanjing 210023, China;
    4. Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China;
    5. Jiangsu Province Land Development and Consolidation Center, Nanjing 210024, China;
    6. Chongqing Rural Land Arrangement Center, Chongqing 401121, China

Received date: 2019-12-04

  Revised date: 2020-05-28

  Online published: 2020-08-28

Fold

Abstract

Sustainable development and construction are the goal and vision of rural revitalization, the focus of promoting the integration of urban-rural development and building a sustainable urban-rural integration system. Under the background of the increasing urbanization process, it is necessary to define the stage and state of rural development, measure the development potential, and effectively identify the future development direction and mode of rural areas, and achieve the goal of rural sustainable development and construction. This paper chooses the Northern Jiangsu province as the research object, and 7980 administrative villages located in Huaihai Economic Zone as the evaluation units to study the rural development status of the village area units. Through the county scale constraints on the urban and rural development stage, the comprehensive measurement of the rural development potential is carried out with the idea of "differentiation and consistency". The results show that: (1) The rural areas in the study area can be divided into three development stages: urban leading, urban-rural linkage and rural leading, with the proportion of 15.38%, 46.15% and 38.46%, respectively. (2) The maximum and average values of the rural development status index in the study area are 6.209 and 1.714, characterized by high value area and low value area agglomeration, respectively. (3) The maximum and average values of rural development potential in the study area are 2.827 and 0.923, respectively, and the proportions of evaluation units are 4.45%, 15.20%, 23.22%, 35.39% and 21.74% with the potential grades from low to high. (4) According to the rural development potential, this study area can be divided into four categories: "key potential area", "balanced potential area", "moderate potential area" and "important maintenance area". This paper puts forward the development ideas of "Narrow the gap within the region by stimulating recessive vitality", "Achieve regional balanced development driven by advantage elements", "Find out disadvantage conditions and fill the potential space moderately" and "Maintain the present mode to achieve stable development".

Key words： Northern Jiangsu; development state; comprehensive zoning; urban-rural integration; development potential; development stage

Cite this article

HE Jie, JIN Xiao-bin, LIANG Xin-yuan, ZHAO Qing-li, HAN Bo, XIAO Ying, WU Xiao-huan, HU Jing, ZHOU Yin-kang . Research of rural system development potential in Huaihai Economic Zone: A case study of Northern Jiangsu province under the background of urban-rural integration[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2020 , 35(8) : 1940 -1957 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200814

