Rural revitalization effect of rural industry integration: Based on the utility perception perspective of rural residents

ZHANG Zhen-wang, ZHANG Jun-hui, SONG Yu

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7) : 1914-1932.

PDF(1006 KB)
PDF(1006 KB)
JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7) : 1914-1932. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250711
Regular Articles

Rural revitalization effect of rural industry integration: Based on the utility perception perspective of rural residents

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Based on the micro-data of China Land Economic Survey conducted in Jiangsu province and the utility perception of rural residents, this paper empirically analyzed the impact of rural industry integration on rural residents' satisfaction with rural revitalization construction and its mechanism by using the order probit model. It is found that: (1) Rural industry integration can significantly improve the satisfaction of rural revitalization construction, and this conclusion is still valid after considering a series of tests. (2) The improvement of rural industry integration degree is conducive to improve the satisfaction of rural revitalization construction, but different integration modes have different promoting effects on rural revitalization effect, especially the integration mode of technology penetration, chain extension and function expansion. (3) Raising household income, and enhancing economic status identity and subjective happiness perception are important mechanisms for rural industry integration to release the effect of rural revitalization. (4) The effect of rural industry integration on rural revitalization is more obvious in villages with higher economic development level and stronger intervention degree of rural affairs organization. This paper enriches the relevant research of rural industry integration, and provides new ideas for accelerating the process of agricultural and rural modernization, promoting the comprehensive revitalization of rural areas and improving the well-being of rural residents.

Key words

industrial integration / rural revitalization / rural residents / satisfaction / utility perception

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Zhen-wang, ZHANG Jun-hui, SONG Yu. Rural revitalization effect of rural industry integration: Based on the utility perception perspective of rural residents[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2025, 40(7): 1914-1932 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20250711

References

[1]
姚林香, 卢光熙. 革命老区振兴规划实施的乡村振兴效应: 基于对省界毗邻地区县域样本的分析. 中国农村经济, 2023, (3): 22-44.
[YAO L X, LU G X. The rural revitalization effect of the implementation of the national revitalization plan of old revolutionary areas: Evidence from adjacent counties surrounding provincial borders. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023, (3): 22-44.]
[2]
张圆刚, 郝亚梦, 郭英之. 共同富裕视域下乡村旅游发展的区域不平衡性: 理论内涵、关键问题与指标体系. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(2): 403-418.
Abstract
乡村旅游发展的区域不平衡是制约乡村共同富裕的突出问题。研究立足共同富裕新挑战,超越单一经济视角,兼顾物质和精神富裕,考量绝对与相对贫困,剖析区域间与区域内多层空间,在宏微观人本理念指导下对乡村旅游发展区域不平衡的内涵进行更新;指出共同富裕视域下乡村旅游发展的区域不平衡性关键问题;建构宏观、中观和微观指标体系。宏观层面通过生态指标、供给指标、文化指标衡量发展能力,社会指标衡量发展机会,经济指标和治理指标衡量发展结果;中观层面通过居民协同治理水平、分配公平水平测度各主体间发展过程的公平性与发展结果的共享程度,主客价值共创水平测度居民与旅游者的互动关系;微观层面以居民满意度为落脚点,关注乡村旅游地居民的幸福感、获得感、公平感、安全感等。研究为动态化、精细化和定量化研究区域不平衡性提供新的理论视角与分析工具,有助于丰富乡村旅游研究的理论内涵,为推动乡村共同富裕和区域旅游协调发展提供科学依据与应用参考。
[ZHANG Y G, HAO Y M, GUO Y Z. Regional imbalance of rural tourism development from the perspective of common prosperity: Theoretical connotation, key issues and measurement system. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(2): 403-418.]
[3]
周国华, 龙花楼, 林万龙, 等. 新时代“三农” 问题和乡村振兴的理论思考与实践发展. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(8): 1919-1940.
Abstract
“三农”是百年党建与中国城乡发展的一条重要主线。为推进新时代的“三农”问题破解与乡村振兴战略实施,特邀请“三农”问题与乡村振兴研究领域的10位专家开展访谈。访谈主要从历史过程与制度情境、城乡系统与跨尺度空间、政策理论—技术方法—实践路径相融合等三大视角,围绕“三农”战略阶段与制度变迁、“三农”问题的本质与新“三农”问题破解、乡村振兴机制与乡建实践等三条主线展开。主要结论有:(1)时空过程和制度语境下的“三农”问题本质、关键领域与体制机制创新。“三农”发展的规律认知与政策调控需要放在全球时空尺度与城乡地域系统中综合把握。“三农”问题是城乡地域系统整体框架下乡村地域系统功能提升的优化决策问题。城乡发展不平衡,农村发展不充分是新时代“三农”问题的集中反映,“三农”问题的症结在于“人地业”的不协调发展。新时代的“三农”发展体制和工作机制,需在国家粮食安全、农民生计发展、现代农业农村发展、乡村振兴与城乡融合发展等关键领域,抓好两个“底线”、做好两个“衔接”、促进两个“融合”。(2)城乡系统互动与人民共同富裕要求下的乡村振兴理论与“三生”空间规划。中国“三农”问题的研究与破解,根植于人地关系地域系统理论与区位理论、部门经济理论和经济周期理论以及发展经济学理论、社会功能理论与社会冲突理论的多学科沃土。在“三农”问题研究实践中也发展出了土地利用转型理论、乡村重构理论、乡村发展多体多极理论、界面理论、乡村吸引力以及乡村可持续性等理论。从区域发展理论和宏观战略政策来看,城乡融合发展与人民共同富裕,是区域均衡发展和中国式现代化的结果表征与应有之义。“让乡村生活具有吸引力”的民间表达与“2035年乡村基本实现现代化”的乡村振兴战略目标互为“表里”关系,可从乡村聚落演变与多功能转型、城乡互动下的乡村绅士化与乡村吸引力、乡村可持续性科学指导下的乡村现代化发展得到综合解释。提升地方品质是以创新驱动乡村振兴的本质要求和一般规律,基于禀赋的特色发展、数字化转型和城镇圈化是重要推进路径。以空间规划来引领城乡空间融合,以土地综合整治推动人居空间品质提升,以精细化管理助力农业空间多功能价值实现,以系统性保护和修复保障生态空间可持续利用,统筹乡村“三生”空间重构和功能融合发展,是乡村振兴和新型城乡关系构建的坚实基础。(3)生态文明建设与治理现代化新需求下全面乡村振兴的路径机制和乡村建设的技术支撑。全面乡村振兴需要“业”的振兴、“地”的改革、“人”的福祉发展与“技”的智能更新。一是统合农业高质量发展与乡村高品质宜业宜居问题,积极从大食物观的新思路,联动自然科学、工程技术创新与制度创新,落实食物安全和重要农产品供给保障安全;二是亟需创新农村土地系统的产权—治权融合机制,尤其是积极构建农户参与的农村绿色发展机制及生态环境治理外部性收益分享机制;三是打通农民分享农村资产升值收益的堵点、补齐小农户与现代农业有效衔接的短板、树立适应中国式现代化需要的县域治理理念;四是以“可计算乡村”理论和技术,推进国家与乡村之间的有效衔接和信息共享,通过多级主体共建共治共管,共同缔造宜居宜业和美乡村。上述观点,可为朝向中国式现代化的“三农”工作创新与乡村振兴实践提供理论借鉴和决策参考。
[ZHOU G H, LONG H L, LIN W L, et al. Theoretical debates and practical development of the "three rural issues" and rural revitalization in the New Era. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(8): 1919-1940.]
[4]
刘佳, 赵青华. 乡村旅游发展对乡村振兴的影响效应: 基于新内源性发展理论的实证检验. 农业技术经济, 1-19, 2024-03-16, https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.jae.20231126.001.
[LIU J, ZHAO Q H. The effect of rural tourism development on rural revitalization: An empirical test based on the new endogenous development theory. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 1-19, 2024-03-16, https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.jae.20231126.001.]
[5]
赵雪, 石宝峰, 盖庆恩, 等. 以融合促振兴: 新型农业经营主体参与产业融合的增收效应. 管理世界, 2023, 39(6): 86-100.
[ZHAO X, SHI B F, GAI Q E, et al. Promoting revitalization through integration: The income increase effect of new type of agricultural operating entities participating in industrial integration. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(6): 86-100.]
[6]
付阳奇, 朱玉春, 刘天军. 村庄产业融合对农地再配置的影响: 来自江苏省的微观证据. 中国农村观察, 2023, (4): 109-128.
[FU Y Q, ZHU Y C, LIU T J. The effect of rural industrial integration on the reallocation of farmland: Micro evidence from Jiangsu province. China Rural Survey, 2023, (4): 109-128.]
[7]
齐文浩, 李佳俊, 曹建民, 等. 农村产业融合提高农户收入的机理与路径研究: 基于农村异质性的新视角. 农业技术经济, 2021, (8): 105-118.
[QI W H, LI J J, CAO J M, et al. Research on the mechanism and path of rural industry integration to improve farmers' income: A new perspective based on rural heterogeneity. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021, (8): 105-118.]
