基于DEA模型的安徽省城市旅游效率研究

doi:10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.02.013

自然资源学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 313-323.doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.02.013

基于DEA模型的安徽省城市旅游效率研究

邓洪波^1,2, 陆林^1,2

1. 安徽师范大学国土资源与旅游学院, 安徽芜湖241003;
2. 安徽师范大学旅游发展与规划研究中心, 安徽芜湖241003

收稿日期:2012-12-21 修回日期:2013-05-03 出版日期:2014-02-20 发布日期:2014-02-18
通讯作者: 陆林（1962-），男，安徽芜湖人，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事人文地理教学与科研工作。E-mail：llin@263.net E-mail:llin@263.net
作者简介:邓洪波（1987-），男，安徽太和人，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为旅游地理和旅游规划。E-mail：asdhongbo@126.com
基金资助:
安徽省社会科学规划重点委托项目（AHSKW2010D01）。

The Urban Tourism Efficiencies of Cities in Anhui Province Based on DEA Model

DENG Hong-bo^1,2, LU Lin^1,2

Center for Tourism and Planning Research, College of Territorial Resources and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, China

Received:2012-12-21 Revised:2013-05-03 Online:2014-02-20 Published:2014-02-18
About author:2

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用数据包络分析方法（Data Envelopment Analysis，DEA），测度2005 年和2010 年安徽省17 个城市旅游资源利用的综合效率、技术效率和规模效率，利用Malmquist 生产率指数模型计算2005 年至2010 年安徽省各个城市的旅游效率变动情况；分析2010 年安徽省城市旅游效率的空间分异特征，总体上呈南北高中间低、东西分化的分布，采用变异系数（CV）分析城市旅游综合效率地域分异成因，城市旅游规模效率变异系数（0.266）小于旅游技术效率的变异系数（0.342），城市旅游技术效率是制约安徽省城市旅游综合效率的主要因素；综合旅游资源、城市规模、经济基础、交通条件和接待能力等因素，分析皖北、皖中和皖南三大地区城市旅游效率差异原因；最后，根据DEA模型的投入优化目标值，探讨提高各城市旅游效率的对策措施。

关键词: 安徽省, 城市旅游效率, DEA模型, 效率评价, Malmquist生产率指数

Abstract:

Improving the efficiency of urban tourism is an important way of tourism development in Anhui Province. This paper adopts DEA model to measure the CRS technical efficiency, pure technical and scale efficiency of urban tourism utilization of 17 cities in Anhui in the year of 2005 and 2010, Malmquist productivity index calculation contrast of variation trend of urban tourism efficiency of these cities in Anhui from 2005 to 2010, under the framework of economic production factors analysis. Then, this paper analyzes the regional differentiation of the CRS technical efficiency, pure technical and scale efficiency of urban tourism utilization in Anhui. The causes for urban tourism efficiency differentiation in Anhui are analyzed with coefficient of variation (CV). The reasons for city travel efficiency differences are analyzed with tourism resources, city size, economic base, traffic conditions, reception capacity and other factors in northern Anhui, central Anhui and southern Anhui. Finally, target values of input obtained through DEA model are used to discuss the strategies for improving urban tourism efficiency of each city. The results show that, the input and output efficiency of urban tourism resources has a room for improvement and the productivity change index is consistent with the technological advance index in Anhui, the spatial distribution of urban tourism efficiency in Anhui is characterized by high-value in the south and north and low-value in the middle, as well as west-east differentiation. It is pure technical urban tourism efficiency that mainly determines the CRS technical efficiency as well as its spatial patterns in Anhui. Input redundancy is relatively ubiquity in Anhui, and regional urban tourism efficiency could be improved by the approach of optimizing investment environment, advancing industrial structure adjustment, highlighting the unique feature of industrial development, raising the quality of human resources or increasing the concentration degree of industrial development, and so on.

Key words: efficiency evaluation, urban tourism efficiency, Anhui, Malmquist productivity index, DEA model

中图分类号:

F592.99

邓洪波, 陆林. 基于DEA模型的安徽省城市旅游效率研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(2): 313-323.

DENG Hong-bo, LU Lin. The Urban Tourism Efficiencies of Cities in Anhui Province Based on DEA Model[J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES, 2014, 29(2): 313-323.

参考文献

[1] Baker M, Riley M. New perspectives on productivity in hotels: Some advances and new directions[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 1994, 13(4): 97-311.
[2] Morey R C, Dittman D A. Evaluating a hotel GM's performance: A case study in Benchmarking[J]. Cornell Hotel Restaurant and Administration Quarterly, 1995, 36(5): 30-35.
[3] Anderson R I, Fish M, Xia Y, et al. Measuring efficiency in the hotel industry: A stochastic frontier approach[J]. Hospitality Management, 1999, 18(1): 45-57.
[4] Reynolds D. Hospitality-productivity assessment using data envelopment analysis[J]. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 2003, 44(2): 130-137.
[5] Hwang S, Chang T. Using data envelopment analysis to measure hotel managerial efficiency change in Taiwan[J]. Tourism Management, 2003, 24(1): 357-369.
[6] Wang F C, Huang W T, Shang J K. Measuring pure managerial efficiency of international tourist hotels in Taiwan[J]. The Service Industries Journal, 2006, 26(1): 59-71.
[7] 郑敏玉. 国际观光旅馆服务质量与经营绩效之研究——以台北地区国际观光旅馆为例[D]. 台湾: 铭传大学, 2000.
[8] 陈浩. 基于DEA的浙江星级酒店效率评价[J]. 江苏商论, 2005, 12(8): 76-77.
[9] 彭建军, 陈浩. 基于DEA的星级酒店效率研究——以北京、上海、广东相对效率分析为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2004, 19 (2): 59-63.
[10] 黄丽英. 基于DEA方法的我国高星级酒店效率研究[D]. 广州: 中山大学, 2005.
[11] Barros C P. Measuring efficiency in the hotel sector[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2005, 32(2): 456-477.
[12] Kgksal C, Aksu A. An Efficiency evaluation of A-group travel agencies with data envelopment analysis (DEA): A case study in the Antalya region, Turkey[J]. Tourism Management, 2007, 28(3): 830-834.
[14] 田喜洲, 王渤. 旅游市场效率及其博弈分析——以旅行社产品为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2003, 18(6): 57-60.
[15] Charles K N, Paul S. Competition, privatization and productive efficiency: evidence from the airline industry[J]. The Economic Journal, 2001, 111(473): 591-619.
[16] Sarkis J, Talluri S. Performance based clustering for benchmarking of US airports[J]. Transportation Research: Part A, 2004, 38(5): 329-346.
[17] Anderson R I, Lewis D, Parker M E. Another look at the efficiency of corporate travel management departments[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 1999, 37(3): 267-272.
[18] 刘静卜. 基于DEA 的中国民航运营效率分析及评价[J]. 武汉理工大学学报: 信息与管理工程版, 2011, 33(3): 483-487.
[19] Lee C K, Han S H. Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks' tourism resources using a contingent valuation method[J]. Tourism Management, 2002, 23(5): 531-540.
[20] Preda P, Watts T. Improving the efficiency of sporting venues through capacity management: The case of the Sydney (Australia) cricket ground trust[J]. Event Management, 2003, 8(2): 83-89.
[21] 李艳双, 韩文秀, 曾真香, 等. DEA 模型在旅游城市可持续发展能力评价中的应用[J]. 河北工业大学学报, 2001, 30(5): 62-66.
[22] Ma Xiao-long, Chris Ryan, Bao Ji-gang. Chinese national parks: Differences, resource use and tourism product portfolios[J]. Tourism Management, 2009, 30(1): 21-30.
[23] 马晓龙, 保继刚. 基于DEA的中国国家级风景名胜区使用效率评价[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 838-848.
[24] 马晓龙, 保继刚. 中国主要城市旅游效率的区域差异与空间格局[J]. 人文地理, 2010, 25(1): 105-110.
[25] 马晓龙. 基于绩效差异的中国主要城市旅游发展阶段演化[J]. 旅游学刊, 2009, 24(6): 25-30.
[26] 顾江, 胡静. 中国分省区旅游生产效率模型创建与评价[J]. 同济大学学报: 社会科学版, 2008, 19(4): 93-98.
[27] 左冰, 保继刚. 1992—2005 年中国旅游业全要素生产率及省际差异[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(4): 417-427.
[28] 陶卓民, 薛献伟, 管晶晶. 基于数据包络分析的中国旅游业发展效率特征[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(8): 1004-1012.
[29] Wong D W S, Lee J. ArcView GIS 与ArcGIS 地理信息统计分析[M]. 张学良, 译. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2008: 171-197.
[30] 萨缪尔森·保罗·A, 诺德豪斯·威廉·D. 经济学[M]. 高鸿业, 译. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 1991: 41.
[31] Barros C P, Matias A. Assessing the efficiency of travel agencies with a stochastic cost frontier: A Portuguese case study[J]. International Journal of Tourism Rescarch, 2006, 8(5): 367-379.
[32] Tsaur S H, Chiang C I, Chang T Y. Evaluating the operating efficiency of international tourism hotels using the modified EDA model[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 1999, 14(1): 73-78.
[33] Anderson R I, Fok R, Scott J. Hotel industry efficiency: An advanced linear programming examination[J]. American Business Review, 2000, 18(1): 40-48.
[34] 马晓龙. 城市旅游竞争力: 基于58 个中国主要旅游城市的比较研究[M]. 天津: 南开大学出版社, 2008: 144-146.

基于DEA模型的安徽省城市旅游效率研究

The Urban Tourism Efficiencies of Cities in Anhui Province Based on DEA Model

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	邓光耀, 张忠杰. 基于网络SBM-DEA模型和GML指数的中国各省工业用水效率研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(7): 1457-1470.
[2]	汪左, 王芳, 张运. 基于CWSI的安徽省干旱时空特征及影响因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(5): 853-866.
[3]	吴成国, 白露, 白夏, 金菊良, 蒋尚明. 基于自助法与云模型的区域旱灾风险评估及区划研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(4): 684-695.
[4]	刘永婷, 徐光来, 尹周祥, 胡晨琦, 王原, 廖富强. 全球变化背景下安徽近55 a气温时空变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(4): 680-691.
[5]	孙才志, 姜坤, 赵良仕. 中国水资源绿色效率测度及空间格局研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(12): 1999-2011.
[6]	潘争伟，金菊良，刘晓薇，周戎星. 水资源利用系统脆弱性机理分析与评价方法研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(9): 1599-1609.
[7]	张乐勤. 基于组合模型的安徽省城镇化演进对碳排放影响极限研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(1): 152-163.
[8]	孙贤斌. 安徽省会经济圈土地利用变化的碳排放效益[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(3): 394-401.
[9]	秦钟,王建武,章家恩,骆世明,徐华勤,赵本良. 广东省农业循环经济发展的DEA分析与有效性评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(6): 904-913.
[10]	何彬方, 冯妍, 荀尚培, 唐为安. 安徽省50年日照时数的变化特征及影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(7): 1275-1285.
[11]	王国强, 李瑛霞, 吴道祥, 葛晓光, 刘洋, 叶朝汉. 安徽省地下水水资源特征与水环境问题[J]. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2): 234-239.