EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2025 , Vol. 40 >Issue 6: 1664 - 1680

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20250614

生态资源价值实现

国家公园生态产品文化服务价值实现的路径与机制

  • 钟林生 , 1, 2 ,
  • 张香菊 , 3
展开
  • 1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所，北京 100101
  • 2.中国科学院大学，北京 100049
  • 3.河南农业大学林学院，郑州 450046
张香菊（1987- ），女，河南太康人，博士，讲师，研究方向为自然保护地与生态旅游。E-mail:

钟林生（1971- ），男，江西于都人，博士，研究员，研究方向为旅游地理与生态旅游、自然保护地管理。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-07-01

  修回日期: 2025-01-22

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-26

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重点项目(23AZD062)

国家自然科学基金项目(42401362)

河南省教育厅人文社会科学一般项目(2025-ZDJH-086)

收起

Path and mechanism for realizing the cultural service value of ecological products in national parks

  • ZHONG Lin-sheng , 1, 2 ,
  • ZHANG Xiang-ju , 3
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3. College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China

Received date: 2024-07-01

  Revised date: 2025-01-22

  Online published: 2025-05-26

Fold

摘要

生态产品文化服务搭建起生态系统与人类福祉的桥梁，是国家公园生态产品价值实现机制探索的重要内容。为促进国家公园“两山”转化、更好满足人民日益增长的优美生态环境需求，基于生态系统服务级联框架，针对生态产品文化服务特征和价值实现条件，提出国家公园生态产品文化服务价值实现的路径与机制。研究认为：价值实现路径包括明确自然资源权属、开展供需调查和监测、规划文化服务项目、核算文化服务价值、探索项目运营机制、促进服务交易与消费6个环节，并需要从政策创新、特许经营、生态补偿、多元资金投入、科技创新和公众参与6个方面完善和优化实现机制。研究基于生态产品文化服务的共同生产特征和对社会建构的更强依赖性，从利益相关者视角提出价值实现的多元参与机制。研究结果有利于从理论上完善和优化级联框架的人类反馈机制，从实践上促进国家公园生态产品文化服务的供需匹配。为有效支撑价值实现的路径和机制，未来研究应在继续完善供给端理论、方法和政策的基础上，重视需求的调查监测、评估方法和公众的参与、监督机制研究。

关键词： 生态产品; 国家公园; 文化服务; 生态系统服务级联框架; 利益相关者

本文引用格式

钟林生 , 张香菊 . 国家公园生态产品文化服务价值实现的路径与机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025 , 40(6) : 1664 -1680 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250614

Abstract

The cultural service value realization of ecological products builds a bridge between ecosystems and human well-being and it is an important part of the exploration of the value realization mechanism of ecological products in national parks. In order to promote the transformation of lucid waters and lush mountains in national parks to invaluable assets and better meet people's growing demand for high-quality cultural ecosystem services, this paper proposed the path and mechanism of realizing the value of cultural service of ecological products in national parks (CSEPNPs) on the condition of the identification of functional characteristics and realization conditions. The analysis followed the chain process of "function-product/services-benefit-value" of ecosystem services based on the framework of ecosystem services cascade. We found that the path of realizing the value of CSEPNP includes six steps, namely clear ownership, survey and monitoring, product production, value accounting, project operation and trading. It was suggested to improve and optimize the mechanism on realizing the value of CSEPNP from policy, ecological compensation, investment, franchising, technology application, and public participation. In view of the characteristics of joint production of cultural ecosystem services and strong dependence on social construction, the value realization mechanism proposed in this paper from the perspective of stakeholders was conducive to improving and optimizing the humanistic feedback of the cascade framework in theory, and promoting the supply and demand matching between ecological products and cultural services in national parks in practice. With the continuing study on supply-side theory, method and policy, future research should pay attention to demand-side investigation, monitoring, evaluation methods and public participation and supervision mechanism research, so as to achieve real-time matching of supply and demand.

Key words： ecological product; national parks; cultural service; ecosystem services cascade framework; stakeholder

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
于贵瑞, 杨萌. 自然生态价值、生态资产管理及价值实现的生态经济学基础研究: 科学概念、基础理论及实现途径. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1153-1165.

DOI

[YU G R, YANG M. Ecological economics foundation research on ecological values, ecological asset management, and value realization: Scientific concepts, basic theories, and realization paths. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1153-1165.]

[2]
章锦河, 苏杨, 钟林生, 等. 国家公园科学保护与生态旅游高质量发展: 理论思考与创新实践. 中国生态旅游, 2022, 12(2): 189-207.

DOI

[ZHANG J H, SU Y, ZHONG L S, et al. Scientific protection of National Parks and high-quality development of tourism: Theoretical thinking and innovative practice. Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2022, 12(2): 189-207.]

DOI

[3]
刘峥延, 李忠, 张庆杰. 三江源国家公园生态产品价值的实现与启示. 宏观经济管理, 2019, (2): 68-72.

[LIU Z Y, LI Z, ZHANG Q J. The realization and enlightenment of the value of the ecological products of the Three-River-Source National Park. Macroeconomic Management, 2019, (2): 68-72.]

[4]
臧振华, 徐卫华, 欧阳志云. 国家公园体制试点区生态产品价值实现探索. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 275-277.

DOI

[ZANG Z H, XU W H, OUYANG Z Y. Exploration on the value realization of ecological products in China's National Park system pilots. Biodiversity Science, 2021, 29(3): 275-277.]

[5]
杜傲, 沈钰仟, 肖燚, 等. 国家公园生态产品价值核算. 生态学报, 2023, 43(1): 208-218.

[DU A, SHEN Y Q, XIAO Y, et al. Research on accounting of ecological products value in National Parks. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(1): 208-218.]

[6]
国家发展和改革委员会, 国家统计局. 生态产品总值核算规范. 北京: 人民出版社, 2022: 8-11.

[National Development and Reform Commission, National Bureau of Statistics. Standard for Accounting the Total Value of Ecological Products. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 2022: 8-11.]

[7]
ZHANG H M, HUANG R H, ZHANG Y C, et al. Cultural ecosystem services evaluation using geolocated social media data: A review. Tourism Geographies. 2022, 24(4-5): 646-668.

[8]
陶思宇, 周忠学. 基于旗舰物种的生态系统文化服务供需及流研究: 以大熊猫国家公园为例. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1643-1652.

[TAO S Y, ZHOU Z X. The supply, demand, and flow of ecosystem cultural services based on flagship species: Case of the Giant Panda National Park,China. Chinese Journal of Ecology: 2022, 41(8): 1643-1652.]

[9]
曹爱红, 伍泽坤, 吴慧珍, 等. 国家公园访客自然教育形式感知对行为意愿的影响路径. 中国生态旅游, 2024, 14(2): 375-390.

DOI

[CAO A H, WU Z K, WU H Z, et al. The National Park visitors' perception of nature education forms and the impacts on their behavioral intentions. Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2024, 14(2): 375-390.]

[10]
王立龙. 国家公园生态旅游的本土化路径研究. 中国生态旅游, 2022, 12(2): 264-274.

DOI

[WANG L L.. Localization path of ecotourism in Chinese National Parks Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2022, 12(2): 264-274.]

DOI

[11]
蔡晓梅, 苏杨, 吴必虎, 等. 生态文明建设背景下中国自然保护地发展的理论思考与创新实践. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(4): 839-861.

DOI

[CAI X M, SU Y, WU B H, et al. Theoretical debates and innovative practices of the development of China's nature protected area under the background of ecological civilization construction. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(4): 839-861.]

[12]
AMENT J M, MOORE C A, HERBST M P, et al. Cultural ecosystem services in protected areas: Understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies. Conservation Letters, 2017, 10(4): 440-450.

[13]
KOSANIC A, PETZOLD J. A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 45: 101168, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168.

[14]
郭宇, 张敏. 文化生态系统服务评估在国土空间规划中的应用展望. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(2): 319-335.

DOI

[GUO Y, ZHANG M. Prospects for integrating cultural ecosystem services assessment into territorial planning. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(2): 319-335.]

DOI

[15]
JIANG W. Ecosystem services research in China: A critical review. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 10-16.

[16]
OCELLI PINHEIRO R, TRIEST L, LOPES P F M. Cultural ecosystem services: Linking landscape and social attributes to ecotourism in protected areas. Ecosystem Services, 2021, 50: 101340, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101340.

[17]
钟敬秋, 高梦凡, 韩增林, 等. 基于生态系统文化服务的人地关系空间重构. 地理学报, 2024, 79(7): 1682-1699.

DOI

[ZHONG J Q, GAO M F, HAN Z L, et al. Spatial reconstruction of the human-land relationship based on cultural ecosystem services. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(7): 1682-1699.]

DOI

[18]
莫琳, 李清华, 王斌, 等. 自然保护地生态产品价值实现的龙口经验. 中国土地, 2023, (6): 36-39.

[MO L, LI Q H, WANG B, et al. Longkou experience in realizing the value of ecological products in nature reserves. China Land, 2023, (6): 36-39.]

[19]
李宇亮, 陈克亮. 生态产品价值形成过程和分类实现途径探析. 生态经济, 2021, 37(8): 157-162.

[LI Y L, CHEN K L. An analysis on the formation process and various realization approaches of ecological product value. Ecological Economic, 2021, 37(8): 157-162.]

[20]
张丽佳, 周妍. 建立健全生态产品价值实现机制的路径探索. 生态学报, 2021, 41(19): 7893-7899.

[ZHANG L J, ZHOU Y. Exploring the path of establishing and perfecting the realization mechanism of ecological product value. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(19): 7893-7899.]

[21]
张林波, 虞慧怡, 郝超志, 等. 生态产品概念再定义及其内涵辨析. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(3): 655-660.

[ZHANG L B, YU H Y, HAO C Z, et al. Redefinition and connotation analysis of ecosystem product. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(3): 655-660.]

[22]
廖茂林, 潘家华, 孙博文. 生态产品的内涵辨析及价值实现路径. 经济体制改革, 2021, (1): 12-18.

[LIAO M L, PAN J H, SUN B W. Analysis of the connotation and realization path of ecological products. Reform of Economic System, 2021, (1): 12-18.]

[23]
高晓龙, 张英魁, 马东春, 等. 生态产品价值实现关键问题解决路径. 生态学报, 2022, 42(20): 8184-8192.

[GAO X L, ZHANG Y K, MA D C, et al. The path to the key problems of the value realization of ecological products. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(20): 8184-8192.]

[24]
GAN Q C, LIAO L Y, KANG X, et al. Cultural ecosystem services and disservices in protected areas: Hotspots and influencing factors based on tourists' digital footprints. Ecosystem Services, 2024, 70: 101680, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101680.

[25]
谢高地, 肖玉, 鲁春霞. 生态系统服务研究: 进展、局限和基本范式. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(2): 191-199.

DOI

[XIE G D, XIAO Y, LU C X. Study on ecosystem services: Progress, limitation and basic paradigm. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30(2): 191-199.]

[26]
吴必虎, 谢冶凤, 张玉钧. 自然保护地游憩和旅游: 生态系统服务、法定义务与社会责任. 旅游科学, 2021, 35(5): 1-10.

[WU B H, XIE Y F, ZHANG Y J. Recreation and tourism supply in protected areas: Ecosystem services, legal obligations, and social responsibilities. Tourism Science, 2021, 35(5): 1-10.]

[27]
JONES L, NORTON L, AUSTIN Z, et al. Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 2016, 52: 151-162.

[28]
CHAN K, SATTERFIELD T, GOLDSTEIN J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 2012, 74: 8-18.

[29]
MÁRQUEZ L A M, REZENDE E C N, MACHADO K B, et al. Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review. Ecosystem Services, 2023, 64: 101572, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101572.

[30]
HEGETSCHWEILER K T, DE VRIES S, ARNBERGER A, et al. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 21: 48-59.

[31]
ZHAO Y Q, YOU W B, LIN X E, et al. Assessing the supply and demand linkage of cultural ecosystem services in a typical county-level city with protected areas in China. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 147: 109992, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109992.

[32]
DICKINSON D C, HOBBS R J. Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 179-194.

[33]
潘健峰, 马月伟, 陈艳, 等. 中美国家公园生态系统服务社会价值对比研究: 以普达措国家公园和圣伊莎贝尔派克国家森林公园为例. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(5): 56-66.

DOI

[PAN J F, MA Y W, CHEN Y, et al. Comparing analysis on social values of ecosystem services in China and US National Park: A case study of the Pudacuo National Park and the Pike and San Isabel (PSI) National Forests. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(5): 56-66.]

[34]
MUÑOZ L, HAUSNER V, BROWN G, et al. Identifying spatial overlap in the values of locals, domestic- and international tourists to protected areas. Tourism Management, 2019, 71: 259-271.

[35]
BUCHEL S, FRANTZESKAKI N. Citizens' voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 12: 169-177.

[36]
CHAN K M A, BALVANERA P, BENESSAIAH K, et al. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. PNAS, 2016, 113(6): 1462-1465.

[37]
FISH R, CHURCH A, WINTER M. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 21: 208-217.

[38]
GOLDENBERG R, KALANTARI Z, CVETKOVIC V, et al. Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow-dependent ecosystem services. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 593: 599-609.

[39]
王鹏, 李乐, 李楠, 等. 国家公园生态系统文化服务多元利益主体认知比较: 基于实证调查分析. 生态学报, 2024, 44(10): 4217-4230.

[WANG P, LI L, LI N, et al. A comparison of multi-stakeholder cognition of cultural ecosystem services in National park: Empirical evidence based on surveys. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(10): 4217-4230.]

[40]
马俊杰, 程捷, 刘晓鸿, 等. 基于地质和自然环境背景的国家公园生态产品价值实现路径研究. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(3): 458-469.

DOI

[MA J J, CHENG J, LIU X H, et al. Research on paths to realize the values of ecological products in National Parks based on the geological and nature environmental settings of the China National Parks. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(3): 458-469.]

DOI

[41]
唐承财, 刘嘉仪, 秦珊, 等. 国家公园生态产品价值实现的机制及模式: 以神农架国家公园为例. 生态学报, 2024, 44(13): 5786-5800.

[TANG C C, LIU J Y, QIN S, et al. Mechanism and mode of realizing the value of ecological products in National Parks: Taking Shennongjia National Park as an example. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(13): 5786-5800.]

[42]
马国勇, 刘欣. 基于利益相关者理论的生态产品价值实现机制探析: 以武夷山国家公园为例. 世界林业研究, 2023, 36(4): 87-93.

[MA G Y, LIU X. Ecological products value realization mechanism based on stakeholder theory: A case study of Wuyishan National Park in China. World Forestry Research, 2023, 36(4): 87-93.]

[43]
张海英, 窦亚权, 刘志博, 等. 新时代国家公园生态产品价值实现路径探析. 环境保护, 2023, 51(15): 41-45.

[ZHANG H Y, DOU Y Q, LIU Z B, et al. Analysis on the value realization path of ecological products in National Parks in the new era. Environmental Protection, 2023, 51(15): 41-45.]

[44]
HAINES-YOUNG R, POTSCHIN M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem service and human well-being. In: RAFFAELLI D, FRID C, eds. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

[45]
王奇, 姜明栋, 黄雨萌. 生态正外部性内部化的实现途径与机制创新. 中国环境管理, 2020, 12(6): 21-28.

[WANG Q, JIANG M D, HUANG Y M. Realization ways and mechanism innovation of internalization of ecological positive externalities. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 12(6): 21-28.]

[46]
祁文莎, 郭青海, 洪艳. 基于生态系统服务层级关联性的景感营造实现途径. 生态学报, 2020, 40(22): 8103-8111.

[QI W S, GUO Q H, HONG Y. The realization ways of landsense creation based on the hierarchical relationships of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(22): 8103-8111.]

[47]
MAYER M, WOLTERING M. Assessing and valuing the recreational ecosystem services of Germany's National Parks using travel cost models. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 31: 371-386.

[48]
ZHANG C, LI J, ZHOU Z X. Ecosystem service cascade: Concept, review, application and prospect. Ecological Indicators, 2022 (137): 108766, Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108766.

[49]
张城, 李晶, 周自翔, 等. 生态系统服务级联效应研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1633-1642.

DOI

[ZHANG C, LI J, ZHOU Z X, et al. Research progress on the cascade effect of ecosystem service. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1633-1642.]

DOI

[50]
陈曦, 梁松斌. 共同生产理论视角下生态系统服务级联框架的重构. 生态学报, 2023, 43(20): 8268-8278.

[CHEN X, LIANG S B. Reconstruction of ecosystem services cascade framework from the perspective of co-production theory. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(20): 8268-8278.]

[51]
陈曦, 梁松斌. 生态系统服务利益相关者界定: 基于实践理论视角的分析框架. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(4): 842-857.

DOI

[CHEN X, LIANG S B. Stakeholder definition of ecosystem services: An analytical framework based on a practical theoretical perspective. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(4): 842-857.]

DOI

[52]
谢花林, 刘琼, 陈彬, 等. 国家公园生态产品价值实现: 基本逻辑、核心机制与典型模式. 经济地理, 2024, 44(8): 158-169.

DOI

[XIE H L, LIU Q, CHEN B, et al. Value realization of ecological products in national parks: Basic logic, core mechanism and typical model. Economic Geography, 2018, 44(8): 158-169.]

[53]
杨锐, 钟乐, 赵智聪. 基于消费端的自然保护地指标交易机制: 生态产品的价值实现. 生态学报, 2020, 40(18): 6687-6693.

[YANG R, ZHONG L, ZHAO Z C. Research on consumer-based quota trading mechanism of protected areas: An innovative approach to achieve value of ecological products. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(18): 6687-6693.]

[54]
钟乐, 赵智聪, 杨锐. 自然保护地自然资源资产产权制度现状辨析. 中国园林, 2019, 35(8): 34-38.

[ZHONG L, ZHAO Z C, YANG R. Discrimination and analysis of the status quo of property rights system of natural resource assets in natural protected areas. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(8): 34-38.]

[55]
李淑娟, 梁晓丽, 隋玉正, 等. 生态旅游视角下海洋保护地生态产品价值实现机理与路径. 生态学报, 2023, 43(12): 5224-5233.

[LI S J, LIANG X L, SUI Y Z, et al. Mechanism and path of realizing the value of ecological products in Marine protected areas from the perspective of eco-tourism. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(12): 5224-5233.]

[56]
SAARIKOSKI H, JAX K, HARRISON P A, et al. Exploring operational ecosystem service definitions: The case of boreal forests. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 14: 144-157.

[57]
刘宁. 国家公园自然资源资产化管理反思. 南京工业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022, 21(2): 47-54, 111-112.

[LIU N. Reflections on the asset management of natural resources in National Parks. Journal of Nanjing Tech University: Social Science Edition, 2022, 21(2): 47-54, 111-112.]

[58]
吴锋, 余瑞, 张倩, 等. 国家公园监管系统框架设计与建设展望. 国家公园(中英文), 2023, 1(3): 190-200.

[WU F, YU R, ZHANG Q, et al. Design framework and construction prospect of National Park supervision system. National Park, 2023, 1(3): 190-200.]

[59]
徐卫华, 臧振华, 杜傲, 等. 东北虎豹国家公园试点经验. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 295-297.

DOI

[XU W H, ZANG Z H, DU A, et al. The experiences of Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park pilot. Biodiversity Science, 2021, 29(3): 295-297.]

DOI

[60]
LEUNG Y F, SPENCELEY A, HVENEGAARD G, et al. Tourism and visitor management in protected areas: Guidelines for sustainability. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No.27, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2018: 6-7.

[61]
吕雪蕾, 蔡芳, 王旭. 国家公园设施绿色营建策略. 林业建设, 2021, (6): 11-17.

[LYU X L, CAI F, WANG X. Green construction strategy for national park facilities. Forestry Construction, 2021, (6): 11-17.]

[62]
钟林生. 设施生态化: 国家公园绿色发展重要保障. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(8): 8-9.

[ZHONG L S. Ecologization of facilities: An important guarantee for the green development of national parks. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(8): 8-9.]

[63]
四川熊猫公园. 大熊猫国家公园成都片区：积极探索生态产品价值实现机制, 完善生态保护补偿机制. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/xdu3tE0UBEgpyTlWbPPm4Q, 2023-09-19.

[Giant Panda National Park (Sichuan). Giant Panda National Park Chengdu Area: Actively Exploring mechanisms for realizing ecological product values and improving ecological protection compensation systems. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/xdu3tE0UBEgpyTlWbPPm4Q, 2023-09-19.]

[64]
王雅菲, 陈洁. 法国国家公园管理政策特征及成效. 世界林业研究, 2024, 37(1): 110-116.

[WANG Y F, CHEN J. National park management in France: Policy characteristics and effectiveness. World Forestry Research, 2024, 37(1): 110-116.]

[65]
张家荣, 马思静, 张茵, 等. 基于社会嵌入视角的国家公园特许经营合作机制探析: 以三江源国家公园为例. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(10): 2276-2293.

DOI

[ZHANG J R, MA S J, ZHANG Y, et al. Exploring the cooperation mechanism of National Park concessions based on the perspective of social embedding: A case study of Sanjiangyuan National Park. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(10): 2276-2293.]

[66]
郑倩倩, 唐承财, 韩莹, 等. 国家公园社区共同富裕的影响机制和实现路径: 以神农架国家公园为例. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(12): 2924-2945.

DOI

[ZHENG Q Q, TANG C C, HAN Y, et al. Influence mechanism and realization pathway for community common prosperity of National Parks: A case study of Shennongjia National Park. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(12): 2924-2945.]

[67]
耿松涛, 张鸿霞, 严荣. 我国国家公园特许经营分析与运营模式选择. 林业资源管理, 2021, (5): 10-19.

[GENG S T, ZHANG H X, YAN R. Concession management analysis and operation model selection of China's National Parks. Forest Resources Management, 2021, (5): 10-19.]

[68]
朱洪革, 赵梦涵, 朱震锋. 国内外国家公园特许经营实践及启示: 以东北虎豹国家公园为例. 世界林业研究, 2022, 35(1): 50-55.

[ZHU H G, ZHAO M H, ZHU Z F. Practice and enlightenment of National Park concession at home and abroad: A case study of Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park. World Forestry Research, 2022, 35(1): 50-55.]

[69]
孔凯, 李鹏. 国家公园社区特许经营: 实践逻辑、模式比较及政策建议. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(10): 2259-2275.

DOI

[KONG K, LI P. National park community concession: Practical logic, model comparison and policy suggestions. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(10): 2259-2275.]

DOI

[70]
张海霞, 付淼瑜, 苏杨. 建设国家公园特许经营制度实现“最严格的保护”和“绿水青山就是金山银山”的统一. 发展研究, 2021, 38(12): 35-39.

[ZHANG H X, FU M Y, SU Y. Constructing the franchise system of National Parks and realizing the unification of "the strictest protection" and "Lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets". Development Research, 2021, 38(12): 35-39.]

[71]
杨桂华, 张一群. 旅游生态不正义及其纠正. 思想战线, 2012, 38(3): 112-115.

[YANG G H, ZHANG Y Q. The injustice of tourism ecology and its correction. Thinking, 2012, 38(3): 112-115.]

[72]
杨桂华, 张一群. 自然遗产地旅游开发造血式生态补偿研究. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(5): 8-9.

[YANG G H, ZHANG Y Q. Study on hematopoietic ecological compensation for tourism development in natural heritage sites. Tourism Tribune, 2012, 27(5): 8-9.]

[73]
黄宝荣. 健全国家公园治理体系, 高质量推动世界最大的国家公园体系建设. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(2): 219-229.

[HUANG B R. Improve governance system of National Parks, build the world's largest National Park system with high quality. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39(2): 219-229.]

[74]
邹统钎. 中国遗产旅游可持续发展模式创新与体制改革. 北京: 旅游教育出版社, 2013: 29-30.

[ZOU T Q. Sustainable Heritage Tourism Development and Administrative System Reform in China. Beijing: Tourism Education Press, 2013: 29-30.]

[75]
张香菊, 钟林生, 陈东军. 世界自然保护地旅游治理模式及对我国的启示. 世界林业研究, 2023, 36(2): 7-13.

[ZHANG X J, ZHONG L S, CHEN D J. Tourism governance models of global protected areas and their implications for China. World Forestry Research, 2023, 36(2): 7-13.]

[76]
张博琳, 乔永强, 徐文彤, 等. 自然保护地生态旅游标准化研究. 林草资源研究, 2023, (5): 1-8.

[ZHANG B L, QIAO Y Q, XU W T, et al. Research on standardization of ecotourism in nature protected areas. Forest and Grassland Resources Research, 2023, (5): 1-8.]

[77]
陈海嵩, 高俊虹. 中国特色国家公园协同治理的规范构造探析. 河海大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2023, 25(5): 68-80.

[CHEN H S, GAO J H. Analysis on the normative structure of collaborative governance of national parks with Chinese characteristics. Journal of Hehai University: Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2023, 25(5): 68-80.]

[78]
苏凯文, 马丽, 杨光. 国家公园生态产品价值实现的理论阐释、机制解析与模式总结. 国家公园(中英文), 2025, 3(2): 117-125.

[SU K W, MA L, YANG G. Theoretical explanation, mechanism analysis, and model summary of the realizationof ecosystem product value in national parks. National Park, 2025, 3(2): 117-125.]

[79]
杨良健, 章锦河, 王静玮, 等. 国家公园生态系统文化服务研究进展及展望. 国家公园(中英文), 2024, 2(8): 524-533.

[YANG L J, ZHANG J H, WANG J W, et al. Research progress and prospects of cultural ecosystem services in national park. National Park, 2024, 2(8): 524-533].

[80]
陈东军, 钟林生, 杜傲, 等. 国家公园生态系统文化服务价值评估研究进展. 生态学报, 2025, 45(6), http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=STXB2024122000S&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ.

[CHEN D J, ZHONG L S, DU A, et al. Review on the value assessment of cultural ecosystem services in national park. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(6), http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=STXB2024122000S&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ.]

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