赵钰 , 应凌霄 , 张观石 , 欧阳志云 . 生态资产质量评估方法与进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025 , 40(7) : 1719 -1742 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250701

[1]	DÍAZ S, PASCUAL U, STENSEKE M, et al. Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science, 2018, 359(6373): 270-272. DOI PMID

[2]	COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.

[3]	CARPENTER S R, MOONEY H A, AGARD J, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. PNAS, 2009, 106(5): 1305-1312. DOI PMID

[4]	SCHRÖTER M, ALBERT C, MARQUES A, et al. National ecosystem assessments in Europe: A review. BioScience, 2016, 66(10): 813-828. DOI PMID

[5]	GOLDSTEIN J H, CALDARONE G, DUARTE T K, et al. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. PNAS, 2012, 109(19): 7565-7570. DOI PMID

[6]	SCHLEYER C, GÖRG C, HAUCK J, et al. Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming the ecosystem services concept in the multi-level policy-making within the EU. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 16: 174-181.

[7]	DAILY G C, RUCKELSHAUS M. 25 years of valuing ecosystems in decision-making. Nature, 2022, 606(7914): 465-466.

[8]	VOGT W. Road to Survival. New York: William Sloane Associates, Inc, 1948.

[9]	COSTANZA R, DALY H E. Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 1992, 6(1): 37-46.

[10]	DAILY G C. Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997.

[11]	高吉喜, 范小杉. 生态资产概念、特点与研究趋向. 环境科学研究, 2007, 20(5): 137-143. [GAO J X, FAN X S. Connotation, traits and research trends of eco-assets. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2007, 20(5): 137-143.]

[12]	TEEB. Frequently asked questions about NCA, 2012, 2024-02-20.

[13]

欧阳志云, 郑华, 谢高地, 等. 生态资产、生态补偿及生态文明科技贡献核算理论与技术. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7136-7139. [OUYANG Z Y, ZHENG H, XIE G D, et al. Accounting theories and technologies for ecological assets, ecological compensation and scientific and technological contribution to ecological civilization. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22): 7136-7139.]

[14]

于贵瑞, 杨萌. 自然生态价值、生态资产管理及价值实现的生态经济学基础研究: 科学概念、基础理论及实现途径. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1153-1165. DOI [YU G R, YANG M. Ecological economics foundation research on ecological values, ecological asset management, and value realization: Scientific concepts, basic theories, and realization paths. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1153-1165.]

[15]	GUERRY A D, POLASKY S, LUBCHENCO J, et al. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. PNAS, 2015, 112(24): 7348-7355. DOI PMID

[16]	GB/T 42340-2023. 生态系统评估生态系统格局与质量评价方法. 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局, 中华人民共和国国家标准化管理委员会, 2023. [GB/T 42340-2023. Ecosystem assessment: Methods for ecosystem pattern and quality assessment. State Administration for Market Regulation & Standardization Administration of P.R.C., 2023.]

[17]	GB/T 43677-2024. 生态系统评估陆地生态资产核算技术指南. 中华人民共和国国家市场监督管理总局, 中华人民共和国国家标准化管理委员会, 2024. [GB/T 43677-2024. Ecosystem assessment: Technical guideline for terrestrial ecosystem asset accounting. State Administration for Market Regulation & Standardization Administration of P.R.C. 2024.]

[18]	United Nations, European Union, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, et al. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting: Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). White Cover. 2021, https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting.

[19]	于贵瑞, 王永生, 杨萌. 生态系统质量及其状态演变的生态学理论和评估方法之探索. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 865-877. DOI [YU G R, WANG Y S, YANG M. Discussion on the ecological theory and assessment methods of ecosystem quality and its evolution. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(4): 865-877.]

[20]	FARRELL C, COLEMAN L, KELLY-QUINN M, et al. Applying the System of Environmental Economic Accounting-Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) framework at catchment scale to develop ecosystem extent and condition accounts. One Ecosystem, 2021, 6: e65582, Doi: 10.3897/oneeco.6.e65582.

[21]	钱爱民, 张新民. 资产质量: 概念界定与特征构建. 财经问题研究, 2009, (12): 99-104. [QIAN A M, ZHANG X M. Asset quality: Definition and characteristics. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2009, (12): 99-104.]

[22]	张新民, 钱爱民, 陈德球. 上市公司财务状况质量: 理论框架与评价体系. 管理世界, 2019, 35(7): 152-166, 204. [ZHANG X M, QIAN A M, CHEN D Q. Quality of financial statement of listed companies: Theoretical framework and evaluation system. Journal of Management World, 2019, 35(7): 152-166, 204.]

[23]	KARR J R. Defining and assessing ecological integrity: Beyond water quality. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1993, 12(9): 1521-1531.

[24]	ROCHE P K, CAMPAGNE C S. From ecosystem integrity to ecosystem condition: A continuity of concepts supporting different aspects of ecosystem sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2017, 29: 63-68.

[25]	LEOPOLD A. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968.

[26]	KARR J R, FAUSCH K D, ANGERMEIER P L, et al. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: A method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication No 05, 1986.

[27]	CANNING A D, DEATH R G. Ecosystem Health Indicators:Freshwater Environments. Encyclopedia of Ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2019: 46-60.

[28]	陈展, 林波, 尚鹤, 等. 适应白洋淀湿地健康评价的IBI方法. 生态学报, 2012, 32(21): 6619-6627. [CHEN Z, LIN B, SHANG H, et al. An index of biological integrity: Developing the methodology for assessing the health of the Baiyangdian Wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(21): 6619-6627.]

[29]	UNNASCH R, BRAUN D, COMER P, et al. The ecological integrity assessment framework: A framework for assessing the ecological integrity of biological and ecological resources of the National Park System. Report to the National Park Service, 2008.

[30]	ANGERMEIER P L, KARR J R. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives: Protecting biotic resources. BioScience, 1994, 44(10): 264-275.

[31]	KANDZIORA M, BURKHARD B, MÜLLER F. Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators: A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 28: 54-78.

[32]	ROHWER Y, MARRIS E. Ecosystem integrity is neither real nor valuable. Conservation Science and Practice, 2021, 3(4): e411, Doi: 10.1111/csp2.411.

[33]	THEOBALD D M. A general model to quantify ecological integrity for landscape assessments and US application. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28(10): 1859-1874.

[34]	PARRISH J D, BRAUN D P, UNNASCH R S. Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. BioScience, 2003, 53(9): 851, Doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:awcwws]2.0.co;2.

[35]	RAPPORT D J. What constitutes ecosystem health?. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1989, 33(1): 120-132.

[36]	马克明, 孔红梅, 关文彬, 等. 生态系统健康评价: 方法与方向. 生态学报, 2001, 21(12): 2106-2116. [MA K M, KONG H M, GUAN W B, et al. Ecosystem health assessment: Methods and directions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(12): 2106-2116.]

[37]	HASKELL B D, NORTON B G, COSTANZA R. What is ecosystem health and why should we worry about it. COSTANZA R, NORTON B G, HASKELL B D, eds. Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Washington D C: Island Press, 1992: 3-20.

[38]	LU Y L, WANG R S, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Ecosystem health towards sustainability. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2015, 1(1): 1-15.

[39]	HOLLING C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4: 1-23.

[40]	CARL F. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 253-267.

[41]	SCHEFFER M. Critical Transitions In nature and Society. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2020.

[42]	HUNTER J R M. Benchmarks for managing ecosystems: Are human activities natural?. Conservation Biology, 1996, 10(3): 695-697.

[43]	ANGERMEIER P L. The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conservation Biology, 2000, 14(2): 373-381.

[44]	SUKOPP H, HEJNÝ S, KOWARIK I. Urban Ecology:Plants and Plant Communities in Urban Environments. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing, 1990.

[45]	MACHADO A. An index of naturalness. Journal for Nature Conservation, 2004, 12(2): 95-110.

[46]	CHAPIN F S III, TORN M S, TATENO M. Principles of ecosystem sustainability. The American Naturalist, 1996, 148(6): 1016-1037.

[47]	SIDLE R C, BENSON W H, CARRIGER J F, et al. Broader perspective on ecosystem sustainability: Consequences for decision making. PNAS, 2013, 110(23): 9201-9208. DOI PMID

[48]	SCHOOLMASTER JR D R, GRACE J B, WILLIAM SCHWEIGER E. A general theory of multimetric indices and their properties. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012, 3(4): 773-781.

[49]	CHEN Y Q, VARDON M, KEITH H, et al. Linking ecosystem accounting to environmental planning and management: Opportunities and barriers using a case study from the Australian capital territory. Environmental Science & Policy, 2023, 142: 206-219.

[50]	MAES J, DRIVER A, CZÚCZ B, et al. A review of ecosystem condition accounts: Lessons learned and options for further development. One Ecosystem, 2020, 5: e53485, Doi: 10.3897/oneeco.5.e53485.

[51]	欧阳志云, 靳乐山, 甄林, 等. 面向生态补偿的生态系统生产总值(GEP)和生态资产核算. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018. [OUYANG Z Y, JIN L S, JIN L, et al. Development Gross Ecosystem Product and Ecological Assets Accounting for Eco-compensation. Beijing: Science Press, 2018.]

[52]	谢高地. 生态资产评价: 存量、质量与价值. 环境保护, 2017, 45(11): 18-22. [XIE G D. Ecological asset evaluation: Stock, quality and value. Environmental Protection, 2017, 45(11): 18-22.]

[53]	张慧龙, 杨秀春, 杨东, 等. 2000—2020年内蒙古草地植被覆盖度时空变化及趋势预测. 草业学报, 2023, 32(8): 1-13. DOI [ZHANG H L, YANG X C, YANG D, et al. Spatio-temporal changes in grassland fractional vegetation cover in Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2020 and a future forecast. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(8): 1-13.]

[54]	湖泊(水库)富营养化评价方法及分级技术规定. 中华人民共和国: 中国环境监测总站, 2001. [Technical regulations on eutrophication evaluation methods and grading for lakes (reservoirs). The People's Republic of China: China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, 2001.]

[55]	GB/T 28407-2012. 农用地质量分等规程. 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局、中华人民共和国国家标准化管理委员会, 2012. [GB/T 28407-2012. Regulation for gradation on agriculture land quality. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine & Standardization Administration of P.R.C., 2012.]

[56]	宋昌素, 肖燚, 博文静, 等. 生态资产评价方法研究: 以青海省为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1): 9-23. [SONG C S, XIAO Y, BO W J, et al. The ecological asset accounting method study: A case study of Qinghai province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1): 9-23.]

[57]	HUANG B B, LI R N, DING Z W, et al. A new remote-sensing-based indicator for integrating quantity and quality attributes to assess the dynamics of ecosystem assets. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020, 22: e00999, Doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00999.

[58]	董天, 张路, 肖燚, 等. 鄂尔多斯市生态资产和生态系统生产总值评估. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 3062-3074. [DONG T, ZHANG L, XIAO Y, et al. Assessment of ecological assets and gross ecosystem product value in Ordos city. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(9): 3062-3074.]

[59]	LIU Q Q, WANG J C, XIONG K N, et al. Quantitative assessment of ecological assets in the world heritage Karst sites based on remote sensing: With a special reference to South China Karst. Heritage Science, 2024, 12(1): 129, Doi: 10.1186/s40494-024-01243-z.

[60]	甘依霖, 罗静, 朱媛媛, 等. 城市空间生态资产评估及其人地关系内涵: 以武汉市府河湿地为例. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(7): 1756-1770. DOI [GAN Y L, LUO J, ZHU Y Y, et al. The evaluation of urban spatial ecosystem assets and human-land relationship: A case study of Fuhe Wetland in Wuhan city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(7): 1756-1770.]

[61]

宗乐丽, 陈孜, 张明, 等. 长江中下游地区流域生态资产价值评估: 以新安江流域为例. 中国地质, 2024, 51(4): 1252-1265. [ZONG L L, CHEN Z, ZHANG M, et al. Assessment method of watershed ecological asset value in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River: A case study of the Xin'an River Basin. Geology in China, 2024, 51(4): 1252-1265.]

[62]	张会儒, 雷相东, 张春雨, 等. 森林质量评价及精准提升理论与技术研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5): 1-18. [ZHANG H R, LEI X D, ZHANG C Y, et al. Research on theory and technology of forest quality evaluation and precision improvement. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2019, 41(5): 1-18.]

[63]	冯继广, 王景升, 姚帅臣, 等. 基于因子分析的森林资源质量综合评价. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(1): 27-32, 42. [FENG J G, WANG J S, YAO S C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of forest resources quality based on factor analysis. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(1): 27-32, 42.]

[64]	刘海轩, 李锋, 马远, 等. 基于景观多样性的北京市域森林质量综合评价. 中国园林, 2022, 38(10): 14-19. [LIU H X, LI F, MA Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of forest quality in Beijing based on landscape diversity. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2022, 38(10): 14-19.]

[65]	丁文成, 宋大利, 周卫. 我国耕地质量主控因素及提升策略. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30(8): 1580-1594. [DING W C, SONG D L, ZHOU W. Dominant factors driving the farmland quality in China and strategies for improvement. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2024, 30(8): 1580-1594.]

[66]	武岩, 刘宏金, 迟文峰, 等. 基于层次分析—客观赋权法的耕地质量等级评价方法研究与实证. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024, (4): 17-25. [WU Y, LIU H J, CHI W F, et al. Research and demonstration of cultivated land quality grade evaluation method based on AHP-CRITIC method. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2024, (4): 17-25.]

[67]	HALMY M W A. Assessing the impact of anthropogenic activities on the ecological quality of arid Mediterranean ecosystems: Case study from the northwestern coast of Egypt. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 101: 992-1003.

[68]	WHEELER B W, LOVELL R, HIGGINS S L, et al. Beyond greenspace: An ecological study of population general health and indicators of natural environment type and quality. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2015, 14: 17, Doi: 10.1186/s12942-015-0009-5. PMID

[69]	SHOFFNER A, WILSON A M, TANG W W, et al. The relative effects of forest amount, forest configuration, and urban matrix quality on forest breeding birds. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 17140, Doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35276-9. PMID

[70]	BAGSTAD K J, INGRAM J C, SHAPIRO C D, et al. Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 52: 101359, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101359.

[71]	EDENS B, MAES J, HEIN L, et al. Establishing the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting as a global standard. Ecosystem Services, 2022, 54: 101413, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101413.

[72]	United Nations, European Union, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, et al. System of Environmental Economic Accounting 2012: Experimental Ecosystem Accounting, 2014.

[73]	CZÚCZ B, KEITH H, MAES J, et al. Selection criteria for ecosystem condition indicators. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 133: 108376, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108376.

[74]	SEEA. Ecosystem accounting for the Netherlands, 2016, https://seea.un.org/news/ecosystem-accounting-netherlands, 2024-01-25.

[75]	MARJOLEIN LOF, PATRICK BOGAART, LARS HEIN, et al. The SEEA-EEA ecosystem condition account for the Netherlands. Statistics Netherlands, Wageningen University, Netherlands, 2019.

[76]	Office for National Statistics. Habitat extent and condition, natural capital, UK: 2022.

[77]	The White House. National strategy to develop statistics for environmental-economic decisions. A U.S. system of natural capital accounting and associated environmental-economic statistics. Office of Science and Technology Policy, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Commerce. U.S., 2023.

[78]	WENTLAND S, CORNWALL G, MOULTON J G. For what it's worth: Measuring land value in the era of big data and machine learning. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2023.

[79]	BAGSTAD K J, ANCONA Z H, HASS J, et al. Integrating physical and economic data into experimental water accounts for the United States: Lessons and opportunities. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 45: 101182, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101182.

[80]	CHAMBERS M L. Proof of concept for a U.S. air emissions physical flows account. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2023.

[81]

FIXLER D, HASS J L, HIGHFILL T, et al. Measuring and accounting for environmental public goods: A national accounts perspective. Accounting for Environmental Activity: Measuring Public Environmental Expenditures and the Environmental Goods and Services Sector in the US. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2024.

[82]	WARNELL K J D, RUSSELL M, RHODES C, et al. Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the southeast. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 43: 101099, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101099.

[83]	SEEA. Natural capital accounting and valuation of ecosystem services project, 2017, https://seea.un.org/home/Natural-Capital-Accounting-Project, 2024-01-20.

