Resource Evaluation

Recreation suitability evaluation of countryside forests in Shanghai and corresponding developing guidance

Expand
  • 1. Department of Tourism Management, Shanghai Business School, Shanghai 201400, China;
    2. Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089, USA;
    3. Graduate School of Horticulture, Chiba University, Matsudo 2718510, Japan

Received date: 2019-04-19

  Revised date: 2019-07-29

  Online published: 2019-11-28

Abstract

Recreation functions of city countryside forests are becoming more prominent due to rapid increasing needs of public outdoor recreation. It is significant to evaluate the suitability of countryside forests for promoting their recreation functions. In this study, by using the Delphi method, 10 indicators were chosen to make an evaluation system to assess the recreation suitability of countryside forests, which can be classified into three groups, including recreational resources, recreational facilities, and recreational locations of countryside forests. AHP method was applied to calculate the weight of indicators. By using GIS technology, 64 countryside forests of Shanghai in 2000, 2006 and 2012 were assessed in the recreation suitability. According to the results of evaluation, the recreation suitability was divided into four grades: highly suitable, moderately suitable, marginally suitable, and not suitable. The results indicated that the recreational suitability of countryside forests in Shanghai showed an increasing trend from 2000 to 2012, and lower suitability grades of countryside forests were transformed into higher suitability grades. Based on different grades of recreational suitability, guidance of countryside forest are proposed. It is suggested that development of highly suitable countryside forests should be given priority, and moderate suitable ones should be actively developed, marginally suitable ones should be reserved and developed.

Cite this article

ZHANG Kai-xuan, FAN Wen, SHI Jia-ying . Recreation suitability evaluation of countryside forests in Shanghai and corresponding developing guidance[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019 , 34(11) : 2270 -2280 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20191102

