县域国土空间主体功能区土地资源空间配置效率及管制策略——以江苏赣榆为例

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210918

Abstract

Abstract:

In terms of the county area, widening the concept application of main functional areas and exploring the spatial allocation efficiency of land resources and its control strategies are of great significance to deepening China's territorial space governance system. This paper combs the theoretical relationship between main functional areas and land resources spatial allocation, the spatial allocation efficiency of land resources in main functional areas of Ganyu district, a typical county-level unit in Jiangsu province, was investigated with the C-D production function, and the differentiated control strategy was put forward. The result shows that the essence of main functional areas construction is "based on land", and land resources spatial allocation should follow the transformation degree of equal marginal net income based on the concept of functional zoning, which makes it possible to improve land efficiency and reduce the efficiency loss of spontaneous competitive advantage. A study of Ganyu district found that the excessive allocation of agricultural land to development land in different main functional areas has the pareto improvement space, which is rooted in the inelastic mechanism of the current land planning management to regulate the spatial land use index, resulting in the spatial mismatch in the actual landing. Therefore, the effective allocation of land resources in Ganyu should be based on the overall planning of main functions and the coordination of land space development pattern, including: optimizing development areas should renovate the spatial structure of land and transform the mode of economic and industrial development; key development areas will contribute to the industrialization of cities and towns and ensure the efficiency of land resources use in the region; restricted development areas focus on the safety of grain and economic products and innovate the management mode of agricultural production land; prohibited development areas draw the red line of ecological space in development zones and explore the layout and structure of agricultural and tourism ecological land.

Key words: territory space governance, main functional areas, land resources spatial allocation efficiency, control strategy, Ganyu

JIANG Hai, CHEN Lei. Spatial allocation efficiency and control strategy of county land resources based on main functional areas of territorial space: A case study of Ganyu, Jiangsu province[J].JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2021, 36(9): 2424-2436.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

References 18

[1]	谭荣, 曲福田. 农地非农化的空间配置效率与农地损失. 中国软科学, 2006, (5):49-57.
	[ TAN R, QU F T. Spatial allocation efficiency of farm land conversion and farm land resource loss in China. China Soft Science, 2006, (5):49-57.]
[2]	姜开宏, 陈江龙, 陈雯. 比较优势理论与区域土地资源配置: 以江苏省为例. 中国农村经济, 2004, (12):16-21.
	[ JIANG K H, CHEN J L, CHEN W. Comparative advantage theory and regional land resource allocation: A case study of Jiangsu province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2004, (12):16-21.]
[3]	陈江龙, 曲福田, 陈雯. 农地非农化效率的空间差异及其对土地利用政策调整的启示. 管理世界, 2004, (8):37-42.
	[ CHEN J L, QU F T, CHEN W. The dissimilarity in space of the non-agricultural efficiency of farmland and its inspiration to the policy adjustment of use of land. Management World, 2004, (8):37-42.]
[4]	王博, 陈笑筑, 何晓波. 省级以下建设用地空间配置效率测度及优化探讨. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(1):89-96.
	[ WANG B, CHEN X Z, HE X B. Research on the measure of spatial allocative efficiency of construction land expansion and optimal path at the sub-provincial level. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(1):89-96.]
[5]	张英浩, 陈江龙, 高金龙, 等. 经济转型视角下长三角城市土地利用效率影响机制. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(6):1157-1170.
	[ ZHANG Y H, CHEN J L, GAO J L, et al. The impact mechanism of urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of economic transition. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(6):1157-1170.]
[6]	杨怀宇, 杨正勇. 基于投资组合模型的海岸带土地利用效率研究: 以上海临港新城围垦区为例. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(2):208-217.
	[ YANG H Y, YANG Z Y. Coastal land use efficiency based on the portfolio model: A case of reclaimed area of Lingang new city, Shanghai. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(2):208-217.]
[7]	陈磊, 姜海. 从土地资源优势区配置到主体功能区管理: 一个国土空间治理的逻辑框架. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(6):10-17.
	[ CHEN L, JIANG H. From land resource advantageous areas allocation to main functional areas management: A logical framework of territorial space governance. China Land Sciences, 2019, 33(6):10-17.]
[8]	陈磊, 姜海. 主体功能区导向下的土地资源空间配置: 对土地生长空间演进规律的理性思考. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(10):22-30.
	[ CHEN L, JIANG H. Land resource spatial allocation under the guidance of main functional areas: rational thinking on the evolution discipline of land development. China Land Sciences, 2019, 33(10):22-30.]
[9]	陈磊, 姜海. 县域主体功能区治理方案设计与监管体系. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(8):1988-2005.
	[ CHEN L, JIANG H. The schematic design and supervision system of the county main functional areas governance. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(8):1988-2005.]
[10]	ROBERT C, RALPHD A, RUDOLFDE G, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387:253-248. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[11]	才国伟, 舒元. 我国资本的配置效率: 一种新的测算方法. 经济科学, 2009, (4):43-52.
	[ CAI G W, SHU Y. Capital allocative efficiency in China: A new measurement method. Economic Science, 2009, (4):43-52.]
[12]	张恒义. 中国省际建设用地空间配置效率研究. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2011: 109-134.
	[ ZHANG H Y. Study on the spatial allocative efficiency of interprovincial construction land in China. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011: 109-134.]
[13]	李辉, 王良健. 土地资源配置的效率损失与优化途径. 中国土地科学, 2015, 29(7):63-72.
	[ LI H, WANG L J. The inefficiency of land allocation and its optimization. China Land Sciences, 2015, 29(7):63-72.]
[14]	王荧. 我国农地非农化配置效率. 福建: 福建师范大学, 2011: 138-152.
	[ WANG Y. Study on allocation efficiency of farmland conversion in China. Fujian: Fujian Normal University, 2011: 138-152.]
[15]	张宏斌, 贾生华. 土地非农化调控机制分析. 经济研究, 2001, (12):50-54.
	[ ZHANG H B, JIA S H. Analysis on the regulation mechanism of non-agricultural land. Economic Research Journal, 2001, (12):50-54.]
[16]	钱忠好. 中国农地保护: 理论与政策分析. 管理世界, 2003, (10):60-70.
	[ QIAN Z H. Farmland protection in China: Theoretical and policy analysis. Management World, 2003, (10):60-70.]
[17]	姚冠荣, 谢花林. 区域土地利用生态管控基本原理初探. 见: 2015年全国土地资源开发整治与新型城镇化建设学术研讨会, 2015: 615-623.
	[ YAO G R, XIE H L. Preliminary study on the basic principle of regional land use ecological Control. In: 2015 National Symposium on Land Resources Development and Renovation and New Urbanization Construction, 2015: 615-623.]
[18]	陈磊, 姜海, 陈文宽, 等. 生态约束下的湖滨土地利用研究: 以四川省仁寿县黑龙滩镇为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(1):231-240.
	[ CHEN L, JIANG H, CHEN W K, et al. Study on lakeside land use under ecological constraints: A case study of Heilongtan town in Renshou county, Sichuan province. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(1):231-240.]

准则层	子准则层	指标层
产出	总收益（Y）	农用地Y_AL	第一产业生产总值
产出	总收益（Y）	非农建设用地Y_DL	二三产业生产总值
投入	资本投入（K）	农用地K_AL	农村固定资产投资
	资本投入（K）	非农建设用地K_DL	城镇固定资产投资
	劳动力投入（L）	农用地L_AL	第一产业从业人员
	劳动力投入（L）	非农建设用地L_DL	二三产业从业人员
	土地资源投入（Land）	农用地Land_AL	农用地面积
	土地资源投入（Land）	非农建设用地Land_DL	建设用地面积

方程	变量	系数		R²	F-statistic	D-W
式（1）	A	A	1.443676	0.934440	72.94258^***	1.201989
	K	a	0.412086^***
	L	b	0.201121^**
	Land_AL	c	0.608623^***
式（2）	B	B	2.081039^*	0.975187	201.1283^***	1.374717
	K	d	0.615686^***
	L	e	0.630872^***
	Land_DL	f	0.306314^**

主体功能区	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年	平均数
转型发展区	835.43	790.58	976.90	1012.53	1177.77	1287.90	1452.40	1076.22
提质发展区	767.15	769.70	825.77	811.22	861.35	1016.24	1166.50	888.28
重点建设区	901.85	999.34	1003.84	1024.42	1085.35	1193.55	1304.53	1073.27
重点培育区	470.93	431.40	469.11	491.68	564.87	609.71	657.35	527.86
一般农业生产区	533.93	525.94	588.37	515.61	571.39	619.33	665.85	574.35
果林产业园建设区	396.61	401.15	402.84	403.19	476.53	473.85	570.38	446.36

主体功能区	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年	平均数
转型发展区	325056.10	319180.20	416598.18	437727.61	562907.95	738764.66	889885.14	527159.98
提质发展区	369284.09	417963.04	463244.68	451394.03	465758.95	634480.68	765912.42	509719.70
重点建设区	695800.18	755606.58	795700.40	820531.36	875093.61	1100002.99	1426657.83	924198.99
重点培育区	458483.41	408128.37	475391.23	508719.17	607312.79	673655.11	760844.66	556076.39
一般农业生产区	491149.11	422501.95	526369.22	433843.58	523408.77	569713.03	698181.62	523595.33
果林产业园建设区	280279.18	267848.86	295022.79	295908.73	383300.78	381453.67	509905.01	344817.00

主体功能区	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017
转型发展区	38204.50	38625.15	38345.42	38659.90	38832.10	38121.05	39018.47
提质发展区	37105.27	37769.95	37527.24	37740.78	37821.69	37075.26	37948.07
重点建设区	26912.01	27735.33	27747.36	27681.57	27894.31	27675.20	28326.71
重点培育区	14781.75	14775.90	14820.72	14801.91	14882.46	14698.49	15044.52
一般农业生产区	32802.87	33629.53	33374.65	32787.10	32605.75	31580.59	32324.04
果林产业园建设区	25226.39	25934.95	25959.01	26025.75	26131.89	25984.16	26595.86

Spatial allocation efficiency and control strategy of county land resources based on main functional areas of territorial space: A case study of Ganyu, Jiangsu province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 18

Related Articles 3

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

主体功能区	2011年	2012年	2013年	2014年	2015年	2016年	2017年
转型发展区	286016.17	279764.48	377275.86	398055.18	522898.07	699355.70	849414.26
提质发展区	331411.67	379423.39	424891.67	412842.03	427075.91	596389.17	726797.85
重点建设区	667986.32	726871.91	766949.21	791825.37	846113.94	1071134.25	1397026.59
重点培育区	443230.73	392921.07	460101.41	493425.58	591865.45	658346.91	745142.80
一般农业生产区	457812.31	388346.48	492406.19	400540.87	490231.63	537513.11	665191.73
果林产业园建设区	254656.18	241512.76	268660.94	269479.79	356692.37	354995.67	482738.76

区域	方程	系数		R²	F-statistic	D-W
经济建设区	式（5）	C₁	-12.59829^*	0.482632	5.441676^***	2.178506
	式（5）	C₂	1.196924^**	0.482632	5.441676^***	2.178506
	式（6）	C₃	-26.02077^*	0.465838	5.087202^***	2.168751
	式（6）	C₄	1.735522^**	0.465838	5.087202^***	2.168751
生态保护区	式（5）	C₁	-16.95226^***	0.652510	11.14148^***	2.087990
	式（5）	C₂	1.498843^***	0.652510	11.14148^***	2.087990
	式（6）	C₃	-33.77918^***	0.662307	11.63688^***	2.067969
	式（6）	C₄	2.183116^***	0.662307	11.63688^***	2.067969

主体功能区		实际配置数量/hm² 1	符合空间配置效率（最优）数量/hm² 2	空间配置损失偏差/hm² 1-2	空间配置效率指数 1/2	与实际相比的幅度/% （2-1）/2
经济建设区	转型发展区	251.1750	154.9831	96.1919	1.6207	-62.0661
	提质发展区	372.8487	238.0065	134.8422	1.5665	-56.6548
	重点建设区	1352.8394	951.3850	401.4544	0.9961	0.3909
	重点培育区	107.8315	91.5353	16.2962	1.2530	-25.3011
生态保护区	一般农业生产区	290.4275	812.6026	-522.1751	0.5930	40.6991
生态保护区	果林产业园建设区	119.4389	246.0474	-126.6085	0.8054	19.4558

[1]	CHEN Lei, JIANG Hai. The schematic design and supervision system of the county main functional areas governance [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2021, 36(8): 1988-2005.
[2]	ZHU Lan-lan, CAI Yin-ying. Regional Differences of Restriction on Farmland Development Rights under Land-Use Regulation and the Economic Compensation: Cases in Wuhan, Jingmen and Huanggang, Hubei Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2015, 30(5): 736-747.
[3]	ZHANG Zhen ke, WANG Su min, WU Rui jin, JIANG Jia hu. Problems and optimum control strategy of lake water resources in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2001, 16(1): 16-21.