专家访谈

生态文明语境下自然研学的创新发展:理论认知与实践体系

  • 王学基 , 1 ,
  • 侯国林 2 ,
  • 张建忠 3 ,
  • 赵多平 , 4 ,
  • 王磊 5 ,
  • 高鑫 6 ,
  • 孙佼佼 7 ,
  • 袁振杰 8 ,
  • 张海洲 9 ,
  • 何小东 10 ,
  • 王勇 11 ,
  • 王金伟 12 ,
  • 王心蕊 13
展开
  • 1.宁波大学昂热大学联合学院, 宁波 315211
  • 2.南京师范大学地理科学学院, 南京 210023
  • 3.山西财经大学文化旅游产业技术创新研究院, 太原 030006
  • 4.宁夏大学地理科学与规划学院, 银川 750021
  • 5.宁夏大学前沿交叉学院, 中卫 755000
  • 6.重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院, 重庆 401331
  • 7.上海师范大学旅游学院, 上海 200234
  • 8.广州大学地理科学与遥感学院, 广州 510006
  • 9.华南理工大学旅游管理系, 广州 510006
  • 10.成都大学旅游与文化产业学院, 成都 610044
  • 11.西南大学地理科学学院, 重庆 400715
  • 12.北京第二外国语学院旅游科学学院, 北京 100024
  • 13.中山大学旅游学院, 珠海 519082
赵多平(1978- ),男,内蒙古鄂尔多斯人,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为旅游地理、社会文化地理及自然研学。E-mail: 。其他作者为共同第二作者

王学基(1990- ),男,山东泰安人,博士,特聘研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为旅游地理、旅游流动性与社会发展。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2025-08-18

  修回日期: 2025-10-17

  网络出版日期: 2026-04-23

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42471261)

宁夏自治区重点研发项目(2023BEG02068)

Innovative development of nature-based study tours in the context of ecological civilization: Theoretical cognition and practical system

  • WANG Xue-ji , 1 ,
  • HOU Guo-lin 2 ,
  • ZHANG Jian-zhong 3 ,
  • ZHAO Duo-ping , 4 ,
  • WANG Lei 5 ,
  • GAO Xin 6 ,
  • SUN Jiao-jiao 7 ,
  • YUAN Zhen-jie 8 ,
  • ZHANG Hai-zhou 9 ,
  • HE Xiao-dong 10 ,
  • WANG Yong 11 ,
  • WANG Jin-wei 12 ,
  • WANG Xin-rui 13
Expand
  • 1. Joint Institute of Ningbo University and the University of Angers, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China
  • 2. School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • 3. Institute for Culture and Tourism Industry Technology Innovation, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • 4. School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
  • 5. School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Ningxia University, Zhongwei 755000, Ningxia, China
  • 6. College of Geography and Tourism, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China
  • 7. College of Tourism, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
  • 8. School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • 9. Department of Tourism Management, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • 10. School of Tourism and Cultural Industry, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610044, China
  • 11. School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
  • 12. School of Tourism Sciences, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing 100024, China
  • 13. School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, China

Received date: 2025-08-18

  Revised date: 2025-10-17

  Online published: 2026-04-23

摘要

在新时代生态文明建设的战略背景下,自然研学作为教育与旅游深度融合的重要创新形态,正逐步发展为以自然场景为认知基础、以生态价值为育人内核、以公共资源为制度支撑的系统性教育实践,其创新路径对推动生态文明战略与教育现代化的协同发展具有重要意义。为深化自然研学的理论认知与实践体系建设,特邀请相关领域专家开展跨学科访谈,围绕自然研学的理论内涵与知识体系、行业自律与治理体系、产品创新与数字化响应、知识传播与国际经验等多元议题进行深入探讨。访谈表明:(1)作为连接人与自然、培育生态文明践行者的新型教育实践,自然研学的创新发展亟需构建以“人与自然共生”为核心特征的新范式,形成扎根中国大地的知识体系,并通过与国家公园和自然保护地的深度协同,实现生态价值转化与教育实践的双赢。(2)面对快速扩张带来的结构性挑战,应建立跨部门、多主体的协同治理机制,健全准入认证、课程评价、行业标准、人才培养与技术赋能等制度安排,全面提升自然研学的规范化与专业化水平。(3)应依托多学科融合与跨界协作,打造兼具教育价值与适配弹性的复合型研学产品体系,在“知识构建—场域组织—主体激活”的交互机制中实现“教”与“游”的深度融合;而数字化技术在自然研学中则应当发挥资源延展与学习互动的增效作用,同时需警惕“虚拟自然”替代真实体验的风险。(4)自然研学的知识传播应立足在地资源与文化、整合多元主体、构建复合媒体矩阵,并借助数智化手段实现科学性与通俗性兼备的公众动员体系,同时通过国际经验与本土生态文明建设实践与资源的有效互动,开展跨国生态合作,形成具有全球推广潜力的“中国方案”。自然研学作为连接教育、自然与社会系统的重要纽带,未来应以跨学科、跨行业、跨尺度的协同创新为导向,完善其学术体系与实践路径,成为推动中国式现代化进程中“人与自然和谐共生”的教育引擎与重要实践场域。

本文引用格式

王学基 , 侯国林 , 张建忠 , 赵多平 , 王磊 , 高鑫 , 孙佼佼 , 袁振杰 , 张海洲 , 何小东 , 王勇 , 王金伟 , 王心蕊 . 生态文明语境下自然研学的创新发展:理论认知与实践体系[J]. 自然资源学报, 2026 , 41(6) : 1637 -1661 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20260601

Abstract

Against the strategic backdrop of ecological civilization construction in the New Era, nature-based study tours, an important innovative form integrating education and tourism, are evolving into a systemic educational practice grounded in natural settings as the cognitive foundation, ecological values as the core of cultivation, and public resources as institutional support. This developmental trajectory holds significant implications for promoting the synergistic advancement of the ecological civilization agenda and the modernization of education. To deepen theoretical understanding and advance the construction of a practical system for nature-based study tours, this research invited experts from relevant fields to engage in cross-disciplinary interviews, focusing on diverse topics such as theoretical connotations and knowledge systems, industry self-regulation and governance frameworks, product innovation and digital responses, knowledge dissemination, and international experience. The discussions indicate that: (1) As a new educational model that connects humans and nature and cultivates practitioners of ecological civilization, the innovative development of nature-based study tours urgently requires the establishment of a new paradigm centered on "harmonious coexistence between humans and nature", the formation of a knowledge system rooted in the Chinese context, and deep coordination with national parks and nature reserves to achieve a win-win outcome between ecological value transformation and educational practice. (2) In response to structural challenges arising from rapid expansion, it is necessary to establish cross-sector, multi-actor collaborative governance mechanisms, and to improve institutional arrangements for entry accreditation, curriculum evaluation, industry standards, talent cultivation, and technological empowerment, thereby enhancing the standardization and professionalization of the sector. (3) A composite study tour product system that balances educational value with adaptive flexibility should be developed by means of multidisciplinary integration and cross-sector collaboration, so as to achieve a deep integration of "teaching" and "touring" through the interactive mechanism of "knowledge construction - site organization - participant activation". Digital technologies should play a part in extending resources and enhancing learning interactions, while caution must be exercised to prevent "virtual nature" from replacing authentic experiences. (4) Knowledge dissemination in nature-based study tours should be grounded in local resources and culture, integrate multiple stakeholders, construct a composite media matrix, and employ intelligent digital tools to build a public engagement system that balances scientific rigor with accessibility. Moreover, through effective interaction between international experience and the practices and resources of China's ecological civilization construction, cross-national ecological cooperation should be pursued to develop a "Chinese solution" with global applicability. As a vital nexus linking education, nature, and society, nature-based study tours should, in the future, be oriented toward cross-disciplinary, cross-industry, and cross-scalar collaborative innovation, improving their academic system and practical pathways to become an educational engine and key practice arena for promoting "harmonious coexistence between humans and nature" in the process of Chinese modernization.

[1]
施美彬, 李姣姣, 黄伟. 指向生态文明教育的跨学科自然研学: 广东省初中地理教师认知现状、困惑与对策研究. 地理教学, 2024, (24): 13-16.

[SHI M B, LI J J, HUANG W. Cross-disciplinary nature study for ecological civilization education: A study on the cognitive status, confusion, and strategies of Guangdong junior high school geography teachers. Geography Teaching, 2024, (24): 13-16.]

[2]
理查德·洛夫. 林间最后的小孩:让我们的孩子远离自然缺失症. 美同, 海狸, 译. 北京: 北京联合出版公司, 2022.

[LOUV R. Last Child in the Woods:Saving Our Children from Nature-deficit Disorder. Translated by MEIT, HAIL. Beijing: Beijing United Publishing Company, 2022.]

[3]
王金阳, 刘济良. 超越工具理性: 教育现代化的生命困境省思. 中国人民大学教育学刊, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.5978.G4.20250826.0927.002.

[WANG J Y, LIU J L. Transcending instrumental rationality: Reflections on the life dilemmas of educational modernization. Renmin University of China Education Journal, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.5978.G4.20250826.0927.002.]

