三江平原保护区社区居民对湿地生态系统服务功能的贡献意愿

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.20160604

自然资源学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 977-987.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.20160604

三江平原保护区社区居民对湿地生态系统服务功能的贡献意愿

戴胡萱¹, 李俊鸿², 程鲲¹, 宗诚^{1, 3, *}

1. 东北林业大学野生动物资源学院,哈尔滨 150040；
2. 台湾东华大学环境学院,台湾花莲 97441；
3. 西藏大学农牧学院,西藏林芝 860000

收稿日期:2016-06-12 修回日期:2016-09-20 出版日期:2017-06-20 发布日期:2017-06-20
作者简介:戴胡萱（1992- ）,女,湖南武冈人,硕士,研究方向为自然保护区有效管理。E-mail: daylily1017@163.com *通信作者简介：宗诚（1973- ）,男,吉林磐石人,副教授,研究方向为野生动物生态和自然保护区有效管理。E-mail: moredonkey@163.com
基金资助:
中国工程院咨询研究项目、国家自然科学基金专项基金项目（L1322010）; 西藏大学农牧学院柔性人才项目（201501）;

Community Residents’ Willingness to Contribute to Wetland Ecosystem Services in Sanjiang Plain Nature Reserves

DAI Hu-xuan¹, LEE Chun-hung², CHENG Kun¹, ZONG Cheng^{1, 3}

1. College of Wildlife Resource, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China;
2. College of Environmental Studies, Dong Hwa University, Hualien 97441, China;
3. Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College, Tibet University, Nyingchi 860000, China

Received:2016-06-12 Revised:2016-09-20 Online:2017-06-20 Published:2017-06-20
Supported by:
Special Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Consulting Program of Chinese Academy of Engineering, No. L1322010; Program of Flexible Talent in Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College of Tibet University, No. 201501.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解社区对维持保护区湿地生态系统服务功能的贡献意愿,研究选取三江平原5个湿地自然保护区及其社区,依据条件价值评估法设计双边界二分式问卷,进行实地走访调查,从居民社会经济背景等方面探讨影响贡献意愿的因素、居民支付意愿（WTP）和劳动意愿（WTW）的差异。结果表明：1）居民对湿地生态系统服务的劳动意愿（73.57%）高于支付意愿（55.65%）,居民的抗议支付率随WTP和WTW投标值增加呈上升趋势,人均WTP为387.25±7.08元/a,WTW为31.40±0.39 h/月;2）月收入水平较高及对支付金钱有较高接受程度的受访居民,其WTP相对较高;加入环保类协会、对付出劳动的接受程度较高、受教育程度较高及男性的受访居民,则有较高的WTW;3）49.46%的居民愿意同时贡献金钱与劳动,远高于其他贡献意愿类型。建议在保护区的资源保护与管理实践中鼓励社区参与,充分发挥社区居民乐于提供志愿服务时间的贡献意愿。

关键词: 劳动意愿, 社区, 湿地生态系统, 条件价值评估法, 支付意愿, 自然保护区

Abstract:

This paper conducted a questionnaire survey in communities of five nature reserves in Sanjiang Plain, using double bounded dichotomous choice model of the contingent valuation method to explore residents’ willingness to contribute to ecosystem service in nature reserves. We found that: 1) the residents had higher willingness of labor contribution (73.57%) than willingness of financial contribution (55.65%), the mean willingness to pay (WTP) by individual being 387.25±7.08 yuan per year and the mean willingness to work (WTW) being 31.40±0.39 hours per month. 2) Residents with higher income and higher acceptance of paying money expressed higher WTP for ecosystem service. Male residents and those who joined environmental defense association, were better educated or had higher acceptance of paying money expressed higher WTW for ecosystem service. 3) 49.46% of the residents are willing to contribute both money and labor, whose proportion is much higher than other types of contribution, and people in this group averagely showed higher WTP and WTW. To take full play of the location advantage in the practice of nature reserves management, we suggest to encourage community volunteers to participate in the ecosystem conservation.

Key words: community, contingent valuation method, nature reserves, wetland ecosystem, willingness to pay, willingness to work

中图分类号:

戴胡萱, 李俊鸿, 程鲲, 宗诚. 三江平原保护区社区居民对湿地生态系统服务功能的贡献意愿[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(6): 977-987.

DAI Hu-xuan, LEE Chun-hung, CHENG Kun, ZONG Cheng. Community Residents’ Willingness to Contribute to Wetland Ecosystem Services in Sanjiang Plain Nature Reserves[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 32(6): 977-987.

参考文献

[1] DAILY G. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems [M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997.
[2] ASSESSMENT M E. Ecosystems and Human Well-being [M]. Vol. 5. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.
[3] 曹智, 闵庆文, 刘某承, 等. 基于生态系统服务的生态承载力: 概念、内涵与评估模型及应用 [J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(1): 1-11. [CAO Z, MIN Q W, LIU M C, et al. Ecosystem-service-based ecological carrying capacity concept, content, assessment model and application. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(1): 1-11. ]
[4] 康鹏, 陈卫平, 王美娥. 基于生态系统服务的生态风险评价研究进展 [J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(5): 1192-1203. [KANG P, CHEN W P, WANG M E. Advancesin ecosystem service-based ecological risk assessment. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(5): 1192-1203. ]
[5] VITOUSEK P M, MOONEY H A, LUBCHENCO J, et al. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems [J]. Science, 1997, 277(5325): 494-499.
[6] JUFFE-BIGNOLI D, BURGESS N D, BELLE E M, et al. Protected planet report 2014 [R]. UNEP-WCMC, 2014.
[7] 徐网谷, 高军, 夏欣, 等. 中国自然保护区社区居民分布现状及其影响 [J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(1): 19-23. [XU W G, GAO J, XIA X, et al. Distribution of community residents in nature reserves and its impacts on the reserves in China. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2016, 32(1): 19-23. ]
[8] 傅娇艳, 丁振华. 湿地生态系统服务、功能和价值评价研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(3): 681-686. [FU J Y, DING Z H. Research progress on wetland ecosystem service and its valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007, 18(3): 681-686. ]
[9] 张艳. 自然保护区社区参与行为的影响因素研究——以兴凯湖国家级自然保护区为例 [J]. 生态经济, 2015, 31(3): 157-160. [ZHANG Y. On the influencing factors of community participation behaviors in nature reserves: Taking Xingkai Lake National Nature Reserves as an example. Ecological Economy, 2015, 31(3): 157-160. ]
[10] BISHOP R C, HEBERLEIN T A. Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979, 61(5): 926-930.
[11] COSTANZA R, CUMBERLAND J H, DALY H, et al. An Introduction to Ecological Economics [M]. CRC Press, 2014.
[12] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋. 条件价值评估法的发展与应用 [J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3): 454-463. [ZHANG Z Q, XU Z M, CHENG G D. The updated development and application of contingent valuation method (CVM). Advance in Earth Science, 2003, 18(3): 454-463. ]
[13] 马爱慧. 基于双边界二分式条件价值法的农户耕地补偿意愿评估 [J]. 上海国土资源, 2015(4): 19-22. [MA A H. An evaluation of farmers’ willingness for compensation for cultivated land based on the double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation method. Shanghai Land & Resources, 2015(4): 19-22. ]
[14] VASQUEZ W F. Willingness to pay and willingness to work for improvements of municipal and community-managed water services [J]. Water Resources Research, 2014, 50(10): 8002-8014.
[15] SOLIKIN A. Revealing Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Work to Avoid Deforestation and Forest Degradation Using the Contingent Valuation Method: Evidences from Indonesia [D]. Bochum, Germany: Ruhr University Bochum, 2015.
[16] RAI R K, SCARBOROUGH H. Nonmarket valuation in developing countries: Incorporating labour contributions in environmental benefits estimates [J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2015, 59(4): 479-498.
[17] SCHIAPPACASSE I, VASQUEZ F, NAHUELHUAL L, et al. Labor as a utility measure in contingent valuation: Application to the valuation of restoration projects in Latin America [R]. Chile: Department of Economics, University of Concepcion, 2010.
[18] 敖长林, 李一军, 冯磊, 等. 基于 CVM 的三江平原湿地非使用价值评价 [J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6470-6477. [AO C L, LI Y J, FENG L, et al. Evaluating the non-use value of Sanjiang wetland based on contigent valuation method. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6470-6477. ]
[19] ALBERINI A. Testing willingness-to-pay models of discrete choice contingent valuation survey data [J]. Land Economics, 1995, 71(1): 83-95.
[20] LEHMANN E L, Elements of Large-sample Theory [M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 1999.
[21] HANEMANN M, LOOMIS J, KANNINEN B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991, 73(4): 1255-1263.
[22] CRANFORD M, MOURATO S. Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services [J]. Ecological Economics, 2011, 71(1): 89-98.
[23] KERR G N. Dichotomous choice contingent valuation probability distributions [J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2000, 44(2): 233-252.
[24] CAMERON T A, QUIGGIN J. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a “dichotomous choice with follow-up” questionnaire [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994, 27(3): 218-234.
[25] ALBERINI A. Optimal designs for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: Single-bound, double-bound, and bivariate models [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995, 28(3): 287-306.
[26] LAWLESS J F. Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
[27] 李俊鸿, 王琼霞, 陈郁蕙, 等. 台湾小区林业生态产业间接效益之价值评估 [J]. 应用经济论丛, 2013(93): 43-82. [LEE C H, WANG Q X, CHEN Y H, et al. The benefit assessment of ecoindustry in Taiwan’s community forestry, Taiwan. Journal of Applied Economics, 2013(93): 43-82. ]
[28] 徐大伟, 常亮, 侯铁珊, 等. 基于 WTP 和 WTA 的流域生态补偿标准测算 [J]. 资源科学, 2012, 34(7): 1354-1361. [XU D W, CHANG L, HOU T S, et al. Measure of watershed ecological compensation standard based on WTP and WTA: A case study in Liaohe River Basin. Resources Science, 2012, 34(7): 1354-1361. ]
[29] 庄大昌. 基于CVM的洞庭湖湿地资源非使用价值评估 [J]. 地域研究与开发, 2006, 25(2): 105-110. [ZHUANG D C. Evaluation of the non-use values of the wetland resources in Dongting Lake based on CVM. Areal Research and Development, 2006, 25(2): 105-110. ]
[30] KAMUANGA M, SWALLOW B M, SIGUE H, et al. Evaluating contingent and actual contributions to a local public good: Tsetse control in the Yale agro-pastoral zone, Burkina Faso [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39(1): 115-130.
[31] CASIWAN-LAUNIO C, SHINBO T, MOROOKA Y. Island villagers’ willingness to work or pay for sustainability of a marine fishery reserve: Case of San Miguel Island, Philippines [J]. Coastal Management, 2011, 39(5): 459-477.
[32] GIRMA W, BEYENE F. Willingness to contribute to collective forest management: Evidence from Godere in the Gambela Region of Ethiopia [J]. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2012, 41(1): 79-86.
[33] 于文金, 谢剑, 邹欣庆. 基于 CVM 的太湖湿地生态功能恢复居民支付能力与支付意愿相关研究 [J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(23): 7271-7278. [YU W J, XIE J, ZOU X Q. CVM for Taihu Lake based on ecological functions of wetlands restoration, and ability to pay and willingness to pay studies. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(23): 7271-7278. ]
[34] 高琴, 敖长林, 陈红光, 等. 基于居民生态认知的非使用价值支付意愿空间分异研究——以三江平原湿地为例 [J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(7): 1851-1859. [GAO Q, AO C L, CHEN H G, et al. Spatial differentiation research of non-use value WTP based on the residents’ ecological cognition: Taking the Sanjiang Plain as a case. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(7): 1851-1859. ]
[35] 李俊鸿, 陈郁蕙, 陈雅惠. 大农大富平地森林园区生态系服务功能经济效益探讨 [R]. 环境教育国际学术研讨会, 2014. [LEE C H, CHEN Y H, CHEN Y H. Evaluation of economic benefits for the ecosystem services in Danongdafu Forest Park. International Conference on Environmental Education, 2014. ]
[36] TIETENBERG T. 环境与自然资源经济学 [M]. 中译本. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2001. [TIETENBERG T. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. Chinese Traslation. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2001. ]
[37] LANKIA T, NEUVONEN M, POUTA E, et al. Willingness to contribute to the management of recreational quality on private lands in Finland [J]. Journal of Forest Economics, 2014, 20(2): 141-160.
[38] CASEY J F. Partners in forest conservation: “willingness-to-work” (WTW) to protect local forest resources in Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico [J]. Problemas Del Dessarrollo: Revista Latinoamericana De Economis, 2003, 34(135): 125-142.
[39] ECHESSAH P N, SWALLOW B M, KAMARA D W, et al. Willingness to contribute labor and money to tsetse control: Application of contingent valuation in Busia District, Kenya [J]. World Development, 1997, 25(2): 239-253.
[40] RAI R K, SCARBOROUGH H. Economic value of mitigation of plant invaders in a subsistence economy: Incorporating labour as a mode of payment [J]. Environment and Development Economics, 2013, 18(2): 225-244.
[41] AHLHEIM M, FROR O, HEINKE A, et al. Labour as a utility measure in contingent valuation studies: How good is it really? [R]. University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID), 2010.

