The Evaluation and Analysis of Coordinated Development on Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity in SouthwesternMountainous Area of China: A Case in Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province

XU Ming-jun, YANG Zi-sheng

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10) : 1726-1737.

PDF(3552 KB)
PDF(3552 KB)
JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10) : 1726-1737. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20151191
Resource Evaluation

The Evaluation and Analysis of Coordinated Development on Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity in SouthwesternMountainous Area of China: A Case in Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province

  • XU Ming-jun, YANG Zi-sheng
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Resources and environment carrying capacity is the basis for regional resources development and utilization as well as economic development strategy making and planning, which has already attracted large quantities of studies in academia. However, previous studies were inadequate in considering the connotation and restriction factors of resources and environment carrying capacity, and the evaluation indexes were not sufficiently connected with land planning (or regional planning). In the meantime, the indexes were treated in black box while neglecting the internal mechanism and coordinated development among systems. This study, took the Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture (Dehong Prefecture) in mountainous area of southwest China as a case. The paper evaluated the resources and environment carrying capacities of Dehong Prefecture and the five counties (cities) under its jurisdiction, and analyzed the mechanism and coordinated development of the nine sub-systems of resources and environment carrying capacity. The results showed that: 1) There is great regional difference of resources and environment carrying capacity in Dehong Prefecture. The resources and environment carrying capacities of Mangshi, Yingjiang and Longchuan counties are relatively high, and the carrying capacity of Lianghe County is at middle level, while the carrying capacity of Ruili is low. The five counties (cities) ranked as Mangshi > Yingjiang > Longchuan > Ruili > Lianghe in resources carrying capacity and ranked as Mangshi > Yingjiang > Longchuan > Ruili > Lianghe in environment carrying capacity. 2) The limitation analysis indicates that Ruili belongs to arable land-mineral resources limitation type, Mangshi and Longchuan belongs to mineral resources-geological environment limitation type, Lianghe belongs to arable land-urban construction limitation type, and Yingjiang belongs to water environment-geological environment limitation type. 3) Larger coupling relationship exists in resource-environmental system of Dehong Prefecture, especially the coordination degrees of urban construction system and geological environment system, forest resource system and atmospheric environment system, water resources and environment system, mineral resources system and atmospheric environment system are all above 0.96. The overall coordination degree of resources and environment in this region is up to 0.98.

Key words

coordinated development / Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture / mountainous area of Southwest China / resources and environment carrying capacity

Cite this article

Download Citations
XU Ming-jun, YANG Zi-sheng. The Evaluation and Analysis of Coordinated Development on Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity in SouthwesternMountainous Area of China: A Case in Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2016, 31(10): 1726-1737 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.20151191

References

[1] 蒋辉, 罗国云. 资源环境承载力研究的缘起与发展 [J]. 资源开发与市场, 2011, 27(5): 453-456.

[2] 封志明, 杨艳昭, 张晶. 中国基于人粮关系的土地资源承载力研究: 从分县到全国 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 865-875.

[3] 彭再德, 杨凯,王云. 区域环境承载力研究方法初探 [J]. 中国环境科学, 1996, 16(1):6-10.

[4] 蒋辉, 罗国云. 可持续发展视角下资源环境承载力——内涵、特点与功能 [J]. 资源开发与市场, 2011, 27(3): 253-256.

[5] 高湘昀, 安海忠, 刘红红. 我国资源环境承载力的研究评述 [J]. 资源与产业, 2012, 14(6): 116-120.

[6] 高小羊, 葛幼松. 基于生态敏感性的土地资源承载力研究——以福建省泉州市为例 [J]. 广东农业科学, 2007, 34(8): 123-126.

[7] 曹月娥, 塔西莆拉提·特依拜, 杨建军, 等. 新疆土地总体规划中区域资源环境承载力分析 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22(1):44-49.

[8] 马仁锋, 王悠春, 易琦, 等. 资源环境约束下的昆明都市区发展模式 [J]. 复旦学报, 2010, 49(1): 104-112.

[9] 孙慧, 刘媛媛. 相对资源承载力模型的扩展与实证 [J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(11): 126-135.

[10] 毛汉英, 余丹林. 环渤海地区区域承载力研究 [J]. 地理学报, 2001, 56(3): 363-371.

[11] 李朝辉, 魏贵臣. 生态环境承载力评价方法研究及实例 [J]. 环境科学与技术, 2005, 28(1): 75-76.

[12] 康松, 刘鲜明, 陈斐. 江西区域资源环境承载力评价及其启示 [J]. 井冈山学院学报, 2005, 26(2): 76-79.

[13] 惠泱河, 蒋晓辉, 黄强, 等. 水资源承载力评价指标体系研究 [J]. 水土保持通报, 2001, 21(1): 30-34.

[14] 刘佳俊, 董锁成, 李泽红. 中国水资源承载力综合评价研究 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(2): 258-269.

[15] 罗公利, 贾小平, 边伟军. 山东省资源环境承载力分析 [J]. 青岛科技大学学报, 2013, 29(4): 55-59.

[16] 周纯, 舒延飞, 吴仁海. 珠江三角地区土地资源承载力研究 [J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2003(6): 16-19.

[17] 邓伟. 山区资源环境承载力研究现状与关键问题 [J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(6): 959-969.

[18] 张小刚, 罗雅. 长株潭城市群资源环境承载力评价及改善措施研 [J]. 中南林业科技大学, 2015, 9(3): 34-39.

[19] 强真, 张舒, 侯华丽. 服务于国土规划编制的国土资源环境承载力评价 [N]. 中国国土资源报, 2011-05-20(04).

[20] 董锁成, 张文中, 方创琳. 资源环境与经济作用机制与规律探讨 [J]. 资源科学, 1999, 21(4): 15-21.

[21] 赵兴国, 潘玉君, 赵波, 等. 区域资源环境与经济发展关系的时空分析 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(6): 706-714.

[22] 洪开荣, 浣晓旭, 孙倩. 中部地区资源-环境-经济-社会协调发展的定量评价分析 [J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(12): 16-23.

[23] 张红. 国内外资源环境承载力研究评述 [J]. 理论学刊, 2007(10): 80-83.

[24] 周侃, 樊杰. 中国欠发达地区资源环境承载力特征与影响因素——以宁夏西海固地区和云南怒江州为例 [J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(1): 39-52.

[25] 王艳飞, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞. 环渤海地区城镇化与农村协调发展的时空特征 [J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(1): 122-130.

[26] 聂艳, 雷文华, 周勇, 等. 区域城市化与生态环境耦合时空变异特征 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2008, 22(11): 56-62.

[27] 廖重斌. 环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系——以珠江三角洲城市群为例 [J]. 热带地理, 1999, 19(2): 171-178.

[28] 陈兴雷, 李淑杰, 郭忠兴. 吉林省延边朝鲜自治州土地利用与生态环境协调分析 [J]. 中国土地科学, 2009, 23(7): 66-73.

[29] 杨子生. 山区城镇建设用地适宜性评价方法及应用——以云南省德宏州为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(1): 64-76.

[30] 杨子生, 赵乔贵. 基于第二次全国土地调查的云南省坝区县、半山半坝县和山区县的划分 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(4): 564-574.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41261018; Innovation Foundation of Graduate Student in Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, No.2015YUFEYC011
PDF(3552 KB)

1909

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/