全球能源安全的格局演变与地缘博弈
苏俊(1981- ),男,福建永定人,博士研究生,主要从事城市与区域规划研究。E-mail: 764162@qq.com |
收稿日期: 2020-01-20
要求修回日期: 2020-05-13
网络出版日期: 2021-01-28
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(41971159)
国家自然科学基金项目(41671126)
版权
Pattern evolution of global energy security and the geopolitical game
Received date: 2020-01-20
Request revised date: 2020-05-13
Online published: 2021-01-28
Copyright
受经济全球化影响,国家能源安全问题的国际化趋势日益突出。21世纪以来,伴随世界多极化加速发展,世界能源安全格局演变特征及其驱动机制成为能源地缘政治研究的关键问题之一。基于这一认识,对2000年以来全球124个国家能源安全状态进行了系统评价,揭示了世界能源安全空间格局的演变特征及主要形成机制,并提出了未来能源地缘政治的博弈焦点。结果显示:(1)自21世纪初以来,全球能源安全格局演变整体上不断优化,但呈现出明显的阶段性特征,即2010年以来,全球能源安全格局优化趋势更为显著。(2)世界能源安全格局与国际地缘秩序区划基本吻合,即能源安全型国家集中分布在西欧和北美经济发达地区,较安全型国家主要分布在中欧、拉丁美洲以及亚洲高收入地区,过渡型国家主要分布在中东、东南欧以及东亚等能源体系亟需转型的地区,而较危险和危险型国家集中分布在南亚以及非洲经济欠发达地区。(3)近20年以来,世界能源安全水平显著提升主要得益于发达经济体能源使用安全维度的良好表现,而发展中国家由于创新能力较低、生产力较落后、居民可支配收入较少,其能源安全水平提升空间较小。(4)当前及今后一段时期内,全球能源安全格局将受到中美关系变化的冲击、能源转型的胁迫以及政治环境不确定性的影响。
苏俊 , 王永洵 , 王强 . 全球能源安全的格局演变与地缘博弈[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020 , 35(11) : 2613 -2628 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20201105
Under the background of economic globalization, the internationalization of national energy security issues has become increasingly prominent. Since the beginning of the 21st century, along with the acceleration of world multi-polarization, the study on the evolution characteristics of global energy security's pattern and its driving mechanism has become one of the key issues in the field of energy geopolitics. Based on this understanding, this paper systematically evaluates the energy security status of 124 countries since 2000, reveals the evolution characteristics and its mechanism, and identifies the major geopolitical threats. The results show that: (1) Since the beginning of the 21st century, the evolution of the global energy security pattern has been continuously optimized, but it has shown obvious phase characteristics. Since 2010, the optimization trend has become more significant. (2) The global energy security pattern is basically consistent with the international order, that is, energy-safe countries are concentrated in economically developed regions of Western Europe and North America, and the relatively safe countries are mainly distributed in Central Europe, Latin America, and high-income regions in Asia. The countries with transitional energy system are mainly distributed in the developing regions of Middle East, Southeast Europe, and East Asia, while countries with dangerous or relatively dangerous energy system are economically underdeveloped regions in Africa and South Asia. (3) In the past 20 years, the world's energy security level has improved significantly, which is mainly driven by climate-friendly green technologies and the continuous downturn in oil price. For this reason, the level of energy security in developed economies has increased significantly. However, due to the low innovation capacity, backward productivity, and low disposable income of residents, developing countries have less room for improvement in energy security. (4) In the context of the rise of populism, the intensification of trade barriers and the strategic contraction of the United States in the Middle East, the global energy security pattern in the future will be affected by the changes in China-US relation, the increasing urgency to promoting the energy transition, and the polarized political climate.
