Changes of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties with the Development of Artificial Planted and Natural Invaded Vegetation in Southern Hulunbeir Sandy Land

LI Zhong-fei, GAO Ji-xi, WANG Ya-ping

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10) : 1739-1750.

PDF(667 KB)
PDF(667 KB)
JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10) : 1739-1750. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20151207
Resource Evaluation

Changes of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties with the Development of Artificial Planted and Natural Invaded Vegetation in Southern Hulunbeir Sandy Land

  • LI Zhong-fei1, 2, GAO Ji-xi2, WANG Ya-ping2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

To understand the improving effect of vegetation restoration on soil properties in sandy land, a study was carried out in Hulunbeir sandy land of North China in 2014. Seven plots, named 8Y (vegetation restoration of 8 years), 5Y (5 years), 3Y (3 years), 1Y (1 years), MD (Moved Dune), SD (Semi-fixed Dune) and FD (Fixed Dune), were set for analyzing the physical and chemical properties of soil, such as content of soil water, pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (N), total phosphorus (P), total potassium (K), available N, available P and available K. The seven plots belong to two series of vegetation types respectively, which are temporal pattern based on artificial vegetation (for 8Y, 5Y, 3Y and 1Y) and spatial pattern based on natural vegetation (for MD, SD and FD). The results show: 1) With the increase of restoration time, the biomass and vegetation coverage increased significantly at both types of plots. The biomass is 267.6 and 79.8 g/m2 respectively on 8Y and FD, and the vegetation coverage is 75% and 50% respectively. 2) The content of SOC increased significantly with the development of the vegetation at both types of plot, and the content in upper layer of soil is significantly higher than that in middle and lower layer of soil. The SOC of upper layer soil is up to 3.85 and 3.22 g/kg respectively in 8Y and 5Y, but is up to 7.99 g/kg in FD. 3) The content of total N and total P show similar tendency as SOC, but the content of total K has no significant difference among plots or soil layers. The total N of upper layer soil ranges between 0.08 and 0.41 g/kg from 1Y to 8Y, between 0.16 and 0.61 g/kg from MD to FD, and the total P ranges between 0.21 and 0.48 g/kg from 1Y to 8Y, and between 0.29 and 0.50 g/kg from MD to FD. 4) The content of soil available nutrients also increases with the development of vegetation to a certain extent, however with an undulation. Generally, the contents of soil nutrients at the plots of 1Y and 3Y are similar with that of MD. When it is planted after more than 5 years, the artificial vegetation can have a significant effect on improving the physical and chemical properties of soil and mitigating the desertification. However, the contents of SOC and total N are significantly lower at the plot of 8Y than that at the plot of FD. Thus, when developing the human-planted vegetation, local government should pay more attention to the protection of natural vegetation.

Key words

desertification / Hulunbeir sandy land / soil physical and chemical properties / vegetation restoration

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Zhong-fei, GAO Ji-xi, WANG Ya-ping. Changes of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties with the Development of Artificial Planted and Natural Invaded Vegetation in Southern Hulunbeir Sandy Land[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 31(10): 1739-1750 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.20151207

References

[1] WANG F, PAN X, WANG D, et al. Combating desertification in China: Past, present and future [J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31(2): 311-313.
[2] CAO C Y, JIANG S Y, YING Z, et al. Spatial variability of soil nutrients and microbiological properties after the establishment of leguminous shrub Caragana microphylla Lam. plantation on sand dune in the Horqin sandy land of Northeast China [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011, 37(10): 1467-1475.
[3] 曹成有, 朱丽辉, 蒋德明, 等. 科尔沁沙地不同人工植物群落对土壤养分和生物活性的影响 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2007, 21(1): 168-171.

[4] 左小安, 赵哈林, 赵学勇, 等. 科尔沁沙地退化植被恢复过程中土壤有机碳和全氮的空间异质性 [J]. 环境科学, 2009, 30(8): 2387-2393.

[5] 王政权, 王庆成. 森林土壤物理性质的空间异质性研究 [J]. 生态学报, 2000, 20(6): 945-950.

[6] 杨越, 哈斯, 孙保平, 等. 毛乌素沙地南缘不同植被恢复类型的土壤养分效应 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(10): 37-42.

[7] ZUO X A, ZHAO X Y, ZHAO H L, et al. Spatialheterogeneity of soil properties and vegetation-soil relationships following vegetation restoration of mobile dunes in Horqin sandy land, Northern China [J]. Plant and Soil, 2009, 318: 153-167.
[8] ZUO X A, ZHAO X Y, ZHAO H L, et al. Scale dependent effects of environmental factors on vegetation pattern and composition in Horqin sandy land, Northern China [J]. Geoderma, 2012, 173/174: 1-9.
[9] MABBUTT J A. Desertification indicators [J]. Climatic Change, 1986, 9: 113-122.
[10] OUNM E P. The strategy of ecosystem development [J]. Science, 1969, 164: 262-270.
[11] SCHLESINGER W H, REYNOLDS J F, CUNNINGHAM G L, et al. Biological feedbacks in global desertification [J]. Science, 1990, 247: 1043-1048.
[12] GROSS K L, BURTON A L. Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1995, 83: 357-367.
[13] 张华, 伏乾科, 李锋瑞, 等. 退化沙质草地自然恢复过程中土壤-植物系统的变化特征 [J]. 水土保持通报, 2003, 23(6): 1-6.

[14] 王涛, 赵哈林. 中国沙漠科学50年 [J]. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(2): 145-166.[WANG T, ZHAO H L. Fifty-year history of China desert science. Journal of Desert Research, 2005, 25(2): 145-166. ]
[15] 杨梅焕, 曹明明, 朱志梅, 等. 毛乌素沙地东南缘沙漠化过程中土壤理化性质分析 [J]. 水土保持通报, 2010, 30(2): 169-174.

[16] 赵哈林, 李玉强, 周瑞莲, 等. 内蒙古东部两大沙地土壤理化特性沙漠化演变规律的比较 [J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(7): 779-786.

[17] 刘树林, 王涛, 屈建军. 浑善达克沙地土地沙漠化过程中土壤粒度与养分变化研究 [J]. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(4): 611-617.

[18] 赵哈林, 周瑞莲, 赵学勇, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙质草地土壤理化特性的沙漠化演变规律及机制 [J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(2): 1-7.

[19] 蒋德明, 苗仁辉, 押田敏雄, 等. 封育对科尔沁沙地植被恢复和土壤特性的影响 [J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(1): 40-46.

[20] 朴起亨, 丁国栋, 吴斌, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙地植被演替规律研究 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(6): 180-186.

[21] 毕超, 周玉喜, 赵云杰, 等. 库布齐沙漠半固定沙丘上2种草本植物的分布格局 [J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(6): 39-44.

[22] 赵云杰, 田赟, 王晓, 等. 典型榆树疏林碳氮储量及其分配特征 [J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2014, 12(6): 82-89.

[23] 苏永中, 赵哈林, 张铜会, 等. 不同强度放牧后自然恢复的沙质草地土壤性状特征 [ J]. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(4): 333-338.

[24] 李刚, 修伟明, 王杰, 等. 不同植被恢复模式下呼伦贝尔沙地土壤反硝化细菌nirK基因组成结构和多样性研究 [J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1): 115-123.

[25] 朱震达, 刘恕. 中国北方地区沙漠化过程及其治理区划 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1981: 1-56.

[26] ZHANG Y, CAO C Y, HAN X S, et al. Soil nutrient and microbiological property recoveries via native shrub and semi-shrub plantations on moving sand dunes in Northeast China [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 53(3): 1-5.
[27] LI X R, HE M Z, DUAN Z H, et al. Recovery of top soil physiochemical properties in revegetated sites in the sand-burial ecosystems of the Tengger Desert, northern China [J]. Geomorphology, 2007, 88: 254-265.
[28] 谢静, 丁仲礼. 中国东北部沙地重矿物组成及沙源分析 [J]. 中国科学D辑, 2007, 37(8): 1065-1072.

[29] ZHOU D J, ZHAO X, HU H F, et al. Long-term vegetation changes in the four mega-sandy lands in Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30(9): 1613-1626.
[30] 封建民, 王涛. 呼伦贝尔草原沙漠化现状及历史演变研究 [J]. 干旱区地理, 2004, 27(3): 356-360.

[31] 赵慧颖. 呼伦贝尔沙地45年来气候变化及其对生态环境的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(11): 1817-1821.

[32] STOKES A, SOTIR R, CHEN W, et al. Soil bio-and eco-engineering in China: Past experience and future priorities preface [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36: 247-257.
[33] 白彦, 安慧君, 张红蕾, 等, 呼伦贝尔沙地植被变化遥感监测 [J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(3): 134-137.