References

[1] 刘彦随, 严镔, 王艳飞. 新时期中国城乡发展的主要问题与转型对策. 经济地理, 2016, 36(7): 1-8.
[LIU Y S, YAN B, WANG Y F.Urban-rural development problems and transformation countermeasures in the new period in China. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(7): 1-8.]
[2] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.
[LIU Y S.Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the New Era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.]
[3] 乔伟峰, 戈大专, 高金龙, 等. 江苏省乡村地域功能与振兴路径选择研究. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 522-534.
[QIAO W F, GE D Z, GAO J L, et al.Detecting the pathways towards rural vitalization from the perspective of territorial functions in Jiangsu province. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 522-534.]
[4] 何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140.
[HE R W.Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140.]
[5] 刘春芳, 张志英. 从城乡一体化到城乡融合: 新型城乡关系的思考. 地理科学, 2018, 38(10): 1624-1633.
[LIU C F, ZHANG Z Y.From town-country integration to urban-rural integration: New thinking on the relationship between urban and rural areas. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 1624-1633.]
[6] 张英男, 龙花楼, 马历, 等. 城乡关系研究进展及其对乡村振兴的启示. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 578-594.
[ZHANG Y N, LONG H L, MA L, et al.Research progress of urban-rural relations and its implications for rural revitalization. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 578-594.]
[7] 杨志恒. 城乡融合发展的理论溯源、内涵与机制分析. 地理与地理信息科学, 2019, 35(4): 111-116.
[YANG Z H.Theory, Connotation and mechanism of urban-rural integration development. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2019, 35(4): 111-116.]
[8] 杨忍, 文琦, 王成, 等. 新时代中国乡村振兴: 探索与思考: 乡村地理青年学者笔谈. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 890-910.
[YANG R, WEN Q, WANG C, et al.Discussion and thoughts of the path to China's rural revitalization in New Era: Notes of the young rural geography scholars. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 890-910.]
[9] 杨园园, 臧玉珠, 李进涛. 基于城乡转型功能分区的京津冀乡村振兴模式探析. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 684-698.
[YANG Y Y, ZANG Y Z, LI J T.Rural revitalization mode in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei from the perspective of urban-rural transformation functional zoning. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 684-698.]
[10] 刘彦随. 新时代乡村振兴地理学研究. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 461-466.
[LIU Y S.Research on the geography of rural revitalization in the New Era. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 461-466.]
[11] LONG H L, TU S S, GE D Z, et al.The allocation and management of critical resources in rural China under restructuring: Problems and prospects. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 47(47): 392-412.
[12] 文琦, 郑殿元, 施琳娜. 1949—2019年中国乡村振兴主题演化过程与研究展望. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1272-1281.
[WEN Q, ZHENG D Y, SHI L N.Themes evolution of rural revitalization and its research prospect in China from 1949 to 2019. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1272-1281.]
[13] CLOKE P J.An index of rurality for England and Wales. Regional Studies, 1977, 11(1): 31-46.
[14] 张小林. 乡村概念辨析. 地理学报, 1998, 65(4): 79-85.
[ZHANG X L.On discrimination of rural definitions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 65(4): 79-85.]
[15] 李红波, 张小林. 乡村性研究综述与展望. 人文地理, 2015, 30(1): 16-20.
[LI H B, ZHANG X L.A review and trend on rurality. Human Geography, 2015, 30(1): 16-20.]
[16] WOODS M.Advocating rurality? The repositioning of rural local government. Journal of Rural Studies, 1998, 14(1): 13-26.
[17] RYE J F.Rural youths' images of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22(4): 409-421.
[18] HIDLE K, CRUICKSHANK J, MARI NESJE L.Market, commodity, resource, and strength: Logics of Norwegian rurality. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift Norwegian Journal of Geography, 2006, 60(3): 189-198.
[19] 龙花楼, 刘彦随, 邹健. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4): 426-434.
[LONG H L, LIU Y S, ZOU J.Assessment of rural development types and their rurality in Eastern Coastal China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4): 426-434.]
[20] 李裕瑞, 卜长利, 曹智, 等. 面向乡村振兴战略的村庄分类方法与实证研究. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 243-256.
[LI Y R, BU C L, CAO Z, et al.Village classification system for rural vitalization strategy: Method and empirical study. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(2): 243-256.]
[21] 文琦, 郑殿元. 西北贫困地区乡村类型识别与振兴途径研究. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 509-521.
[WEN Q, ZHENG D Y.Identification and revitalization of rural poverty-stricken areas in Northwest China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 509-521.]
[22] 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 论乡村重构. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 563-576.
[LONG H L, TU S S.Rural restructuring: Theory, approach and research prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 563-576.]
[23] JUAN P, JORGE P, RAMON D, et al.A population-based iterated greedy algorithm for the delimitation and zoning of rural settlements. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 2013, 39(39): 12-26.
[24] SEVENANT M, ANTROP M, ABDULLAEV L.Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: Two case studies in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 80(4): 362-374.
[25] CONRAD C, RUDLOFF M.Measuring rural settlement expansion in Uzbekistan using remote sensing to support spatial planning. Applied Geography, 2015, 62(62): 29-43.
