基于GIS格网模型的银川市土地生态安全评价研究

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160633

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探索市域范围内土地生态安全的粒度特性及其空间效应,论文结合PSR理论框架构建评价指标体系,以公里格网为评价单元,采用熵权法计算区域土地生态安全综合指数。银川市的实证分析表明,2014年整个区域土地生态安全指数为0.488 2,市域范围内土地生态安全存在着空间异质性和结构功能分化的双重特征。从宏观行政区划层面来看,3个中心辖区表现相对较为均衡,2个郊区县差异性较大,仅有贺兰县（0.557 7）高于全市均值;从微观格网尺度来看,北部和城市中心的综合指数较高且呈离散分布,城市边缘区较低且呈集聚分布;从土地利用功能区的角度来看,农业区、城市建城区、湿地和自然保护区的核心区域综合指数较高,而功能边缘区与交叉区较低,土地生态安全和土地利用方式存在耦合关系。通过ESDA空间分析表明,格网尺度下土地生态安全全局Moran’s I指数为0.780 4,生态安全的空间格局表现出空间连续性和聚集效应。因此,从空间建构的视角来看,应充分利用“高高聚集”区的空间扩散和溢出效益,并通过逐步改善影响“低低聚集”区的限制性因子,实现区域内部土地生态安全格局的优化配置。

关键词: 格网分析, 空间探索分析, 土地生态安全, 银川市

Abstract:

To explore the spatial effect and scale characteristics of the land ecological system within the scope of the city, this paper constructs a scientific evaluation system of land ecosystem based on PSR model. The basic unit of the evaluation system is 1 km×1 km grid. Entropy method is used to calculate the regional land ecological security index. We assess the land ecological security index in Yinchuan city, and the results show that the regional land ecological index is 0.488 2 in 2015. The land ecological security has dual characteristics which includes structure function differentiation and spatial heterogeneity. From the macro perspective, the gaps among the three central districts are very small, while the difference between the two suburban counties is very large. Only the ecological security value of Helan County (0.557 7) is higher than the overall average in the city. From the micro perspective, there is a certain relationship between land ecological security and the way people use the land. At the micro level, the composite index in the north and center of the city was higher, while it is lower at the fringe of the city. From the view of land use function, the core composite indexes of agricultural areas, urban built-up areas, wetlands and nature reserves are higher, while the index in cross-functional areas is very low. There is coupling relationship between the land ecological security and the land use pattern. The important factors of land ecological security in Yinchuan include per capita arable land area, industrial structure and pollution control efforts, etc. By ESDA spatial analysis, the global Moran’s I of land ecological security in Yinchuan city is 0.780 4, which means inherent spatial correlation of ecological security. The land ecological security in Yinchuan city as a whole has characteristics of spatial continuity and spatial dependence. Therefore, we should make full use of the spatial diffusion and spillover benefits in high-high aggregation area, and improve the restriction factors in low-low aggregation area, so as to reduce the environmental risk and optimize the allocation of space.

Key words: exploratory spatial data analysis, grid method, land ecological security, Yinchuan city

中图分类号:

F301.2

李建春, 袁文华. 基于GIS格网模型的银川市土地生态安全评价研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 988-1001.

LI Jian-chun, YUAN Wen-hua. Assessment of Urban Land Ecological Security in Yinchuan City Based on the Grid Method[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(6): 988-1001.

参考文献

[1] 蒙吉军, 赵春红, 刘明达. 基于土地利用变化的区域生态安全评价——以鄂尔多斯市为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(4): 578-590. [MENG J J, ZHAO C H, LIU M D. Regional ecological security assessment based on land—A case study in Ordos city. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(4): 578-590. ]
[2] ALCAMO J, ENDEJAN M B, KASPAR F, et al. The glass model: A strategy for quantifying global environmental security [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2001, 4(1): 1-12.
[3] CAMPBELL K R, BARTELL S M. Ecological models and ecological risk assessment [C]// NEWMAN M C, STROJAN C L. Risk Assessment: Logic and Measurement. Michigan: Ann Arbor Press, 1998.
[4] 国土资源部土地整治中心. 中国土地整治相关法律法规文件汇编 [G]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2014. [The Ministry of Land and Resources of Land Regulation Center. China’s Land Management Collection of Relevant Laws and Regulations. Beijing: China Earth Press, 2014. ]
[5] 中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 中华人民共和国国务院公报 [EB/OL]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-05/31/content_5078377.htm. 2016. [General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. The State Council Bulletin of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-05/31/content_5078377.htm. 2016. ]
[6] 张玉泽, 任建兰, 刘凯, 等. 山东省生态安全预警测度及时空格局 [J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(11): 166-171. [ZHANG Y Z, REN J L, LIU K, et al. The ecological security early warning measures and space-time pattern of Shandong Province. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(11): 166-171. ]
[7] 李悦, 张合兵, 张小虎, 等. 基于熵值法和灰色预测模型的城市土地生态安全评价 [J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(12):242-247. [LI Y, ZHANG H B, ZHANG X H, et al. Evaluation on ecological security of urban land based on entropy method and grey prediction model. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 38(12): 242-247. ]
[8] PIRAGES D. Demographic change and ecological insecurity [J]. Environmental Change and Security Program Report, 1997, 7(3): 324-345.
[9] 谢花林. 区域土地利用变化的生态效应研究 [M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2011. [XIE H L. Ecological Effects of Regional Land Use Change. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2011. ]
[10] 李昊, 李世平, 银敏华. 中国土地生态安全研究进展与展望 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(9): 50-56. [LI H, LI S P, YIN M H. Research progress and prospect of land ecological security in China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(9): 50-56. ]
[11] 俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局 [J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(1): 8-15. [YU K J. Landscape ecological security patterns in biological conservation. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(1): 8-15. ]
[12] VAN DEN BERGH J C J M, VERBRUGGEN H. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: An evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’ [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(1): 61-72.
[13] 张虹波, 刘黎明. 土地资源生态安全研究进展与展望 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2006, 25(5): 77-85. [ZHANG H B, LIU L M. Main progress and prospects of land resource ecological security research. Progress in Geography, 2006, 25(5): 77-85. ]
[14] 李明月, 赖笑娟. 基于BP神经网络方法的城市土地生态安全评价——以广州市为例 [J]. 经济地理, 2011, 31(2): 289-293. [LI M Y, LAI X J. Evaluation on ecological security of urban land based on BP neural network—A case study of Guangzhou. Economic Geography, 2011, 31(2): 289-293. ]
[15] 余健, 房莉, 仓定帮, 等. 熵权模糊物元模型在土地生态安全评价中的应用 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(5):260-266. [YU J, FANG L, CANG D B, et al. Evaluation of land eco-security in Wanjiang district base on entropy weight and matter element model. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012, 28(5): 260-266. ]
[16] 徐美, 朱翔, 刘春腊. 基于RBF的湖南省土地生态安全动态预警 [J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(10): 1411-1422. [XU M, ZHU X, LIU C L. Early-warning of land ecological security in Hunan Province based on RBF. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(10): 1411-1422. ]
[17] MONTGOMERY B, DRAGIĆEVIĆ S, DUJMOVIĆ J, et al. A GIS-based Logic Scoring of Preference method for evaluation of land capability and suitability for agriculture [J]. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 2016, 124: 340-353.
[18] 常学礼, 赵文智, 李秀梅, 等. 基于生态服务价值的张掖绿洲生态安全评价 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(3): 396-406. [CHANG X L, ZHAO W Z, LI X M, et al. Ecological security assessment based on the ecosystem service value in Zhangye Oasis. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(3): 396-406. ]
[19] 王鹏, 况福民, 邓育武, 等. 基于主成分分析的衡阳市土地生态安全评价 [J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(1):168-172. [WANG P, KUANG F M, DENG Y W, et al. Assessment of land eco-security of the Hengyang city on the principal component. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(1): 168-172. ]
[20] 张小虎, 雷国平, 袁磊, 等. 黑龙江省土地生态安全评价 [J]. 中国人口.资源与环境, 2009, 19(1):88-93. [ZHANG X H, LEI G P, YUAN L, et al. Evaluation on ecological security of land based on entropy weight and matter-element model: A case study of Heilongjiang Province. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2009, 19(1): 88-93. ]
[21] 秦晓楠, 卢小丽, 武春友. 国内生态安全研究知识图谱——基于Citespace的计量分析 [J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13): 3693-3703. [QIN X N, LU X L, WU C Y. The knowledge mapping of domestic ecological security research: Bibliometric analysis based on Citespace. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(13): 3693-3703. ]
[22] 谢花林. 基于景观结构的土地利用生态风险空间特征分析——以江西兴国县为例 [J]. 中国环境科学, 2011, 31(4): 688-695. [XIE H L. Spatial characteristic analysis of land use eco-risk based on landscape structure: A case study in the Xingguo County, Jiangxi Province. China Environmental Science, 2011, 31(4): 688-695. ]
[23] 张利, 陈影, 王树涛, 等. 滨海快速城市化地区土地生态安全评价与预警——以曹妃甸新区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2445-2454. [ZHANG L, CHEN Y, WANG S T, et al. Assessment and early warning of land ecological security in rapidly urbanizing coastal area: A case study of Caofeidian new district, Hebei, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(8): 2445-2454. ]
[24] 陈美球, 黄靓, 蔡海生, 等. 鄱阳湖区土地健康评价 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(2): 170-175. [CHEN M Q, HUANG L, CAI H S, et al. Evaluation of land health in Poyang lake area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004, 19(2): 170-175. ]
[25] 赵岩洁, 李阳兵, 邵景安. 基于土地利用变化的三峡库区小流域生态风险评价——以草堂溪为例 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(6): 944-956. [ZHAO Y J, LI Y B, SHAO J A. Ecological risk assessment of small watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir area based on land use change—A case study of Caotang River. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(6): 944-956. ]
[26] 张晓琴, 石培基. 基于PSR模型的兰州城市生态系统健康评价研究 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2010, 24(3): 77-82. [ZHANG X Q, SHI P J. The assessment of urban ecosystem health based on PSR model: A case study of Lanzhou city. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2010, 24(3): 77-82. ]
[27] 彭建, 吴健生, 潘雅婧, 等. 基于PSR模型的区域生态持续性评价概念框架 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(7): 933-940. [PENG J, WU J S, PAN Y J, et al. Evaluation for regional ecological sustainability based on PSR model: Conceptual framework. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(7): 933-940. ]
[28] 张永凯, 马国霞. 西北干旱区资源型城市发展与转型研究 [J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(7): 1013-1017. [ZHANG Y K, MA G X. Development and transition of resource-based cities in China’s arid northwest. Resources Science, 2008, 30(7): 1013-1017. ]
[29] 刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制 [J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389. [LIU Y S, LIU Y, CHEN Y F. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379-1389. ]
[30] 蔡芳芳, 濮励杰, 张健, 等. 基于ESDA的江苏省县域经济发展空间模式解析 [J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(3): 22-28. [CAI F F, PU L J, ZHANG J, et al. Identification of spatial economic structure in Jiangsu Province by applying exploratory spatial data statistics. Economic Geography, 2012, 32(3): 22-28. ]
[31] 蒲英霞, 葛莹, 马荣华, 等. 基于ESDA的区域经济空间差异分析——以江苏省为例 [J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(6): 965-974. [PU Y X, GE Y, MA R H, et al. Analyzing regional economic disparities based on ESDA. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(6): 965-974. ]
[32] 李丁, 冶小梅, 汪胜兰, 等. 基于ESDA-GIS的县域经济空间差异演化及驱动力分析——以兰州—西宁城镇密集区为例 [J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(5): 31-36. [LI D, YE X M, MA R H, et al. Research on evolutionary process and driving forces of spatially economic disparity within counties based on technology of ESDA-GIS. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(5): 31-36. ]