Resources Safety

Response of Landscape Ecological Risk to Land Use Change in Level I Aquatic Eco-functional Regions in Taihu Lake Watershed

Expand
  • Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China

Received date: 2010-01-19

  Revised date: 2010-05-04

  Online published: 2010-07-10

Abstract

In this study, the Taihu Lake Watershed and its level I aquatic eco-functional regions were selected as study areas, and the land use classification maps for 2005 and 2008, which were interpreted and obtained using Landsat remote sensing image, were used for further analysis. Change detection methods, e. g. transfer matrix, GIS overlay analysis, comprehensive coefficient of land use type change velocity, landscape ecological risk index and landscape ecological risk effect index of the land-use change, were selected to analyze the spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of land use and landscape as well as their transfer characteristics from 2005 to 2008 in the Taihu Lake Watershed and its level I aquatic eco-functional regions. The values of landscape ecological risk of the Taihu Lake Watershed and its level I aquatic eco-functional regions were calculated, and a comparison analysis of different characteristics of the landscape ecological risk between different level I aquatic eco-functional regions was carried out, and then the effect relationships between the landscape ecological risks and the land use changes was further analyzed. The results showed that the values of landscape ecological risk index in the eastern level I aquatic eco-functional region was bigger than that in the western level I aquatic eco-functional region both in 2005 and 2008. In 2008, compared to 2005, the value of landscape ecological risk index in the western level I aquatic eco-functional region increased by 6.49%, however, the value in eastern level I aquatic eco-functional region had a opposite change direction with a reduction of 2.57%. The comprehensive conversion rate of land use types in the eastern region was significantly 1.66 times faster than that in the western region. However, the landscape eco-risk index in the western region was -4.19 times that in the eastern region, and the response rate of landscape ecological risk to land use change in the western region was significantly higher than that in the eastern region. The reduction of landscape eco-risk index in the eastern region was mainly due to the reduction of area and patch number of lake, rural settlement, paddy field and urban landscape, and the increase of landscape eco-risk index in the western region was mainly due to the increase of area and patch number of lake, forest, urban land and rural residential landscape. Based on the above analysis, it provided a basis for the aquatic ecological protection decision-making of different aquatic eco-functional regions in Taihu Lake Watershed. And it should be focused on the land use change process and trend in the course of economic development in Taihu Lake Watershed, and the land use change direction should be properly controlled and adjusted in the region with a higher landscape eco-risk index. The management of the construction land except for the urban and rural settlements land, beaches, reservoir and pond land should be strengthened in the eastern region, and the management of the forest land, paddy field, urban land and rural residential land should be strengthened in the western region, and the appropriate-scaled land use should be introduced and the direction of land use should be kept from the high fragmentation and vulnerability, so as to reduce the landscape ecology risk and protect the landscape eco-functions in Taihu Lake Watershed.

Cite this article

GAO Yong-nian, GAO Jun-feng, XU Yan . Response of Landscape Ecological Risk to Land Use Change in Level I Aquatic Eco-functional Regions in Taihu Lake Watershed[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2010 , 25(7) : 1088 -1096 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.07.004

References

[1] 肖杨, 毛显强. 区域景观生态风险空间分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2006, 26(5): 623-626. [2] 贡璐, 鞠强, 潘晓玲. 博斯腾湖区域景观生态风险评价研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2007, 21(1): 27-31. [3] 陈鹏, 潘晓玲. 干旱区内陆流域区域景观生态风险分析——以阜康三工河流域为例[J]. 生态学杂志, 2003, 22(4): 116-120. [4] 李景刚, 何春阳, 李晓兵. 快速城市化地区自然/半自然景观空间生态风险评价研究——以北京为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(1): 33-47. [5] Wu L Y, Huang Y X. Landscape ecological risk assessment of Dongshan Island [J]. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait, 2005, 24(1): 35-42. [6] 张学林, 王金达, 张博, 等. 区域农业景观生态风险评价初步构想[J]. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(6): 712-716. [7] 谢花林. 基于景观结构和空间统计学的区域生态风险分析[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(10): 5020-5026. [8] Kapustka L A, Galbraith H, Luxon M, et al. Using landscape ecology to focus ecological risk assessment and guide risk management decision-making [J]. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 2001, 17(5-10): 236-246. [9] 王娟, 崔保山, 刘杰等. 云南澜沧江流域土地利用及其变化对景观生态风险的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28(2): 269-277. [10] 陈荷生. 太湖流域湿地及保护措施[J]. 水资源研究, 2003, 24(3): 27-29. [11] Spalding M D, Fox H E, Allen G R, et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coast and shelf areas [J]. BioScience, 2007, 57(7): 573-583. [12] Abell R, Thieme M L, Revenga C, et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: A new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation [J]. BioScience, 2008, 58(5): 403-414. [13] 孟伟, 张远, 郑丙辉. 水生态区划方法及其在中国的应用前景[J]. 水科学进展, 2007, 18(2): 293-300. [14] 孟伟, 张远, 郑丙辉. 辽河流域水生态分区研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(6): 911-918. [15] Zhou B, Zheng B. Research on aquatic ecoregions for lakes and reservoirs in China [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2008, 147(1-3): 339-350. [16] 高永年, 高俊峰. 太湖流域水生态功能分区[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(1): 111-117. [17] 王磊, 贾炜玮, 李凤日. 孟家岗林场森林景观结构动态分析[J]. 植物研究, 2008, 28(4): 497-502. [18] 涂小松, 濮励杰. 苏锡常地区土地利用变化时空分异及其生态环境响应[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(3): 583-593.
Outlines

/