JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES >
Health Assessment and Driving Mechanism Analysis of Cultivated Land in the Township Enterprises Developed Region
Received date: 2014-07-14
Revised date: 2015-01-10
Online published: 2015-09-15
The rapid development of township enterprises in the region will bring a direct influence on cultivated land’s use and protection, and cause a conspicuous change of the cultivated land health. This paper selected the cultivated land of township enterprises developed regions for the case study. A composite evaluation model was used to evaluate the cultivated land health index (CLHI), which is developed from the cultivated land emergy index with multi-level fuzzy evaluation model. A fuzzy assessing system including quality, productivity and soil environment was used to evaluate the health of cultivated land, and the fuzzy decision result were revised by the agricultural land emergy index which was comprised of the emergy utilization coefficient and the cultivated land pressure index based on the emergy analysis theory. The basic data were acquired by household survey, sampling and testing analysis, and the health status of cultivated land in this study region was assessed by using the platform of GIS. The evaluation results show that the health of cultivated land in the township enterprises developed area is worth of worrying about, the composite index of cultivated land health being in the range of 0.412-0.677. The result of composite index was divided into three classes, namely in normal health, sub-health and poor health in the study area, and the area proportions of them are 35.23%, 41.55% and 23.22%, respectively. This study indicates that the direct harm has been brought to the soil environment of farmland by the pollutant emitted from the adjacent township enterprises and the pollutant diffused along the river. With development of township enterprises, the farmers become to pay more emphasis on non-agricultural production, and the productivity of cultivated land were reduced. This study can provided reference for the assessment method selection in similar areas, and for the improvement of science adjustment and mechanism study of the health of cultivated land in the township enterprises developed region.
LI Qiang, PENG Wen-ying, WANG Jian-qiang, ZHAO Ye . Health Assessment and Driving Mechanism Analysis of Cultivated Land in the Township Enterprises Developed Region[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2015 , 30(9) : 1499 -1510 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.09.007
[1] 李强, 赵烨, 严金明. 城市化驱动机制下的农用地健康评价 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(9): 301-307.
[2] Shearer A W, Mouat D A, Bassett S D, et al . Land Use Scenarios—Environmental Consequences of Development [M]. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009.
[3] Li Q, Yan J M. Assessing the health of agricultural land with emergy analysis and fuzzy logic in the major grain-producing region [J]. CATENA , 2012, 99: 9-17.
[4] 于斌, 梁留科. 河南省东北部农用地健康评价 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2012, 26(8): 60-66. [YU Bin, LIANG Liu-ke. Assessment on the health of agricultural land in the northeastern part of Henan Province. China Land Sciences , 2012, 26(8): 60-66. ]
[5] Parlee B, Berkes F. Health of the land, health of the people: A case study on Gwich’ in Berry Harvesting in Northern Canada [J]. EcoHealth , 2005, 2(2): 127-137.
[6] Dengiz O, Baskan O. Land quality assessment and sustainable land use in Salt Lake (Tuz Gölü) specially protected area [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment , 2009, 148: 233-243.
[7] Doran J W, Zeiss M R. Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality [J]. Applied Soil Ecology , 2000, 15: 3-11.
[8] Masto R E, Chhonkar P K, Purakayastha T J, et al . Soil quality indices for evaluation of long-term land use and soil management practices in semi-arid sub-tropical India [J]. Land Degradation & Development , 2008, 19: 516-529.
[9] Cheng Y, Nathanail P C. Generic assessment criteria for human health risk assessment of potentially contaminated land in China [J]. Science of the Total Environment , 2010, 408: 324-339.
[10] 李强, 严金明, 赵烨. 耕地也需诊断健康 [J]. 中国土地, 2011(11): 37-39. [LI Qiang, YAN Jin-ming, ZHAO Ye. Cultivated land also needs diagnosis health. China Land , 2011(11): 37-39. ]
[11] 李强, 彭文英. 生态脆弱区耕地健康诊断体系构建及评价实践 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014, 28(7): 67-72. [LI Qiang, PENG Wen-ying. Diagnosis system development and assessment on the cultivated land health in ecological fragile region. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment , 2014, 28(7): 67-72. ]
[12] 姚冠荣, 刘桂英, 谢花林. 中国耕地利用投入要素集约度的时空差异及其影响因素分析 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(11): 1836-1848. [YAO Guan-rong, LIU Gui-ying, XIE Hua-lin. Spatiotemporal difference and driving forces of input factors intensity for arable land-use in China. Journal of Natural Resource , 2014, 29(11): 1836-1848. ]
[13] 邹金浪, 杨子生. 中国耕地利用投入的时空差异 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(7): 1080-1093. [ZOU Jin-lang, YANG Zi-sheng. Temporal and spatial variations of arable land use input in China. Journal of Natural Resource , 2013, 28(7): 1080-1093. ]
[14] 曹志洪, 周健民. 中国土壤质量 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008. [CAO Hong-zhi, ZHOU Jian-min. Soil quality of China. Beijing: Science Press, 2008. ]
[15] 蔡博广, 许皞. 中国耕地质量等级调查与评定（河北卷）[M]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2010. [CAI Bo-guang, XU Hao. Investigation and Assessment of Cultivated Land Quality Grade in China (Hebei Volume). Beijing: China Land Press, 2010. ]
[16] Odum H T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making [M]. Wiley, New York, 1996.
[17] Martin J F, Diemont S A W, Powell E, et al . Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment , 2006, 115: 128-140.
[18] 蔡为民, 唐华俊, 陈佑启, 等. 土地利用系统健康评价的框架与指标选择 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2004, 14(1): 31-35. [CAI Wei-min, TANG Hua-jun, CHEN You-qi, et al . Framework of conception and option of health assessment index in land use system. China Population , Resources and Environment , 2004, 14(1): 31-35. ]
[19] 陈百明, 张凤荣. 中国土地可持续利用指标体系的理论与方法 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2001, 16(3): 197-203. [CHEN Bai-ming, ZHANG Feng-rong. Theory and methodology for sustainable land use indicator system in China. Journal of Natural Resource , 2001, 16(3): 197-203. ]
[20] 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马诚. 土地可持续利用评价的指标体系与方法 [J]. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2): 113-118. [FU Bo-jie, CHEN Li-ding, MA Cheng. The index system and method of land sustainable use evaluation. Journal of Natural Resource , 1997, 12(2): 113-118. ]
[21] 徐建华. 现代地理学中的数学方法 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002. [XU Jian-hua. Mathematical Methods in Contemporary Geography. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002. ]
[22] 沈珍瑶, 杨志峰. 黄河流域水资源可再生性评价指标体系与评价方法 [J].自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2): 188-197. [SHEN Zhen-yao, YANG Zhi-feng. Index system and method for assessing water resources renewability of the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Natural Resource , 2002, 17(2): 188-197. ]
[23] 李强. 基于能值分析与模糊评价的农用地健康评价方法探讨 [J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2011, 27(2): 87-91. [LI Qiang. Exploration on the appraisal method of agricultural land health based on energy analysis and fuzzy decisions. Geography and Geo-Information Science , 2011, 27(2): 87-91. ]
[24] Kaufmann M, Tobias S, Schulin R. Quality evaluation of restored soils with a fuzzy logic expert system [J]. Geoderma , 2009, 151: 290-302.
[25] 舒帮荣, 刘友兆, 陆效平, 等. 能值分析理论在耕地可持续利用评价中的应用研究——以南京市为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 876-885. [SHU Bang-rong, LIU You-zhao, LU Xiao-ping, et al . Application of the theory of emergy analysis to the sustainability assessment of cultivated lands: A case study of Nanjing. Journal of Natural Resource , 2008, 23(5): 876-885. ]
[26] GB/T 28407—2012. 农用地质量分等规程 [S]. [GB/T 28407-2012. Regulation for Gradation on Agriculture Land Quality. ]
[27] 刘玉, 门明新, 许皞, 等. 农用地综合生产能力测算及应用研究——以霸州市为例 [J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2008, 10(1): 87-92. [LIU Yu, MEN Ming-xin, XU Hao, et al . Study on calculation and application of the integrated productive capacity of cultivated land: A case study of Bazhou City. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology , 2008, 10(1): 87-92. ]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |