其他研究论文

“三水统筹”治理的影响因素及组态路径研究——基于TOSE理论框架的动态fsQCA因果关系分析

  • 王雅莉 , 1 ,
  • 侯林岐 , 1 ,
  • 刘鹏 1 ,
  • 邱善运 2
展开
  • 1 安徽工程大学经济与管理学院, 芜湖 241000
  • 2 山东大学经济学院, 济南 250100
侯林岐(1994- ),男,河南商丘人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,研究方向为公共治理。E-mail:

王雅莉(1994- ),女,河南安阳人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,研究方向为环境经济。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2025-07-27

  修回日期: 2026-02-04

  网络出版日期: 2026-04-07

基金资助

安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目(AHSKQ2023D036)

安徽省教育厅人文社会科学重点项目(2024AH052249)

The influencing factors and configuration pathways of coordinated management of "water resources, water environment and water ecology": Dynamic fsQCA causal analysis based on the TOSE theoretical framework

  • WANG Ya-li , 1 ,
  • HOU Lin-qi , 1 ,
  • LIU Peng 1 ,
  • QIU Shan-yun 2
Expand
  • 1 School of Economics and Management, Anhui University of Engineering, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China
  • 2 School of Economics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China

Received date: 2025-07-27

  Revised date: 2026-02-04

  Online published: 2026-04-07

摘要

水资源、水环境与水生态是相互联系的有机整体,推动“三水统筹”治理是建设美丽河湖的根本路径。在拓展TOE归因模型基础上,构建TOSE整体性理论框架以阐释“三水统筹”治理的影响因素,借助耦合协调度模型测度2012—2023年中国省域“三水统筹”治理成效,采用动态fsQCA方法检验治理路径。结果表明:(1)样本期内23个省(自治区、直辖市)的“三水统筹”耦合协调度实现梯度迁跃,但整体上处于低水平阶段;区域间发展差距逐步扩大,长三角成为水生态文明建设“先行区”。(2)TOSE理论框架对解释“三水统筹”治理的驱动因素具有适用性。治理成效有赖于技术基础、组织管理、社会参与、经济环境四组因素的共同优化。(3)“三水统筹”治理的驱动路径包括政策驱动+社会联动型、政策驱动+经济推动型、政策驱动+技术拉动型三种;无效路径包括政策目标失衡型与政策执行缺失型两种。(4)驱动路径的条件变量间存在替代性关系,但其有效性均以组织管理条件为前提。驱动路径的运行模式呈现阶段性特征,“十二五”期间依赖政策驱动,“十三五”期间依靠政策引导与社会响应的良性互动,“十四五”期间技术基础与社会参与跃升为关键因素。研究结论为“三水统筹”治理提供了理论框架与实践路径。

本文引用格式

王雅莉 , 侯林岐 , 刘鹏 , 邱善运 . “三水统筹”治理的影响因素及组态路径研究——基于TOSE理论框架的动态fsQCA因果关系分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2026 , 41(5) : 1617 -1636 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20260519

Abstract

Water resources, water environment, and water ecology form an interconnected organic whole. Promoting the integrated governance of these three elements is the fundamental pathway to constructing beautiful rivers and lakes. Building upon an expanded TOE attribution model, a holistic TOSE theoretical framework was constructed to explain the influencing factors of integrated water governance. Using a coupling coordination degree model, the effectiveness of integrated water governance at the provincial level in China from 2012 to 2023 was measured, and dynamic fsQCA was employed to examine governance pathways. The results indicate that: (1) During the sample period, the coupling coordination degree of integrated water governance in 23 provincial-level regions achieved gradient leapfrogging, though overall it remains at a low level. Regional development gaps have gradually widened, with the Yangtze River Delta emerging as a "pioneering zone" for water ecological civilization construction. (2) The TOSE theoretical framework demonstrates applicability in explaining the driving factors of integrated water governance. Governance effectiveness relies on the synergistic optimization of four groups of factors: technological foundations, organizational management, social participation, and economic environment. (3) The driving pathways for integrated water governance include three types: policy-driven + social linkage, policy-driven + economic propulsion, and policy-driven + technology pull. Ineffective pathways consist of two types: imbalanced policy objectives and deficient policy implementation. (4) Substitutability exists among the conditional variables of driving pathways, but their effectiveness is premised on organizational management conditions. The operational modes of driving pathways exhibit phased characteristics: during the 12th Five-Year Plan period (2011-2015), reliance was on policy drive; during the 13th Five-Year Plan period (2016-2020), governance depended on positive interactions between policy guidance and societal response; and during the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-2025), technological foundations and social participation have become key factors. The research conclusions provide a theoretical framework and practical pathways for integrated water governance.

[1]
杨洋, 樊聪怡, 汪自书. “三水”协同视角下长江流域绿色发展评估与差异化策略研究. 中国环境管理, 2025, 17(1): 21-29.

[YANG Y, FAN C Y, WANG Z S. Green development assessment and differentiated management strategies in the Yangtze River Basin from the perspective of 'three water' coordination. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 17(1): 21-29.]

[2]
徐敏, 秦顺兴, 马乐宽, 等. 水生态环境保护回顾与展望: 从污染防治到三水统筹. 中国环境管理, 2021, 13(5): 69-78.

[XU M, QIN S X, MA L K, et al. Review and prospect of water ecology and environment protection: From pollution prevention and control to overall planning about water environment improvement, water resource security and water ecology protection. Environmental Conformity Assessment, 2021, 13(5): 69-78.]

[3]
SCHLAGER E, OSTROM E. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 1992, 68(3): 249-262.

DOI

[4]
任以胜, 龙一鸣, 陆林. 流域生态补偿政策对受偿地区水污染强度的影响: 以新安江流域为例. 经济地理, 2023, 43(11): 181-189.

DOI

[REN Y S, LONG Y M, LU L. Impact of watershed eco-compensation policy on water pollution intensity in the compensated area: A case study of the Xin'an River Basin. Economic Geography, 2023, 43(11): 181-189.]

[5]
张恒, 常江. 国家海绵城市建设对城市水生态环境质量的影响. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(11): 2721-2734.

DOI

[ZHANG H, CHANG J. The impact of national sponge city construction on urban water ecological environment quality. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(11): 2721-2734.]

DOI

[6]
宁静, 周申蓓, 侯伽萍, 等. 中国新发展格局下产业转移的水环境效应研究. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(5): 1330-1343.

DOI

[NING J, ZHOU S B, HOU J P, et al. Study on the water environment effect of industrial transfer in China's new development pattern. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(5): 1330-1343.]

DOI

[7]
ARMENIA S, BARNABÉ F, FRANCO E, et al. Identifying policy options and responses to water management issues through system dynamics and fsQCA. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 194: 122737, Doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122737.

[8]
李强, 王亚仓. 长江经济带环境治理组合政策效果评估. 公共管理学报, 2022, 19(2): 130-141, 174.

[LI Q, WANG Y C. Effect evaluation of the combined policies of environmental governance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Journal of Public Management, 2022, 19(2): 130-141, 174.]

[9]
郭沁, 陈昌文. 政策工具是否能有效改善水环境质量: 基于30个省份的面板数据分析. 社会科学研究, 2023, (2): 53-62.

[GUO Q, CHEN C W. Whether policy tools can effectively improve water environment quality: Based on panel data analysis of 30 provinces. Social Science Research, 2023, (2): 53-62.]

[10]
颜海娜, 刘泽森. 从“九龙治水”到“一龙治水”: 水环境跨部门协同治理的审视与反思. 吉首大学学报: 社会科学版, 2022, 43(1): 43-56.

[YAN H N, LIU Z S. From "multi-layered regulation" to "single jurisdiction": A review and reflection on interdepartmental collaboration of water environment governance. Journal of Jishou University: Social Sciences, 2022, 43(1): 43-56.]

[11]
刘永超, 杜政轩, 施琪, 等. 水资源、水环境、水生态复合系统内涵解析及韧性评估指标体系研究. 宁波大学学报: 理工版, 2025, 38(5): 31-42.

[LIU Y C, DU Z X, SHI Q, et al. Connotation analysis and resilience assessment index system development for the water resources-water environment-water ecology coupled system. Journal of Ningbo University: Natural Science & Engineering Edition, 2025, 38(5): 31-42.]

[12]
李加林, 田鹏, 刘永超, 等. 水资源、水环境、水生态统筹治理研究进展. 宁波大学学报: 理工版, 2024, 37(4): 22-30.

[LI J L, TIAN P, LIU Y C, et al. Research progress on the overall management of water resources, water environment and water ecology. Journal of Ningbo University: Natural Science & Engineering Edition, 2024, 37(4): 22-30.]

[13]
朱骁, 李加林, 刘永超, 等. “三水统筹”治理绩效评价及影响因素研究: 以长江中下游地区为例. 人民长江, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1202.TV.20250911.1620.006.

[ZHU X, LI J L, LIU Y C, et al. Research on the performance evaluation and influencing factors of "three water coordination" governance: Taking the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River as an example. People's Yangtze River, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/42.1202.TV.20250911.1620.006.]

[14]
OSTROM E. Institutions and common-pool resources. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1992, 4(3): 243-245.

DOI

[15]
SSEKAJJA G. The inter-community domain of commons governance: A framework for analyzing collaborative management of shared environmental resources. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 389: 126086, Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126086.

[16]
柴建, 田凌钺, 张晓空. 经济—能源—环境系统耦合协调发展的动态演化与影响要素研究. 管理评论, 2024, 36(1): 29-41.

[CHAI J, TIAN L Y, ZHANG X K. Research on the dynamic evolution and influence factors of the coupling coordination development of the economy-energy-environment system. Management Review, 2024, 36(1): 29-41.]

[17]
TORNATZKY L G, FLEISCHER M, CHAKRABARTI A K. Processes of Technological Innovation. Lanham: Lexington Books, 1990.

[18]
李婧婧, 徐珂欣, 付轼辉, 等. 长江经济带国家高新区如何实现绿色低碳发展: 基于TOE框架的组态研究. 中国软科学, 2024, (2): 94-103.

[LI J J, XU K X, FU S H, et al. How to achieve green and low-carbon development in the national high-tech zone of the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Configuration research based on TOE framework. China Soft Science, 2024, (2): 94-103.]

[19]
周梓参, 马文聪, 苏涛, 等. 科技型孵化器绩效影响因素的模糊集组态分析: 以广州为例. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(2): 201-208.

[ZHOU Z C, MA W C, SU T, et al. Fuzzy set configuration analysis of influencing factors of science and technology incubator performance: A case study of Guangzhou. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022, 42(2): 201-208.]

[20]
张跃胜, 金文俊, 谭宇轩. 地方政府数字治理能力提升路径研究: 基于TOE分析框架的组态分析. 经济与管理研究, 2024, 45(4): 93-111.

[ZHANG Y S, JIN W J, TAN Y X. Path to enhance local governments' digital governance capability: Configuration analysis based on TOE framework. Research on Economics and Management, 2024, 45(4): 93-111.]

[21]
韩宇飞, 吴凤平, 王维, 等. 再生水利用配置的基本要素与理论模型研究. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(6): 1450-1472.

DOI

[HAN Y F, WU F P, WANG W, et al. Research on the basic elements and theoretical model of reclaimed water allocation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(6): 1450-1472.]

DOI

[22]
谭诗钲, 李玮, 刘效广, 等. 组态视角下黄河流域城市水环境质量提升路径研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2025, 39(6): 146-155.

[TAN S Z, LI W, LIU X G, et al. Pathway to improve urban water environment quality in the Yellow River Basin from configuration perspective. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2025, 39(6): 146-155.]

[23]
王勇, 曹银山. 权合式治理如何可能: 基于对中国河长制实践的观察. 地方治理研究, 2025, (1): 14-28, 78.

[WANG Y, CAO Y S. How power-based integrated governance is possible: Based on the observation of the practice of river chief system in China. Local Governance Research, 2025, (1): 14-28, 78.]

[24]
王雅莉, 蔡书凯, 侯林岐, 等. 合作致远: 政策协同如何驱动企业数字化转型? 基于产学研政策与上市公司年报的文本分析. 产业经济研究, 2024, (6): 56-69.

[WANG Y L, CAI S K, HOU L Q, et al. Collaboration towards success: How does policy synergy drive the digital transformation of enterprises? Text analysis based on industry-university-research policies and annual reports of listed companies. Industrial Economics Research, 2024, (6): 56-69.]

[25]
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度? 基于制度组态的分析. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 141-155.

[DU Y Z, LIU Q C, CHENG J Q. What kind of ecosystem for doing business will contribute to city-level high entrepreneurial Activity? A research based on institutional configurations. Management World, 2020, 36(9): 141-155.]

[26]
孙燕芳, 张淑惠. 区域“创新—生态—经济”耦合协调发展的组态路径: 基于动态定性比较分析. 资源科学, 2024, 46(3): 549-564.

DOI

[SUN Y F, ZHANG S H. Combination path of regional innovation-ecology-economy coupling and coordinated development: Based on a dynamic qualitative comparative analysis. Resources Science, 2024, 46(3): 549-564.]

[27]
FISS P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2): 393-420.

DOI

文章导航

/