EN中文

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES >

2018 , Vol. 33 >Issue 7: 1129 - 1138

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20170657

Resource Economics

Study on Integrated Water Quality Index and Its Application in Water Resources Assets Assessment in Shenzhen

Expand
  • State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Management Technology Drinking Water Sources/Shenzhen Academy of Environmental Science, Shenzhen 518001, China

Received date: 2017-06-29

  Revised date: 2018-01-17

  Online published: 2018-07-20

Supported by

The National Key Research and Development Program of China, No. 2016YFC0503500

Fold

Abstract

Exploring the connotations of natural resources balance sheets is one of the major decisions the central government made on the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee to evaluate environmental performance of government leaders. Natural resources assets assessment techniques serve as a fundamental support for the application of natural resources balance sheets and the establishment of ecological damage liability scheme. Shenzhen, a burgeoning city located within the Pearl River Delta, is confronted with essential water problems ranging from water pollution to water shortage. Evaluating the monetary value of water resources with qualitative and quantitative methods could provide a unified approach to examine and compare water resources status at various spatial and temporal scales. Monthly sewage treatment data of Shuitou, Kuichong and Henggang water plants in Shenzhen in 2013 and 2014 have been collected. By analyzing the inlet and outlet water quality in each water plant with comprehensive pollution indice and principal component analysis method, the comprehensive water quality index which can be used to assess local water quality in Shenzhen is defined with parameters of key pollutants including TN, NH3-N, TP, COD, BOD5 and SS and is used to assess the value of local water resources in Shenzhen. Moreover, replacement cost is calculated. The link between comprehensive water quality and replacement costs is studied to construct the valuation model which can assess the value of Shenzhen landscape water and drinking water. The result indicates that it costs 0.6 yuan/t and 0.1 yuan/t to improve one unit of comprehensive water quality of landscape water resource and that of drinking water resource, respectively. Besides, it costs 1.05 yuan/t to store drinking water annually. Dapeng Peninsula, lying in east cost of Shenzhen, is selected to carry out the case study. The comprehensive water quality of all six main rivers and five major water reservoirs that supply water in Dapeng Peninsula is assessed. Accumulated surface runoff of the catchment areas and water retention capacity in 2015 are used to calculate the quantity of landscape water resource and drinking water resource. The results show that, in 2015, the value of landscape water resource and drinking water resource in Dapeng Peninsula is 3.60×108 yuan and 0.35×108 yuan, respectively.

Key words： comprehensive water quality index; principal component analysis; replacement cost method; Shenzhen; water resources assets assessment

Cite this article

YANG Meng-chan, YE You-hua, ZHANG Yuan, CHEN Long, ZHANG Yi . Study on Integrated Water Quality Index and Its Application in Water Resources Assets Assessment in Shenzhen[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018 , 33(7) : 1129 -1138 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20170657

References

[1] VICENTE D J, RODRIGUEZ-SINOBAS L, GARROTE L, et al. Application of the system of environmental economic accounting for water SEEAW to the Spanish part of the Duero basin: Lessons learned [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 563/564: 611-622.
[2] 水利部发展研究中心. 探索编制水资源资产负债表课题报告 [R]. 北京: 水利部发展研究中心, 2016.
[Development Research Center of the Ministry of Water Resources of China. The development of water resource assets balance sheets report. Development Research Center of the Ministry of Water Resources of China, 2016. ]
[3] BATEMAN I, DAY B, AGARWALA M, et al.UK national ecosystem assessment follow-on work package report 3: Economic value of ecosystem services [R]. UK: UNEP-WCMC, LWEC, 2014: 77-99.
[4] 夏凡, 胡圣, 龚治娟, 等. 不同水质评价方法的应用比较研究——以丹江口水库入库河流为例[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(17): 11-15, 24.
[XIA F, HU S, GONG Z J, et al.Comparative study on application of different water quality evaluation methods: A case study of inflow rivers in Danjiangkou Reservoir area. Yangtze River, 2017, 48(17): 11-15, 24. ]
[5] 高红杰, 郑利杰, 嵇晓燕, 等. 典型城市地表水质综合评价方法研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 2017, 33(2): 55-60.
[GAO H J, ZHEN L J, JI X Y, et al.Study on comprehensive evaluation methods for surface water of typical cities. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2017, 33(2): 55-60. ]
[6] 池仕运, 舒卫先, 胡菊香, 等. 基于大型底栖动物的沙颍河干流水质生物学评价——两种方法体系的比较分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(S1): 78-84.
[CHI S Y, SHU W X, HU J X, et al.Bio-assessment of water quality based on macroinvertebrates in the mainstream of Shaying River—Comparison of two methodologies. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(S1): 78-84. ]
[7] 董艳慧, 周维博, 赖坤容, 等. 基于概率神经网络的西安地区地下水水质评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(4): 737-742.
[DONG Y H, ZHOU W B, LAI K R, et al.The application of probabilistic neural network model in evaluating the groundwater quality of Xi’an area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(4): 737-742. ]
[8] BIROL E, KAROUSAKIS K, KOUNDOURI P.Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 365(1/2/3): 105-122.
[9] 简富缋, 宋晓谕, 虞文宝. 水资源资产价格模糊数学综合评价指标体系构建——以黑河中游张掖市为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(2): 567-572.
[JIAN F H, SONG X Y, YU W B.Construction of the evaluation system of water asset price with fuzzy comprehensive assessment indexes: Taking Zhangye Prefecture in Heihe River Basin as an example. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2016, 38(2): 567-572. ]
[10] 郭鹏, 王敏, 王莉芳. 基于DHGF算法的水资源定价模型研究[J]. 环境保护科学, 2012, 38(1): 45-49.
[GUO P, WANG M, WANG L F.Study on model of water resource pricing based on DHGF algorithm. Environmental Protection Science, 2012, 38(1): 45-49. ]
[11] 彭晓明, 王红瑞, 董艳艳, 等. 水资源稀缺条件下的水资源价值评价模型及其应用[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(4): 670-675.
[PENG X M, WANG H R, DONG Y Y, et al.Evaluation model of water resources value under the condition of water shortage and its application. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(4): 670-675. ]
[12] 陈丹, 陈菁, 罗朝晖. 天然水资源价值评估的能值方法及应用[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(10): 1188-1192.
[CHEN D, CHEN J, LUO Z H.Evaluation method of natural water resources based on energy theory and its application. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(10): 1188-1192. ]
[13] 邱德华, 沈菊琴. 水资源资产价值评估的收益现值法研究[J]. 河海大学学报, 2001, 29(2): 26-29.
[QIU D H, SHEN J Q.Study on profit present value method for value appraisal of water resource assets. Journal of Hohai University, 2001, 29(2): 26-29. ]
[14] 沈菊琴, 郭孟卓. 水资源资产价值评估的替代法研究[J]. 河海大学学报, 2000, 28(3): 51-54.
[SHEN J Q, GUO M Z.Study on substitution method for value appraisal of water resource assets. Journal of Hohai University, 2000, 28(3): 51-54. ]
[15] 何锦峰, 陈国阶. 水资源动态完全成本定价的理论探讨[J]. 自然资源学报, 2000, 15(3): 236-240.
[HE J F, CHEN G J.A theoretical explorat ion of price water in dynamic total cost. Journal of Natural Resources, 2000, 15(3): 236-240. ]
[16] 蒋火华, 朱建平, 梁德华, 等. 综合污染指数评价与水质类别判定的关系[J]. 中国环境监测, 1999(6): 48-64.
[JIANG H H, ZHU J P, LIANG D H, et al.The relationship between comprehensive pollution index assessment and water quality type distingquishing. Environmental Monitoring in China, 1999(6): 48-64. ]
[17] 王晓鹏. 河流水质综合评价之主成分分析方法[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2001, 20(4): 49-52.
[WANG X P.The principal component analysis method of the water quality assessment in rivers. Application of Statistics and Management, 2001, 20(4): 49-52. ]
[18] 张龙玲, 徐慧, 管桂玲, 等. 改进的综合水质标识指数法在上海市长宁区水质评价中的应用[J]. 水资源保护, 2014(3): 81-84.
[ZHANG L L, XU H, GUAN G L, et al.Application of improved comprehensive water quality identification index method to evaluation of water quality in Changning District, Shanghai City. Water Resources Protection, 2014(3): 81-84. ]
[19] PARINET B, LHOTE A, LEGUBE B.Principal component analysis: An appropriate tool for water quality evaluation and management—Application to a tropical lake system[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 178(3/4): 295-311.
[20] JACKSON S, FINN M, SCHEEPERS K.The use of replacement cost method to assess and manage the impacts of water resource development on Australian indigenous customary economies[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014, 135(4): 100-109.
[21] 张兵, 陈廷照, 曾明华. 基于BP神经网络的城市公交服务质量影响因素主成分分析[J]. 交通运输研究, 2015, 1(1): 14-19.
[ZHANG B, CHEN T Z, ZENG M H.Principal component analysis of factors influencing city bus service quality based on BP neural network. Transport Research, 2015, 1(1): 14-19. ]
[22] 董光华, 沈菊琴, 孙付华, 等. 水资源资产量核算研究综述[J]. 水利经济, 2017, 35(4): 7-11.
[DONG G H, SHEN J Q, SUN F H, et al.Research review on asset accounting of water resources. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 2017, 35(4): 7-11. ]
[23] 梁鸿, 潘晓峰, 余欣繁, 等. 深圳市水生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1474-1487.
[LIANG H, PAN X F, XU X F, et al.Valuation of water ecosystem services in Shenzhen city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(9): 1474-1487. ]
[24] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 王效科, 等. 中国陆地地表水生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(4): 443-452.
[ZHAO T Q, OUYANG Z Y, WANG X K, et al.Ecosystem services and their valuation of terrestrial surface water system in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(4): 443-452. ]
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