[8]
苏毅清, 游玉婷, 王志刚. 农村一二三产业融合发展: 理论探讨、现状分析与对策建议. 中国软科学, 2016, (8): 17-28.
[SU Y Q, YOU Y T, WANG Z G. Convergence development of primary, secondary and tertiary industries: Theoretical discussion, situation analysis and suggestions. China Soft Science, 2016, (8): 17-28.]
[9]
张义博. 农业现代化视野的产业融合互动及其路径找寻. 改革, 2015, (2): 98-107.
[ZHANG Y B. Industrial convergence and interaction in the vision of agricultural modernization and its path. Reform, 2015, (2): 98-107.]
[10]
赵霞, 韩一军, 姜楠. 农村三产融合: 内涵界定、现实意义及驱动因素分析. 农业经济问题, 2017, 38(4): 49-57, 111.
[ZHAO X, HAN Y J, JIANG N. Integration of three industries in rural areas: Connotation definition, realistic meanings and driving factors analysis. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2017, 38(4): 49-57, 111.]
[11]
张元洁, 田云刚. 马克思的产业理论对乡村产业振兴的指导意义. 中国农村经济, 2020, (10): 2-16.
[ZHANG Y J, TIAN Y G. The guiding significance of Karl Marx's industrial theory to rural industry revitalization. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020, (10): 2-16.]
[12]
李晓龙, 冉光和. 农村产业融合发展如何影响城乡收入差距: 基于农村经济增长与城镇化的双重视角. 农业技术经济, 2019, (8): 17-28.
[LI X L, RAN G H. How does the rural industrial convergence development affect the urban-rural income gap: Based on the dual perspective of rural economic growth and urbanization. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2019, (8): 17-28.]
[13]
钱明辉, 李胡蓉, 郭佳璐, 等. 中国农村产业融合模式分析与融合度测算: 基于文本数据挖掘的视角. 农业经济问题, 2023, 44(6): 58-77.
[QIAN M H, LI H R, GUO J L, et al. Analysis of China's rural industrial integration model and measurement of integration degree: From the perspective of text data mining. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2023, 44(6): 58-77.]
[14]
张林, 温涛. 数字普惠金融如何影响农村产业融合发展?. 中国农村经济, 2022, (7): 59-80.
[ZHANG L, WEN T. How does digital inclusive finance affect the integrated development of rural industries?. Chinese Rural Economy, 2022, (7): 59-80.]
[15]
陈红霞, 雷佳. 农村一二三产业融合水平测度及时空耦合特征分析. 中国软科学, 2021, (s1): 357-364.
[CHEN H X, LEI J. The level measurement and spatio-temporal coupling characteristic analysis of the integration of rural primary, secondary and tertiary industries. China Soft Science, 2021, (s1): 357-364.]
[16]
郝爱民, 谭家银. 农村产业融合赋能农业韧性的机理及效应测度. 农业技术经济, 2023, (7): 88-107.
[HAO A M, TAN J Y. Empowering agricultural resilience by rural industrial integration: Influence mechanism and effect analysis. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2023, (7): 88-107.]
[17]
YANG G Y, ZHOU C C, ZHANG J K. Does industry convergence between agriculture and related sectors alleviate rural poverty: Evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25(11): 12887-12914.
[18]
李琳, 田彩红. 农村一二三产业融合促进了县域共同富裕吗: 来自长江经济带579个县域的证据. 农业技术经济, 2024, (4): 59-75.
[LI L, TIAN C H. Can the integration of rural primary, secondary and tertiary industries promote the common prosperity of county: Evidence from 579 counties in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2024, (4): 59-75.]
[19]
田彩红, 李琳, 廖斌. 农村一二三产业融合能否促进农业绿色发展: 以长江经济带579个县域为例. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(3): 601-619.
Abstract
基于2006—2021年长江经济带579个县域的面板数据,采用固定效应模型、门槛模型探讨农村一二三产业融合对农业绿色发展的影响效应及非线性调节机制。研究表明:(1)研究期间,长江经济带县域农业绿色发展和农村一二三产业融合水平均呈波动上升趋势,并呈现“下游高、中游平、上游低”的空间分异格局。(2)长江经济带县域农村一二三产业融合能显著促进农业绿色发展,但影响效应存在区域异质性,表现为下游县域>中游县域>上游县域。(3)农村一二三产业融合对农业绿色发展的影响存在双门槛特征,在整体层面和中游县域呈“跃迁式”增长特征,在下游县域呈“U”型特征,在上游县域先呈边际效应递增再呈边际效应递减。农村一二三产业融合对农业绿色发展的影响存在产业升级的双门槛特征,在整体层面和上游县域、中游县域呈“跃迁式”增长特征,在下游县域呈“增长—缓冲—增长”特征。农村一二三产业融合对农业绿色发展的影响存在技术创新的双门槛特征,在整体层面和中游县域呈“跃迁式”增长特征,下游县域呈“增长—缓冲—增长”特征,上游县域不存在门槛效应。研究结果可为中国推动农业绿色发展提供决策参考,也为其他欠发达国家的农业绿色发展提供经验借鉴。
[TIAN C H, LI L, LIAO B. Can integration of rural primary, secondary and tertiary industries promote agricultural green development: A case study of 579 counties in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(3): 601-619.]
[20]
熊小林. 聚焦乡村振兴战略探究农业农村现代化方略: “乡村振兴战略研讨会” 会议综述. 中国农村经济, 2018, (1): 138-143.
[XIONG X L. An exploration of strategic modernization of agriculture and rural areas with a focus on rural revitalization strategy: A workshop review. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (1): 138-143.]
[21]
黄祖辉. 准确把握中国乡村振兴战略. 中国农村经济, 2018, (4): 2-12.
[HUANG Z H. On the strategy of rural revitalization in China. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (4): 2-12.]
[22]
张挺, 李闽榕, 徐艳梅. 乡村振兴评价指标体系构建与实证研究. 管理世界, 2018, 34(8): 99-105.
[ZHANG T, LI M R, XU Y M. The construction and empirical study of rural revitalization evaluation index system. Journal of Management World, 2018, 34(8): 99-105.]
[23]
吕承超, 崔悦. 乡村振兴发展: 指标评价体系、地区差距与空间极化. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42(5): 20-32.
[LYU C C, CUI Y. Rural vitalization and development: Evaluation index system, regional disparity and spatial polarization. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42(5): 20-32.]
[24]
姚树荣, 周诗雨. 乡村振兴的共建共治共享路径研究. 中国农村经济, 2020, (2): 14-29.
[YAO S R, ZHOU S Y. The research on the rural revitalization path based on collaboration, participation and common interests. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020, (2): 14-29.]
[25]
薄文广, 钱镱, 屈建成, 等. 新型城镇化与乡村振兴耦合协调及交互影响研究: 基于156个地级市面板数据的实证分析. 中国软科学, 2023, (9): 106-116.
[BO W G, QIAN Y, QU J C, et al. Study on coupling coordination and interaction between new urbanization and rural revitalization: Empirical analysis based on panel data of 156 prefecture-level cities. China Soft Science, 2023, (9): 106-116.]
[26]
龙花楼, 屠爽爽. 土地利用转型与乡村振兴. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(7): 1-6.
[LONG H L, TU S S. Land use transition and rural vitalization. China Land Science, 2018, 32(7): 1-6.]
[27]
陈志军, 徐飞雄. 乡村旅游地旅游发展对乡村振兴的影响效应与机理: 以关中地区为例. 经济地理, 2022, 42(2): 231-240.
Abstract
选择陕西省关中地区的袁家村、上王村与茯茶小镇作为实证研究区域,基于旅游发展、乡村重构和乡村振兴3个潜变量,构建旅游发展对乡村振兴影响的结构关系模型。通过问卷收集数据,运用SPSS、Amos软件和验证性因子分析方法,深入探讨乡村旅游地旅游发展对乡村振兴的影响效应及作用机理。研究表明:①旅游发展对乡村重构有极为显著的正向影响(0.868),旅游发展对乡村振兴有直接的正向影响(0.049),但其影响非常微弱,最主要的影响来自间接效应(0.748)。②旅游发展的二维影响中,旅游发展对乡村重构的影响以经济重构和社会重构为主,以空间重构为辅,对乡村振兴的影响以产业振兴、人才振兴、文化振兴为主,以生态振兴和组织振兴为辅。③乡村重构对乡村振兴产生极为显著的正向影响,也是推动乡村振兴最主要的直接因素,在旅游发展与乡村振兴之间起完全中介效应。④旅游发展对乡村振兴的影响作用机理符合DPSIR模型,通过乡村重构直接驱动和旅游发展间接驱动的“双轮驱动”,通过市场机制的“自组织”及正确的政府规划决策和宏观调控下的利益相关者协作的“他组织”的共同作用,旅游发展推动乡村旅游地沿着正确轨道全面重构和深度重构,最终在乡村地域功能优化或强化的转型发展中实现乡村振兴。
[CHEN Z J, XU F X. Mechanism of rural tourism development on rural revitalization: Taking Guanzhong area as an example. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(2): 231-240.]
[28]
张旺, 白永秀. 数字经济与乡村振兴耦合的理论构建、实证分析及优化路径. 中国软科学, 2022, (1): 132-146.
[ZHANG W, BAI Y X. Theoretical construction, empirical analysis and optimization path of the coupling of digital economy and rural revitalization. China Soft Science, 2022, (1): 132-146.]
[29]
郑永君, 李春雨, 刘海颖. 旅游驱动的三产融合型乡村振兴模式研究: 基于共享发展理论视角的案例分析. 农业经济问题, 2023, (6): 97-110.
[ZHENG Y J, LI C Y, LIU H Y. Study on tourism-driven rural revitalization model of integration of three industries: A case study from the perspective of shared development theory. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2023, (6): 97-110.]
[30]
储亚娟, 吉振峰, 黄美蓉. 文体旅产业融合共轭驱动乡村振兴的价值、机制与推展. 社会科学家, 2024, (5): 72-78.
[CHU Y J, JI Z F, HUANG M R. The value, mechanism and promotion of rural revitalization driven by the integration and conjugation of cultural, sports and tourism industries. Social Scientist, 2024, (5): 72-78.]
[31]
いまむら ならおみ. 第六次産業を創造する:農業を21世紀の多彩な産業にする. ちいきかいはつげっかん, 1996, 40(3): 335-341.
[IMAMURA N. Creating the sixth industry: Making agriculture a flourishing industry in the 21st Century. Regional Development Monthly, 1996, 40(3): 335-341.]
[32]
孙雪峰, 张凡. 农村集体经济的富民效应研究: 基于物质富裕和精神富裕的双重视角. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022, 22(6): 183-194.
[SUN X F, ZHANG F. Study on the enrichment effect of rural collective economy: The dual perspective of physical and spiritual affluence. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 22(6): 183-194.]
[33]
李升. 主客观阶层位置与社会政治态度研究: 兼论中国中产阶层的“稳定器” 功能. 社会发展研究, 2017, 4(2): 73-88, 243-244.
[LI S. The social-political attitudes of subjective-objective class: A study on social function of the middle class in China. Journal of Social Development, 2017, 4(2): 73-88, 243-244.]
[34]
MIRET M, CABALLERO F F, CHATTERJI S, et al. Health and happiness: Cross-sectional household surveys in Finland, Poland and Spain. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2014, 92(10): 716-725.
To explore the associations between health and how people evaluate and experience their lives.We analysed data from nationally-representative household surveys originally conducted in 2011-2012 in Finland, Poland and Spain. These surveys provided information on 10 800 adults, for whom experienced well-being was measured using the Day Reconstruction Method and evaluative well-being was measured with the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale. Health status was assessed by questions in eight domains including mobility and self-care. We used multiple linear regression, structural equation models and multiple indicators/multiple causes models to explore factors associated with experienced and evaluative well-being.The multiple indicator/multiple causes model conducted over the pooled sample showed that respondents with younger age (effect size, β = 0.19), with higher levels of education (β = -0.12), a history of depression (β = -0.17), poor health status (β = 0.29) or poor cognitive functioning (β = 0.09) reported worse experienced well-being. Additional factors associated with worse evaluative well-being were male sex (β = -0.03), not living with a partner (β = 0.07), and lower occupational (β = -0.07) or income levels (β = 0.08). Health status was the factor most strongly correlated with both experienced and evaluative well-being, even after controlling for a history of depression, age, income and other sociodemographic variables.Health status is an important correlate of well-being. Therefore, strategies to improve population health would also improve people's well-being.
[35]
FREY B S, STUTZER A. What can economists learn from happiness research?. Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40(2): 402-435.
[36]
郑沃林, 洪炜杰, 罗必良. 在促进共同富裕中增进农民幸福感: 基于经济收入—社会网络—生态环境框架的分析. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2021, 21(6): 140-151.
[ZHENG W L, HONG W J, LUO B L. Enhancing farmers' happiness in common prosperity: Analysis based on economic income-social network-ecological welfare framework. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2021, 21(6): 140-151.]
[37]
麻学锋, 胡双林. 自然资源驱动型旅游城镇化与居民幸福协调发展及演化: 以张家界为例. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(2): 442-459.
Abstract
建构自然资源驱动型旅游城镇化与居民幸福协调发展的理论框架,以自然资源驱动型旅游城市张家界为例,运用耦合协调度模型、趋势面分析及二次指数平滑预测模型等,对2002—2020年协调发展时空演化规律及2021—2030年耦合协调度进行分析与预测,并使用灰色关联度模型测度协调发展的主要影响因素。结果表明:(1)张家界旅游城镇化与居民幸福发展水平总体不断提高,并由初期的旅游城镇化滞后状态向同步发展状态转变;(2)协调发展程度不断增强,实现了由濒临失调向良好协调的转变,预计2030年进入优质协调状态;(3)耦合协调空间分异显著,具有“东高西低、南高北低”的特征;(4)协调发展的影响因素以物质基础和保障为主,但非物质影响因素的重要性也在逐渐增强。
[MA X F, HU S L. Coordinated development and evolution of natural resource-driven tourism urbanization and residents' happiness: Take Zhangjiajie as an example. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(2): 442-459.]
[38]
许海平, 张雨雪, 傅国华. 绝对收入、社会阶层认同与农村居民幸福感: 基于CGSS的微观经验证据. 农业技术经济, 2020, (11): 56-71.
[XU H P, ZHANG Y X, FU G H. Income, class identity, and happiness of rural residents: Empirical analysis based on intermediary effect model. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2020, (11): 56-71.]
[39]
江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应. 中国工业经济, 2022, (5): 100-120.
[JIANG T. Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference. China Industrial Economics, 2022, (5): 100-120.]
[40]
张振旺, 李建强. 城乡融合对中国农业生态效率的影响及其机制. 资源科学, 2024, 46(8): 1570-1587.
Abstract
【目的】城乡融合是影响农业生态效率的关键要素,本文通过厘清两者之间的逻辑关系及其机制,为推动农业生态效率稳步提升、促进农业绿色发展提供政策启示。【方法】基于2006—2020年中国31个省份的面板数据,采用熵值法和Super-NSBM模型分别对城乡融合水平、农业生态效率及其子阶段进行测度,分析城乡融合和农业生态效率的时空演进,然后综合运用固定效应模型和门槛效应模型剖析了城乡融合对农业生态效率的影响及其作用机制。【结果】①城乡融合不仅可以有效促进农业生态效率的提高,而且在农业生产积累阶段和农业生态治理阶段均呈现显著的促进作用,城乡融合主要是通过改善技术效率对农业生态效率产生影响。从城乡融合分解项来看,土地的融合和资本的融合是农业生态效率提升的关键所在。②从地理区位和粮食生产功能区异质性来看,中西部地区的城乡融合对农业生态效率有显著的提升作用,而东部地区的作用效果并不显著。相较于粮食主产区,城乡融合在非粮食主产区可以产生出更大的农业生态效率提升效应。③随着城乡融合发展水平的提高,城乡融合对农业生态效率的促进作用存在着显著的门槛效应,即城乡融合对农业生态效率的正向影响具备边际效应递减的特征。【结论】城乡融合对中国农业生态效率具有积极影响,且这一影响具备地理区位异质性、粮食生产功能区异质性和门槛效应。为此,应鼓励绿色创新技术的自主开发和引进,拓宽绿色生产技术应用渠道,通过建立差别化的城乡融合发展体制机制,推动人、土地、资本高效融合,以实现农业绿色和经济增长的协调发展。
[ZHANG Z W, LI J Q. Impact of urban-rural integration on agricultural ecological efficiency in China and mechanism. Resources Science, 2024, 46(8): 1570-1587.]

[Objective] Urban-rural integration is a key factor affecting agricultural ecological efficiency. This paper clarifies the logical relationship between the two and its mechanism, hoping to provide policy enlightenment for promoting the steady improvement of agricultural ecological efficiency and promoting the green development of agriculture. [Methods] Based on the panel data of 31 provinces in China’s mainland from 2006 to 2020, the entropy method and Super-NSBM model were used to measure urban-rural integration and agricultural ecological efficiency and their sub-stages, and the spatial distribution of urban-rural integration and agricultural ecological efficiency was compared and analyzed. Then the fixed effect model and threshold effect model were used to analyze the influence of urban-rural integration on agricultural ecological efficiency and its mechanism. [Results] The results show that urban-rural integration could not only effectively promote the improvement of agricultural ecological efficiency, but also significantly promote the agricultural production accumulation stage and the agricultural ecological management stage. Urban-rural integration had an impact on agricultural ecological efficiency mainly through improving technical efficiency. Based on the decomposition of urban-rural integration, the integration of land and capital was the key to improve agricultural ecological efficiency. From the perspective of geographical location heterogeneity and grain production functional area heterogeneity, in the central and western regions, the integrated development of urban and rural areas played a significant role in promoting agricultural ecological efficiency, while the effect in the eastern region was not significant. Compared with major grain-producing areas, urban-rural integration in non-major grain-producing areas can produce a more significant and larger effect on improving agricultural ecological efficiency. With the improvement of the development level of urban-rural integration, the promotion effect of urban-rural integration on agricultural ecological efficiency had a significant threshold effect, that is, the positive impact of urban-rural integration on agricultural ecological efficiency was characterized by diminishing marginal effect. [Conclusion] Rural-urban integration had a positive impact on agricultural ecological efficiency in China, and this impact showed geographical location heterogeneity, grain production functional area heterogeneity, and threshold effect. To this end, the independent development and introduction of green innovative technologies should be encouraged, the application channels of green production technologies should be broadened, and the efficient integration of people, land, and capital should be promoted through the establishment of differentiated urban-rural integrated development systems and mechanisms, in order to realize the coordinated development of green agricultural production and economic growth.