[4]
杨继荣, 张朝枝. 研学旅游的知识与社区居民的地方认同重构: 以广东丹霞山自然保护地为例. 热带地理, 2024, 44(3): 393-402.

DOI

[YANG J R, ZHANG C Z. Knowledge of study tourism and reconstruction of community residents' place identity: A case study of Danxia Mountain Nature Protected Area, Guangdong. Tropical Geography, 2024, 44(3): 393-402.]

DOI

[5]
李星明, 雷雯, 陈芷涵, 等. 基于水土之美的生态文明研学旅行开发研究: 以武汉市蔡甸西湖流域水土保持科技示范园为例. 华中师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 54(4): 624-631, 669.

[LI X M, LEI W, CHEN Z H, et al. Research on the development of ecological civilization study travel based on the beauty of water and soil: A case of water and soil conservation technology demonstration park in Xihu Lake of Caidian district of Wuhan. Journal of Central China Normal University: Natural Sciences, 2020, 54(4): 624-631, 669.]

[6]
李先跃, 张丽萍. 全域研学的理论基础、发展理念与实践研究. 经济地理, 2022, 42(8): 232-239.

DOI

[LI X Y, ZHANG L P. Theoretical basis, development concept and practice of holistic study tour. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(8): 232-239.]

[7]
花菲菲, 白凯, 胡宪洋. 青少年研学群体的自然关联性建构研究: 以陕西翠华山国家地质公园为例. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(11): 162-171.

[HUA F F, BAI K, HU X Y. Construction of connectedness with nature in Chinese adolescent study group: A case study of Shaanxi Cuihua Mountain National Geological Park. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(11): 162-171.]

[8]
马波. 中国旅游发展笔谈: 研学旅游理论发育. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(9): 1.

[MA B. Discussion forum of China tourism development: Theoretical growing on educational tour. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(9): 1.]

[9]
陈东军, 谢红彬. 我国研学旅游发展与研究进展. 世界地理研究, 2020, 29(3): 598-607.

DOI

[CHEN D J, XIE H B. Development and research progress of study travel in China. World Regional Studies, 2020, 29(3): 598-607.]

DOI

[10]
蔡克信, 贺海, 郭凌. 自然联结: 自然研学旅游体验研究. 四川师范大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022, 49(4): 97-106.

[CAI K X, HE H, GUO L. Connectedness to nature: A research on tourist experiences of study tours to nature. Journal of Sichuan Normal University: Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 49(4): 97-106.]

[11]
温士贤, 廖健豪. 研学旅行中的生态文明与动物伦理教育. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(11): 11-13.

[WEN S X, LIAO J H. Ecological civilization and animal ethics education in research travel. Tourism Tribune, 2022, 37(11): 11-13.]

[12]
袁振杰, 谢宇琳, 何兆聪. 主体、 知识和地方: 一个研学旅行研究的探索性理论框架. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(11): 14-26.

[YUAN Z J, XIE Y L, HE Z C. Subject, knowledge, and place: An exploratory theoretical framework of study tour. Tourism Tribune, 2022, 37(11): 14-26.]

[13]
袁振杰, 谢慧宇, 陈佳银, 等. 场域视角下自然教育营地的地方建构与多主体互动. 旅游学刊, 2026, 41(2): 79-95.

[YUAN Z J, XIE H Y, CHEN J Y, et al. Processes of place construction and multi-actor interaction mechanisms of nature education camp from the field perspective. Tourism Tribune, 2026, 41(2): 79-95.]

[14]
陈晓亮, 蔡晓梅, 朱竑. 基于“地方场域”视角的中国旅游研究反思. 地理研究, 2019, 38(11): 2578-2594.

DOI

[CHEN X L, CAI X M, ZHU H. Reflection on China's tourism study based on the perspective of field of place. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(11): 2578-2594.]

[15]
GIANNINI S. Bridging green and digital transitions through education for a sustainable future. Paris: UNESCO, 2024.

[16]
ZEYBEK N, SAYG E. Gamification in education: Why, where, when, and how? A systematic review. Games and Culture, 2024, 19(2): 237-264.

DOI

[17]
MCCAULEY D J. Digital nature: Are field trips a thing of the past?. Science, 2017, 358(6361): 298-300.

DOI PMID

[18]
CONTI E, FARSARI I. Disconnection in nature-based tourism experiences: An actor-network theory approach. Annals of Leisure Research, 2024, 27(4): 525-542.

DOI

[19]
LYSKLETT O B, BERGER H W. What are the characteristics of nature preschools in Norway, and how do they organize their daily activities?. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 2017, 17(2): 95-107.

DOI

[20]
DICKINSON J L, SHIRK J, BONTER D, et al. The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2012, 10(6): 291-297.

DOI

[21]
欧阳勇强, 周伟, 化夏. 国外中小学教育旅行安全预防制度建设与主体协同. 教育科学, 2019, 35(4): 59-63.

[OUYANG Y Q, ZHOU W, HUA X. The institutional construction and legal subjects synergism for education tourism safety in foreign primary and second schools. Education Science, 2019, 35(4): 59-63.]

DOI

[22]
蔡晓梅, 苏杨, 吴必虎, 等. 生态文明建设背景下中国自然保护地发展的理论思考与创新实践. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(4): 839-861.

DOI

[CAI X M, SU Y, WU B H, et al. Theoretical debates and innovative practices of the development of China's nature protected area under the background of ecological civilization construction. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(4): 839-861.]

DOI

[23]
洪增林, 张洪涛, 张国伟, 等. 坚持人与自然和谐共生, 推动生态文明建设: “美丽秦巴”专家笔谈. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2): 493-500.

DOI

[HONG Z L, ZHANG H T, ZHANG G W, et al. Commit to peaceful co-existence between man and nature and promote the building of an ecological civilization: Expert interviews of Beautiful Qinling-Daba Mountain Region. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(2): 493-500.]

DOI

[24]
岳伟, 许元元. 深层生态文明教育的内涵、使命与实践向度. 现代教育管理, 2023, (6): 31-39.

DOI

[YUE W, XU Y Y. Deep ecological civilization education: Connotation, mission and practical dimension. Modern Education Management, 2023, (6): 31-39.]

DOI

[25]
MALLETTE A, HEANEY S, MCGLYNN B, et al. Outdoor education, environmental perceptions, and sustainability: Exploring relationships and opportunities. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 2025, 28(2): 177-192.

DOI

[26]
孔令帅, 刘子靖. 联合国教科文组织可持续发展教育的动因、路径及保障: 基于对“绿色教育伙伴计划”的分析. 教育科学, 2025, 41(2): 90-96.

[KONG L S, LIU Z J. The motivation, path and guarantee of UNESCO's sustainable development education: Based on the analysis of the "green education partnership". Education Science, 2025, 41(2): 90-96.]

[27]
顾明远, 滕珺. 《中国教育现代化2035》与全球可持续发展教育目标实现. 比较教育研究, 2019, 41(5): 3-9, 35.

[GU M Y, TENG J. "China education modernization 2035 framework" and its significance for SDG4. International and Comparative Education, 2019, 41(5): 3-9, 35.]

[28]
孙九霞. “游育”: 研学旅游新论. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(11): 5-7.

[SUN J X. "Recreation": A new theory of research tourism. Tourism Tribune, 2022, 37(11): 5-7.]

[29]
王学基, 庞兆玲, 张海洲. 生产与编织: 场景驱动旅游资源创新的双路径. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(9): 2334-2350.

DOI

[WANG X J, PANG Z L, ZHANG H Z. Producing and weaving: Dual paths for scene-driven innovation in tourism resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(9): 2334-2350.]

DOI

[30]
胡金木. 生态文明教育的价值愿景及目标建构. 中国教育学刊, 2019, (4): 34-38.

[HU J M. Value vision and target construction of ecological civilization education. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, 2019, (4): 34-38.]

[31]
LIEFLÄNDER A K, FRÖHLICH G, BOGNER F X, et al. Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 2013, 19(3): 370-384.

DOI

[32]
LLOPIZ-GUERRA K, RUIZ D U, HERNANDEZ R M, et al. Importance of environmental education in the context of natural sustainability. Natural and Engineering Sciences, 2024, 9(1): 57-71.

DOI

[33]
倪娟, 李广洲. 自然·自然观·自然教育思想发微: 兼评新课程改革中“回归自然”的适切性. 教育研究与实验, 2007, (2): 26-31.

[NI J, LI G Z. Nature, nature view and nature education thought: Also on the appropriateness of "returning to nature" in the new curriculum reform. Educational Research and Experiment, 2007, (2): 26-31.]

[34]
BONNETT M. Environmental education and the issue of nature. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2007, 39(6): 707-721.

DOI

[35]
黄向. 儿童与自然的人地关系研究: 接触、认知与情感. 人文地理, 2020, 35(6): 9-17, 75.

[HUANG X. The children-nature relationship: Contact, cognization and emotion. Human Geography, 2020, 35(6): 9-17, 75.]

文章导航

/