农业生产性服务对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——来自江汉平原水稻主产区的证据

杨高第, 张露

自然资源学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7) : 1848-1864.

PDF(1916 KB)
PDF(1916 KB)
自然资源学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7) : 1848-1864. DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220713
其他研究论文

农业生产性服务对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——来自江汉平原水稻主产区的证据

作者信息 +

Impact of agricultural productive services on farmland quality protection behaviors of farmers: Evidence from the main rice-producing areas in Jianghan Plain

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

利用江汉平原水稻种植农户调查数据,建立Ordered Probit模型,讨论农业生产性服务对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响,揭示服务规模经营促进农户耕地质量保护行为的理论机制和现实逻辑。研究表明:(1)目前农户对修整农田水渠、施用农家肥、测土配方施肥、秸秆还田四类典型耕地质量保护措施的采纳比例分别为17.79%、17.31%、7.89%和90.69%;(2)控制其他条件不变,农业生产性服务能显著促进农户耕地质量保护行为,经检验后该结论依然稳健;(3)排除秸秆还田这一强制性措施后,生活型农户偏向采纳资本投入型技术,生产型农户则更偏好劳动投入型技术;(4)较之于生产型农户,农业生产性服务对生活型农户采纳耕地质量保护措施的促进作用更强。

Abstract

Based on survey data of rice-growing farmers in the Jianghan Plain, this paper examines the impact of agricultural productive services on farmers' farmland quality protection behaviors. Then it reveals the theoretical mechanism and realistic logic of motivating farmers' farmland quality protection behaviors via developing service scale operation. The results indicate that: first, the current adoption rates of typical farmland quality protection measures, including repairing farmland ditches, applying farm manure, adopting soil testing and formula fertilization, and returning straw to the field are 17.79%, 17.31%, 7.89% and 90.69% respectively. Second, agricultural productive services can significantly promote farmers' farmland quality protection behaviors, and the conclusion proves to be robust. Third, after the compulsory measure - returning straw to the field, is eliminated, life-oriented farmers prefer to adopt capital-driven technologies, while production-oriented farmers prefer to apply labor-driven technologies. Fourth, further analyses show that the positive effect of agricultural productive services on motivating cultivated land quality protection behavior is greater in the group of life-oriented farmers than in the group of production-oriented farmers.

关键词

农业生产性服务 / 耕地质量保护行为 / 资本投入型技术 / 劳动投入型技术 / 农户技术偏好

Key words

agricultural productive service / cultivated land quality protection behavior / capital-driven technologies / labor-driven technologies / farmer's technology preference

引用本文

导出引用
杨高第, 张露. 农业生产性服务对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——来自江汉平原水稻主产区的证据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(7): 1848-1864 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20220713
YANG Gao-di, ZHANG Lu. Impact of agricultural productive services on farmland quality protection behaviors of farmers: Evidence from the main rice-producing areas in Jianghan Plain[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2022, 37(7): 1848-1864 https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20220713

参考文献

[1]
FAN M S, SHEN J B, YUAN L X, et al. Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(1): 13-24.
[2]
许恒周, 郭玉燕, 吴冠岑. 农民分化对耕地利用效率的影响: 基于农户调查数据的实证分析. 中国农村经济, 2012, (6): 31-39, 47.
[XU H Z, GUO Y Y, WU G C. The impact of farmers' differentiation on cultivated land use efficiency: An empirical analysis based on household survey data. Chinese Rural Economy, 2012, (6): 31-39, 47.]
[3]
刘丹, 巩前文, 杨文杰. 改革开放40年来中国耕地保护政策演变及优化路径. 中国农村经济, 2018, (12): 37-51.
[LIU D, GONG Q W, YANG W J. The evolution of farmland protection policy and optimization path from 1978 to 2018. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (12): 37-51.]
[4]
谭秋成. 作为一种生产方式的绿色农业. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(9): 44-51.
[TAN Q C. Green agriculture as a production mode. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(9): 44-51.]
[5]
罗小娟, 冯淑怡, 石晓平, 等. 太湖流域农户环境友好型技术采纳行为及其环境和经济效应评价: 以测土配方施肥技术为例. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(11): 1891-1902.
[LUO X J, FENG S Y, SHI X P, et al. Farm households' adoption behavior of environment friendly technology and the evaluation of their environmental and economic effects in Taihu basin: Taking formula fertilization by soil testing technology as an example. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(11): 1891-1902.]
[6]
杨志海, 王雅鹏, 麦尔旦·吐尔孙. 农户耕地质量保护性投入行为及其影响因素分析: 基于兼业分化视角. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(12): 105-112.
[YANG Z H, WANG Y P, TURSUN M. Farm households' input behavior of land conservation and its driving factors: From a perspective of farm household differentiation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(12): 105-112.]
[7]
姚科艳, 陈利根, 刘珍珍. 农户禀赋、政策因素及作物类型对秸秆还田技术采纳决策的影响. 农业技术经济, 2018, (12): 64-75.
[YAO K Y, CHEN L G, LIU Z Z. The Influence of farmer's endowment, policy factors and crop types on the adoption decision of straw returning technology. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2018, (12): 64-75.]
[8]
刘乐, 张娇, 张崇尚, 等. 经营规模的扩大有助于农户采取环境友好型生产行为吗: 以秸秆还田为例. 农业技术经济, 2017, (5): 17-26.
[LIU L, ZHANG J, ZHANG C S, et al. Does the expansion of business scale help farmers to adopt environmentally friendly production behavior: Taking straw returning as an example. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2017, (5): 17-26.]
[9]
童洪志, 刘伟. 农户秸秆还田技术采纳行为影响因素实证研究: 基于311户农户的调查数据. 农村经济, 2017, (4): 108-114.
[TONG H Z, LIU W. An empirical study on the influencing factors of farmers' adoption of straw returning technology: Based on the survey data of 311 farmers. Rural Economy, 2017, (4): 108-114.]
[10]
储成兵. 农户病虫害综合防治技术的采纳决策和采纳密度研究: 基于Double-Hurdle模型的实证分析. 农业技术经济, 2015, (9): 117-127.
[CHU C B. Study on adoption decision and adoption density of integrated pest control technology for farmers: Empirical analysis based on double hurdle model. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2015, (9): 117-127.]
[11]
仇焕广, 苏柳方, 张祎彤, 等. 风险偏好、风险感知与农户保护性耕作技术采纳. 中国农村经济, 2020, (7): 59-79.
[QIU H G, SU L F, ZHANG Y T, et al. Risk preference, risk perception and farmers' adoption of conservation tillage technology. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020, (7): 59-79.]
[12]
钱龙, 冯永辉, 陆华良, 等. 产权安全性感知对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响: 以广西为例. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(10): 93-101.
[QIAN L, FENG Y H, LU H L, et al. The influence of property security sexy knowledge on farmers' cultivated land quality protection behavior: Taking Guangxi as an example. China Land Science, 2019, 33(10): 93-101.]
[13]
龙云, 任力. 农地流转制度对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响: 基于湖南省田野调查的实证研究. 资源科学, 2017, 39(11): 2094-2103.
[LONG Y, REN L. The influence of farmland transfer system on farmers' cultivated land quality protection behavior. Resources Science, 2017, 39(11): 2094-2103.]
[14]
佟大建, 黄武, 应瑞瑶. 基层公共农技推广对农户技术采纳的影响: 以水稻科技示范为例. 中国农村观察, 2018, (4): 59-73.
[TONG D J, HUANG W, YING R Y. The impact of grass roots public agricultural technology extension on farmers' technology adoption: Taking rice science and technology demonstration as an example. China Rural Survey, 2018, (4): 59-73.]
[15]
杨志海. 老龄化、社会网络与农户绿色生产技术采纳行为: 来自长江流域六省农户数据的验证. 中国农村观察, 2018, (4): 44-58.
[YANG Z H. Aging, social network and farmers' adoption behavior of green production technology. China Rural Survey, 2018, (4): 44-58.]
[16]
曹慧, 赵凯. 耕地经营规模对农户亲环境行为的影响. 资源科学, 2019, 41(4): 740-752.
[CAO H, ZHAO K. The impact of cultivated land management scale on farmers' pro environmental behavior. Resources Science, 2019, 41(4): 740-752.]
[17]
张露, 罗必良. 农业减量化: 农户经营的规模逻辑及其证据. 中国农村经济, 2020, (2): 81-99.
[ZHANG L, LUO B L. Agricultural reduction: Scale logic and evidence of farmers' management. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020, (2): 81-99.]
[18]
罗必良. 论服务规模经营: 从纵向分工到横向分工及连片专业化. 中国农村经济, 2017, (11): 2-16.
[LUO B L. On service scale operation: From vertical division to horizontal division and continuous specialization. Chinese Rural Economy, 2017, (11): 2-16.]
[19]
吕晓, 臧涛, 张全景. 农户规模经营意愿与行为的影响机制及差异: 基于山东省3县379份农户调查问卷的实证. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(5): 1147-1159.
[LYU X, ZANG T, ZHANG Q J. Influencing mechanism of the willingness and behavior of farmland scale management: Evidence from Shandong province, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(5): 1147-1159.]
[20]
万凌霄, 蔡海龙. 合作社参与对农户测土配方施肥技术采纳影响研究: 基于标准化生产视角. 农业技术经济, 2021, (3): 63-77.
[WAN L X, CAI H L. Study on the impact of cooperative's participation on farmers' adoption of testing soil for formulated fertilization technology: Analysis based on the perspective of standardized production. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2021, (3): 63-77.]
[21]
董莹, 穆月英. 农户环境友好型技术采纳的路径选择与增效机制实证. 中国农村观察, 2019, (2): 34-48.
[DONG Y, MU Y Y. The path selection and efficiency increase mechanism of farmers' adoption of environmentally friendly technology: An empirical analysis. China Rural Survey, 2019, (2): 34-48.]
[22]
刘帅, 沈兴兴, 朱守银. 农业产业化经营组织制度演进下的农户绿色生产行为研究. 农村经济, 2020, (11): 37-44.
[LIU S, SHEN X X, ZHU S Y. Research on farmers' green production behavior under the evolution of agricultural industrialization management organization system. Rural Economy, 2020, (11): 37-44.]
[23]
胡新艳, 朱文珏, 罗必良. 产权细分、分工深化与农业服务规模经营. 天津社会科学, 2016, (4): 93-98.
[HU X Y, ZHU W J, LUO B L. Subdivision of property rights, deepening of division of labor and scale operation of agricultural services. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2016, (4): 93-98.]
[24]
罗必良. 小农经营、功能转换与策略选择: 兼论小农户与现代农业融合发展的“第三条道路”. 农业经济问题, 2020, (1): 29-47.
[LUO B L. Small farmers' management, function transformation and strategy choice: And the third way of the integration of small farmers and modern agriculture. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2020, (1): 29-47.]
[25]
费显政, 李陈微, 周舒华. 一损俱损还是因祸得福: 企业社会责任声誉溢出效应研究. 管理世界, 2010, (4): 74-82, 98.
[FEI X Z, LI C W, ZHOU S H. A loss or a blessing in disguise: Research on reputation spillover effect of corporate social responsibility. Management World, 2010, (4): 74-82, 98.]
[26]
熊鹰, 何鹏. 绿色防控技术采纳行为的影响因素和生产绩效研究: 基于四川省水稻种植户调查数据的实证分析. 中国生态农业学报, 2020, 28(1): 136-146.
[XIONG Y, HE P. Impact factors and production performance of adoption of green control technology: An empirical analysis based on the survey data of rice farmers in Sichuan province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(1): 136-146.]
[27]
严功岸, 刘瑞峰, 马恒运. 为什么要保护绿色认证生产者的利益: 来自河南西峡猕猴桃的证据. 农业技术经济, 2019, (6): 70-81.
[YAN G A, LIU R F, MA H Y. Why to protect the interests of green certified producers? Evidence from Xixia kiwifruit in Henan province. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2019, (6): 70-81.]
[28]
郭晓鸣, 曾旭晖, 王蔷, 等. 中国小农的结构性分化: 一个分析框架: 基于四川省的问卷调查数据. 中国农村经济, 2018, (10): 7-21.
[GUO X M, ZENG X H, WANG Q, et al. The structural division of smallholder farmers in China: An analytical framework based on smallholder farmer survey data in Sichuan province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (10): 7-21.]
[29]
张露. 小农分化、行为差异与农业减量化. 农业经济问题, 2020, (6): 131-142.
[ZHANG L. Small household differentiation, behavioral differences and agricultural chemical reduction. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2020, (6): 131-142.]
[30]
ARRIAGADA R A, SILLS E O, PATTANAYAK S K, et al. Modeling fertilizer externalities around Palo Verde National Park, Costa Rica. Agricultural Economics, 2010, 41(6): 567-575.
[31]
SCHULTZ T W. Transforming Traditional Agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.
[32]
SCOTT J. The Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.
[33]
朱淀, 孔霞, 顾建平. 农户过量施用农药的非理性均衡: 来自中国苏南地区农户的证据. 中国农村经济, 2014, (8): 17-29, 41.
[ZHU D, KONG X, GU J P. Irrational equilibrium of excessive pesticide application by farmers: Evidence from farmers in Southern Jiangsu province of China. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014, (8): 17-29, 41.]
[34]
韩洪云, 杨增旭. 农户农业面源污染治理政策接受意愿的实证分析: 以陕西眉县为例. 中国农村经济, 2010, (1): 45-52.
[HAN H Y, YANG Z X. Empirical analysis on farmers' willingness to accept agricultural non point source pollution control policies: A case study of Meixian county, Shaanxi province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2010, (1): 45-52.]
[35]
YOUNG A. Increasing returns and economic progress. The Economic Journal, 1928, 38(152): 527-542.
[36]
ROSEN S. Specialization and human capital. Journal of Labor Economic, 1983, 1(1): 43-49.
[37]
BECKER G, MURPHY K M. The division of labor, coordination cost, and knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, 107(4): 1137-1160.
[38]
穆娜娜, 周振, 孔祥智. 农业社会化服务模式的交易成本解释: 以山东舜耕合作社为例. 华中农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2019, (3): 50-60, 160-161.
[MU N N, ZHOU Z, KONG X Z. Explanation of transaction cost on the mode of specialized agricultural services: A case study of Shungeng cooperative in Shandong province. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2019, (3): 50-60, 160-161.]
[39]
郑适, 陈茜苗, 王志刚. 土地规模、合作社加入与植保无人机技术认知及采纳: 以吉林省为例. 农业技术经济, 2018, (6): 92-105.
[ZHENG S, CHEN Q M, WANG Z G. Scale of land, enrollment of agricultural cooperatives and adoption of unmannered aerial vehicle: Evidence from Jilin province. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2018, (6): 92-105.]
[40]
赵丹丹, 周宏, 高富雄. 农户分化、技术约束与耕地保护技术选择差异: 基于不同约束条件下的农户技术采纳理论分析框架. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12): 2956-2967.
[ZHAO D D, ZHOU H, GAO F X. Differentiation of farmers, technical constraints and the differences of cultivated land protection technology selection: A theoretical analysis framework of farmer households' technological adoption based on different constraints. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(12): 2956-2967.]
[41]
曹光乔, 张宗毅. 农户采纳保护性耕作技术影响因素研究. 农业经济问题, 2008, (8): 69-74.
[CAO G Q, ZHANG Z Y. Study on influencing factors of farmers' adoption of conservation tillage technology. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2008, (8): 69-74.]
[42]
单玉红, 王琳娜. 农户分化对农地功能供给多样化的影响路径. 资源科学, 2020, 42(7): 1405-1415.
[SHAN Y H, WANG L N. The influence path of farmer differentiation on the diversification of farmland function supply. Resources Science, 2020, 42(7): 1405-1415.]
[43]
辛玥, 殷冠羿, 娄毅. 基于三维分形的山东省农户分化及耕地利用异质性分析. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(4): 78-85.
[XIN Y, YIN G Y, LOU Y. Analysis of cultivated land use heterogeneity based on the three dimensional differentiation of rural households in Shandong province. China Land Science, 2020, 34(4): 78-85.]
[44]
WILLY D K, HOLM-MÜLLER K. Social influence and collective action effects on farm level soil conservation effort in rural Kenya. Ecological Economics, 2013, 90(3): 94-103.
[45]
刘丽, 白秀广, 姜志德. 空间异质性下农户水土保持耕作技术采用行为研究: 基于黄土高原3省6县的实证. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(8): 1874-1884.
[LIU L, BAI X G, JIANG Z D. Research on Farmers' adoption behavior of soil and water conservation tillage technology under spatial heterogeneity: Based on the empirical study of six counties in three provinces of the Loess Plateau. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(8): 1874-1884.]
[46]
张永强, 田媛, 王珧. 农户认知视角下保护性耕作技术采纳行为研究: 以东北黑土区黑龙江省为例. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(2): 275-284.
[ZHANG Y Q, TIAN Y, WANG Y. Research on the adoption behavior of conservation tillage technology from the perspective of farmers' cognition: A case study of Heilongjiang province in northeast black soil region. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2020, 41(2): 275-284.]
[47]
王朝辉. 我国小麦施肥问题与化肥减施. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(23): 4813-4815.
[WANG C H. Problems of wheat fertilization and reduction of chemical fertilizer in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4813-4815.]
[48]
COLEMAN J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94: 95-120.
[49]
毛慧, 周力, 应瑞瑶. 风险偏好与农户技术采纳行为分析: 基于契约农业视角再考察. 中国农村经济, 2018, (4): 74-89.
[MAO H, ZHOU L, YING R Y. Analysis of risk preference and farmers' technology adoption behavior: Based on the perspective of contract agriculture. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (4): 74-89.]
[50]
WOOLDRIDGE J M. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (Sixth Edition). Boston: Cengage Learning, 2016.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(42071157)
国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL192)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2662020JGPYG11)
PDF(1916 KB)

2077

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/