自然资源学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3170-3185.doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20211212

• 其他研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中部地区乡村生产要素协同转型的时空格局及影响因素——以湖南岳阳为例

赵宁宁1,2(), 郭炎1,2(), 李志刚1,2, 许红梅1,2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学城市设计学院,武汉 430072
    2. 湖北省人居环境工程技术研究中心,武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-11 修回日期:2020-07-08 出版日期:2021-12-28 发布日期:2022-02-28
  • 通讯作者: 郭炎(1983- ),男,湖北荆州人,博士,副教授,研究方向为城乡融合发展与规划。E-mail: tiverguo@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵宁宁(1993- ),女,河北沧州人,硕士,研究方向为城乡融合发展与规划。E-mail: ningningzhao@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41971185);国家自然科学基金项目(41771167);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2042019kf0225)

Spatio-temporal patterns and influencing factors of the collaborative transformation of rural production factors in Central China: A case study of Yueyang, Hunan province

ZHAO Ning-ning1,2(), GUO Yan1,2(), LI Zhi-gang1,2, XU Hong-mei1,2   

  1. 1. School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    2. Center of Hubei Human Habitat Engineering and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2020-05-11 Revised:2020-07-08 Online:2021-12-28 Published:2022-02-28

摘要:

乡村生产要素(人—地—资本)协同转型,即劳动力转移、农地流转、资本循环协同演进,对乡村发展至关重要。本文构建了要素协同转型的理论框架,探讨影响因素的作用机制;以湖南岳阳市为例,揭示了要素转型发展水平,探究了要素协同的时空演化;从内生和外源两个维度,探讨了协同水平空间异质性的影响因素。基于要素转型会由“失配”转向“协同”的理论假说,实证发现:劳动力转移水平远高于农地流转和资本循环,三者空间分异显著;要素协同程度不高但在增强,空间集聚明显;坡度、耕地资源禀赋、距县城的距离、政府农业农村投入分别是关键的内生与外源解释因素,除距县城距离仅有正向影响外,其余因素正、负向影响并存。政策举措应因地制宜。

关键词: 乡村转型, 生产要素, 协同转型, 时空格局, 影响因素, 中部地区

Abstract:

The collaborative transformation of rural production factors, namely the coordination among flow of labor, farmland transfer and capital circulation, is crucial for rural development. This paper constructs a theoretical framework of the collaborative transformation among the three factors and the impacts of some local influencing factors. With the case of Yueyang city, Hunan province, we reveal the transformation levels of each production factor, explore the spatio-temporal patterns of collaborative transformation, and examine the endogenous and exogenous influencing factors underlying the spatial heterogeneity of the collaborative transformation levels. Based on the theoretical hypothesis that transformation of the three factors will be upgraded from "mismatch" to "collaboration", empirical findings are as follows: the transformation level of labor is much higher than that of farmland and capital; the spatial patterns of the levels are different; the collaborative level of factor transformation is not high, but a trend of temporal uplifting and spatial aggregation is apparently shown; slope, cultivated land resource endowment, distance from the county seat and government investment in rural and agricultural development are the key endogenous and exogenous factors respectively. Distance from the county seat has positive effect, while other factors have both positive and negative effects. Policy implications are proposed according to the collaborative levels and local conditions.

Key words: rural transformation, production factor, collaborative transformation, spatio-temporal pattern, influencing factor, Central China