Key words: energy security; pattern evolution; geopolitical game; global scale
表1 评价指标体系及其权重Table 1 Indicators for the construction of national energy security |
目标层 | 维度层 | 指标层 | 单位 | 权重/% | 说明 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
维度层 | 指标层 | |||||
能源安全综合指数 | 供应维度 | 一次能源生产量与 消费量之比 | — | 35 | 7 | 供应维度用以描述和评价区域能源系统应对能源供给—需求关系失调的能力 |
能源供应多样性系数 | — | 7 | ||||
电力多样性系数 | — | 7 | ||||
原油储备量 | 亿桶 | 7 | ||||
天然气储备量 | 万亿立方英尺 | 7 | ||||
普惠维度 | 通电率 | % | 18 | 6 | 普惠维度用以表征能源系统满足区域生产、生活用能需求的综合能力 | |
汽油零售价格 | 美元/升 | 6 | ||||
非固态燃料获得率 | % | 6 | ||||
使用维度 | 化石能源所占比例 | % | 32 | 8 | 使用维度用以测度区域能源使用的环境效应 | |
可再生能源发电所占比例 | % | 8 | ||||
碳排放因子 | t/t油当量 | 8 | ||||
能源效率 | 103美元/t油当量(已转换为2011年不变价) | 8 | ||||
发展环境 | 政治稳定性 | — | 15 | 2 | 发展环境主要是指区域能源发展的社会、政治与经济环境,其优劣程度显著影响着国家在能源市场中的话语权,以及本地能源政策制定与能源部门投资,继而影响着自身能源安全水平 | |
管理水平 | — | 2 | ||||
政府效率 | — | 2 | ||||
法律角色 | — | 2 | ||||
腐败控制 | — | 2 | ||||
人均GDP | 美元(已转换为2011年不变价) | 5 |
表2 2000年以来世界能源安全类型区数量变化Table 2 Changes in the numbers of different energy system types in the world since 2000 (个) |
类型区 | 2000年 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 2018年 | 2000—2018年 变化情况 | 其中 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010—2018年 | 2000—2010年 | |||||||
安全型国家 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 14 | 17 | +11 | +8 | +3 |
较安全型国家 | 30 | 26 | 25 | 29 | 33 | +3 | +8 | -5 |
过渡型国家 | 34 | 40 | 40 | 35 | 32 | -2 | -8 | +6 |
较危险型国家 | 22 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 18 | -4 | -3 | -1 |
危险型国家 | 32 | 32 | 29 | 23 | 24 | -8 | -5 | -3 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
林初昇. 去中心化和(逆)全球化背景下中国人文地理学的批判性理论探索与方法创新. 热带地理, 2019,39(5):1-9.
[
|
[4] |
沈镭, 张红丽, 钟帅, 等. 新时代下中国自然资源安全的战略思考. 自然资源学报, 2018,33(5):721-734.
[
|
[5] |
沈镭. 三十年来中国自然资源学会的发展与展望. 自然资源学报, 2013,28(9):1464-1478.
[
|
[6] |
董锁成, 石广义, 沈镭, 等. 我国资源经济与世界资源研究进展及展望. 自然资源学报, 2010,25(9):1432-1444.
[
|
[7] |
彭焜, 朱鹤, 王赛鸽, 等. 基于系统投入产出和生态网络分析的能源—水耦合关系与协同管理研究: 以湖北省为例. 自然资源学报, 2018,33(9):1514-1528.
[
|
[8] |
张雷, 黄园淅, 杨波, 等. 国家能源供应时空协调: 基本概念、理论与方法. 自然资源学报, 2012,27(4):529-539.
[
|
[9] |
吴初国, 何贤杰, 盛昌明, 等. 能源安全综合评价方法探讨. 自然资源学报, 2011,26(6):964-970.
[
|
[10] |
International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Technology Policy. Paris: OECD/IEA, 1985: 29.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC). A quest for energy security in the 21st century. Tokyo: Institute of Energy Economics, Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre, 2007: 5-8.
|
[19] |
International Energy Agency (IEA). World energy outlook. https://www.iea.org/topics/energysecurity/what is energy security: 2019-11-22.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
刘立涛, 沈镭, 高天明, 等. 中国能源安全评价及时空演进特征. 地理学报, 2012,67(12):1634-1644.
[
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Supply Security: The emergency response of IEA countries. 2014 Ed. Paris, France, 2014: 3-6.
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
International Energy Agency (IEA). The IEA Model of Short-term Energy Security, 2011. https: //www.iea.org/reports/ the-iea-model-of-short-term-energy-security: 2019-11-23.
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
U.S.Chamber of Commerce's Global Energy Institute. International Index of Energy Security Risk: 2020 Edition. Washington DC: US Chamber of Commerce, 2020: 17-25.
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
European Commission's Joint Research Centre. Risk of Energy Availability Common Corridors for Europe Supply Security, Summary Report. Project funded by EC FP7 under the theme "Energy Security of Supply". Final Workshop, Brussels May 13th, 2011. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/212011, 2019-11-25.
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
World Energy Council. World Energy Trilemma Index 2019. https://trilemma.worldenergy.org/reports/main/2019/2019%20Energy%20 Trilemma%20Index.pdf, 2019-11-18.
|
[46] |
徐玲琳, 王强, 李娜, 等. 20世纪90年代以来世界能源安全时空格局演化过程. 地理学报, 2017,72(12):2166-2178.
[
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
任仙玲, 张世英. 基于非参数核密度估计的Copula函数选择原理. 系统工程学报, 2010,25(1):36-42.
[
|
[49] |
申鹏, 张晓宇, 张婉玉. 中国城乡居民收入的分布动态演进: 1985—2017. 经济论坛, 2019, (11):15-23.
[
|
[50] |
International Energy Council. Statistics. https://www.iea.org/classicstats/statisticssearch/report/?country=AUSTRALI&product=balances& year=2015&country=AUSTRALI&product=balances&year=2015, 2019-11-18.
|
[51] |
The World Bank. World Bank Open Data. http://data.worldbank.org/, 2019-11-18.
|
[52] |
The World Bank. World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org.cn/data-catalog/world-development-indicators, 2019-11-18.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |