
Coupling relationship and interactive response between ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin
LIU Lin-ke, LIANG Liu-tao, GAO Pan, FAN Chang-sheng, WANG Hong-hao, WANG Han
JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1) : 176-195.
Coupling relationship and interactive response between ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin
Based on the analysis of the coupling mechanism of ecological protection and high-quality development, the provincial unit is taken as the research unit to evaluate the coupling coordination degree of ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin, compared with the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Finally, the panel VAR model is used to quantitatively analyze the interactive response relationship between ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) During the study period, both the ecological protection index and the high-quality development index of the Yellow River Basin showed an increasing trend, and the overall pattern of the middle and lower reaches was higher than that of the upper reaches. (2) The coupling coordination degree of ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin showed an overall increasing trend. Among them, the coupling coordination degree from 2003 to 2011 was less than 0.5, which was an antagonistic stage; in 2012-2017, the coupling coordination degree is between 0.5-0.7, which belongs to the run-in stage. The metropolis in the Yellow River Basin presents a spatial pattern of downstream > middle reaches > upstream, with the highest coupling coordination between Shandong and Shanxi at the provincial level, and the lowest coupling coordination between Ningxia and Qinghai. (3) The ecological protection index of the Yellow River Basin is slightly higher than the national average. The high-quality development index and the coupling coordination degree are lower than the national average. The ecological protection index of the Yellow River Basin in the early stage (2003-2009) is lower than that of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, while it is higher in the later period (2010-2017). The high-quality development index and coupling coordination degree are lower compared with the Yangtze River Economic Belt in all the years. (4) Both the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin have positive progressive effects and inertial development characteristics, and their effects on themselves are declining year by year, and the degree of attenuation of high-quality development is more obvious. The ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin play a positive role in promotion, but due to the overall low level of ecological protection and high-quality development and uneven internal development, the mechanism of action of the two is not significant.
ecological protection / high-quality development / coupling coordination / interactive response / Yellow River Basin {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] |
魏伟, 石培基, 魏晓旭, 等. 中国陆地经济与生态环境协调发展的空间演变. 生态学报, 2018,38(8):2636-2648.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
魏敏, 李书昊. 新时代中国经济高质量发展水平的测度研究. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2018,35(11):3-20.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
马茹, 罗晖, 王宏伟, 等. 中国区域经济高质量发展评价指标体系及测度研究. 中国软科学, 2019, (7):60-67.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
王育宝, 陆扬, 王玮华. 经济高质量发展与生态环境保护协调耦合研究新进展. 北京工业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2019,19(5):84-94.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
闫桂权, 何玉成, 张晓恒. 绿色技术进步、农业经济增长与污染空间溢出: 来自中国农业水资源利用的证据. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019,28(12):2921-2935.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
李雅男, 丁振民, 邓元杰, 等. 中国城市工业化发展与PM2.5的关系: 兼论EKC曲线形成的内在机制. 环境科学, 2020,41(4):1987-1996.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
张庆宇, 张雨龙, 潘斌斌. 改革开放40年中国经济增长与碳排放影响因素分析. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019,33(10):9-13.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
王维. 长江经济带生态保护与经济发展耦合协调发展格局研究. 湖北社会科学, 2018, (1):73-80.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
肖黎明, 张仙鹏. 强可持续理念下绿色创新效率与生态福利绩效耦合协调的时空特征. 自然资源学报, 2019,34(2):312-324.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
许振宇, 贺建林. 湖南省生态经济系统耦合状态分析. 资源科学, 2008,30(2):185-191.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
周成, 冯学钢, 唐睿. 区域经济—生态环境—旅游产业耦合协调发展分析与预测: 以长江经济带沿线各省市为例. 经济地理, 2016,36(3):186-193.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
方创琳, 周成虎, 顾朝林, 等. 特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径. 地理学报, 2016,71(4):531-550.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
蒋黎, 王晓君. 环境质量与农业经济增长的内在关系探讨: 基于我国31个省区面板数据的EKC分析. 农业经济问题, 2019, (12):43-51.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
姜磊, 柏玲, 吴玉鸣. 中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析: 兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(5):788-799.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[22] |
赵先贵, 马彩虹, 赵晶, 等. 足迹家族的改进及其在新疆生态文明建设评价中的应用. 地理研究, 2016,35(12):2384-2394.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[23] |
高阳, 黄姣, 王羊, 等. 基于能值分析及小波变换的城市生态经济系统研究: 以深圳市为例. 资源科学, 2011,33(4):781-788.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[24] |
方创琳, 任宇飞. 京津冀城市群地区城镇化与生态环境近远程耦合能值代谢效率及环境压力分析. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2017,47(7):833-846.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[25] |
刘耀彬, 李仁东, 宋学锋. 中国区域城市化与生态环境耦合的关联分析. 地理学报, 2005,60(2):237-247.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[26] |
刘承良, 颜琪, 罗静. 武汉城市圈经济资源环境耦合的系统动力学模拟. 地理研究, 2013,32(5):857-869.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[27] |
崔学刚, 方创琳, 刘海猛, 等. 城镇化与生态环境耦合动态模拟理论及方法的研究进展. 地理学报, 2019,74(6):1079-1096.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[28] |
王介勇, 吴建寨. 黄河三角洲区域生态经济系统动态耦合过程及趋势. 生态学报, 2012,32(15):4861-4868.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[29] |
马彩虹, 赵晶, 赵先贵. 基于足迹家族的宁夏资源环境压力评估及时空差异分析. 环境科学学报, 2016,36(8):3049-3058.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[30] |
赵建吉, 刘岩, 朱亚坤, 等. 黄河流域新型城镇化与生态环境耦合的时空格局及影响因素. 资源科学, 2020,42(1):159-171.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[31] |
邢霞, 修长百, 刘玉春. 黄河流域水资源利用效率与经济发展的耦合协调关系研究. 软科学, 2020,34(8):44-50.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[32] |
焦念涛, 郑向敏, 殷杰. 黄河流域旅游经济与生态环境耦合协调度评价及影响因素. 资源开发与市场, 2020,36(6):591-598.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[33] |
杨莉, 刘海燕. 习近平“两山理论”的科学内涵及思维能力的分析. 自然辩证法研究, 2019,35(10):107-111.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[34] |
胡咏君, 吴剑, 胡瑞山. 生态文明建设“两山”理论的内在逻辑与发展路径. 中国工程科学, 2019,21(5):151-158.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[35] |
梁流涛. 经济增长与环境质量关系研究: 以江苏省为例. 南京农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2008, (1):20-25.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[36] |
张军扩, 侯永志, 刘培林, 等. 高质量发展的目标要求和战略路径. 管理世界, 2019,35(7):1-7.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[37] |
毕国华, 杨庆媛, 刘苏. 中国省域生态文明建设与城市化的耦合协调发展. 经济地理, 2017,37(1):50-58.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[38] |
樊杰, 王亚飞, 王怡轩. 基于地理单元的区域高质量发展研究: 兼论黄河流域同长江流域发展的条件差异及重点. 经济地理, 2020,40(1):1-11.
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[39] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |