EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2025 , Vol. 40 >Issue 7: 1816 - 1838

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20250706

自然资源观察

农地“三权分置”赋能农业农村新内生发展的效果及机制研究

  • 公茂刚 , 1, 2 ,
  • 韩方营 1
展开
  • 1.山东理工大学经济学院，淄博 255000
  • 2.山东理工大学马克思主义中国化研究中心，淄博 255000

公茂刚（1982- ），男，山东蒙阴人，博士，教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为“三农”问题。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-07-25

  修回日期: 2024-11-05

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-20

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目(20BJY118)

山东省社会科学规划研究项目(23BJJJ07)

山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2020MG045)

收起

Effect and mechanism of the "Three Rights Separation" of agricultural land in empowering the neo-endogenous agricultural and rural development

  • GONG Mao-gang , 1, 2 ,
  • HAN Fang-ying 1
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, China
  • 2. Research Center for Sinicization of Marxism, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, China

Received date: 2024-07-25

  Revised date: 2024-11-05

  Online published: 2025-06-20

Fold

摘要

新内生发展是实现农业农村现代化的重要途径，土地产权制度改革在激活农业农村内外发展动力的过程中发挥着重要作用。基于多期双重差分法，使用2008—2022年中国206个地级市平衡面板数据，分析检验了农地“三权分置”改革对农业农村新内生发展的影响及其作用机制。研究发现：（1）农地“三权分置”显著提升了农业农村新内生发展水平；（2）促进土地规模化和吸引资本投资是农地“三权分置”政策效应发挥的两个重要渠道；（3）农地“三权分置”对农业资本深化程度较低和科学教育环境较好地区的农业农村新内生发展水平提升更大，且政策效应不会因农村劳动力流失和自然资源禀赋而表现出显著差异。研究结果为利用土地产权制度改革加快农业农村发展，进而实现农业农村现代化提供了更多理论支撑和经验证据。

关键词： 农地“三权分置”; 新内生发展; 土地产权; 农业农村现代化; 多期双重差分法

本文引用格式

公茂刚 , 韩方营 . 农地“三权分置”赋能农业农村新内生发展的效果及机制研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025 , 40(7) : 1816 -1838 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250706

Abstract

Neo-endogenous development is an important way to realise the modernization of agriculture and rural areas, and the reform of the land property rights system plays an important role in activating the internal and external development momentum of agriculture and rural areas. Based on the multi-period double-difference method, the study analyses and examines the impact of "Three Rights Separation" of agricultural land on the neo-endogenous development of agriculture and rural areas and its mechanism of action using balanced panel data of 206 prefecture-level cities in China from 2008 to 2022. The study finds that: (1) "Three Rights Separation" of agricultural land significantly improves the level of neo-endogenous development in agriculture and rural areas. (2) Promoting land scale and attracting capital investment are two important channels through which we can exert the policy effect of "Three Rights Separation" of agricultural land. (3) "Three Rights Separation" of agricultural land has significantly raised the level of neo-endogenous development in agriculture and rural areas. (4) "Three Rights Separation" of agricultural land will enhance the level of neo-endogenous development of agriculture and rural areas to a greater extent in areas with a lower degree of deepening of agricultural capital and better scientific and educational environments, and the policy effect will not be significantly different due to the loss of rural labour and the differences in natural resource endowment. This paper provides more theoretical support and empirical evidence for the use of land property rights reform to accelerate agricultural and rural development and thus achieve agricultural and rural modernization.

Key words： "Three Rights Separation" of agricultural land; neo-endogenous development; agricultural land property rights; agricultural and rural modernization; multi-period double-difference approach

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
苏毅清, 邱亚彪, 方平. “外部激活+内部重塑”下的公共事物供给: 关于激活乡村内生动力的机制解释. 中国农村观察, 2023, (2): 72-89.

[SU Y Q, QIU Y B, FANG P. Provision of public goods and services under "external activation+internal reshaping": An explanation of the mechanism of creating incentives for rural endogenous development. China Rural Survey, 2023, (2): 72-89.]

[2]
张文明, 章志敏. 资源·参与·认同: 乡村振兴的内生发展逻辑与路径选择. 社会科学, 2018, (11): 75-85.