[26] 吴昕晖, 袁振杰, 朱竑. 全球信息网络与乡村性的社会文化建构: 以广州里仁洞“淘宝村”为例. 华南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2015, 47(2): 115-123.
[WU X H, YUAN Z J, ZHU H.Global information network and social cultural construction of rurality: A case based on "Taobao" village in Guangzhou. Journal of South China Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2015, 47(2): 115-123.]
[27] CHE J, QIAN Y.Institutional environment, community government, and corporate governance: Understanding China's township-village enterprises. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 1998, 14(1): 1-23.
[28] 谷晓坤, 陶思远, 卢方方, 等. 大都市郊野乡村多功能评价及其空间布局: 以上海89个郊野镇为例. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2281-2290.
[GU X K, TAO S Y, LU F F, et al.Multi-function evaluation of metropolitan suburbs and its spatial difference: A case study of 89 towns in Shanghai. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(11): 2281-2290.]
[29] 马历, 龙花楼, 屠爽爽, 等. 基于乡村多功能理论的贫困村域演变特征与振兴路径探讨: 以海南省什寒村为例. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1435-1446.
[MA L, LONG H L, TU S S, et al.Characteristics of change and vitalization pathways of poor villages based on multifunctional rural development theory: A case study of Zahan village in Hainan province. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1435-1446.]
[30] 朱琳, 黎磊, 刘素, 等. 大城市郊区村域土地利用功能演变及其对乡村振兴的启示: 以成都市江家堰村为例. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 535-549.
[ZHU L, LI L, LIU S, et al.The evolution of village land-use function in the metropolitan suburbs and its inspiration to rural revitalization: A case study of Jiangjiayan village in Chengdu city. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(3): 535-549.]
[31] 李小建, 杨慧敏. 乡村聚落变化及发展型式展望. 经济地理, 2017, 37(12): 1-8.
[LI X J, YANG H M.The change of rural settlements and their future development patterns. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(12): 1-8.]
[32] 汪火根, 曹卉. 新农村建设中的乡村共同体与社会秩序的重构. 经济研究导刊, 2011, (31): 39-40.
[WANG H G, CAO H.The reconstruction of rural community and social order in the construction of new countryside. Economic Research Guide, 2011, (31): 39-40.]
[33] 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.
[FANG Y G, LIU J S.Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.]
[34] HOLMES J.Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22(2): 142-160.
[35] 杨忍, 罗秀丽, 陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328.
[YANG R, LUO X L, CHEN Y C.Spatial pattern and influencing factors of rural multifunctionality at county level in China. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1316-1328.]
[36] MARSDEN T.Beyond agriculture? Regulating the new rural spaces. Journal of Rural Studies, 1995, 62(62): 285-296.
[37] 王扬, 翟腾腾, 尹登玉. 乡村振兴背景下空心村土地整治潜力评价: 以山东省五莲县为例. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(2): 288-292.
[WANG Y, ZHAI T T, YIN D Y.Evaluation of land consolidation potential of vacant villages under background of rural revitalization: Taking Wulian county of Shandong province as an example. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(2): 288-292.]
[38] 王新越, 朱文亮. 鲁南贫困地区识别与乡村旅游发展潜力研究. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(12): 269-275.
[WANG X Y, ZHU W L.Study on the identification of poverty-stricken areas and the develoment potential of rural tourism in Shandong province. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(12): 269-275.]
[39] 屠爽爽, 龙花楼, 刘永强, 等. 农村居民点整治潜力测算方法研究进展与展望. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(11): 1956-1968.
[TU S S, LONG H L, LIU Y Q, et al.Research progress and prospects in the methodology of assessing the potential of rural residential land consolidation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(11): 1956-1968.]
[40] 刘晶, 金晓斌, 范业婷, 等. 基于“城—村—地”三维视角的农村居民点整理策略: 以江苏省新沂市为例. 地理研究, 2018, 37(4): 678-694.
[LIU J, JIN X B, FAN Y T, et al.Rural residential land consolidation strategy from a perspective synthesizing towns, villages and land parcels: A case study in Xinyi city, Jiangsu province. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(4): 678-694.]
[41] 程明洋, 刘彦随, 蒋宁. 黄淮海地区乡村人—地—业协调发展格局与机制. 地理学报, 2019, 74(8): 1576-1589.
[CHENG M Y, LIU Y S, JIANG N.Study on the spatial pattern and mechanism of rural population-land-industry coordinating development in Huanghuaihai Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(8): 1576-1589.]
[42] 舒帮荣, 黄琪, 刘友兆, 等. 基于变权的城镇用地扩展生态适宜性空间模糊评价: 以江苏省太仓市为例. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(3): 402-412.
[SHU B R, HUANG Q, LIU Y Z, et al.Spatial fuzzy assessment of ecological suitability for urban land expansion based on variable weights: A case study of Taicang. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(3): 402-412.]
[43] LIU J, JIN X B, XU W Y, et al.Spatial coupling differentiation and development zoning trade-off of land space utilization efficiency in Eastern China. Land Use Policy, 2019, 85(85): 310-327.
[44] 张晓琳, 金晓斌, 范业婷, 等. 1995—2015年江苏省土地利用功能转型特征及其协调性分析. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 689-706.
[ZHANG X L, JIN X B, FAN Y T, et al.Spatial-temporal characteristics and coordination status of the land use function transition in Jiangsu province from 1995 to 2015. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(4): 689-706.]
[45] 顾铮鸣, 金晓斌, 沈春竹, 等. 近15 a江苏省水源涵养功能时空变化与影响因素探析. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2453-2462.
[GU Z M, JIN X B, SHEN C Z, et al.Variation and influence factors of water conservation service function in Jiangsu province from 2000 to 2015. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(11): 2453-2462.]
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