EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2026 , Vol. 41 >Issue 6: 1874 - 1892

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20260614

其他研究论文

“双碳”目标下复合型治理的系统集成与路径创新

  • 刘福临 , 1 ,
  • 任大鹏 , 1, 2
展开
  • 1.中国农业大学人文与发展学院， 北京 100193
  • 2.中国农业大学农业与农村法制研究中心， 北京 100193
任大鹏（1963- ），男，山西运城人，教授，博士生导师，研究方向为农村法治、土地问题。E-mail:

刘福临（1993- ），男，辽宁丹东人，博士研究生，研究方向为区域发展与管理、环境治理。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2025-07-28

  修回日期: 2025-12-30

  网络出版日期: 2026-04-23

基金资助

2021年度法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目(21SFB2029)

收起

System integration and path innovation of compound governance under the "dual carbon" goals

  • LIU Fu-lin , 1 ,
  • REN Da-peng , 1, 2
Expand
  • 1. College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • 2. Center for Agricultural and Rural Legal Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received date: 2025-07-28

  Revised date: 2025-12-30

  Online published: 2026-04-23

Fold

摘要

以广东省江门市为研究案例，分析“双碳”目标下多维度治理资源的整合机制与实践逻辑，探索复合型治理的逻辑与实践路径。研究发现：江门市通过“政策协同—市场激活—技术赋能”的路径，构建了多层次治理体系：（1）以制度复合性突破部门壁垒，通过跨层级政策整合锚定低碳目标，依托动态责任分解与绩效评估形成闭环管理；（2）以工具复合性驱动资源整合，创新市场激励机制，激活企业低碳转型与社会参与动力；（3）以技术复合性强化系统协同，搭建数字化监管平台推动政企社数据共享，实现碳排放精准监测与动态反馈。研究表明，复合型治理通过制度韧性、工具适配与技术嵌入的协同增效，最终实现环境效益与经济社会发展的互嵌式提升；复合型治理需从实践效能、韧性调适、价值融合等方面进行完善，为实现“双碳”目标提供理论与实践范式。

关键词： “双碳”目标; 复合型治理; 治理系统; 路径创新

本文引用格式

刘福临 , 任大鹏 . “双碳”目标下复合型治理的系统集成与路径创新[J]. 自然资源学报, 2026 , 41(6) : 1874 -1892 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20260614

Abstract

Taking Jiangmen city in Guangdong province as a case study, this research examines the integration mechanism and practical logic of multi-dimensional governance resources under the "dual carbon" goals, while exploring the logic and practical paths of compound governance. The study finds that Jiangmen has constructed a multi-level governance system through the path of "policy coordination—market activation—technology empowerment": (1) Breaking through departmental barriers via institutional complexity, anchoring low-carbon targets through cross-level policy integration, and forming closed-loop management based on dynamic responsibility decomposition and performance evaluation. (2) Driving resource integration through tool complexity, innovating market incentive mechanisms, and activating motivations for enterprise low-carbon transformation and social participation. (3) Strengthening system coordination via technological complexity, establishing a digital supervision platform to promote data sharing among government, enterprises, and society, thereby achieving precise monitoring and dynamic feedback of carbon emissions. The study indicates that compound governance achieves synergistic enhancement through institutional resilience, tool adaptation, and technology embedding, ultimately realizing the embedded mutual promotion of environmental benefits and socio-economic development. Furthermore, the study suggests that compound governance should be refined in aspects such as practical efficacy, resilience adjustment, and value integration, providing theoretical and practical paradigms for achieving the "dual carbon" goals.

Key words： "dual carbon" goals; compound governance; governance systems; pathway innovation

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
KOOIMAN J. Governing as Governance. California: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2003.

[2]
ANSELL C A. Gash. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008, 18(4): 543-571.

DOI

[3]
OSTROM E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(4): 550-557.

DOI

[4]
DELMAS M A, YOUNG O R. Governance for the Environment:New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[5]
BULKELEY H, CASTAN B V, EDWARDS G A S. An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-technical Transitions. Routledge, 2014.

[6]
ÖRJAN B. Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 2017, 357(6352): eaan1114, Doi: 10.1126/science.aan1114.

[7]
欧阳康. “双碳”目标、绿色发展与国家治理: “双碳”战略及其实施路径的若干前提性问题. 华中科技大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022, 36(5): 24-30.

[OUYANG K. "Dual Carbon" goals, green development, and national governance: Some prerequisite issues regarding the "Dual Carbon" strategy and its implementation path. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Social Science Edition, 2022, 36(5): 24-30.]

[8]
周黎安. 行政发包制. 社会, 2014, 34(6): 1-38.

[ZHOU L A. Administrative subcontract. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2014, 34(6): 1-38.]

[9]
何建坤. 碳达峰碳中和目标导向下能源和经济的低碳转型. 环境经济研究, 2021, 6(1): 1-9.

[HE J K. Low carbon transformation of energy and economy aiming for the peaking of carbon emission and carbon neutrality. Journal of Environmental Economics, 2021, 6(1): 1-9.]

[10]
崔晶. 调适与弥合: 基层“缝隙治理”中的政策执行研究. 理论与改革, 2024, (1): 139-151, 167.

[CUI J. Adaptation and bridging: Policy implementation in "gap governance" at the community level. Theory and Reform, 2024, (1): 139-151, 167.]

[11]
王亚华, 陈相凝. 河长制实施进展的评价与展望. 中国水利, 2021, (23): 21-24, 27.

[WANG Y H, CHEN X N. Evaluation and prospects for the implementation progress of river chief system. China Water Resources, 2021, (23): 21-24, 27.]

[12]
张萍, 农麟, 韩静宇. 迈向复合型环境治理: 我国环境政策的演变、发展与转型分析. 中国地质大学学报: 社会科学版, 2017, 17(6): 105-116.

[ZHANG P, NONG L, HAN J Y. An analysis of the evolving and transformation of Chinese environmental protection policy. Journal of China University of Geosciences: Social Sciences Edition, 2017, 17(6): 105-116.]

[13]
洪大用. 复合型环境治理的中国道路. 中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报, 2016, 20(3): 67-73.

[HONG D Y. China's approach of complex environmental governance. Journal of the Party School of the Central Committee of the C.P.C.(Chinese Academy of Governance), 2016, 20(3): 67-73.]

[14]
岳梦婷, 刘军, 黄丽. 中国区域生态文明发展水平时空演变及影响因素: 基于绿色技术创新视角. 生态经济, 2021, 37(9): 208-215.

[YUE M T, LIU J, HUANG L. Spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factors of eco-civilization development in China: From the green technology innovation perspective. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(9): 208-215.]

[15]
陈振明, 张树全. 技术与制度互构关系转换及其对公共治理的影响. 公共管理学报, 2023, 20(4): 1-12, 168.

[CHEN Z M, ZHANG S Q. Transformation of technology-institution inter-construction and its effect on public governance. Journal of Public Management, 2023, 20(4): 1-12, 168.]

[16]
贺东航, 孔繁斌. 中国公共政策执行中的政治势能: 基于近20年农村林改政策的分析. 中国社会科学, 2019, (4): 4-25, 204.

[HE D H, KONG F B. Political potential energy in the implementation of Chinese public policy: An analysis based on the forestry reform policy of the last two decades. Social Sciences in China, 2019, (4): 4-25, 204.]

[17]
刘瀚斌. 长三角生态绿色一体化展新颜. 光明日报, https://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2019-10/19/nw.D110000gmrb_20191019_3-11.htm, 2019-10-19(11).

[LIU H B. A new look for the Yangtze River Delta's ecological and green integration. Guangming Daily, https://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/2019-10/19/nw.D110000gmrb_20191019_3-11.htm, 2019-10-19(11).]

[18]
JESSOP B. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 1998, 50(155): 29-45.

DOI

[19]
中国信息通信研究院. 携手区块链技术, 踏上可信“双碳”之路, https://www.fisco.org.cn/class_33/789.html, 2023-10-23.

[China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. Joining hands with blockchain technology to embark on a trusted path toward "Dual-Carbon" goals, https://www.fisco.org.cn/class_33/789.html, 2023-10-23.]

[20]
杭州市人民政府. 2025年杭州市环境质量报告发布, https://www.hangzhou.gov.cn/art/2025/4/1/art_812262_59111132.html, 2025-04-01.

[Hangzhou Municipal People's Government. 2025 Hangzhou environmental quality report released, https://www.hangzhou.gov.cn/art/2025/4/1/art_812262_59111132.html, 2025-04-01.]

[21]
能源基金会(EF China). 中国碳普惠发展与实践案例研究报告, https://www.efchina.org/Reports-zh/report-comms-20230227-zh, 2023-02-27.

[Energy Foundation. Research report on the development and practical cases of China's carbon inclusion, https://www.efchina.org/Reports-zh/report-comms-20230227-zh, 2023-02-27.]

[22]
胡晓玲, 崔莹. 碳普惠机制发展现状及完善建议. 中央财经大学绿色金融国际研究院, https://iigf.cufe.edu.cn/info/1012/6838.htm, 2023-05-09.

[HU X L, CUI Y. The current development of the carbon inclusion mechanism and suggestions for its improvement. International Institute of Green Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics, https://iigf.cufe.edu.cn/info/1012/6838.htm, 2023-05-09.]

[23]
吴明华, 何晓贝. 北京大学: 气候政策与绿色金融(季报), https://mgflab.nsd.pku.edu.cn/yjcg/cbw/index.htm, 2025-02-21.

[WU M H, HE X B. Peking University: Climate policy and green finance (quarterly report), https://mgflab.nsd.pku.edu.cn/yjcg/cbw/index.htm, 2025-02-21.]

[24]
刘智勇. 从协同治理走向合作治理: 环境群体性事件治理模式的选择. 上海行政学院学报, 2023, 24(3): 33-40.

[LIU Z Y. From collaborative governance to cooperative governance: The governance approach of environmental mass incidents. The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 2023, 24(3): 33-40.]

[25]
张锐. 碳中和背景下的全球能源治理: 范式转换、议题革新与合作阻碍. 学术论坛, 2022, 45(2): 16-27.

[ZHANG R. Global energy governance in the context of carbon neutrality: Paradigm shift, topic innovation and obstacles to cooperation. Academic Forum, 2022, 45(2): 16-27.]

[26]
顾向一, 祁毓. 迈向合作治理: 我国碳排放权交易治理体系的重构. 江苏社会科学, 2023, (5): 163-172, 243-244.

[GU X Y, QI Y. Moving towards collaborative governance: Restructuring China's carbon emissions trading governance system. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2023, (5): 163-172, 243-244.]

[27]
肖义, 孔庆申. 资源型城市可持续发展政策对碳排放效率的影响. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(3): 833-854.

DOI

[XIAO Y, KONG Q S. The influence of sustainable development policy of resource-based cities on carbon emission efficiency. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(3): 833-854.]

DOI

[28]
OSTROM E. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2010, 2(2): 1-12.

[29]
孙岩, 张备. 协作治理目标演化的微观过程: 基于两个中央环保督察典型案例的比较. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2023, 33(12): 120-133.

[SUN Y, ZHANG B. Microscopic process of the evolution of the goals of collaborative governance: A comparative case study. China Population Resources and Environment, 2023, 33(12): 120-133.]

[30]
ZHU J M, XUE L. Low-carbon innovation induced by emissions trading in China. Nature Communications, 2019, (9): Article4088, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12213-6.

[31]
HOLLAND J H. Emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998: 123-225.

[32]
DAGNINO G B, LEVANTI G, MOCCIARO LI DESTRI A. Structural dynamics and intentional governance in strategic interorganizational network evolution: A multilevel approach. Organization Studies, 2016, 37(3): 349-373.

DOI

[33]
马克数据网. 马克集数: 中国城市CO2排放数据(2000—2023). https://s.macrodatas.cn/jqsj/detail/id=36, 2024-12-23.

[Mark Data. CO2 emissions data of Chinese cities (2000-2023). https://s.macrodatas.cn/jqsj/detail/id=36, 2024-12-23.]

[34]
江门市人民政府. 江门市生态环境保护“十四五”规划. http://www.jiangmen.gov.cn, 2022-03-01.

[Jiangmen Municipal People's Government. The 14th Five-Year Plan for ecological and environmental protection of Jiangmen city. http://www.jiangmen.gov.cn, 2022-03-01.]

[35]
江门市统计局. 2022年江门市国民经济和社会发展统计公报. http://www.jiangmen.gov.cn, 2023-05-06.

[Jiangmen Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Bulletin on the National Economic and Social Development of Jiangmen City in 2022. http://www.jiangmen.gov.cn, 2023-05-06.

[36]
刘明明. “双碳”目标下可再生能源发展规划实施的用地困境及其纾解. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2022, 32(12): 21-30.

[LIU M M. Land use dilemmas of implementing renewable energy development plans under the 'dual carbon' goals and their countermeasures. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2022, 32(12): 21-30.]

[37]
NORTH D C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

[38]
江门市统计局. 2023年江门市统计年鉴. http://www.jiangmen.gov.cn, 2023-12-06.

[Jiangmen Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Jiangmen Statistical Yearbook 2023. http://www.jiangmen.gov.cn, 2023-12-06.]

[39]
王玉燕, 林飞, 申亮. 低碳合作供应链的内部合作协调与外部补贴激励机制设计. 经济研究, 2024, (6): 164-183.

[WANG Y Y, LIN F, SHEN L. Internal cooperation coordination and external subsidy mechanisms in low-carbon cooperative supply chains. Economic Research Journal, 2024, (6): 164-183.]

[40]
王智睿. 组织如何选择协作方式? 来自“双碳”目标实施的纵向案例考察. 公共管理学报, 2024, 21(2): 91-101, 173, 174.

[WANG Z R. How do organizations choose to collaborate? A longitudinal case study from the goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Journal of Public Management, 2024, 21(2): 91-101, 173, 174.]

[41]
锁利铭, 冷雪忠. 中国区域环境协同治理的“适应性嵌套”逻辑: 基于社会生态系统框架的分析. 理论与改革, 2024, (5): 109-128.

[SUO L M, LENG X Z. The logic of "adaptive nesting" in China's regional environmental co-governance: An analysis based on the framework of social-ecological system. Theory and Reform, 2024, (5): 109-128.]

[42]
田淑英, 郭浩. 不同环境规制工具对碳排放绩效的影响与作用机制. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(3): 812-832.

DOI

[TIAN S Y, GUO H. The impact and mechanism of different environmental regulation tools on carbon emission performance. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(3): 812-832.]

DOI

[43]
WILLIAMSON O E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.

[44]
王心怡, 孟天广. 知识政治学: 国家治理中的知识生产与调用. 探索与争鸣, 2024, (2): 6-24, 177.

[WANG X Y, MENG T G. Politics of knowledge: Knowledge production and utilization in national governance. Exploration and Free Views, 2024, (2): 6-24, 177.]

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