[ZHANG W M, ZHANG Z M. Resources, participation and identity: Logic of endogenous development and path selection of rural revitalization. Journal of Social Sciences, 2018, (11): 75-85.]

[3]
RAY C. Culture, intellectual property and territorial rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 1998, 38(1): 3-20.

[4]
张环宙, 黄超超, 周永广. 内生式发展模式研究综述. 浙江大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2007, 37(2): 61-68.

[ZHANG H Z, HUANG C C, ZHOU Y G. A review of the endogenous development. Journal of Zhejiang University: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2007, 37(2): 61-68.]

[5]
GAO J, WU B H. Revitalizing traditional villages through rural tourism: A case study of Yuanjia village, Shaanxi province, China. Tourism Management, 2017, 63: 223-233.

[6]
GKARTZIOS M, SCOOT M. Housing and rural development. Sociol Ruralis, 2014, 54: 241-265.

[7]
吴茂英, 张镁琦, 王龙杰. 共生视角下乡村新内生式发展的路径与机制: 以杭州临安区乡村运营为例. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(8): 2097-2116.

DOI

[WU M Y, ZHANG M Q, WANG L J. The path and mechanism of neo-endogenous rural development from the perspective of symbiosis: A case study of rural operation in Lin'an district, Hangzhou. Hangzhou. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(8): 2097-2116.]

[8]
王兰. 新内生发展理论视角下的乡村振兴实践: 以大兴安岭南麓集中连片特困区为例. 西北农林科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2020, 20(4): 65-74.

[WANG L. The practice of rural revitalization under the New endogenous development theory: Taking the contiguous and extremely poor area in the south foot of the Greater Xing'an Mountains as an example. Journal of Northwest A&F University: Social Science Edition, 2020, 20(4): 65-74.]

[9]
高飞. 农村土地“三权分置”的法理阐释与制度意蕴. 法学研究, 2016, 38(3): 3-19.

[GAO F. Theoretical interpretation and institutional implication of the policy of "separation of three rights relating to agricultural land". Chinese Journal of Law, 2016, 38(3): 3-19.]

[10]
刘守英, 章元. “刘易斯转折点”的区域测度与战略选择: 国家统计局7万户抽样农户证据. 改革, 2014, (5): 75-81.

[LIU S Y, ZHANG Y. Regional measurement of lewis turing point and strategic choices: Evidence from 70000 sampling farmer households of NBS. Reform, 2014, (5): 75-81.]

[11]
公茂刚, 陈思凡. 农地三权分置对中国耕地产出效率的影响及机制: 基于生产要素视角. 资源科学, 2024, 46(3): 597-609.

DOI

[GONG M G, CHEN S F. Impact and mechanism of the "three rights separation" of agricultural land on the output efficiency of arable land in China: Based on the production factor perspective. Resources Science, 2024, 46(3): 597-609.]

[12]
GONG M G, ELAHI E. A nexus between farmland rights, and access, demand, and amount of agricultural loan under the socialist system of China. Land Use Policy, 2022, 120: 106279, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106279.

[13]
黄季焜, 冀县卿. 农地使用权确权与农户对农地的长期投资. 管理世界, 2012, 28(9): 76-81, 99, 187-188.

[HUANG J K, JI X Q. The verification of the right to use farmland and farmers' long-term investment in farmland. Journal of Management World, 2012, 28(9): 76-81, 99, 187-188.]

[14]
程令国, 张晔, 刘志彪. 农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗?. 管理世界, 2016, 32(1): 88-98.

[CHENG L G, ZHANG Y, LIU Z B. Does the confirmation of farmland promote the circulation of rural land in China?. Journal of Management World, 2016, 32(1): 88-98.]

[15]
周力, 沈坤荣. 中国农村土地制度改革的农户增收效应: 来自“三权分置”的经验证据. 经济研究, 2022, 57(5): 141-157.

[ZHOU L, SHEN K R. Impact of the rural land system reform on rural households' income growth in China: Evidence from the three rights separation. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 57(5): 141-157.]

[16]
李根丽, 杨美春, 刘天军. 农地流转能否提升劳动力市场有效性: 以“三权分置”改革为背景. 经济学家, 2023, (8): 117-128.

[LI G L, YANG M C, LIU T J. Can farmland transfer improve the efficiency of the labor market: Under the background of the reform of "three rights separation". Economist, 2023, (8): 117-128.]

[17]
许彩华, 余劲. “三权分置”背景下土地流转的收入效应分析: 基于粮食主产区3省10县的农户调查. 华中农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2020, (1): 18-27, 162.

[XU C H, YU J. The income effect of land transfer under the background of "division of three rights": Based on the survey of farmers in 10 counties of 3 major grain-producing provinces. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2020, (1): 18-27, 162.]

[18]
徐玉婷, 黄贤金, 陈志刚, 等. 农地三权分置改革对多元主体收入的影响: 来自长江中下游地区的实证经验. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(9): 2451-2466.

DOI

[XU Y T, HUANG X J, CHEN Z G, et al. Impact of agricultural land reform of separation of three rights on multi-operators income: Empirical experience from the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(9): 2451-2466.]

[19]
刘宗志, 周力. 农地确权、“三权分置”与增收效应: 基于集体与农户的双重视角. 山西财经大学学报, 2024, 46(1): 40-53.

[LIU Z Z, ZHOU L. Rural land right verification, "separation of ownership rights" and revenue-increasing effect: Based on the dual perspectives of collective and peasant households. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2024, 46(1): 40-53.]

[20]
韩旭东, 郑风田, 郑淋议. 能人型村干部如何影响村庄新内源式发展: 基于全国性村级面板数据的分析. 中国软科学, 2023, (6): 56-65.

[HAN X D, ZHENG F T, ZHENG L Y. How do capable village cadres influence the neo-endogenous development of villages: An analysis based on nationwide village panel data. China Soft Science, 2023, (6): 56-65.]

[21]
曲颂, 朱铁辉, 郭君平. 演进中的农地“三权”分置: 来自中国化时代化马克思主义土地理论的检视. 中国农村经济, 2024, (5): 21-39.

[QU S, ZHU T H, GUO J P. Evolving division of "three rights" of farmland: An inspection of the Marxist land theory with chineseization and modernization. Chinese Rural Economy, 2024, (5): 21-39.]

[22]
李怀. 集体地权变迁下的乡村治理: 演进、主线及深化. 当代经济研究, 2020, (7): 73-81.

[LI H. Rural governance under the changes of collective land rights: Evolution, main lines and deepening. Contemporary Economic Research, 2020, (7): 73-81.]

[23]
罗必良, 耿鹏鹏. 乡村治理及其转型的产权逻辑. 清华大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2022, 37(3): 188-204, 219-220.

[LUO B L, GENG P P. The property rights logic of Chinese rural governance and its transformation. Journal of Tsinghua University: Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2022, 37(3): 188-204, 219-220.]

[24]
贺雪峰. 大城市的“脚”还是乡村的“脑”? 中西部县域经济与县域城镇化的逻辑. 社会科学辑刊, 2022, (5): 55-62.

[HE X F. Big cities' "feet" or the country's "brain": The logic of county economy and urbanization in central and western regions. Social Science Journal, 2022, (5): 55-62.]

[25]
耿鹏鹏, 罗必良. 农地确权是否推进了乡村治理的现代化?. 管理世界, 2022, 38(12): 59-76.

[GENG P P, LUO B L. Has the land titling promoted the modernization of rural governance?. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(12): 59-76.]

[26]
李宁, 周琦宇, 邹丽琼. 农产品网络销售会影响新型农业经营主体的农地经营规模吗?. 农业技术经济, 2022, (2): 94-109.

[LI N, ZHOU Q Y, ZOU L Q. Will network sales of agricultural products affect the farmland scales of new agricultural business entities?. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2022, (2): 94-109.]

[27]
涂圣伟. 工商资本下乡的适宜领域及其困境摆脱. 改革, 2014, (9): 73-82.

[TU S W. The suitable field and getting rid of the dilemma of industrial and commercial capital into rural area. Reform, 2014, (9): 73-82.]

