
Research progress of sustainable cities and its implications for national territory spatial plan
ZHU Xiao-dan, YE Chao, LI Si-meng
JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9) : 2120-2133.
Research progress of sustainable cities and its implications for national territory spatial plan
Sustainable cities are the focus of attention in many areas. The advent of the intelligent era and the evolution of the network society have promoted the study of the relationship between technology and sustainable development. Sustainable cities need innovative research methods and contents. The domestic academic circles have not paid enough attention to the forefront of sustainable cities. The national territory spatial plan also needs to draw on and integrate the relevant theories of sustainable cities. With the help of CiteSpace software, this article systematically reviews the current research situations and development trend of sustainable cities. The paper analyzes its evolution and research hotspots, and finds that the research on sustainable cities has mainly experienced four stages: germination, rise, growth and diffusion. International sustainable cities research mainly focuses on three aspects: climate change, urban governance and smart cities. The research changes from "sustainable" to "smart sustainable". Big data-assisted urban planning has become a trend, and the co-governance of diverse community stakeholders has gradually increased. However, the research and practice of smart sustainable cities in China are insufficient, the evaluation index system of sustainable cities is not perfect, the international experience is lacking, and the research on joint urban-rural governance is insufficient. The combination of the new sustainable cities research framework and the territorial development plan will be the key to future research. The practice of sustainable cities in China is not just for cities, but for urban-rural co-governance, which is also a concentrated manifestation of sustainability in terms of time, space and society. In the evaluation index system of sustainable cities, rural development indicators should be considered. And the issues of rural intelligence, environmental compatibility and technology compatibility in the national territory spatial plan are also important aspects of sustainable cities. Sustainable cities should focus on the coordinated development of nature, society and technology, not only to protect the environment and natural resources, but also to reform the urban and rural governance model and system. The national territory spatial plan is an important foundation for China to achieve sustainable cities. Starting from the proposition of "urban-rural China", urban-rural co-governance is the focus of China's sustainable urban development and research, and is also the main content of the national territorial development planning. Only through the reform of the combination of multi-dimensional systems can the concept of sustainable cities be implemented, and the integration of urban and rural areas can be achieved with the help of intelligent technology. In the future, China's sustainable cities research and practice will become a focus.
sustainable cities / urbanization / national territorial spatial plan / urban governance / smart cities / CiteSpace {{custom_keyword}} /
Table 1 Top 20 keywords of high frequency and its centrality in sustainable cities research from 1998 to 2018 |
序号 | 频次 | 中心性 | 年份 | 关键词 | 序号 | 频次 | 中心性 | 年份 | 关键词 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 194 | 0.16 | 2003 | city | 11 | 39 | 0.1 | 2011 | urbanization |
2 | 193 | 0.15 | 2004 | sustainable city | 12 | 38 | 0.06 | 2007 | energy |
3 | 107 | 0.05 | 2006 | sustainability | 13 | 35 | 0.05 | 2004 | environment |
4 | 57 | 0.02 | 2003 | system | 14 | 35 | 0.03 | 2004 | China |
5 | 52 | 0.16 | 1998 | sustainable development | 15 | 34 | 0.04 | 2013 | framework |
6 | 47 | 0.05 | 2014 | smart city | 16 | 34 | 0.01 | 2012 | model |
7 | 47 | 0.05 | 2007 | climate change | 17 | 33 | 0.05 | 2007 | urban |
8 | 46 | 0.17 | 2012 | management | 18 | 31 | 0.02 | 2013 | performance |
9 | 40 | 0.04 | 1998 | urban sustainability | 19 | 30 | 0.05 | 2007 | policy |
10 | 39 | 0.06 | 2010 | governance | 20 | 29 | 0.04 | 2012 | land use |
Fig. 4 International cooperation of countries in "sustainable cities" research from 1998 to 2018图4 1998—2018年“可持续城市”国际研究的国家合作情况 |
Table 2 The contrast of top 10 journal between international research and Chinese research表2 排名前十的中外文期刊对比 |
序号 | 文献数量/篇 | 期刊名称 | 序号 | 文献数量/篇 | 期刊名称 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 73 | Sustainability | 1 | 16 | 城市规划学刊 |
2 | 44 | Sustainable Cities and Society | 2 | 4 | 建筑学报 |
3 | 36 | Cities | 3 | 3 | 中国人口·资源与环境 |
4 | 23 | Journal of Cleaner Production | 4 | 3 | 城市发展研究 |
5 | 22 | Landscape and Urban Planning | 5 | 3 | 地理科学进展 |
6 | 17 | Habitat International | 6 | 3 | 给水排水 |
7 | 16 | Journal of Industrial Ecology | 7 | 3 | 中国给水排水 |
8 | 12 | International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology | 8 | 3 | 中国园林 |
9 | 10 | Urban Studies | 9 | 3 | 生态经济 |
10 | 9 | Energy and Buildings | 10 | 3 | 环境保护 |
注:外文期刊基于共被引分析得出前十,中文期刊基于文献数量排名得出前十。 |
[1] |
World Commissionon on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[2] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[3] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[4] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[5] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[6] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[7] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[8] |
AbstractNearly any introduction to the ideas and actions of sustainable development includes a mention of the role played in launching the global movement by the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. International forums have been a major vehicle for the pursuit of sustainability subsequent to 1992, as well, but little attention has been paid to the contribution that these global gatherings have made to the advancement of sustainability goals. This article takes up this question, with a focus on the role that major global gatherings may be playing in the pursuit of urban sustainability, specifically. To this end, we examine outcomes from the United Nations Habitat II Forum (1996, Istanbul), the World Summit on Sustainable Development (2002, Johannesburg), the World Social Forum (2001–present, Porto Alegre), and the World Urban Forum 3 (2006, Vancouver), based on reports in the scholarly literature and, in the latter case, based on our own experience as urbanists in the host city of the World Urban Forum 3. For comparative purposes, we include in our review reflections on the contribution made by a United Nations effort towards sustainability, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), made without an accompanying major global gathering. While we do not find evidence of ‘Rio-scale’ success among either the forums or in the case of the MDGs, we report on process and structural innovations made with each forum as well as common critiques of all of them. A primary contribution that all the forums have made to the advancement of urban sustainability has been more clearly differentiating among sustainability's very different types of proponents and charting the landscape of barriers and opportunities for paradigm change towards sustainable urban futures. ]]>{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[9] |
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication2015.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[10] |
United Nations Habitat Assembly (UNHA). Achieving gender equality through the work of the United Nations Human Settlements Programme to support inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable cities and human settlements. https://unhabitat.org/governance/un-habitat-assembly2019-06-13.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[11] |
The present paper aims to shed light on the often elusive definition of the concept of the "smart city." We provide a focused and operational definition of this construct and present consistent evidence on the geography of smart cities in the EU27. Our statistical and graphical analyses exploit in depth, for the first time to our knowledge, the most recent version of the Urban Audit data set in order to analyze the factors determining the performance of smart cities. We find that the presence of a creative class, the quality of and dedicated attention to the urban environment, the level of education, and the accessibility to and use of ICTs for public administration are all positively correlated with urban wealth. This result prompts the formulation of a new strategic agenda for European cities that will allow them to achieve sustainable urban development and a better urban landscape.]]> {{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[12] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[13] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[14] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[15] |
中国政府网. 中共中央国务院关于建立国土空间规划体系并监督实施的若干意见. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-05/23/content_5394187.htm, 2019-05-23.
[Chinese Government Website. Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on the establishment and supervision of the implementation of the natioinal territory spatial planning system. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-05/23/content_5394187.htm, 2019-05-23.]
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[16] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[17] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[18] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[19] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[20] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[21] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[22] |
UN-HABITAT, UNEP. Sustainable Cities Programme 1990-2000. Nairobi: UN-HABITAT, UNEP, 2002.
