Resources Utilization and Management

Analysis of Energy Intensity of Guangdong, Hunan and Guizhou Provinces and Comparison

Expand
  • 1. College of Geography of Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China;
    2. University of Zaozhuang, Zaozhuang 277160, China

Received date: 2009-06-22

  Revised date: 2010-05-18

  Online published: 2010-07-10

Abstract

Energy is the most basic driving force for socio-economic development, and the basis for human survival. With the rapid economic development, energy scarcity has gradually been appeared. Moreover, low energy efficiency is the prominent problem in China. In this paper, the energy intensity of Guangdong, Hunan and Guizhou were analyzed based on Laspeyres decomposition method. We found that: 1)The difference of energy intensity are large obviously among the three provinces, particularly in Guangdong and Guizhou. Nevertheless, the differences of energy intensity will gradually become smaller among the three provinces in the future. 2)The structure share and efficiency share of primary industry are beneficial to reduce energy intensity. The structure share of secondary industry can increase the energy intensity, but the efficiency share of secondary industry can reduce energy intensity. Moreover, the efficiency share of secondary industry plays an strongly import role in reducing energy intensity. The structure share in Guangdong Province is negative. But they are positive in Hunan and Guizhou. The efficiency share of tertiary industry of Guangdong and Hunan is negative or positive during different periods. The reasons need further study. Whereas, the efficiency share of the tertiary industry is negative in Guizhou. 3) The structure share in three provinces is negative to energy intensity. The efficiency share of the three provinces can reduce energy intensity, the roles vary from region to region. In this paper, we suggest the great effort should focus on economic underdevelopment or high energy intensity areas in order to reduce energy consumption by 20% of unit of GDP in the near future and guarantee energy security.

Cite this article

PENG Yuan-xin, LIN Zhen-shan . Analysis of Energy Intensity of Guangdong, Hunan and Guizhou Provinces and Comparison[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2010 , 25(7) : 1061 -1069 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.07.001

References

[1] 周轶昆. 广东能源消费与能源供给状况分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2006(8):49-52. [2] 中国经济网. http://www.ce.cn/cysc/hb/gdxw/200809/04/t20080904_16708599.shtml . [3] 李力, 王凤. 中国制造业能源使用强度因素分解研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008(10):66-74. [4] 周勇, 李廉水. 中国能源使用强度变化的结构与效率因素贡献——基于AWD的实证分析[J]. 产业经济研究, 2006(4):68-74. [5] 张炎治, 聂锐. 能源使用强度的指数分解分析研究综述[J]. 管理学报, 2008(5):647-650. [6] Ang B W. Decomposition of industrial energy decomposition: The energy intensity approach [J]. Energy Economics, 1994(16):163-174. [7] Jan Cornillie, Samuel Fankhauser. The energy intensity of transition countries [J]. Energy Economics, 2004(26):283-295. [8] 王群伟, 周德群, 张柳婷. 影响我国能源使用强度变动的因素探析[J]. 统计与决策, 2008(8):72-74. [9] 王俊松, 贺灿飞. 技术进步、结构变动与中国能源利用效率[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009(2):157-161. [10] 李国璋, 王双. 中国能源使用强度变动的区域因素分解分析——基于LMDI分解方法[J]. 财经研究, 2008(8):52-62. [11] 邱寿丰. 中国能源使用强度变化的区域影响分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2008(12):37-48. [12] 吴巧生, 成金华. 中国工业化中的能源消耗强度变动及因素分析——基于分解模型的实证分析[J]. 财经研究, 2006(6):75-85. [13] 韩智勇, 魏一鸣, 范英. 中国能源使用强度与经济结构变化特征研究[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2004(1):1-6. [14] 韩银娥. 广东产业结构优化升级的驱动力分析[J]. 现代商业, 2008(30):145-147. [15] 汤清, 张建梅. 关于广东产业结构的均衡分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2005(3):79-80. [16] 史丹. 我国经济增长过程中能源利用效率的改进[J]. 经济研究, 2002(9):49-56. [17] 高明芳. 广东产业结构分析[J]. 新西部, 2008(16):52. [18] 刘鲁鱼, 胡振宇. 广东产业结构的现状分析与思路调整[J]. 广东经济, 2005(7):16-21. [19] 李晓纯. 外源型经济对广东产业结构优化的积极作用[J]. 中山大学学报论丛, 2007(4):78-80.
Outlines

/