[28]
孙琳琳, 杨浩, 郑海涛. 土地确权对中国农户资本投资的影响: 基于异质性农户模型的微观分析. 经济研究, 2020, 55(11): 156-173.

[SUN L L, YANG H, ZHENG H T. The impact of land titling on agricultural investment in rural China. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(11): 156-173.]

[29]
公茂刚, 王天慧. 农地“三权分置”改革对农业内生发展的影响机制及实证检验. 经济体制改革, 2020, (1): 73-80.

[GONG M G, WANG T H. The influence mechanism of the separation of Three rights of agricultural land on the endogenous development of agriculture in China. Reform of Economic System, 2020, (1): 73-80.]

[30]
郭熙保, 吴方. 家庭农场经营规模、信贷获得与固定资产投资. 经济纵横, 2020, (7): 92-105, 2.

[GUO X B, WU F. Operation scale, credit availability and fixed asset investment of family farms. Economic Review Journal, 2020, (7): 92-105, 2.]

[31]
张亚洲, 陈卓, 杨俊孝, 等. 农业补贴改革对粮食生产效率的影响: 基于土地转入户的视角. 经济经纬, 2023, 40(5): 36-47.

[ZHANG Y Z, CHEN Z, YANG J X, et al. The influence of agricultural subsidies reform on grain production efficiency: From the perspective of farmers who rented-in land. Economic Survey, 2023, 40(5): 36-47.]

[32]
封志明, 张丹, 杨艳昭. 中国分县地形起伏度及其与人口分布和经济发展的相关性. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2011, 51(1): 146-151, 160.

[FENG Z M, ZHANG D, YANG Y Z. Relief degree of land surface in China at county level based on GIS and its correlation between population density and economic development. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 2011, 51(1): 146-151, 160.]

[33]
CINELLI C, FORNEY A, PEARL J. A crash course in good and bad controls. Sociological Methods & Research, 2024, 53(3): 1071-1104.

[34]
唐建军, 龚教伟, 宋清华. 数字普惠金融与农业全要素生产率: 基于要素流动与技术扩散的视角. 中国农村经济, 2022, (7): 81-102.

[TANG J J, GONG J W, SONG Q H. Digital financial inclusion and agricultural total factor productivity: The role of factor flow and technology diffusion. Chinese Rural Economy, 2022, (7): 81-102.]

[35]
牛志伟, 许晨曦, 武瑛. 营商环境优化、人力资本效应与企业劳动生产率. 管理世界, 2023, 39(2): 83-100.

[NIU Z W, XU C X, WU Y. Business environment optimization, human capital effect and firm labor productivity. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(2): 83-100.]

[36]
RAMBACHAN A, ROTH J. A more credible approach to parallel trends. Review of Economic Studies, 2023, 90(5): 2555-2591.

[37]
许文立, 孙磊. 市场激励型环境规制与能源消费结构转型: 来自中国碳排放权交易试点的经验证据. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(7): 133-155.

[XU W L, SUN L. Market-incentive environmental regulation and energy consumption structure transformation. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40(7): 133-155.]

[38]
CALLAWAY B, SANT'ANNA P H C. Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225(2): 200-230.

[39]
王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等. 国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 793-810.

DOI

[WANG S J, KONG W, REN L, et al. Research on misuses and modification of coupling coordination degree model in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(3): 793-810.]

[40]
姚文. 数字农业促进农业强国建设的作用机制与推进路径: 基于农业强省建设视角的实证检验. 华南师范大学学报: 社会科学版, 2023, (6): 31-55, 205-206.

[YAO W. The mechanism and promotion path of the impact of digital agriculture on the achievement of the goal of building a strong agricultural country: Empirical testing based on the perspective of building a strong agricultural province. Journal of South China Normal University: Social Science Edition, 2023, (6): 31-55, 205-206.]

[41]
靳永广. 比较优势转化、优质要素集聚与村级集体经济发展: 基于浙江省安吉县的经验观察. 农业经济问题, 2023, 44(4): 64-77.

[JIN Y G. Comparative advantage transformation, high-quality factor agglomeration and the development of village collective economy: Based on the case study of Anji county, Zhejiang province. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2023, 44(4): 64-77.]

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