Calculation of Compensation for Water Transfer：Model and Application

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.12.015

PDF(563 KB)

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2013, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12) : 2178-2188. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.12.015

Resources Research Methods

Calculation of Compensation for Water Transfer：Model and Application

MA Yong-xi

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Water resource transfer not only affects the efficiency and effectiveness of water resource use, but also influences the fairness and sustainability of water resource use for different users. To scientifically and reasonably calculate the compensation for water resource transfer, a model which calculates compensation of water resource transfer is built in this paper. Factors including the contribution of income, the capital, efficiency of water use, the risk and the fairness for the cooperators are all synthetically considered in the model to determine the profit-sharing in the water resource transfer. The weights of influencing factors are creatively calculated by the method of rough analytical hierarchy process (RAHP). On this basis, the profit-sharing and compensation amount of the water resource transfer are calculated. The economic and social objectives are integrated in the model for calculation of compensation in water resource transfer. The social factor (social justice) included in the index system of income distribution, along with the economic factors indicators, are regarded as an objective of the decision on compensation for water resource transfer. It makes the decision-making index system in the model being closer to the practical multi-objective decision-making situations. The Chenshi Irrigation District in Zhuji city is taken as an example. The paper introduces the model which calculates compensation of water resource transfer to redesign the index system of income distribution and the interest compensation among the main bodies of the water resource transfer. The case study from Chenshi Irrigation District verified the feasibility and validity of the model. The case study shows that the weight of contribution of income and the capital on income distribution are 0.321 and 0.383 respectively which have a greater impact on income distribution than other factors. And the weight of social justice is 0.116 which also accounts for a large proportion of income distribution. Thus, the weight of social objective should be fully considered in the index system of income distribution to reasonably determine the compensation among the participating bodies in water resource transfer. And the case study also indicates that the amount of interest compensation for agricultural water resource users in practice is far less than what agricultural water resource users should gain based on the calculation result from the model. Then, it is urgent to raise the interest compensation for agricultural water resource users in water resource transfer.

Key words

water resource management / calculation of compensation / interest compensation / RAHP

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

MA Yong-xi. Calculation of Compensation for Water Transfer：Model and Application[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 28(12): 2178-2188 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.12.015

References

[1] Omezzine A, Lokman Z. Management of modern irrigation systems in Oman: Allocative vs. irrigation efficiency[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 1998, 37: 99-107.
[2] Han S Y, Kwak S J, Yoo S H. Valuing environmental impacts of large dam construction in Korea: An application of choice experiments[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2008, 28(4/5): 256-266.
[3] Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 663-674.
[4] 王元京. 水利工程的利益补偿与收益分享问题探讨[J]. 中国水利, 2003(12): 8-10.[WANG Yuan-jing. A discussion on benefit compensation and sharing of returns of water projects. China Water Resources, 2003(12): 8-10.]
[5] 周静. 水资源开发补偿的制度架构研究[J]. 农业经济, 2008(11): 51-53.[ZHOU Jing. Institutional framework of compensation for exploitation on the water Resources. Agriculture Economy, 2008(11): 51-53.]
[6] 葛颜祥, 梁丽娟, 接玉梅. 水源地生态补偿机制的构建与运作研究[J]. 农业经济问题, 2006(9): 22-27.[GE Yan-xiang, LIANG Li-juan, JIE Yu-mei. Building up a mechanism of ecological compensation for the waterhead region and its operation. Issues in Agriculture Economy, 2006(9): 22-27.]
[7] Mamatkanov D M. Mechanisms for improvement of transboundary water resources management in Central Asia[M]//Moerlins J E, et al. Transboundary Water Resources: A Foundation for Regional Stability in Central Asia. Springer Netherlands, 2008: 141-152.
[8] 魏守科, 雷阿林, Albrecht Gnauck. 博弈论模型在解决水资源管理中利益冲突的运用[J]. 水利学报, 2009, 40(8): 910-917.[WEI Shou-ke, LEI A-lin, Albrecht Gnauck. Application of game theoretic models to solve the benefit conflicts in water resources management. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 40(8): 910-917.]
[9] Mokorosi P S, van der Zaag P. Can local people also gain from benefit sharing in water resources development? Experiences from dam development in the Orange-Senqu River Basin[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2007, 32(15/18): 1322-1329.
[10] Tilmant A, Goor Q, Pinte D. Agricultural-to-hydropower water transfers: Sharing water and benefits in hydropower-irrigation systems[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2009, 13: 1091-1101.
[11] 陈菁, 代小平, 陈祥, 等. 基于改进的Shapley 值法的农业节水补偿额测算方法[J]. 水利学报, 2011, 42(6): 750-756.[CHEN Jing, DAI Xiao-ping, CHEN Xiang, et al. Calculation of compensation amount for agricultural water saving based on improved Shapley method. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2011, 42(6): 750-756.]
[12] 尹云松, 孟令杰. 基于AHP 的流域初始水权分配方法及其应用实例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(4): 645- 652.[YIN Yun-song, MENG Ling-jie. The method of basin initial water rights allocation and its application based on AHP. Journal of Natural Resources, 2006, 21(4): 645-652.]
[13] Martin-Ortega J, Berbel J. Using multi-criteria analysis to explore non-market monetary values of water quality changes in the context of the water framework directive[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(19): 3990-3997.
[14] 高媛媛, 王红瑞, 许新宜, 等. 水资源安全评价模型构建与应用——以福建省泉州市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(2): 204-214.[GAO Yuan-yuan, WANG Hong-rui, XU Xin-yi, et al. Assessment of water resources security — Case of Quanzhou city in Fujian Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2012, 27(2): 204-214.]
[15] Anagnostopoulos K P, Petalas C. A fuzzy multicriteria benefit-cost approach for irrigation projects evaluation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 98(9): 1409-1416.
[16] Freitas A H A, Magrini A. Multi-criteria decision-making to support sustainable water management in a mining complex in Brazil[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.043.
[17] Pawlak Z. Rough set approach to knowledge based decision support[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 99(1): 48-57.
[18] Pawlak Z, Skowron A. Rudiments of rough sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(1): 3-27.
[19] 生效友. 农业水权转让中的农民权益保护机制研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2007.[SHENG Xiao-you. Research on Farmer's Right Protection in Agricultural Water Rights Transfer. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science, 2007.]
[20] 陆文聪, 马永喜, 祁慧博. 跨区水利工程投入与受益的区域利益协调机制研究[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(8): 935-942.[LU Wen-cong, MA Yong-xi, QI Hui-bo. Study on the investment-benefit coordination mechanism of cross-regional water project. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41(8): 935-942.]
[21] 龚园喜. 基于改进的生产函数模型分析浙江省水资源经济效益[J]. 浙江水利水电专科学校学报, 2007, 19(2): 4-6.[GONG Yuan-xi. Analysis on economic benefits of water recourse based on Solow's advanced production function—Taking Zhejiang Province as an example. Journal of Zhejiang Water Conservancy and Hydropower College, 2007, 19(2): 4-6.]
[22] 王岳峰, 刘伟. 考虑权重的Shapley 值法虚拟企业伙伴利益分配策略的改进[J]. 上海海事大学学报, 2005, 26(4): 48-51.[WANG Yue-feng, LIU Wei. Innovation on strategies of profit allocation among partners in virtual enterprise based on Shapley value considering weight. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 2005, 26 (4): 48-51.]
[23] 戴建华, 薛恒新. 基于Shapley 值法的动态联盟伙伴企业利益分配策略[J].中国管理科学, 2004, 12(4): 33-36.[DAI Jian-hua, XUE Heng-xin. The strategy of profit allocation among partners in dynamic alliance based on the Shapley value. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2004, 12(4): 33-36.]
[24] 周大杰, 孙丽英, 石缎花, 等. 流域水资源管理中的生态补偿问题研究[J]. 北京师范大学学报: 社会科学版, 2005 (4): 131-135.[ZHOU Da-jie, SUN Li-ying, SHI Duan-hua, et al. Ecological compensation in management of water resources of the river basins. Journal of Beijing Normal University: Social Sciences, 2005(4): 131-135.]
[25] 陈丽丽. 基于层次分析法(AHP)的流域排污权初始分配模型研究[D]. 南京:南京信息工程大学, 2011.[CHEN Li-li. An Allocation Model of Basin Initial Emission Permits and Its Application Based on the AHP. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 2011.]
[26] 刘喜峰, 谷红梅, 王海潮, 等. 公共水资源公平配置研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2007, 29(1): 43-44, 49.[LIU Xi-feng, GU Hong-mei, WANG Hai-chao, et al. Study on fair disposition of public water resources. Yellow River, 2007, 29(1): 43-44, 49.]
[27] 王小军, 张建云, 刘九夫, 等. 我国生活用水公平问题研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(2): 328-334.[WANG Xiao-jun, ZHANG Jian-yun, LIU Jiu-fu, et al. Discussion on evaluating the fairness of domestic water use in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(2): 328-334.]