[34] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析 [M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978.

[35] 周文龙, 张福锁, 曹一平. 根际土壤pH动态及其效应 [C]// 张福锁. 土壤与植物营养新动态 (第一卷) . 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1992: 50-63.

[36] LIU R T, ZHAO H L, ZHAO X Y, et al. Facilitative effects of shrubs in shifting sand on soil macro-faunal community in Horqin Sand Land of Inner Mongolia, Northern China [J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2011, 47(5): 316-321.
[37] TORNQUIST C G, HONS F M, FEAGLEY S E. Agroforestry system effects on soil characteristics of the Sarapiqi region of Costarica [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 1999, 73(1): 19-28.
[38] PHOENIX G K, EMMETT B A, BRITTON A J, et al. Impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: Responses of multiple plant and soil parameters across contrasting ecosystems in long-term field experiments [J]. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18(4): 1197-1215.
[39] DUAN Z H, XIAO H L, DON Z U, et al. Estimate of total CO 2 output from desertified sandy land on China [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35: 5915-5921.
[40] REEDER J D, SCHUMAN G E. Influence of livestock grazing on C sequestration in semi-arid mixed grass and short-grass rangelands [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2002, 116: 457-763.
[41] SCHUMAN G E, JANZEN H H, HERRICK J E. Soil carbon dynamics and potential carbon sequestration by rangelands [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2002, 116(3): 391-396.
[42] 丁文广, 魏银丽, 杨军梅, 等. 甘肃省中部干旱区植被恢复对土壤养分变化的影响研究 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(1): 159-162.

[43] 刘海涛, 贾志清, 朱雅娟, 等. 高寒沙地不同林龄乌柳的水分生理特性及叶性状 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(9): 2370-2376.

[44] 范国艳, 张静妮, 张永生, 等. 放牧对贝加尔针茅草原植被根系分布和土壤理化特征的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(9): 1715-1721.

[45] 于洋, 贾志清, 朱雅娟, 等. 高寒沙地植被恢复区乌柳人工防护林对土壤的影响 [J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(11): 10-15.

[46] LI X R, KONG D S, TAN H J, et al. Changes in soil and vegetation following stabilisation of dunes in the southeastern fringe of the Tengger Desert, China [J]. Plant & Soil, 2007, 300(1): 221-231.
[47] 谭明亮, 段争虎, 陈小红, 等. 流沙地恢复过程中土壤特性演变研究 [J]. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(4): 685-689.

[48] LU J F, DONG Z B, LI W J, et al. The effect of desertification on carbon and nitrogen status in the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 71(2): 807-815.
[49] 聂浩刚, 岳乐平, 杨文, 等. 呼伦贝尔草原沙漠化现状、发展态势与成因分析 [J]. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(5): 635-640.

[50] ROSS D S, LAWRENCE G B, FREDRIKSEN G. Mineralization and nitrification patterns at eight northeastern USA forested research sites [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 188: 317-335.
[51] 左小安, 赵学勇, 赵哈林, 等. 沙地退化植被恢复过程中灌木发育对草本植物和土壤的影响 [J]. 生态环境学报, 2009,18(2): 643-647.

[52] 陈伏生, 曾德慧, 范志平, 等. 章古台沙地樟子松人工林土壤有效氮的研究 [J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005, 27(3): 6-11.

[53] RAIESI F, ASADI E. Soil microbial activity and litter turn-over in native grazed and ungrazed rangelands in a semiarid ecosystem [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2006, 43: 76-82.
[54] KOOIJMAN A M, BESSE M. The higher availability of N and P in lime-poor than in lime-rich coastal dunes in the Netherlands [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2002, 90: 394-403.
[55] FORD H, ROBERTS A, JONES L. Nitrogen and phosphorus co-limitation and grazing moderate nitrogen impacts on plant growth and nutrient cycling in sand dune grassland [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 542: 203-209.
[56] 张玉兰, 陈利军. 沙漠化逆转过程中土壤性状演变综述 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(7): 1440-1450.

[57] 孙向阳. 土壤学 [M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005.

Funding

Special Fund for Environmental Protecting Research in the Public Interest, No.201409055 National Technology R&D Program, No.2012BAC01B00 National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.31360122
PDF(667 KB)

1596

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/