[41]
韦锋, 李亭颖, 江紫薇. 脱贫户对乡村振兴建设有更高满意度吗?. 农林经济管理学报, 2024, 23(1): 12-20.
[WEI F, LI T Y, JIANG Z W. Do poverty-free households have higher satisfaction with rural revitalization?. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2024, 23(1): 12-20.]
[42]
徐超, 周彩, 吴一平. 设立村务监督委员会能否改善村庄治理绩效: 基于“千村调查” 数据的实证分析. 中国农村经济, 2023, (11): 164-184.
[XU C, ZHOU C, WU Y P. Does village affairs supervision committee improve rural governance performance: An empirical analysis based on "thousand villages survey" data. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023, (11): 164-184.]
[43]
杨义武, 芦千文. 村级组织负责人“一肩挑” 能否提升农村居民生活满意度: 基于中国乡村振兴调查数据的经验证据. 中国农村观察, 2024, (1): 161-183.
[YANG Y W, LU Q W. Do village leaders "one shoulder multitasking" improve rural residents' life satisfaction: Empirical evidence from the data of China rural revitalization survey. China Rural Survey, 2024, (1): 161-183.]
[44]
ROODMAN D. Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with CMP. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 2011, 11(2): 159-206.
[45]
张宽, 雷卓骏, 李后建. 市场准入管制与企业全要素生产率: 来自负面清单的证据. 世界经济, 2023, 46(5): 152-176.
[ZHANG K, LEI Z J, LI H J. Market access control and corporate total factor productivity: Evidence from the negative list. The Journal of World Economy, 2023, 46(5): 152-176.]
[46]
NUNN N, WANTCHEKON L. The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 2011, 101(7): 3221-3252.
PDF(1006 KB)

134

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/