Nowadays, rural development that determines the progress of building the moderately prosperous society is the most concerned work of Chinese governments, and several national strategies and policies like rural revitalization and urban-rural integrated development were proposed to promote the rural development. The key of rural revitalization strategy implementation is to realize urban-rural cooperation by their mutual supports, and thus it is urgent to shed light on the dynamic mechanism of rural development oriented urban-rural integration. This paper first established a conceptual framework of dynamic mechanism of rural development oriented urban-rural integration, and then the structural equation model (SEM) including 5 latent variables and 16 observation variables was applied to validate this dynamic mechanism based on data of 120 towns in Xuzhou city of 2018. Lastly, corresponding policy implications for rural development in China were proposed. It was found that: urban-rural integration could be classified into urban-rural homogeneous integration and complementary integration, and the homogeneous integration implied that rural areas pursued the same conditions and treatments as cities, and the complementary integration referred that in the urban-rural competition, rural advantages should be created from the opposite perspective of urban areas, like leisure activities, ecological tourism and healthy development. Urban-rural homogeneous integration was the external driving force of rural development, while urban-rural complementary integration was the internal driving force. External driving force included two aspects of urban-rural infrastructure and public service integration, and they impacted rural development indirectly with corresponding effect of 0.1558 and 0.6836, respectively; internal driving force also included two aspects of rural attraction and rural factors conglomeration, and they impacted rural development directly with corresponding effect of 0.702 and 0.3356, respectively. The urban-rural infrastructure integration firstly improved conglomeration level of rural factors like capital, land and labor, and then promoted rural development; similarly, urban-rural public service integration firstly improved rural attraction, and then made countryside developed. In terms of policy implications, multidimensional rural development dynamics should be established from the views of urban-rural homogeneous integration and complementary integration, and external driving force should be mainly created by government investment, while internal driving force was created and shaped by rural planning. Governance boundaries among market, government and society (locality) with respect to the creation of rural development dynamics should be defined. Rural revitalization should follow the law of rural life cycle and delimit its geographic space according to different rural types. This study reveals rural development dynamics mechanism from a perspective of urban-rural integrated development, which has an importance guidance for governments to implement rural revitalization strategy at the operational level.
[1] 刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.
[LIU Y S.Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the New Era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650.]
[2] 陈锡文. 实施乡村振兴战略, 推进农业农村现代化. 中国农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2018, 35(1): 5-12.
[CHEN X W.Implement rural rejuvenation strategy and promote agricultural modernization. China Agricultural University Journal of Social Science Edition, 2018, 35(1): 5-12.]
[3] 湖南省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心. 实施乡村振兴战略, 走城乡融合发展之路. 求是, 2018, (6): 35-36.
[Theoretical System of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics Institute of Hunan Province. Taking the road of urban-rural integration to implement rural revitalization strategy. Qiushi, 2018, (6): 35-36.]
[4] 周志山. 从分离与对立到统筹与融合: 马克思的城乡观及其现实意义. 哲学研究, 2007, (10): 9-15.
[ZHOU Z S.From separation and opposition to co-ordination and integration: Marx's view of city and countryside and its practical significance. Philosophical Research, 2007, (10): 9-15.]
[5] 金成武. 中国城乡融合发展与理论融合: 兼谈当代发展经济学理论的批判借鉴. 经济研究, 2019, 54(8): 183-197.
[JIN C W.A critical reference to contemporary theories of development economics: A theoretical synthesis based on Chinese urban-rural integrated development. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(8): 183-197.]
[6] 何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140.
[HE R W.Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140.]
[7] 李文宇. 城乡分割会走向城乡融合吗: 基于空间经济学的理论和实证分析. 财经科学, 2015, (6): 71-83.
[LI W Y.Will segmentation of urban-rural move towards integration: Based on theoretical and empirical analysis of spatial economics. Finance & Economics, 2015, (6): 71-83.]
[8] 雍会, 杨丹. 乡村振兴战略背景下西北五省城乡一体化水平评价及对策研究. 北方园艺, 2019, (19): 136-143.
[YONG H, YANG D.Evaluation of urban and rural integration levels in five northwest provinces and countermeasures under the background of rural revitalization. Northern Horticulture, 2019, (19): 136-143.]
[9] 杨娜曼, 肖地楚, 黄静波. 城乡统筹发展视角下湖南省城乡协调发展评价. 经济地理, 2014, 34(3): 58-64.
[YANG N M, XIAO D C, HUANG J B.Urban and rural balanced development evaluation in Hunan province. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(3): 58-64.]
[10] 杨志恒. 城乡融合发展的理论溯源、内涵与机制分析. 地理与地理信息科学, 2019, 35(4): 111-116.
[YANG Z H.Theory, connotation and mechanism of urban-rural integration development. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2019, 35(4): 111-116.]
[11] 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(2): 131-138.
[LONG H L.China's rural land reform and rural vitalization. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(2): 131-138.]
[12] 刘守英. 土地活才有城乡融. 中国经贸导刊, 2019, (10): 15-16.
[LIU S Y.Only rural land property is enabled, the urban-rural integration can be realized. China Economic & Trade Herald, 2019, (10): 15-16.]
[13] 蒋永甫, 宁西. 乡村振兴战略: 主题转换、动力机制与实践路径: 基于文献综述的分析. 湖北行政学院学报, 2018, (3): 83-88.