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[23] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[24] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[25] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[26] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[27] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[28] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[29] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[30] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[31] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[32] |
AbstractThat green-spaces relieve urban heat is well known in urban landscape planning. Scientific information on what kinds of green-spaces best reduce heat, however, is still largely unknown. This is a preliminary study aimed at (1) devising a method to detect and compare the local cool-island intensities of various urban parks; (2) verifying that this local cool-island intensity differs among parks; (3) determining whether this local cool-island intensity is related to park characteristics. Results from air–temperature measurements in and around 61 Taipei city parks showed that urban parks were on average cooler than their surroundings, confirming the term “urban cool-islands.” However, approximately one-fifth of the parks were warmer than their urban surroundings. At noon in summer, parks with ≥50% paved coverage and little tree- and shrub-cover were on average warmer than their surroundings. Large parks were on average cooler than the smaller ones, but this relationship was non-linear. In Taipei, parks differed in their local cool-island intensity and this intensity can be related to park characteristics. Before further details concerning better planning and design approaches to mitigate urban heat-islands can be addressed, a neighborhood-scaled understanding of the urban microclimate is first needed as a basis. ]]>{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[33] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[34] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[35] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[36] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[37] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[38] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[39] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[40] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[41] |
AbstractInternational efforts to preserve the natural environment are mainly concerned with large, bio-diverse and relatively untouched ecosystems or with individual animal or vegetal species, either endangered or threatened with extinction. Much less attention is being paid to that type of nature close to where people live and work, to small-scale green areas in cities and to their benefits to people. Increasing empirical evidence, however, indicates that the presence of natural areas contributes to the quality of life in many ways. Besides many environmental and ecological services, urban nature provides important social and psychological benefits to human societies, which enrich human life with meanings and emotions. The main concern of this paper is to address the importance of urban nature for citizens’ well being and for the sustainability of the city they inhabit. Some results of a survey conducted among visitors of an urban park in Amsterdam (The Netherlands) are presented and discussed. The issues investigated concern people’s motives for urban nature, the emotional dimension involved in the experience of nature and its importance for people’s general well being. Results confirm that the experience of nature in urban environment is source of positive feelings and beneficial services, which fulfill important immaterial and non-consumptive human needs. Implications for the sustainability of the city will be analyzed and discussed. ]]>{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[42] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[43] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[44] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[45] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[46] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[47] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[48] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[49] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[50] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[51] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[52] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[53] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[54] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[55] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[56] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[57] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[58] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[59] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[60] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[61] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[62] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[63] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[64] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[65] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[66] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[67] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[68] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[69] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[70] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[71] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[72] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[73] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[74] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[75] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[76] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[77] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[78] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[79] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[80] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[81] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[82] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[83] |
Takeaway for practice: Urban form policies can have important impacts on local environmental quality, economy, crowding, and social equity, but their influence on energy consumption and land use is very modest; compact development should not automatically be associated with the preferred spatial growth strategy.]]> {{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[84] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[85] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[86] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[87] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[88] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[89] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[90] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[91] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[92] |
中国城市科学研究会. 中国城市规划发展报告(2017—2018). 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018: 3-6.
[Chinese Society for Urban Studies. Report on the Development of Urban Planning in China (2017-2018). Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018: 3-6.]
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[93] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[94] |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[95] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[96] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[97] |
[
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
[98] |
AbstractIncluding greenery in human settlements is a tradition deeply rooted in antiquity, with diverse expressions. Realization of the green city ideal has changed with prevailing social–economic–political regimes and landscape styles. Variations in land use and development mode have generated green spaces of different geometry, distribution and composition. The compact city incurs inherent physical and institutional obstacles, restricting the quantity and quality of amenity vegetation. Recent research findings in arboriculture, urban forestry, urban ecology, urban planning and urban geography suggest alternative strategies for both existing and new green sites. A multidisciplinary interpretation distils relevant principles and practices to facilitate greening in packed neighborhoods and overcome major constraints. Measures are proposed to guard green spaces from intrusion, intensification and infilling to preserve both sites and conditions for plants, wildlife and ecological functions. New developments and redevelopments, with suitable encouragement and incentives, can earmark enough new green areas with appropriate location and design. Natural enclaves, especially woodlands, with high biodiversity and complex biomass should be incorporated into the future built environment. Partnership among government, developers and citizens should nurture the community’s determination and capability to augment greening. A coordinating body to mobilize initiatives and efforts could gel disparate stakeholders and bring concerted actions. ]]>{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
{{custom_ref.label}} |
{{custom_citation.content}}
{{custom_citation.annotation}}
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |