EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2025 , Vol. 40 >Issue 6: 1451 - 1467

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20250602

城市更新与治理变革

城市更新多元协同治理的实践路径与内在机制——基于杭州的探索性案例研究

  • 徐可西 , 1, 2 ,
  • 苏婕妤 1, 2 ,
  • 鲍海君 , 1
展开
  • 1.浙大城市学院国土空间规划学院，杭州 310015
  • 2.浙江财经大学公共管理学院，杭州 310018
鲍海君（1977- ），男，浙江台州人，博士，教授，研究方向为国土空间规划与城乡治理。E-mail:

徐可西（1989- ），女，浙江金华人，博士，副教授，研究方向为城市更新。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-10-14

  修回日期: 2025-02-06

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-26

基金资助

浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(24SSHZ011YB)

浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY24G030003)

国家自然科学基金项目(42271267)

收起

The practical approaches and internal mechanisms of multi-stakeholder collaborative governance in urban renewal: A case study of Hangzhou

  • XU Ke-xi , 1, 2 ,
  • SU Jie-yu 1, 2 ,
  • BAO Hai-jun , 1
Expand
  • 1. School of Spatial Planning and Design, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China
  • 2. School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received date: 2024-10-14

  Revised date: 2025-02-06

  Online published: 2025-05-26

Fold

摘要

创新多元协同治理模式是应对中国城市更新价值转变与破解发展困局的重要抓手，是推动城市高质量发展的迫切需要。从治理要素的整体协同视角出发，运用案例研究和归纳分析法，以杭州为典型案例，系统解析城市更新协同治理的实践路径与内在机制。结果表明：（1）杭州城市更新形成了统筹管理体制与多元政策工具的治理环境建设、“政府、市场、居民、社会”四心协同的治理结构搭建、“知识—话语”与“实体技术”协同的治理手段应用、“发展、民生、保护”多目标协同的治理结果达成等四条多元协同治理路径。（2）城市更新多元协同治理应是涵盖“协同环境—协同结构—协同手段—协同结果”的整体协同，通过自洽型统筹管理与协调型政策创新的环境协同机制、多元化利益协调与差异化权力配置的结构协同机制、规范性程序驱动与激励性刚弹管控的手段协同机制、冲突性目标共生与差异性全民共享的结果协同机制，实现城市更新高质量发展目标。基于此，提出以责权协调与动态调适为原则，协同创新统筹型管理体制与政策工具；根据角色定位差异化配置主体权力，形成兼容型城市更新治理共同体；以规范与激励为基点，创新刚弹结合的城市更新治理手段；兼顾效率与公平，促进经济、社会、环境等多维目标协调发展等治理启示，为新发展阶段下的城市更新治理提供经验借鉴。

关键词： 城市更新; 实践路径; 内在机制; 多元协同治理; 案例研究; 杭州

本文引用格式

徐可西 , 苏婕妤 , 鲍海君 . 城市更新多元协同治理的实践路径与内在机制——基于杭州的探索性案例研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025 , 40(6) : 1451 -1467 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250602

Abstract

Innovating the multi-stakeholder collaborative governance model is essential for addressing the China's urban renewal and developmental obstacles. It would also assist in promoting high-quality urban development. This study analyzes the practical pathways and internal mechanisms of collaborative governance in urban renewal. With Hangzhou as an example, the study adopts a case study and inductive analysis methods to explore these dynamics. The results indicate that: (1) Hangzhou's urban renewal has developed four governance paths. The first path is building a governance environment through an integrated management system and diverse policy tools. The second path is establishing a governance structure that coordinates the efforts of government, market, residents, and society. The third path is applying governance tools that combine knowledge-based discourse and physical technology. Finally, the fourth path is achieving governance outcomes that balance development, livelihood, and preservation. (2) Multi-stakeholder collaborative governance of urban renewal should encompass an integrated framework of 'synergistic environment-structure-means-outcomes.' This includes an environmental synergy through self-consistent management and coordinated policy innovation, a structural synergy via diversified interest coordination and differentiated power allocation, a means synergy through normative procedures and incentive controls, and a results synergy focused on balancing conflicting goals with universal sharing. These integrated mechanisms are designed to facilitate high-quality urban renewal through coordinated development strategies. Therefore, this study offers four key governance insights. Firstly, it highlights the principles of responsibility-rights coordination and dynamic adjustment to innovate management systems and policy tools. Secondly, it calls for allocating stakeholder power based on roles to build an inclusive urban renewal governance community. Thirdly, it proposes combining regulation and incentives for flexible yet effective governance approaches. Finally, it stresses balancing efficiency and equity to achieve coordinated economic, social, and environmental development. These insights provide valuable lessons for advancing urban renewal governance in the New Era.

Key words： urban renewal; practical approach; internal mechanism; multi-stakeholder collaboration; case study; Hangzhou

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
阳建强, 陈月. 1949—2019年中国城市更新的发展与回顾. 城市规划, 2020, 44(2): 9-19, 31.

[YANG J Q, CHEN Y. Review on the development of urban regeneration in China from 1949 to 2019. City Planning Review, 2020, 44(2): 9-19, 31.]

[2]
赵万民, 李震, 李云燕. 当代中国城市更新研究评述与展望: 暨制度供给与产权挑战的协同思考. 城市规划学刊, 2021, (5): 92-100.

[ZHAO W M, LI Z, LI Y Y. A review of researches on urban renewal in contemporary China and the future prospect: Integrated perspectives of institutional capacity and property rights challenges. Urban Planning Forum, 2021, (5): 92-100.]

[3]
阳建强. 走向持续的城市更新: 基于价值取向与复杂系统的理性思考. 城市规划, 2018, 42(6): 68-78.

[YANG J Q. Towards sustainable urban regeneration: Based on the rational thinking of value orientation and complex system. City Planning Review, 2018, 42(6): 68-78.]

[4]
赵燕菁, 沈洁. 增长转型最后的机会: 城市更新的财务陷阱. 城市规划, 2023, 47(10): 11-22.

[ZHAO Y J, SHEN J. Last chance for growth transformation: The financial pitfalls of urban regeneration. City Planning Review, 2023, 47(10): 11-22.]

[5]
张京祥, 陈浩. 基于空间再生产视角的西方城市空间更新解析. 人文地理, 2012, 27(2): 1-5.

[ZHANG J X, CHEN H. Research on western urban space renewal from the perspective of space re-production. Human Geography, 2012, 27(2): 1-5.]

[6]
尹维娜, 古颖, 石路. 治理视角下长三角中心城市的城市更新路径: 基于上海、杭州、南京、合肥等的实践观察. 城市规划学刊, 2023, (3): 85-91.

[YIN W N, GU Y, SHI L. A comparative study of the urban renewal paths in the Yangtze River Delta Region: The perspective of governance. Urban Planning Forum, 2023, (3): 85-91.]

[7]
赵燕菁. 城市更新中的财务问题. 国际城市规划, 2023, 38(1): 19-27.

[ZHAO Y J. Financial issues on urban renewal. Urban Planning International, 2023, 38(1): 19-27.]

[8]
田莉, 陶然, 梁印龙. 城市更新困局下的实施模式转型: 基于空间治理的视角. 城市规划学刊, 2020, (3): 41-47.

[TIAN L, TAO R, LIANG Y L. Transition of implementation pattern in the predicament of urban renewal: A perspective of spatial governance. Urban Planning Forum, 2020, (3): 41-47.]

[9]
吴永兴, 张耀宇, 王博, 等. 城中村更新模式: 治理逻辑与优化路径: 基于原型分析法的经验考察. 城市发展研究, 2023, 30(7): 66-72, 78.

[WU Y X, ZHANG Y Y, WANG B, et al. Governance logic and optimization path of renewal pattern of urban village: Experience inspection based on archetype analysis method. Urban Development Studies, 2023, 30(7): 66-72, 78.]

[10]
郑露荞, 熊子超, 伍江. 基于社会网络分析的参与式社区更新治理绩效及机制研究: 以上海新华社区为例. 城市发展研究, 2024, 31(8): 111-120.

[ZHENG L Q, XIONG Z C, WU J. Research on the performance and mechanism of participatory community regeneration governance based on social network analysis: A case study of Xinhua community in Shanghai. Urban Development Studies, 2024, 31(8): 111-120.]

[11]
温锋华, 姜玲. 整体性治理视角下的城市更新政策框架研究. 城市发展研究, 2022, 29(11): 42-48.

[WEN F H, JIANG L. Holistic governance and urban regeneration: A policy framework. Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(11): 42-48.]

[12]
武龙, 阎波, 朱珉莹, 等. 中国基层环境治理中的“链式协同”: 基于S市工业园区的一项案例研究. 管理世界, 2024, 40(8): 145-161.

[WU L, YAN B, ZHU M Y, et al. The "chain-style collaboration" of local environmental governance in China: A case study based on an industrial district in S city. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40(8): 145-161.]

[13]
陈利根, 陶嘉诚. 多中心协同治理: 何以可能, 何以可为? 基于江苏C县农村人居环境治理的经验诠释. 西北农林科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2024, 24(1): 10-21.

[CHEN L G, TAO J C. Will model of polycentric synergetic governance be "the good road to governance" of rural habitat environment? An analysis based on a case in C county, Jiangsu province. Journal of Northwest A&F University: Social Science Edition, 2024, 24(1): 10-21.]

[14]
李振锋, 王翔君. 老旧小区改造中协同治理的模式比较研究: 基于对北京市3个治理案例的考察. 湖北社会科学, 2023, (10): 46-60.

[LI Z F, WANG X J. A comparative study of models of collaborative governance in the renovation of old community: Based on three governance cases in Beijing. Hubei Social Sciences, 2023, (10): 46-60.]

[15]
古颖, 李秋实, 尹维娜. 以社区街道为主体的上海市普陀区石泉路街道城市微更新路径探索. 城市规划学刊, 2022, (s2): 161-166.

[GU Y, LI Q S, YIN W N. Urban micro renewal at the street-community level: The case of Shiquan street office sub-district, Putuo district, Shanghai. Urban Planning Forum, 2022, (s2): 161-166.]

[16]
李南枢, 杨焱. 绿色城市更新的治理逻辑与路径优化. 社会科学家, 2022, (10): 84-90.

[LI N S, YANG Y. Governance logic and path optimization of green city renewal. Social Scientist, 2022, (10): 84-90.]

[17]
ANSELL C, GASH A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008, 18(4): 543-571.

[18]
孙婧雯, 陆玉麒. 城乡融合导向的全域土地综合整治机制与优化路径. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(9): 2201-2216.

DOI

[SUN J W, LU Y Q. Mechanism and optimization path of comprehensive land consolidation oriented urban-rural integration. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(9): 2201-2216.]

[19]
EMERSON K, NABATCHI T, BALOGH S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2012, 22(1): 1-29.

[20]
朱晓丹, 叶超, 李思梦. 可持续城市研究进展及其对国土空间规划的启示. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2120-2133.

DOI

[ZHU X D, YE C, LI S M. Research progress of sustainable cities and its implications for national territory spatial plan. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(9): 2120-2133.]

[21]
陈水生, 王培红. 统筹式城市更新: 中国城市更新的发展困境与优化路径. 治理研究, 2024, 40(4): 98-113, 159.

[CHEN S S, WANG P H. Integrated urban renewal: The development dilemma and optimization path of urban renewal in China. Governance Studies, 2024, 40(4): 98-113, 159.]

[22]
王江, 王鹏. 流域府际生态协同治理优于属地治理的证成与实现: 基于动态演化博弈模型. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(5): 1334-1348.

DOI

[WANG J, WANG P. The justification of inter-government ecological collaborative governance in the river basin better than territorial governance and its realization path: Based on the dynamic evolutionary game model. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(5): 1334-1348.]

[23]
汪锦军. 构建公共服务的协同机制: 一个界定性框架. 中国行政管理, 2012, (1): 18-22.

[WANG J J. To build coordination mechanisms of public services: A defining framework. Chinese Public Administration, 2012, (1): 18-22.]

[24]
魏娜, 郭彬彬, 张乾瑾. 协同治理视角下基金会开展儿童医疗救助研究: 基于Z基金会J项目的案例分析. 中国行政管理, 2017, (3): 38-43.

[WEI N, GUO B B, ZHANG Q J. Foundation's involvements in medical assistance for child from the perspective of collaborative governance: A case study of J program of Z foundation. Chinese Public Administration, 2017, (3): 38-43.]

[25]
梁紫环, 林辉煌. 撂荒地治理: 一种协同理论的解释: 以广东省Z村为例. 农业经济问题, 2024, 45(7): 90-104.

[LIANG Z H, LIN H H. Wasteland governance: An explanation of synergy theory taking Z village in Guangdong as an example. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2024, 45(7): 90-104.]

[26]
吴茂英, 张镁琦, 王龙杰. 共生视角下乡村新内生式发展的路径与机制: 以杭州临安区乡村运营为例. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(8): 2097-2116.

DOI

[WU M Y, ZHANG M Q, WANG L J. The path and mechanism of neo-endogenous rural development from the perspective of symbiosis: A case study of rural operation in Lin'an district, Hangzhou. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(8): 2097-2116.]

[27]
祝贺, 陈旖媛. 城市更新中的多数决制度设计研究. 城市发展研究, 2023, 30(9): 73-79.

[ZHU H, CHEN Y Y. Research on the design of majority decision system in urban renewal. Urban Development Studies, 2023, 30(9): 73-79.]

[28]
李钧鹏, 茹文俊. 治理手段: 福柯权力观的另一维. 华东理工大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022, 37(4): 1-14, 49.

[LI J P, RU W J. Means of governance: Another dimension of Foucault's view on power. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology: Social Science Edition, 2022, 37(4): 1-14, 49.]

[29]
赵科科, 孙文浩, 李昕阳. 我国地方城市更新制度的特征及趋势: 基于20部城市更新地方法规的内容比较. 规划师, 2022, 38(9): 5-10.

[ZHAO K K, SUN W H, LI X Y. The characters and trends of current local urban regeneration systems in China: A comparative study of 20 local urban regeneration regulations. Planners, 2022, 38(9): 5-10.]

[30]
谢延会, 陈瑞莲. 中国地方政府议事协调机构设立和运作逻辑研究. 学术研究, 2014, (10): 50-55.

[XIE Y H, CHEN R L. Research on the logic of the establishment and operation of the deliberation and coordination institutions of local governments in China. Academic Research, 2014, (10): 50-55.]

[31]
郭子莹. 权利变换与合约选择: 物权视角下的城市更新利益协调机制研究. 城市发展研究, 2024, 31(3): 65-72.

[GUO Z Y. Right transformation and contract selection: Interest coordination mechanism in urban regeneration from the perspective of property right. Urban Development Studies, 2024, 31(3): 65-72.]

[32]
唐明良, 骆梅英. 地方行政审批程序改革的实证考察与行政法理: 以建设项目领域为例. 法律科学: 西北政法大学学报, 2016, 34(5): 46-58.

[TANG M L, LUO M Y. Formation and legal theory of new outlook on administrative procedure. Science of Law: Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law, 2016, 34(5): 46-58.]

[33]
焦胜, 韩宗伟, 金瑞, 等. 信息化背景下国土空间规划刚性与弹性协同路径研究. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(11): 19-26.

[JIAO S, HAN Z W, JIN R, et al. Research on the pathway of the coordination of rigidity and elasticity of territorial space planning under the background of informatization. China Land Science, 2021, 35(11): 19-26.]

[34]
李凯, 王凯. 新区产业用地的更新困局与转型探索: 以北京经济技术开发区为例. 国际城市规划, 2022, 37(4): 74-82.

[LI K, WANG K. Renewal predicament and transformation exploration of industrial land in new urban area: The case study of Beijing economic and technological development zone. Urban Planning International, 2022, 37(4): 74-82.]

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