[JIANG Y F, NING X.Rural revitalization strategy: Theme transformation, dynamic mechanism and practical path: Based on the analysis of literature review. Journal of Hubei Administration Institute, 2018, (3): 83-88.]
[14] 张富刚, 刘彦随. 中国区域农村发展动力机制及其发展模式. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 115-122.
[ZHANG F G, LIU Y S.Dynamic mechanism and models of regional rural development in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(2): 115-122.]
[15] 龙花楼, 李婷婷, 邹健. 我国乡村转型发展动力机制与优化对策的典型分析. 经济地理, 2011, 31(12): 2080-2085.
[LONG H L, LI T T, ZOU J.Analysis of dynamical mechanism of rural transformation development in typical regions of China. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(12): 2080-2085.]
[16] 陈昕昕. 农村内生发展动力与城乡融合发展. 农业经济, 2018, (12): 35-37.
[CHEN X X.Rural endogenous development power and urban-rural integration development. Agricultural Economy, 2018, (12): 35-37.]
[17] 谷晓坤, 陶思远, 卢方方, 等. 大都市郊野乡村多功能评价及其空间布局: 以上海89个郊野镇为例. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(11): 2281-2290.
[GU X K, TAO S Y, LU F F, et al.Multi-functional evaluation of metropolitan suburbs and its spatial difference: A case study of 89 towns in Shanghai. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(11): 2281-2290.]
[18] 谢臻, 张凤荣, 陈松林, 等. 中国乡村振兴要素识别与发展类型诊断: 基于99个美丽乡村示范村的信息挖掘分析. 资源科学, 2019, 41(6): 1048-1058.
[XIE Z, ZHANG F R, CHEN S L, et al.Development types of rural revitalization based on the identification of development elements in China. Resources Science, 2019, 41(6): 1048-1058.]
[19] 张晨, 肖大威. 从“外源动力”到“内源动力”: 二战后欧洲乡村发展动力的研究、实践及其启示. 国际城市规划, 2020, (4): 1-16.
[ZHANG C, XIAO D W.From "exogenous forces" to "endogenous forces": Research, practice and enlightenment of rural development driving forces in Europe after World War Ⅱ. Urban Planning International, 2020, (4): 1-16.]
[20] 陈丹, 张越. 乡村振兴战略下城乡融合的逻辑、关键与路径. 宏观经济管理, 2019, (1): 57-64.
[CHEN D, ZHANG Y.The logic, key and path of urban-rural integration under the strategy of rural vitalization. Macroeconomic Management, 2019, (1): 57-64.]
[21] 党国英. 乡村振兴战略的现实依据与实现路径. 社会发展研究, 2018, 5(1): 9-21.
[DANG G Y.The practical basis and realization path of the rural vitalization strategy. Journal of Social Development, 2018, 5(1): 9-21.]
[22] 吴传钧. 中国农业与农村经济可持续发展问题: 不同类型地区实证研究. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2001: 98-106.
[WU C J.Sustainable Development of Agriculture and Rural Economy in China: An Empirical Study of Different Types of Areas. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2001: 98-106.]
[23] 龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 乡村重构的理论认知. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(5): 581-590.
[LONG H L, TU S S.Theoretical thinking of rural restructuring. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(5): 581-590.]
[24] OECD. Rural-urban Partnerships: An Integrated Approach to Economic Development, OECD Rural Policy Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013.
[25] 戴柳燕, 周国华, 何兰. 乡村吸引力的概念及其形成机制. 经济地理, 2019, 39(8): 177-184.
[DAI L Y, ZHOU G H, HE L.Rural attraction: Concept and formation mechanism. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(8): 177-184.]
[26] 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨: 超越“现代化”发展范式. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.
[FANG Y G, LIU J S.Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257-270.]
[27] 徐州市人民政府. 徐州市土地利用总体规划(2006—2020年)调整方案. 徐州: 徐州市人民政府, 2017, 10: 88-89.
[Xuzhou Government.Xuzhou General Land Use Planning (2006-2020). Xuzhou: Xuzhou Government, 2017, 10: 88-89.]
[28] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS的操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010: 26-28.
[WU M L.Structural Equation Model: Operation and Application of AMOS. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2010: 26-28.]
[29] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型: AMOS实务进阶. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2013: 40-46.
[WU M L.Structural Equation Modeling: Tips for Practical Application. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2013: 40-46.]
[30] 徐新悦, 岳梦凡, 李建国, 等. 滨海地区畜禽养殖户污染防治意愿影响因素及其响应机理: 以盐城市为例. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(9): 1974-1986.
[XU X Y, YUE M F, LI J G, et al.Analysis of factors influencing the willingness of livestock and poultry farmers to control pollution in coastal areas: A case study of Yancheng, Jiangsu. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(9): 1974-1986.]
[31] 付伟. 城乡融合发展进程中的乡村产业及其社会基础: 以浙江省L市偏远乡村来料加工为例. 中国社会科学, 2018, (6): 71-90, 205-206.
[FU W. Rural industry and its social foundation in the integrated urban-rural development process: A case study of processing in remote villages under the jurisdiction of city L, Zhejiang province. Social Sciences in China, 2018, (6): 71-90, 205-206.]
[32] WOODS M.Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2011: 1-2.
[33] JOHN H.Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22(2): 142-160.