References

[1] BELL S.Forest recreation and nature tourism. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2010, 9(2): 69-70.
[2] RANTALA O.Tourist practices in the forest. Annals of Tourism Research, 2010, 37(1): 249-264.
[3] 易逸瑜, 张庆费, 安齐, 等. 城市森林游憩发展探讨. 中国城市林业, 2018, 16(1): 7-10.
[YI Y Y, ZHANG Q F, AN Q, et al.Discussion on development of urban forest recreation. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2018, 16(1): 7-10.]
[4] 张凯旋, 范雯, 陈圣子. 郊野游憩资源开发背景下的上海城市森林景观格局动态. 资源开发与市场, 2019, 35(1): 32-37.
[ZHANF K X, FAN W, CHEN S Z.Characteristics and variations of landscape pattern of urban forests in Shanghai based on the background of the development of countryside recreational resources. Resources Development & Market, 2019, 35(1): 32-37.]
[5] COHEN-HATTAB K, GELBMAN A, SHOVAl N.From ideological space to recreational tourism: The Israeli forest. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 2018, 16(5): 501-520.
[6] LAMBERT D.The history of the country park, 1966-2005: Towards a renaissance?. Landscape Research, 2006, 31(1): 43-62.
[7] 秦学, 吴楚材, 吴章文. 森林旅游研究的学术生态位与学术价值链. 中南林业科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2007, 1(4): 23-26.
[QIN X, WU C C, WU Z W.On the academic niche and the system of learned importance of forestry tourism research. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology: Social Sciences, 2007, 1(4): 23-26.]
[8] 马耀峰, 张春晖. 基于瓶颈破解的我国森林旅游发展理念和产品创新. 旅游科学, 2013, 27(1): 84-94.
[MA Y F, ZHANG C H.Analysis on concept and production innovation in forest tourism development: Based on bottleneck breakthrough theory. Tourism Science, 2013, 27(1): 84-94.]
[9] OHE Y, IKEI H, SONG C, et al.Evaluating the relaxation effects of emerging forest-therapy tourism: A multidisciplinary approach. Tourism Management, 2017, 62(10): 322-334.
[10] 黄杰龙, 王立群, 陈秋华. 基于资源比较优势的森林公园旅游增长方式合理性研究. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(2): 261-273.
[HUANG J L, WANG L Q, CHEN Q H.The rationality of the model of tourism economic growth in forest parks based on the comparative advantage of resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(2): 261-273.]
[11] GU X K, TAO S Y, DAI B.Spatial accessibility of country parks in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 27: 373-382.
[12] 方家, 刘颂, 王德, 等. 基于手机信令数据的上海城市公园供需服务分析. 风景园林, 2017, (10): 35-40.
[FANG J, LIU S, WANG D, et al.Supply-demand service analysis of park in Shanghai by mobile phone signaling data. Landscape Architecture, 2017, (10): 35-40.]
[13] XIAO S L, JIA L M, JIANG L L.Forest recreation opportunity spectrum in the suburban mountainous region of Beijing. Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 2012, 138: 335-341.
[14] 李效文, 田甜, 王敏增, 等. 游憩者对北京风景游憩林营建需求的研究. 北京林业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2009, 8(3): 45-49.
[LI X W, TIAN T, WANG M Z, et al.Tourists' demands for construction of scenic and recreational forests in Beijing mountainous area. Journal of Beijing Forestry University: Social Sciences, 2009, 8(3): 45-49.]
[15] ZHANG H, CHEN B, SUN Z, et al.Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2013, 12: 44-52.
[16] 肖亮, 张立明, 王剑. 城市森林游憩需求特征分析: 以武汉市居民为例. 中南林业调査规划, 2007, 26(1): 31-34.
[XIAO L, ZHANG L M, WANG J.Study on recreation demand for recreational urban forest: A case study of citizen in Wuhan. Central South Forest Inventory and Planning, 2007, 26(1): 31-34.]
[17] 邓颖, 钱益春. 长沙市居民城市森林游憩需求特征研究. 中南林业科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2011, 5(5): 135-138.
[DENG Y, QIAN Y C.Study on habitants demand characteristics of urban forest recreation in Changsha city. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology: Social Sciences, 2011, 5(5): 135-138.]
[18] 刘常富, 李海梅, 何兴元, 等. 城市森林概念探析. 生态学杂志, 2003, 22(5): 146-149.
[LIU C F, LI H M, HE X Y, et al.Concept discussion and analysis of urban forest. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2003, 22(5): 146-149.]
[19] 朱祥明, 孙琴. 英国郊野公园的特点和设计要则. 中国园林, 2009, 25(6): 1-5.
[ZHU X M, SUN Q.Character and design principles of country parks in UK. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2009, 25(6): 1-5.]
[20] CHEN B X, NAKAMA Y.Thirty years of forest tourism in China. Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 18(4): 285-292.
