Special Column:Celebration of the 70th Anniversary of IGSNRR, CAS

Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Natural/Semi-natural Landscapes in Fast Urbanization Regions —A Case Study in Beijing, China

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology (Beijing Normal University); College of Resources Science & Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. Remote Sensing Technology Application Center, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100044, China

Received date: 2007-08-31

  Revised date: 2007-09-28

  Online published: 2008-02-01


How to effectively and reasonably assess the ecological risk of the natural/semi-natural landscapes under the fast urbanization process is helpful to optimize the urban land use pattern and to reduce and keep away the urban environment venture. So, in this paper, firstly based on the Landsat TM/ETM+ data in 1991, 1997, 2000 and 2004 and combining with the geographic information system (GIS) and landscape analysis techniques, the landscape pattern changes in Beijing region from 1991 to 2004 were measured. Then through quantifying the influences from four factors of inner stability, neighborhood stability, external accessibilities and external pressure within every natural/semi-natural landscape cell, a multi-factor evaluating model for the spatial ecological risk of landscape was constructed. And finally using the model the spatial ecological risk level of natural/semi-natural landscapes in Beijing region was assessed in the process of fast urban expansion from 1991 to 2004. The research showed that: (1)With the rapid urbanization process, the primary characteristic of the landscape changes in Beijing region was the persistent increase of factitious building landscape and the substantial decrease of cropland landscape from 1991 to 2004. The proportion of factitious building landscape cells increased from 5.58% in 1991 to 12.72% in 2004, and that of cropland landscape cells decreased from 33.14% in 1991 to 22.19% in 2004, with approximately an average annual reduction rate of 1%. In the meantime, there also was a durative increasing for the woodland landscape. (2)The landscape ecological risk level of the natural/semi-natural landscapes in the study area put up an ascending tendency during 1991 to 2004. For the natural/semi-natural landscapes in mountain regions, the landscape ecological risk level was better than that in plain areas, and the impact of the rapid urbanization process on the landscape ecological risk level of mountain regions was comparatively faint. (3)There also existed some differences among all the natural/semi-natural landscape styles in the study area. The landscape ecological risk level of forest landscape was the lowermost, and the mixed landscape was the topmost, namely the effect of the fast urbanization process to the fixed landscape was most obvious. (4)The newly increased landscape cells of construction land from 1991 to 2004 in Beijing region were primarily from the landscapes of cultivated land and mixed styles, and the total amount from the two landscape styles was more than 95%. Especially to the mixed landscape, the percentage was the highest and exceeded 60%.

Cite this article

LI Jing-gang, HE Chun-yang, LI Xiao-bing . Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment of Natural/Semi-natural Landscapes in Fast Urbanization Regions —A Case Study in Beijing, China[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2008 , 23(1) : 33 -47 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.01.005


[1] 曾辉,刘国军.基于景观结构的区域生态风险分析[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(5):454~457. [2] 肖杨,毛显强.区域景观生态风险空间分析[J].中国环境科学,2006,26(5):623~626. [3] 许学工,林辉平,付在毅,等.黄河三角洲湿地区域生态风险评价[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2001, 37(1):111~120. [4] 孙新亮,方创琳.干旱区城市化过程中的生态风险评价模型及应用——以河西地区城市化过程为例[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(5):668~674. [5] 付在毅,许学工,林辉平,等.辽河三角洲湿地区域生态风险评价[J].生态学报,2001,21(3):365~373. [6] Peterseil J, Wrbka T, Plutzar C, et al. Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrian agricultural landscapes-The SINUS approach[J]. Land Use Policy,2004,21:307-320. [7] Fu B J, Hu C X, Chen L D, et al. Evaluating change in agricultural landscape pattern between 1980 and 2000 in the Loess hilly region of Ansai County, China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2006,114: 387-396. [8] 北京市统计局.北京统计年鉴2005[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2005. [9] 顾朝林.北京土地利用/覆盖变化机制研究[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(4):300~312. [10] 何春阳,史培军,陈晋,等.北京地区城市化过程与机制研究[J].地理学报,2002,57(3):363~371. [11] 宗跃光.大都市空间扩展的廊道效应与景观结构优化——以北京地区为例[J].地理研究,1998,17(2): 119~124. [12] 刘盛和,吴传钧,沈洪泉.基于GIS的北京城市土地利用扩展模式[J].地理学报,2000,55(4):407~415. [13] Wu Q, Li H Q, Wang R S, et al. Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,78(4):322-333. [14] IIASA. Modeling land-use and land-cover changes in Europe and Northern Asia.1998,1999 Research Plan. [15] 史培军,陈晋,潘耀忠.深圳市土地利用变化机制分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(2):151~160. [16] Lucas I F J, Frans J M, Wel V D. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: A review[J]. Photogramme-tric Engineering & Remote Sensing,1994,60(4):410-432. [17] 施维林,李自珍,王兮之.沙坡头地区人工-自然景观空间格局研究[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(1):84~89. [18] Mcgarigal K, Marks B J. FRAGSTATS - Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure.Users Manual, version 2.0, 1994. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/pubs/pubs.html#fragstats. [19] 闾国年.《GIS空间关联模式发现》评述[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):封2. [20] 李迈和,Norbert Krauchi,杨健.生态干扰度:一种评价植被天然性程度的方法[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(5): 450~458. [21] Jalas J. Hemerobe and hemechore Pflanzenarten. Ein terminologischer Reformversuch[J]. Acta Fauna Flora Femm.,1955,72(11):1-15. [22] Sukopp H. Dynamik und Konstanz in der Flora der Bundesrepublik Deutschland[J]. Schr.-R. f. Vegetationskunde,1976,10:9-26. [23] O’Neill R V, Krummel J R, Gardner R H, et al. Indices of landscape pattern[J]. Landscape Ecology,1988, 1(3):152-162. [24] Steinhart U, Herzog F, Lausch A, et al. Hemeroby index for landscape monitoring and evaluation. In: Pykh Y A, Hyatt D E, Lenz R J. Environmental Indices - System Analysis Approach. Oxford, EOLSS Publ.,1999.237-254.