Payments Calculation for Soil and Water Conservation Environmental Services ——A Case Study of Dongbeigou Watershed in Water Source Area of Panjiakou Reservoir

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.06.005

PDF(2919 KB)

JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 933-941. DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.06.005

Payments Calculation for Soil and Water Conservation Environmental Services ——A Case Study of Dongbeigou Watershed in Water Source Area of Panjiakou Reservoir

L? Ming-quan¹, WANG Ji-jun^1,2, XIA Zi-lan¹, CHEN Zhi-xue³

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The payments for soil and water conservation environmental services are of great importance to soil and water conservation. The payments amount is a core issue of setting up payments for environmental services (PES) scheme. In this paper, Dongbeigou Watershed in the upstream area of the Panjiakou Reservoir was selected to study PES amount related to soil and water conservation, on the basis of land use in 1990 and 2009, soil, vegetation, DEM and peasant household survey data. The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) based on GIS was used to calculate the reduction of soil loss between 1990 and 2009 because of taking precaution measures against soil loss. The environmental economics approaches (nonmarket valuation methods) was applied in calculating downstream benefit from Dongbeigou Watershed providing soil and water conservation services, and Dongbeigou Watershed’s cost and benefit in providing soil conservation services. A payment amount for soil and water conservation environmental services model was set up based on previous calculation. The results indicated that the soil loss amount decreased by 6.49×10⁴t·a^-1 from 1990 to 2009. The watershed inhabitants providing soil conservation services lost 24.48×10⁴ yuan/a from losing developing opportunities and gained 44.21×10⁴ yuan/a from reducing land and fertility losses. Downstream water users receiving soil and water conservation services benefited 84.88×10⁴ yuan/a from losing siltation and eutrophication of Panjiakou Reservoir. The compensation standard was from 24.48×10⁴ yuan (222.55 yuan per person) to 46.90×10⁴ yuan(426.36 yuan per person).

Key words

ecological economics / payments for soil conservation ecological services / Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) / Panjiakou Reservoir

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

L? Ming-quan, WANG Ji-jun, XIA Zi-lan, CHEN Zhi-xue. Payments Calculation for Soil and Water Conservation Environmental Services ——A Case Study of Dongbeigou Watershed in Water Source Area of Panjiakou Reservoir[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 27(6): 933-941 https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.06.005

References

[1] 中国水土保持生态补偿机制研究课题组. 我国水土保持生态补偿类型划分及机制研究[J]. 中国水利, 2009(14): 26-31.
[2] 史宇, 余新晓, 毕华兴. 水土保持生态补偿机制建立的理论基础分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(1): 156-161.
[3] 胡嘉. 水土保持生态补偿机制初探[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(6): 99-101.
[4] 毕华兴, 毕嘉敏, 刘立斌, 等. 论实行水土保持生态补偿的经济学基础[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(1): 156-161.
[5] 唐文坚, 程冬兵. 长江流域水土保持生态补偿机制探讨[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2010, 27(11): 94-97.
[6] 余新晓, 吴岚, 饶良懿, 等. 水土保持生态服务功能价值估算[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2008, 6(1): 83-88
[7] 盛莉, 金艳, 黄敬峰. 中国水土保持生态服务功能价值估算及其空间分布[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(7): 1105-1113.
[8] 许月卿, 黄靖, 冯艳, 等. 不同土地利用结构下的土壤侵蚀经济损失: 以贵州省猫跳河流域为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(11): 1451-1456.
[9] 杨子生, 谢应齐. 云南水土流失直接经济损失的计算方法与区域特征[J]. 云南大学学报, 1994, 16(增刊1): 99-106.
[10] 闫业超, 岳书平, 张树文, 等. 黑土区土壤侵蚀经济损失价值估算及其特征分析——以黑龙江克拜东部黑土区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(12): 2135-2146.
[11] 杜丽娟, 王秀茹, 刘钰, 等. 水土保持生态补偿标准的计算[J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(11): 1346-1352.
[12] 杨光梅, 闵庆文, 李文华, 等. 我国生态补偿研究中的科学问题[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10): 4289-4300.
[13] 吕明权, 王继军, 江青龙, 等. 基于LUCC的冀北土石山区东北沟流域土壤侵蚀时空变化分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2011, 9(3): 18-25.
[14] 李晓光, 苗鸿, 郑华, 等. 机会成本法在确定生态补偿标准中的应用——以海南中部山区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9): 4875-4883.
[15] Nicolas Kosoy, Miguel Martinez-Tuna, Roldan Muradian, et al. Payments for environmental services in watersheds: Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61: 446-455.
[16] 刘永宏, 贾福平, 刘永军, 等. 大青山山地草场理论载畜量的研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2002(增刊1): 44-47.
[17] 韩永伟, 高吉喜, 拓学森, 等. 门头沟生态系统土壤保持功能及其生态经济价值分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2007, 20(5): 144-147.
[18] 马履一, 翟明普, 王勇. 京西山地棕壤和淋溶褐土饱和导水率的分析[J]. 林业科学, 1999, 35(3): 109-112.
[19] 李海东, 宋秀清, 周亚歧. 水土保持措施对滦河流域径流泥沙的影响研究(一)[J]. 海河水利, 2004(1): 18-20.
[20] 杜丽娟. 水土保持补偿机制研究——以滦河流域为例. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008.
[21] 黄云凤, 张珞平, 洪华生, 等. 不同土地利用对流域土壤侵蚀和氮、磷流失的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2004, 23(4): 735-739.
[22] 王晓燕, 王晓峰, 汪清平, 等. 北京密云水库小流域非点源污染负荷估算[J]. 农业工程学报, 2004, 24(2): 227-231.
[23] XIONG Ying, WANG Ke-lin. Eco-compensation effects of the wetland recovery in Dongting Lake area [J]. Journal of Geographic Science, 2010, 20(3): 389-405.
[24] 吴楠, 苏德毕力格, 高吉喜, 等. 生态系统减轻水环境磷素非点源污染服务及价值——以雅砻江二滩水库为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(7): 1734-1743.