[84]	IBGE. Ecosystem accounts for Brazil: Report of the NCAVES project. Brazil, 2021.

[85]	South African National Biodiversity Institute & Statistics South Africa. Ecosystem accounts for South Africa: Report of the NCAVES project. SANBI, Pretoria, 2021.

[86]	NEL J L, DRIVER A. National river ecosystem accounts for South Africa. Discussion document. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, 2015.

[87]	VAN NIEKERK L, TALJAARD S, LAMBERTH S, et al. Experimental ecosystem accounts for South Africa's estuaries: Extent, condition and ecosystem services accounts. Report produced by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), South Africa, 2020.

[88]	TASHA R, JESSICA A. Valuing the salt marsh ecosystem: Developing ecosystem accounts. Statistics Canada., Canada, 2022.

[89]	JULIE B-C, JESSICA A. Ecosystem accounting in Canadian agroecosystems. Statistics Canada, Canada, 2023.

[90]	European Union. INCA platform: About INCA, 2015, https://ecosystem-accounts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/about-inca, 2024-01-07.

[91]

VYSNA V, MAES J, PETERSEN J-E, et al. Accounting for ecosystems and their services in the European Union (INCA). Final report from Phase II of the INCA Project Aiming to Develop a Pilot for an Integrated System of Ecosystem Accounts for the EU. Publications office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2021.

[92]	BURKHARD B, SANTOS-MARTIN F, NEDKOV S, et al. An operational framework for integrated Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES). One Ecosystem, 2018, 3: e22831, Doi: 10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831.

[93]	VALLECILLO S, MAES J, TELLER A, et al. EU-wide Methodology to Map and Assess Ecosystem Condition: Towards a Common Approach Consistent with a Global Statistical Standard. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2022.

[94]	LOH J, GREEN R E, RICKETTS T, et al. The living planet index: Using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Biological Sciences, 2005, 360(1454): 289-295.

[95]	LEDGER S E H, LOH J, ALMOND R, et al. Past, present, and future of the living planet index. NPJ Biodiversity, 2023, 2(1): 12, Doi: 10.1038/s44185-023-00017-3. PMID

[96]	CZÚCZ B, KEITH H, DRIVER A, et al. A common typology for ecosystem characteristics and ecosystem condition variables. One Ecosystem, 2021, 6: e58218, Doi: 10.3897/oneeco.6.e58218.

[97]	BLAND L M, WATERMEYER K E, KEITH D A, et al. Assessing risks to marine ecosystems with indicators, ecosystem models and experts. Biological Conservation, 2018, 227: 19-28.

[98]	HEIN L, BAGSTAD K J, OBST C, et al. Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems. Science, 2020, 367(6477): 514-515. DOI PMID

[99]	OUYANG Z Y, SONG C S, ZHENG H, et al. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. PNAS, 2020, 117(25): 14593-14601. DOI PMID

[100]

董贵华, 何立环, 刘海江, 等. 生态系统管理中生态环境评价的关键问题. 中国环境监测, 2013, 29(2): 41-45. [DONG G H, HE L H, LIU H J, et al. Key factors of ecological environment evaluation in eco-system management. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2013, 29(2): 41-45.]

[101]

WANG S, WANG J, ZHANG L, et al. A national key R&D program: Technologies and guidelines for monitoring ecological quality of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(2): 105, Doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2019.02.001.

[102]

牛丽楠, 邵全琴, 宁佳, 等. 黄土高原生态恢复程度及恢复潜力评估. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(3): 779-794. DOI [NIU L N, SHAO Q Q, NING J, et al. Evaluation on the degree and potential of ecological restoration in Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(3): 779-794.]

[103]

KEITH H, VARDON M, OBST C, et al. Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 769: 144341, Doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144341.

[104]

KING S, VARDON M, GRANTHAM H S, et al. Linking biodiversity into national economic accounting. Environmental Science & Policy, 2021, 116: 20-29.

[105]

ROWLAND J A, LEE C K F, BLAND L M, et al. Testing the performance of ecosystem indices for biodiversity monitoring. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 116: 106453, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106453.

[106]

European Union. Water framework directive. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, 2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/60/oj, 2024-03-15.

[107]

European Union. Marine strategy framework directive. Directive 2008/56/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 17 june 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy, 2017, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/56/oj, 2024-03-15.

[108]

HERING D, BORJA A, CARSTENSEN J, et al. The European water framework directive at the age of 10: A critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(19): 4007-4019.

[109]

LONG R. The marine strategy framework directive: A new European approach to the regulation of the marine environment, marine natural resources and marine ecological services. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 2011, 29(1): 1-44.

[110]

European Union. The birds directive. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, 2009, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0147, 2024-03-15.

[111]

European Union. The habitats directive. Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, 2013, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31992L0043, 2024-03-15.

[112]

DE VIDO S. Protecting biodiversity in Europe: The habitats and birds directives and their application in Italy in an evolving perspective. NAKANISHI Y, ed. Contemporary Issues in Environmental Law: The EU and Japan. Environmental Protection in the European Union. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2016: 115-138.

[113]

BRADY A F, BODA C S. How do we know if managed realignment for coastal habitat compensation is successful? Insights from the implementation of the EU birds and habitats directive in England. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017, 143: 164-174.

[114]

BEUNEN R, KOLE S. Institutional innovation in conservation law: Experiences from the implementation of the birds and habitats directives in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 2021, 108: 105566, Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105566.

[115]

European Commission. Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council amending regulation (EU) No 691/2011 as regards introducing new environmental economic accounts modules, 2022, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0329, 2024-05-06.

[116]

SCHULTZ L, FOLKE C, ÖSTERBLOM H, et al. Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. PNAS, 2015, 112(24): 7369-7374. DOI PMID

[117]

于贵瑞, 王永生, 杨萌. 提升生态系统质量和稳定性的生态学原理及技术途径之探讨. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 1-10. DOI [YU G R, WANG Y S, YANG M. Discussion on the ecological theory and technological approaches of ecosystem quality improvement and stability enhancement. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(1): 1-10.]

[118]

LA NOTTE A, CZÚCZ B, VALLECILLO S, et al. Ecosystem condition underpins the generation of ecosystem services: An accounting perspective. One Ecosystem, 2022, 7: e81487, Doi: 10.3897/oneeco.7.e81487.

[119]

ZHAO C, SHAO N, YANG S, et al. Integrated assessment of ecosystem health using multiple indicator species. Ecological Engineering, 2019, 130: 157-168.

[120]

MONONEN L, AUVINEN A P, AHOKUMPU A L, et al. National ecosystem service indicators: Measures of social-ecological sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 61: 27-37.

[121]

李梦桃, 周忠学. 基于多维评价模型的都市农业多功能发展模式探究. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(9): 1275-1284. [LI M T, ZHOU Z X. Evaluation of urban agriculture multi-functionality development models based on multi-dimension evaluation. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(9): 1275-1284.]

[122]

LIAO W H, JIANG W G. Evaluation of the spatiotemporal variations in the eco-environmental quality in China based on the remote sensing ecological index. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(15): 2462, Doi: 10.3390/rs12152462.

[123]

高宇婷, 高甲荣, 顾岚, 等. 北京市汤河生态健康评价指标相关性分析. 中国水土保持科学, 2014, 12(3): 119-124. [GAO Y T, GAO J R, GU L, et al. Correlation analysis of ecological health evaluation factors on Tanghe River in Beijing. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 12(3): 119-124.]

[124]

SONG C L, SIMMONS B I, FORTIN M J, et al. Rapid monitoring of ecological persistence. PNAS, 2023, 120(20): e2211288120, Doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211288120.

[125]

ZHANG M Y, ZHANG L, HE H L, et al. Improvement of ecosystem quality in national key ecological function zones in China during 2000-2015. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 324: 116406, Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116406.

[126]

董贵华, 王业耀, 于洋, 等. “十三五” 以来我国生态质量状况时空变化分析. 中国环境监测, 2023, 39(1): 1-9. [DONG G H, WANG Y Y, YU Y, et al. Analysis on spatio-temporal changes of ecological quality status in China since the 13th five year plan period. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2023, 39(1): 1-9.]