[21] NAHUELHUAL L, CARMONA A, LOZADA P, et al.Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: An application at the local level in Southern Chile. Applied Geography, 2013, 40: 71-82.
[22] JAY M, SCHRAML U.Managing city forests for or in spite of recreation? Perspectives of forest managers. European Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 132: 93-105.
[23] MATSIORI S, ANAGNOS N, AGGELOPOULOS S, et al.Economic valuation of forest recreation: The case of the University Forest of Pertouli in Greece. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 2012, 10: 866-870.
[24] 丁振民, 黄秀娟, 朱佳佳. CVM 评价森林景区游憩价值的理论效度: 以福州国家森林公园为例. 林业科学, 2018, 52(8): 133-141.
[DING Z M, HUANG X J, ZHU J J.Theoretical validity of CVM on assessment of the recreation value in forest scenic areas: A case study of Fuzhou National Forest Park. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 52(8): 133-141.]
[25] CERVENY L K, BLAHNA D J, STERN M J, et al.The use of recreation planning tools in US Forest Service NEPA assessments. Environmental Management, 2011, 48: 644-657.
[26] 沈芝琴, 陈秋华, 陈贵松, 等. 城市森林游憩功能评价研究: 以福州国家森林公园和金牛山公园为例. 林业经济问题, 2011, 31(3): 228-233.
[SHEN Z Q, CHEN Q H, CHEN G S, et al.Urban forest recreation function evaluation research: Take Fuzhou National Forest Park and Jinniu Mountain Park for example. Issue of Forestry Economics, 2011, 31(3): 228-233.]
[27] GÜL A M, KAMIL Ö, ÖZNUR K. An approach for recreation suitability analysis to recreation planning in Gölcük Nature Park. Environmental Management, 2006, 37(5): 606-625.
[28] DHAMI I, DENG J, BURNS R C, et al.Identifying and mapping forest-based ecotourism areas in West Virginia: Incorporating visitors' preferences. Tourism Management, 2014, 42: 165-176.
[29] LEE C F, HUANG H I, YEH H R.Developing an evaluation model for destination attractiveness: Sustainable forest recreation tourism in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2010, 18(6): 811-828.
[30] 张凯旋, 凌焕然, 达良俊. 上海环城林带景观美学评价及优化策略. 生态学报, 2012, 32(17): 5521-5531.
[ZHANG K X, LING H R, DA L J.Optimization strategies and an aesthetic evaluation of typical plant communities in the Shanghai Green Belt. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(17): 5521-5531.]
[31] 张凯旋, 张建华. 上海环城林带保健功能评价及其机制研究. 生态学报, 2013, 33(13): 4189-4198.
[ZHANG K X, ZHANG J H.Health function evaluation and it's mechanisms exploration in Shanghai Green Belt. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(13): 4189-4198.]
[32] 陈敏, 李婷婷. 上海郊野公园发展的几点思考. 中国园林, 2009, 25(6): 10-13.
[CHEN M, LI T T.Several thoughts about the development of Shanghai country parks. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2009, 25(6): 10-13.]
[33] 韩玉洁, 李琦, 王兵, 等. 上海市森林生态连清与生态系统服务研究. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2018.
[HAN Y J, LI Q, WANG B, et al.Study on Forest Ecological Linkage and Ecosystem Services in Shanghai. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2018.]
[34] 郊野公园规划项目组. 落实生态文明建设, 探索郊野公园规划: 以上海试点郊野公园规划为例. 上海城市规划, 2013, (5): 51-61.
[Country Park Planning Project Team. Implement progress of ecology civilization, explore planning of country park: A case study of country park plan of Shanghai. Shanghai Urban Planning, 2013, (5): 51-61.]
[35] 齐增湘, 廖建军, 徐卫华, 等. 基于GIS的秦岭山区聚落用地适宜性评价. 生态学报, 2015, 35(4): 1274-1283.
[QI Z X, LIAO J J, XU W H, et al.Suitability analysis of mountain settlements in Qinling using a GIS system. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(4): 1274-1283.]
[36] 杨子生. 山区城镇建设用地适宜性评价方法及应用: 以云南省德宏州为例. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(1): 64-76.
[YANG Z S.Land suitability evaluation for urban construction and its application in mountainous areas: A case study in Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(1): 64-76.]
[37] 董斌, 陈立平, 钱国英. 基于遥感的层次分析法和模糊数学模型综合评价森林资源生态适宜性. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(3): 468-476.
[DONG B, CHEN L P, QIAN G Y.Synthetic evaluation of ecological suitability of forest resources by Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Mathematics Model based on remote sensing data. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(3): 468-476.]
[38] 杨俊, 张永恒, 席建超. 中国避暑旅游基地适宜性综合评价研究. 资源科学, 2016, 38(12): 2210-2220.
[YANG J, ZHANG Y H, XI J C.The comprehensive evaluation of suitability of summer tourism base in China. Resources Science, 2016, 38(12): 2210-2220.]
Outlines

/