三江平原保护区社区居民对湿地生态系统服务功能的贡献意愿

Community Residents’ Willingness to Contribute to Wetland Ecosystem Services in Sanjiang Plain Nature Reserves

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	卢明强, 陈丽军. 基于MNL离散选择模型的社区居民对湿地保护的贡献意愿——以大庆湿地为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(2): 449-458.
[2]	尹寿兵, 王鑫. 湖泊型旅游地社区参与的去权过程及启示——以安徽省太平湖为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(9): 2105-2119.
[3]	张锐, 刘焱序, 赵嵩, 傅伯杰. 中国城市居民对青藏高原生态资产的支付意愿——以中国27市为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 563-575.
[4]	单菁竹, 李京梅, 许志华. CVM中的抗议性响应:动机与影响——以胶州湾浒苔治理支付意愿为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 626-638.
[5]	彭澎, 程诗奋, 陈闪闪, 陆锋. 全球液化石油气运输网络贸易社区特征及其演化分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(11): 2687-2695.
[6]	杨喆, 吴健. 中国自然保护区的保护成本及其区域分布[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4): 839-852.
[7]	何思源, 苏杨, 王蕾, 程红光. 国家公园游憩功能的实现——武夷山国家公园试点区游客生态系统服务需求和支付意愿[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(1): 40-53.
[8]	曹飞, 邵景安, 马雪莹, 李春梅, 杜建平, 蒋佳佳, 强丹阳. 三峡库区社区水平乡村路网对森林景观变化的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1363-1375.
[9]	李霞, 杜世勋, 桑满杰, 郭新亚. 山西省自然保护区生态系统格局及稳定性变化趋势研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(2): 208-218.
[10]	马雪莹, 邵景安, 徐新良. 乡村路网对三峡库区社区水平森林结构的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(9): 1482-1494.
[11]	张彪, 史芸婷, 李庆旭, 谢高地. 北京湿地生态系统重要服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1311-1324.
[12]	王璐, 邵景安, 郭跃, 徐新良. 社区水平森林景观格局的动态变化与未来情景模拟[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(4): 568-581.
[13]	石春娜, 姚顺波, 陈晓楠, 薛彩霞, 龚直文. 基于选择实验法的城市生态系统服务价值评估——以四川温江为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 767-778.
[14]	张华兵, 刘红玉, 侯明行, 李玉凤. 海滨湿地景观过程模型与模拟研究——以江苏盐城保护区核心区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(7): 1105-1115.
[15]	肖建红, 于庆东, 张运磊, 刘娟, 管建世. 基于CVM的旅游相关资源价值评估总体范围扩展方法研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(9): 1623-1636.