资源生态

生态恢复背景下关中地区城镇与植被空间优化协调研究

展开
  • 陕西师范大学 旅游与环境学院, 西安 710062
刘焱序(1988- ),男,陕西西安人,硕士研究生,研究方向为资源环境与GIS。E-mail:liuyanxu00777@126.com

收稿日期: 2012-08-26

  修回日期: 2013-01-31

  网络出版日期: 2013-09-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41201464);陕西师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(GK201002030)。

Study on the Spatial Optimizing and Coordination of Cities and Ground Vegetation Under the Background of Ecological Restoration in Guanzhong Region

Expand
  • College of Tourism and Environment Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China

Received date: 2012-08-26

  Revised date: 2013-01-31

  Online published: 2013-09-20

摘要

针对关中地区城市化土地利用与生态建设的关系,利用2000年和2008年的TM、ETM+与MODIS影像,在不同尺度的格网下,基于土地利用度、生态位理论、廊道与点轴理论,并采用对山脊线山谷线提取的方法,从格局、过程和机理等角度进行研究,实现区域格局优化,并进行功能分区。研究结论如下:①研究区2000—2008年东部与中部土地利用程度增加、西部与南北部分土地利用程度下降,而LAI整体上增加显著,城市发展与植被恢复相对协调;②基于空间生态位理论,绝大多数区县的现实生态位都超过基础生态位的50%,表明调控可从区县所辖乡镇进行,并按照现实生态位范围进行城市发展阻力测算;③选用基于DEM的山脊线山谷线提取方法,获得关中地区景观生态廊道、城市发展轴线和缓冲区,并据此将研究区乡镇分为城市扩展型、双轨并重型、生态建设型。

本文引用格式

刘焱序, 薛亮, 刘宪锋 . 生态恢复背景下关中地区城镇与植被空间优化协调研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013 , 28(9) : 1515 -1525 . DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.09.007

Abstract

The spatial-temporal changes on the land use/cover pattern are the interaction processes influenced by eco-environment and socio-economy. It is necessary to take a comprehensive research to analyze the interaction and mechanism in the process, so that the spatial layout of cities and ground vegetation can be figured out. In view of the relationship of which between the land use in urbanization and the eco-environmental construction is often complex, this study is based on the vegetation changes in different grids that aim to find the optimal partitions of the land resource in the study area. In the analysis, a regional structure optimization is given, and the mechanism perspective has been researched on. By virtue of the theories and methods such as ecological niche, minimum cost distance, point axis development theory, ecological corridor, and so on, the conclusions are drawn as follows: 1) From 2000 to 2007, the land use degree increased in the central and eastern parts of the study area, while dropped in the western, northern and southern parts. And there was a relatively high coordination degree between city development and ecological restoration. Of the total 748 samples, both land use degree and LAI were increased in 393 samples. 2) Based on spatial ecological niche theory, in most cities and counties, the reality niche accounted for more than 50% of the foundation niche. This phenomenon suggested that the contradictions between urbanization and vegetation restoration can be solved at the township level, and the accumulative cost for every city can be calculated based on the reality niche. 3) An extract method for DEM was chosen and the ridge lines and valley lines of urbanization resistance were extracted. And the key parameter of curvature is artificially defined as 3. Based on the concept of point axis development theory and landscape ecological corridors theory, the study area is divided into three types as urban expansion zone, vegetation restoration zone and double track development zone. The discussion mentioned that there are a lot of uncertainties existing in the remote sensing image analysis, so more comprehensive statistical data should be adopted. In this article we innovatively introduced DEM extraction method to analyze the spatial layout of land resource, from which the three zones can be set up by one curvature, hence the subjective uncertainty can be lessened in contrast to the traditional methods. Finally, refering to the spatial scale of land resource researches, we hold that the scale from hundreds meters to several kilometers is suitable.

参考文献

[1] Franoise B, Jacques B. Landscape Ecology: Concepts, Methods and Applications [M]. New Hampshire: Science Publishers, 2003: 18-24.
[2] 李秀彬. 全球环境变化研究的核心领域——土地利用/土地覆被变化的国际研究动向[J]. 地理学报, 1996, 51(6): 553-557. [LI Xiu-bin. A review of the international researches on land use/landcover change. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1996, 51(6): 553-557.]
[3] Foley J A, DeFries A, Asner G P, et al. Global consequences of land use [J]. Science, 2005, 309: 570-574.
[4] Futemma C, Brondízio E S. Land reform and land-use changes in the lower Amazon: Implications for agricultural intensification [J]. Human Ecology, 2003, 31(3): 369-402.
[5] Mather A S, Needle C L. The relationships of population and forest trends [J]. Geographical Journal, 2000, 166(1): 2-13.
[6] Feen R. Keeping the balance: Ancient Greek philosophical concerns with population and environment [J]. Population and Environment, 1996, 17(6): 447-458.
[7] Vincent J Burke. Landscape ecology and species conservancy [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15(1): 1-3.
[8] Marsh-Mathews E, Mathews W J. Spatial variation in relative abundance of a widespread, numerically dominant fish species and its effect on fish assemblage structure [J]. Oecologia, 2000, 125: 283-292.
[9] Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997, 386: 253-260.
[10] 任志远, 黄青, 李晶. 陕西省生态安全及空间差异定量分析[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(4): 597-606. [REN Zhi-yuan, HUANG Qing, LI Jing. Quantitative analysis of dynamic change and spatial difference of the ecological safety: The case of Shaanxi Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(4): 597-606.]
[11] 陈昌笃. 注目世界动向: 迎接21世纪中国生态学新发展[J]. 科技导报, 1996(2): 7-9. [CHEN Chang-du. To follow the world's new tendency of ecological development in developing China's ecology. Science & Technology Review, 1996(2): 7-9.]
[12] 岳德鹏, 王计平, 刘永兵, 等. GIS与RS技术支持下的北京西北地区景观格局优化[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(11): 1223-1231. [YUE De-peng, WANG Ji-ping, LIU Yong-bin, et al. Landscape pattern optimization based on RS and GIS in Northwest of Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(11): 1223-1231.]
[13] 傅伯杰, 赵文武, 陈利顶. 地理-生态过程研究的进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2006, 61(11): 1123-1131. [FU Bo-jie, ZHAO Wen-wu, CHEN Li-ding. Progress and perspective of geographical-ecological processes. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2006, 61(11): 1123-1131.]
[14] 王思远, 刘纪远, 张增祥, 等. 中国土地利用时空特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2001, 56(6): 631-639. [WANG Si-yuan, LIU Ji-yuan, ZHANG Zeng-xiang, et al. Analysis on spatial-temperal features of land use in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2001, 56(6): 631-639.]
[15] 黄玫, 季劲钧. 中国区域植被叶面积指数时空分布——机理模型模拟与遥感反演比较[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(11): 3057-3064. [HUANG Mei, JI Jing-jun. The spatial-temporal distribution of leaf area index in China: A comparison between ecosystem modeling and remote sensing reversion. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(11): 3057-3064.]
[16] 高江波, 赵志强, 李双成. 基于地理信息系统的青藏铁路穿越区生态系统恢复力评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(11): 2473-2479. [GAO Jiang-bo, ZHAO Zhi-qiang, LI Shuang-cheng. Evaluation of ecosystem resilience in the regions across Qinghai-Tibet railway based on GIS. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(11): 2473-2479.]
[17] 张光明, 谢寿昌. 生态位概念演变与展望[J]. 生态学杂志, 1997, 16(6): 46-51. [ZHANG Guang-ming, XIE Shou-chang. Developement of niche concept and its perspectives: A review. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 19(11): 2473-2479.]
[18] Adriaensen F, Chardon J P, Blust G D, et al. The application of 'least-cost' modeling as a functional landscape model [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 64: 233-247.
[19] 刘焱序, 任志远. 基于区域地形起伏度模型的陕西农村劳动力时空格局[J]. 山地学报, 2012, 30(4): 431-438. [LIU Yan-xu, REN Zhi-yuan. Spatio-temporal patterns of Shaanxi rural labor base on the regional terrain model. Journal of Mountain Science, 2012, 30(4): 431-438.]
[20] 秦贤宏, 段学军, 杨剑. 基于GIS的城市用地布局多情景模拟与方案评价——以江苏省太仓市为例[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(9): 1121-1129. [QIN Xian-hong, DUAN Xue-jun, YANG Jian. Scenario simulation of urban land use allocation and scheme evaluation based on GIS: A case study of Taicang City. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(9): 1121-1129.]
文章导航

/