自然资源学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1119-1134.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230501

• “新时期遗产地保护传承的理论与实践创新”专栏 •    下一篇

农业文化遗产保护预警评价体系构建与方法研究

崔峰(), 王哲政   

  1. 南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院,南京 210095
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-06 修回日期:2022-12-05 出版日期:2023-05-28 发布日期:2023-05-15
  • 作者简介:崔峰(1973- ),男,山西沁源人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,主要从事农业文化遗产保护与利用、旅游开发与管理研究。E-mail: cuifeng@njau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目(2011ZDIXM013)

Construction and method of early-warning evaluation system of agricultural heritage protection

CUI Feng(), WANG Zhe-zheng   

  1. College of Humanities & Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
  • Received:2022-06-06 Revised:2022-12-05 Online:2023-05-28 Published:2023-05-15

摘要:

农业文化遗产保护预警作为农业文化遗产动态保护、适应性管理的重要内容,对农业文化遗产价值的维护和农业文化遗产地可持续发展具有重要意义。针对当前农业文化遗产保护预警理论研究和实践工作较为滞后的状况,在界定农业文化遗产保护预警概念的基础上,结合农业文化遗产的属性和特点,提出构建农业文化遗产保护预警评价体系的基本原则,基于“压力—状态—响应”模型(PSR)并运用德尔菲法,最终筛选出农业文化遗产保护预警评价的3个一级指标、11个二级指标和21个三级指标。鉴于农业文化遗产保护预警评价具有较大的模糊性,本文给出运用模糊综合评判法进行农业文化遗产保护预警评价的技术路线,依据确定的警度区间将农业文化遗产保护预警级别划分为四个等级(无警、轻警、中警、重警),并综合运用大气污染预警分级和交通信号警示灯原理,分别用蓝色、黄色、橙色、红色直观反映农业文化遗产保护警戒情况。研究结果认为:给出的评价指标体系和评价方法,可以对农业文化遗产保护预警状况进行有效定量评估,进而为建立科学的农业文化遗产保护预警机制提供理论与方法基础。

关键词: 农业文化遗产, 预警评价, 指标体系, 模糊综合评判法, PSR模型

Abstract:

As an important part of dynamic protection and adaptive management of agricultural heritage, the early-warning is of great significance to the maintenance of agricultural heritage values and the sustainable development of agricultural heritage sites. In view of the current situation that the theoretical research and practical work on the early-warning of agricultural heritage protection are lagging behind, on the basis of defining the concept of early-warning of agricultural heritage protection, and conbined with the analysis of attributes and characteristics of agricultural heritage, the paper offers the basic principles of constructing the early-warning evaluation system of agricultural heritage protection. Based on the "Pressure-State-Response" model (PSR) and the Delphi method, we selected three first-grade indicators, 11 second-grade indicators and 21 third-grade indicators of the early-warning evaluation. Because of the fuzziness of early-warning evaluation of agricultural heritage protection, the study puts forward the technical route of early-warning evaluation by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and divides the early-warning level into four scales (no warning, light warning, medium warning, and severe warning) according to the determined warning degree range, and comprehensively uses the principles of air pollution warning classification and traffic signal warning lights to intuitively reflect the warning situation by blue color, yellow color, orange color and red color. The results show that the given index system and method of evaluation can effectively and quantitatively evaluate the early-warning status of agricultural heritage protection, and thus lay the theoretical and methodological foundations of establishing scientific early-warning system and mechanism for agricultural heritage protection.

Key words: agricultural heritage, early-warning evaluation, index system, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, PSR model