This paper analyzes quantitatively the land-use type shifts according to the differences comparison of history, present status and the planning with the data from field survey and the administrative authority,and argues the issue that the regional development trend is incompatible to the territorial function, which could contribute to the understanding of scientific issue to harmonize land use and serve the decision-making for future development. The paper analyzes numeric coordination, spatial coordination, main coordination problem and effect between current land use (2010) and function planning, using the overall coordination (C1) and effective coordination (C2) and other indicators, based on the territorial function and pattern perspective, taking Muyun Town of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan (Chang-Zhu-Tan), combination as an example. It reveals the coordination characteristic and problem of the three types of the function space including ecological space, agricultural space and construction space, and then proposes the coordination policy. The results show that: land for construction grew rapidly in the recent years, while the agricultural land, forest land and countryside land declined dramatically. There were 426.67 hm2 of cultivated land and 359.24 hm2 of forest land decreasing, with the proportion declining by 6.58% and 5.53% respectively, and the growth weight heart of the town moved eastward rapidly and became a new development corridor rapidly as well. The index C1 of ecological space is 54% and the C2 is 69.81%, with a huge ecological space gap, so a larye area of 802.95 hm2 should be added to Muyun Town, the green heart construction should take more and heavier responsibilities and must focus on strengthening the northeast forest ecology and north greenbelt. The index C1 of agricultural space is 38.08% and the C2 is 91.28%, and the space conversion potential is greater, but villages land consolidation and renovation should be strengthened to enhance production efficiency and ecological service function. The index C1 of construction space is 36.11% and the C2 is 82.94%, and the construction land has being grown too fast and occupied a large amount of ecological space, threatening the ecological green heart function and pattern formation. Growth rate and spatial layout of construction space need to be adjusted and optimized. Research suggests that a three-layer security of the function space shoud be executed, population and urban-rural land should be integrated, and moderate complex function space and regional coordination mechanism should be constructed, in order to promote the coordinated development of land use and territorial function.
[1] 梁发超, 刘黎明, 许瑾璐. 闽北典型盆地土地利用系统协调性研究——以周宁县狮浦盆地为例[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(4):447-452.[LIANG Fa-chao, LIU Li-ming, XU Jin-lu. Study on coordination of land use system in typical basin in northern Fujian-A case study of Shipu Basin in Zhouning County. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(4):447-452.]
[2] 谭峻, 李楠, 魏锜琀. 北京市土地利用协调度模拟分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(9):38-42.[TAN Jun, LI Nan, WEI Qi-han. Simulation analysis on land use coordination degree in Beijing. China Land Science, 2008, 22(9):38-42.]
[3] 陈兴雷, 李淑杰, 郭忠兴. 吉林省延边朝鲜自治州土地利用与生态环境协调度分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(7):66-70, 78.[CHEN Xing-lei, LI Shu-jie, GUO Zhong-xing. Analysis on the harmonious degree between land use and ecological environment in Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture, Jilin Province. China Land Science, 2009, 23(7):66-70, 78.]
[4] 刘健, 毛其智. 影响北京城市土地与交通协调发展的因素分析[J]. 城市规划, 2008, 32(3):56-61.[LIU Jian, MAO Qi-zhi. Factor influencing balanced development of land-use & transportation: A case study of Beijing. City Planning Review, 2008, 32(3):56-61.]
[5] 冯科, 吴次芳, 韩昊英, 等. 杭州市土地利用总体规划的建设用地控制成效研究——界线评价法的引进与实践[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(3):376-385.[FENG Ke, WU Ci-fang, HAN Hao-ying, et al. Study on the Implementation Evaluation Of Urban Construction Boundary In Land Use Planning-A case study of Hangzhou. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(3):376-385.]
[6] 梁湖清, 沈正平, 沈山. 村镇规划与土地规划的比较及协调研究[J]. 人文地理, 2002, 17(4):67-70.[LIANG Hu-qing, SHEN Zheng-ping, SHEN Shan. On the comparison and coordination of village-town planning and land use planning. Human Geography, 2002, 17(4):67-70.]
[7] 吕维娟, 杨陆铭, 李延新. 试析城市规划与土地利用总体规划的相互协调[J]. 城市规划, 2004, 28(4):58-61.[LV Wei-juan, YANG Lu-ming, LI Yan-xin. An analysis on the coordination between city planning and comprehensive land use planning. City Planning Review, 2004, 28(4):58-61.]
[8] 王利, 韩增林, 王泽宇. 基于主体功能区规划的"三规"协调设想[J]. 经济地理, 2008, 28(5):845-848.[WANG Li, HAN Zeng-lin, WANG Ze-yu. An assumption on coordinated three kinds of planning based on major function oriented zoning. Economic Geography, 2008, 28(5):845-848]
[9] 郑荣宝, 刘毅华, 董玉祥, 等. 基于主体功能区划的广州市土地资源安全评价[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(6):654-664.[ZHENG Rong-bao, LIU Yi-hua, DONG Yu-xiang, et al. Appraisal of land resources security in guangzhou based on major function regionalization. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(6):654-664.]
[10] 谭峻, 苏红友. 北京城市功能区土地利用协调度分析[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2010, 29(4):117-121.[TAN Jun, SU Hong-you. Analysis of land-use coordination degree in beijing urban functional zone. Areal Research and Development, 2010, 29(4):117-121.]
[11] 蒙吉军, 周平, 艾木入拉, 等. 鄂尔多斯主体功能区划分及其土地可持续利用模式分析[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(9):1674-1683.[MENG Ji-jun, ZHOU Ping, Amrulla, et al. A study on major function-oriented zoning and sustainable land use patterns of Ordos. Resources Science, 2011, 33(9):1674-1683.]
[12] 曹玉红, 曹言红. 生态-生产-生活功能协调的长江岸线资源开发与管理[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2011, 36(10):176-179.[CAO Yu-hong, CAO Yan-hong. Coordinated resources development and management of ecology, production and life along the waterfront of Yangtze River. Environmental Science and Management, 2011, 36(10):176-179.]
[13] 樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4):339-350.[FAN Jie. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(4):339-350].
[14] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 生态系统服务的供给、 消费和价值化[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(1):93-99.[XIE Gao-di, ZHEN Lin, LU Chun-xia, et al. Supply, consumption and valuation of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 2008, 30(1):93-99.]
[15] 陶岸君. 我国地域功能的空间格局与区划方法. 北京:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 2011.[TAO An-jun. The Spatial Pattern and Zoning Method of China’s Territory Function. Beijing: Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, CAS, 2011.]
[16] 樊杰. 优化中国经济地理格局的科学基础——对未来10年经济地理学学科建设问题的讨论[J]. 经济地理, 2011(1):1-6.[FAN Jie. Scientific foundation for optimizing the pattern of China’s economic geography-A discussion on the development of economic geography in 10 years. Economic Geography, 2011(1):1-6.]
[17] 李文华, 张彪, 谢高地. 中国生态系统服务研究的回顾与展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 29(1):1-10.[LI Wen-hua, ZHANG Biao, XIE Gao-di. Research on ecosystem services in China: Progress and perspectives. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 29(1): 1-10.]
[18] Peter H Verburg, Jeannette van de Steeg, Veldkamp A, et al. From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90:1327-1335.
[19] FAN Jie, TAO An-jun, REN Qing. On the historical background, scientific intentions, goal orientation, and policy framework of Major Function-Oriented Zone Planning in China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2010(4):289-299.
[20] 周峰, 濮励杰, 彭补拙. 苏锡常地区土地利用变化及其绩效分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(3):392-400.[ZHOU Feng, PU Li-jie, PENG Bu-zhou. Analysis on land use change and its effectiveness in Su-Xi-Chang area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(3):392-400.]
