Special Column:Celebration of the 70th Anniversary of IGSNRR, CAS

Response of Farmers to Conversion of Cultivated Land to Wetland and Substitute Livelihood—A Case of Sanjiang Reserve

  • 1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS, Changchun 130012;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Department of Urban and Environment Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 13002;
    4. Urban and Country Planning and Design Institute of Jilin Province, Changchun 130061, China

Received date: 2007-08-31

  Revised date: 2007-11-26

  Online published: 2008-07-28


Based on investigation on 310 households of 5 farmers located in core zone and 6 farmers of buffer zone of Sanjiang reserve of Heilongjiang in China, and analyses of response of farmers on conversion of cultivated land to wetland and substitute livelihood,we found farmers’s have different responses to conversion of cultivated land to wetland and substitute livelihood. In terms of conversion of arable land to wetland, this article presents findings of an in-depth study, that is, farmers’ response to cultivated land conversion is related to age, quantity of cultivated land and residential site. By comparison with these aspects, the result reveals that the youngsters and farmers lived in buffer zone prefer to it, but the supporting rate of those who own land between 6 and 12 ha is very low. The reasons of villagers opposing it are that they take the cultivated land as an important income source, and have no other living skills and enough money used in other industries. Other reasons agreeing with it include obtaining cash compensation, new training or new jobs opportunities, steady non-agricultural income and equivalent land replacement. As for substitute livelihood, most have no specific object, but they tend to select farming. The study indicates that the importance of wetland is recognized by most farmers, hereby, whether farmers agree with conversion of cultivated land to wetland or not, the supporting rate is still determined by the economic benefits of farmers sustained, moreover it is related to income source and living ability of farmers. In addition,the arable land is regarded as the existent safeguard by farmers because substitute livelihood is uncertain and unsteady. On second thoughts, the compensation system of conversion of arable land to wetland hasn’t come forth and substitute livelihood hasn’t been put forward, which are the holdback of conversion of arable land to wetland. Finally, based on consideration of regional environment, economic level and farmers’ needs, this article puts forwards the sustainable substitute livelihood models which are the ecological transmigrates in core zone, the traditional agriculture alteration in buffer zone and multi-industry model in experimental zone.

Cite this article

ZHANG Chun-li, TONG Lian-jun, LIU Ji-bin . Response of Farmers to Conversion of Cultivated Land to Wetland and Substitute Livelihood—A Case of Sanjiang Reserve[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2008 , 23(4) : 568 -574 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.04.003


[1] 周德民,宫辉力,胡金明,等.三江平原淡水湿地生态系统景观格局特征研究——以洪河湿地自然保护区为例[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(1):86~88. [2] ZHOU Zhi-qiang, LIU Tong. The current status, threats and protection way of Sanjiang plain wetland, Northeast China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research,2005,16(2):148-152. [3] 李云成,刘昌明,于静洁.三江平原湿地保护与耕地开垦冲突权衡[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(1):39~42. [4] 俞穆清,田卫,刘景双,等.向海国家级自然保护区湿地资源保护与可持续利用探析[J].地理科学,2000,20(2):193~194. [5] 张春丽,刘继斌,佟连军.不同空间尺度的湿地保护与持续利用研究[J].资源科学,2007,29(3):133~135. [6] Maria del Carmen Sabatini, Adriana Verdiell, Ricardo M Rodriguez Iglesias, et al. A quantitative method for zoning of protected areas and its spatial ecological implications[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007,83(2):198-206. [7] 熊鹰,王克林,蓝万炼,等.洞庭湖区湿地恢复的生态补偿效应评估[J].地理学报,2004,59(5):772~780. [8] Ian Hodge, Sandra McNally. Wetland restoration, collective action and the role of water management institutions[J]. Ecological Economics,2000,35(1):107-118. [9] 王晓鸿.鄱阳湖湿地生态系统评估[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.135~138. [10] Karin Johst, Martin Drechslerand Frank Wtzold. An ecological economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures[J].Ecological Economics,2002,41(1):37-49. [11] 严冬,夏军,王立新,等.黑龙江省粮食生产与三江平原湿地协调发展水平的评价[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(1):73~75.