EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2026 , Vol. 41 >Issue 4: 1253 - 1270

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20260416

多元价值与活化路径

传统村落人居环境感知价值对居民遗产责任行为的影响及其启示

  • 何峰 , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • 邱钦莲 1
展开
  • 1.湖南师范大学地理科学学院，长沙 410081
  • 2.地理空间大数据挖掘与应用湖南省重点实验室，长沙 410081
  • 3.湖南师范大学城乡转型过程与效应重点实验室，长沙 410081

何峰（1975- ），女，湖南岳阳人，博士，副教授，主要从事历史文化资源保护利用、乡村聚落地理等研究。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2025-07-07

  修回日期: 2025-12-15

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42371216)

收起

The impact of perceived residential value on heritage responsibility behavior in traditional villages and their implications

  • HE Feng , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • QIU Qin-lian 1
Expand
  • 1. School of Geographical Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
  • 2. Hunan Key Laboratory of Geospatial Big Data Mining and Application, Changsha 410081, China
  • 3. Key Laboratory for Urban-Rural Transformation Processes and Effects, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Received date: 2025-07-07

  Revised date: 2025-12-15

  Online published: 2026-03-20

Fold

摘要

居民是传统村落的主体，从居民的人居环境感知价值出发来认识其遗产责任行为，是平衡传统村落社区属性与遗产属性，实现村落可持续发展的关键。基于马斯洛需求层次理论，探讨了传统村落居民人居环境感知价值的结构维度，并以ABC态度模型为基础，通过结构方程模型实证检验其对遗产责任行为的影响。结果表明：传统村落居民人居环境感知价值包括生活价值、安全价值、社会价值、文化价值和精神价值五个维度；安全价值和地方依恋对遗产责任行为均具有显著的正向直接影响；地方依恋在安全价值与遗产责任行为间发挥部分中介作用，在生活价值、社会价值与遗产责任行为间发挥完全中介作用；文化价值和精神价值对地方依恋与遗产责任行为均未表现出显著影响。研究从优先保障和提升村落的安全价值、增强居民与传统村落的情感联结、推动居民成长性需求感知响应三个方面，提出进一步驱动居民遗产责任行为、提升居民在遗产保护与村落发展中主体性的实践启示。

关键词： 遗产责任行为; 居民感知价值; 人居环境; 传统村落; 需求层次理论

本文引用格式

何峰 , 邱钦莲 . 传统村落人居环境感知价值对居民遗产责任行为的影响及其启示[J]. 自然资源学报, 2026 , 41(4) : 1253 -1270 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20260416

Abstract

Traditional village is a unique type of living heritage, functioning as both precious historical and cultural heritage and practical human settlements for current residents. Residents constitute the core subject of traditional villages, and exploring their heritage responsibility behavior from the lens of their perceived value of human settlements is deemed a key prerequisite for balancing the dual attributes of traditional village-community and heritage-and facilitating their long-term sustainable development. Based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory, this research establishes a multi-dimensional structural framework for the perceived value of human settlements among residents in traditional villages. Furthermore, grounded in the ABC attitude model, it formulates research hypotheses and develops a theoretical model following the influence pathway of "perceived value of human settlements-place attachmen-heritage responsibility behavior". To validate the theoretical model, this study selects 14 traditional villages located in southern Hunan as research cases, and employs structural equation modeling (SEM) to empirically examine the impact of perceived value of human settlements on heritage responsibility behavior, as well as the mediating role of place attachment in this pathway, based on the data collected from 306 valid questionnaires. The results show that: (1) The perceived value of human settlements of traditional village residents comprises five distinct dimensions: living value, safety value, social value, cultural value, and spiritual value. (2) Both safety value and place attachment exert a significant positive direct effect on heritage responsibility behavior. (3) Place attachment plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between safety value and heritage responsibility behavior, while exerting a full mediating effect between living value, social value and heritage responsibility behavior. (4) Cultural value and spiritual value do not demonstrate significant influences on either place attachment or heritage responsibility behavior. Drawing on these results, the study puts forward targeted suggestions: Firstly, give priority to ensuring and enhancing village's safety value. Secondly, strengthen the emotional connection between residents and traditional villages, stimulating their internal motivation to participate in heritage conservation. Lastly, after effectively meeting residents' basic needs, promote their perceptual response to growth-oriented needs, inspire their cultural awareness and cultural confidence, and further enhance their subjectivity in heritage protection and village development.

Key words： heritage responsibility behavior; residents' perceived value; human settlements; traditional village; hierarchy of needs theory

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
吴薇, 王晓葵. “文化”场域的博弈与“遗产”价值的重构: 基于彝族禳灾记忆遗产化案例的思考. 民族学刊, 2017, 8(6): 37-45, 107-109.

[WU W, WANG X K. The game of "cultural" domains and the reconstruction of "heritage" values: A reflection on the heritagization of the disastrous extermination of the memory of the Yi. Journal of Ethnology, 2017, 8(6): 37-45, 107-109.]

[2]
何银春, 梁越, 曾斌丹. 遗产化进程中遗产认同的内涵及形成路径: 以世界遗产永顺老司城为例. 热带地理, 2019, 39(5): 749-758.

DOI

[HE Y C, LIANG Y, ZENG B D. The connotation and formation path of heritage identity in the process of heritagization: A case study of the Laosicheng world heritage, Yongshun. Tropical Geography, 2019, 39(5): 749-758.]

DOI

[3]
孙九霞. 乡村旅游视域下传统村落的主体性消解与重构. 湖北民族大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2024, 42(3): 119-128.

[SUN J X. The dissolution and reconstruction of subjectivity of traditional villages from the perspective of rural tourism. Journal of Hubei Minzu University: Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2024, 42(3): 119-128.]

[4]
中井治郎, 郭海红. “故乡”的文化遗产化与观光资源化: 以京都府南丹市美山町的“茅葺之乡”为中心. 民俗研究, 2019, (2): 88-98, 159.

[JIRO N, GUO H H. "Furusato" as a cultural heritage and a tourism resource: A study of "Kayabuki-No-Sato" in Miyamacho. Folklore Studies, 2019, (2): 88-98, 159.]

[5]
习近平. 在中央农村工作会议上的讲话. 见: 中共中央文献研究室. 十八大以来重要文献选编(上). 北京: 中央文献出版社, 2014: 682.

[XI J P. Speech at the Central Rural Work Conference. In: Party Literature Research Office of the Central Committee of CPC. Selected Important Documents Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (Volume I). Beijing: Central Party Literature Press, 2014: 682.]

[6]
程叶青, 胡守庚, 杨忍, 等. 面向乡村振兴的中国传统村落保护与利用: 挑战与展望. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(8): 1735-1759.

DOI

[CHENG Y Q, HU S G, YANG R, et al. Protection and utilization of the traditional villages of China in the context of rural revitalization: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(8): 1735-1759.]

DOI

[7]
GURSOY D, ZHANG C Z, CHI O H. Determinants of locals' heritage resource protection and conservation responsibility behaviors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2019, 31(6): 2339-2357.

DOI

[8]
巨英英, 程励. 文化遗产地旅游社区居民遗产责任行为的形成机制: 基于模糊集定性比较分析. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(5): 1135-1149.

DOI

[JU Y Y, CHENG L. Formation mechanism of heritage responsibility behavior of residents in the tourism community of cultural heritage sites: Based on the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(5): 1135-1149.]

DOI

[9]
冯骥才. 传统村落的困境与出路: 兼谈传统村落是另一类文化遗产. 民间文化论坛, 2013, (1): 7-12.

[FENG J C. Thedilemma and the way out of traditional villages: On traditional villages as another kind of cultural heritage. Folk CultureForum, 2013, (1): 7-12.]

[10]
王淑佳, 孙九霞. 中国传统村落可持续发展评价体系构建与实证. 地理学报, 2021, 76(4): 921-938.

DOI

[WANG S J, SUN J X. Construction and empirical research on the evaluation system of sustainable development of Chinese traditional villages. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(4): 921-938.]

DOI

[11]
吴良镛. 人居环境科学导论. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2001: 38, 49-50.

[WU L Y. Introduction to Sciences of Human Settlements. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2001: 38, 49-50.]

[12]
李伯华, 邹靓, 程波, 等. 传统村落人居环境更新的认知重建与实践: 以高椅村为例. 地理科学, 2025, 45(2): 315-325.

DOI

[LI B H, ZOU L, CHENG B, et al. Cognitive reconstruction and practical exploration of the renewal of traditional village residential environment: Taking Gaoyi village as an example. Geographical Science, 2025, 45(2): 315-325.]

[13]
LONG T X, IșIK C, YAN J L, et al. Promoting the sustainable development of traditional villages: Exploring the comprehensive assessment, spatial and temporal evolution, and internal and external impacts of traditional village human settlements in Hunan province. Heliyon, 2024, 10(11): e32439, Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32439.

[14]
曾灿, 潘鑫玥, 李伯华, 等. 传统村落人居环境脆弱性评价研究: 以湖南省江永县上甘棠村为例. 资源开发与市场, 2020, 36(10): 1080-1086.

[ZENG C, PAN X Y, LI B H, et al. Research on vulnerability assessment of human settlements in traditional villages: Taking the Shanggantang village of Jiangyong county in Hunan province as an example. Resource Development & Market, 2020, 36(10): 1080-1086.]

[15]
李伯华, 龙翔宇, 窦银娣, 等. 传统村落人居环境体检及其修复路径: 以湖南4个典型传统村落为例. 经济地理, 2024, 44(2): 175-186.

DOI

[LI B H, LONG X Y, DOU Y D, et al. Physical examination and restoration path of human settlement of traditional villages: A case study of four typical traditional villages in Hunan province. Economic Geography, 2024, 44(2): 175-186.]

[16]
李伯华, 李珍, 刘沛林, 等. 聚落“双修”视角下传统村落人居环境活化路径研究: 以湖南省张谷英村为例. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1794-1806.

DOI

[LI B H, LI Z, LIU P L, et al. Activation path of human settlement environment of traditional villages from the perspective of "double repair": A case study of Zhang-Guying village in Hunan province. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(8): 1794-1806.]

[17]
李伯华, 曾荣倩, 刘沛林, 等. 基于CAS理论的传统村落人居环境演化研究: 以张谷英村为例. 地理研究, 2018, 37(10): 1982-1996.

DOI

[LI B H, ZENG R Q, LIU P L, et al. Human settlement evolution of traditional village based on theory of complex adaptive system: A case study of Zhangguying village. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(10): 1982-1996.]

[18]
李伯华, 曾灿, 刘沛林, 等. 传统村落人居环境转型发展的系统特征及动力机制研究: 以江永县兰溪村为例. 经济地理, 2019, 39(8): 153-159.

DOI

[LI B H, ZENG C, LIU P L, et al. System characteristics and dynamic mechanism of transformation development of human settlement environment in traditional villages: A case study of Lanxi village Jiangyong county. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(8): 153-159.]

DOI

[19]
刘建国, 张文忠. 人居环境评价方法研究综述. 城市发展研究, 2014, 21(6): 46-52.

[LIU J G, ZHANG W Z. Review of habitat environment assessment method. Urban Development Studies, 2014, 21(6): 46-52.]

[20]
WEI W B, HEEREMA H, RUSHFELD R, et al. Issues in conservation: Three value moments in the public perception of cultural heritage objects in public spaces. Collabra: Psychology, 2021, 7(1): 21935, Doi: 10.1525/collabra.21935.

[21]
高晓路. 居住环境的价值化评价及其实践意义. 城市发展研究, 2010, 17(2): 117-125.

[GAO X L. Evaluation of the values of living environments and its significance. Urban Development Studies, 2010, 17(2): 117-125.]

[22]
冶建明, 刘滨谊. 城市居民感知价值、居住满意度与地方认同的关系研究: 以石河子市为例. 西北师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2022, 58(6): 124-130.

[YE J M, LIU B Y. Study of the relationship among perceived value, residential satisfaction and place identity of urban residents: Taking Shihezi city as an example. Journal of Northwest Normal University: Natural Science, 2022, 58(6): 124-130.]

[23]
徐水太, 袁北飞, 陈美玲. 感知价值对居民参与老旧小区改造意愿的影响: 基于广州市老旧小区居民的调查数据. 地域研究与开发, 2023, 42(2): 80-85, 92.

[XU S T, YUAN B F, CHEN M L. Influence of perceived value on the willingness of residents to participate in the renovation of old residential areas: Based on the survey data of old residential areas in Guangzhou city. Areal Research and Development, 2023, 42(2): 80-85, 92.]

[24]
袁梦, 吴哲楷, 谢光权, 等. 多元主体视角下传统村落人居环境满意度研究: 以福建省屏南县龙潭村为例. 地域研究与开发, 2023, 42(6): 115-120.

DOI

[YUAN M, WU Z K, XIE G Q, et al. Study on satisfaction of rural human settlements in traditional villages from the perspective of multiple subjects: A case study of Longtan village of Pingnan county in Fujian province. Areal Research and Development, 2023, 42(6): 115-120.]

DOI

[25]
吕晓峰. 环境心理学: 内涵、理论范式与范畴述评. 福建师范大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2011, (3): 141-148.

[LYU X F. Environmental psychology: Review of content, theory paradigms and category. Journal of Fujian Normal University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 2011, (3): 141-148.]

[26]
陈志军, 徐飞雄. 乡村民宿旅游地游客忠诚度影响因素及作用机制: 基于ABC态度模型视角的实证分析. 经济地理, 2021, 41(5): 232-240.

DOI

[CHEN Z J, XU F X. Influencing factors and mechanism of tourist loyalty in rural homestay(B & B) tourist destination: An empirical analysis based on ABC attitude model. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(5): 232-240.]

[27]
LU X X, TAN D H, ZHOU Y C, et al. Traditional village perception and protection behavior: The mediating role of local identity and the impact of different population differences. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2025, 24(6): 5104-5121.

DOI

[28]
MASLOW A H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 1943, 50(4): 370-396.

DOI

[29]
ZHANG Y, FANG Z Q, XIE Z Q. Coupling and coordination relationship between human settlement environments and resident demand: An empirical study from China. Sustainability, 2023, 15(10): 8341, Doi: 10.3390/su15108341.

[30]
ZEITHAML V A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 1988, 52(3): 2-22.

DOI

[31]
马海群, 邹纯龙, 王今. 公共数据用户感知价值内涵及量表构建研究. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(10): 11-18.

[MA H Q, ZOU C L, WANG J. Research on the connotation and scale construction for perceived value of public data users. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2022, 45(10): 11-18.]

[32]
王玉娟, 杨山, 吴连霞. 多元主体视角下城市人居环境需求异质性研究: 以昆山经济技术开发区为例. 地理科学, 2018, 38(7): 1156-1164.

DOI

[WANG Y J, YANG S, WU L X. Heterogeneity for urban human settlements demand from the perspective of multiple subjects: A case study of Kunshan economic and technological development zone. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(7): 1156-1164.]

DOI

[33]
鲍捷, 张毓, 李雪, 等. 从生存到自我实现: 需求层次理论视角下的城市人居环境质量评价: 以安徽省为例. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(9): 88-95, 140.

[BAO J, ZHANG Y, LI X, et al. From survival to self-actualization: Quantitative evaluation of human settlement environment from the perspective of hierarchy of needs theory: A case study of Anhui province. Urban Development Studies, 2020, 27(9): 88-95, 140.]

[34]
ROSENBERG M J, HOVLAND C I. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In: HOVLAND C I, ROSENBERG M J (Eds.). Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960: 1-14.

[35]
HU X P, XI L, ESTHER KOU I, et al. Macau residents' attitude towards the free independent travellers (FIT) policy: An analysis from the perspective of the ABC model and group comparison. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2021, 26(9): 935-952.

DOI

[36]
梁玲, 袁璐华, 谢家平. 基于ABC态度理论的直播带货用户购买行为机理实证. 软科学, 2022, 36(12): 118-126.

[LIANG L, YUAN L H, XIE J P. Mechanism study of live streaming customers purchase behavior based on ABC belief theory. Soft Science, 2022, 36(12): 118-126.]

[37]
HOMANS G C. Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 63(6): 597-606.

DOI

[38]
蔡礼彬, 程晓盈. 情感认知评价视角下文化遗产城市游客遗产责任行为形成机制. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(6): 1278-1298.

DOI

[CAI L B, CHENG X Y. Formation mechanism of heritage responsibility behaviour of tourists in cultural heritage cities from the perspective of affective-cognitive evaluation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2024, 39(6): 1278-1298.]

DOI

[39]
朱竑, 刘博. 地方感、地方依恋与地方认同等概念的辨析及研究启示. 华南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 43(1): 1-8.

[ZHU H, LIU B. Concepts analysis and research implications: Sense of place, place attachment and place identity. Journal of South China Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 2011, 43(1): 1-8.]

[40]
ROLLERO C, DE PICCOLI N. Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(2): 198-205.

DOI

[41]
程励, 李珍芳, 祁杉. 世界遗产旅游者环境责任行为的构成维度及形成逻辑: 基于青城山—都江堰世界文化遗产地的实证研究. 旅游科学, 2025, 39(10): 1-23.

[CHENG L, LI Z F, QI S. Constructing dimensions and formation logic of world heritage tourists' environmentally responsible behavior: Based on the empirical study of the Qingcheng mountain-Dujiangyan world cultural heritage site. Tourism Science, 2025, 39(10): 1-23.]

[42]
MESCH G S, MANOR O. Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior, 1998, 30(4): 504-519.

DOI

[43]
GUO Y, WANG B R, LI W S, et al. Deciphering the impacts of environmental perceptions on place attachment from the perspective of place of origin:A case study of rural China. Applied Geography, 2024, 162: 103165, Doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103165.

[44]
贾衍菊, 林德荣. 旅游者环境责任行为: 驱动因素与影响机理: 基于地方理论的视角. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(7): 161-169.

[JIA Y J, LIN D R. Influence factors and effects of tourists' environmentally responsible behaviors based on place theory. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(7): 161-169.]

[45]
贾衍菊, 孙凤芝, 刘瑞. 旅游目的地依恋与游客环境保护行为影响关系研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(12): 159-167.

[JIA Y J, SUN F Z, LIU R. Research on the relationship of destination attachment and tourists' environmentally protection behaviors. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(12): 159-167.]

[46]
ZHANG T, WEI C, NIE L Y. Experiencing authenticity to environmentally responsible behavior: Assessing the effects of perceived value, tourist emotion, and recollection on industrial heritage tourism. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 1081464, Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1081464.

[47]
屈小爽, 张大鹏. 传统村落游客感知价值、地方认同对公民行为的影响. 企业经济, 2021, 40(3): 123-131.

[QU X S, ZHANG D P. Impact of tourist perceived value, place identity on citizenship behavior of traditional villages. Enterprise Economy, 2021, 40(3): 123-131.]

[48]
李燕琴, 施佳伟, 罗湘阳. 乡村旅游社区居民主观幸福感变迁机理: 聚焦发展期到巩固期的幸福拐点. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(8): 1514-1526.

DOI

[LI Y Q, SHI J W, LUO X Y. Mechanism of change in residents' subjective well-being in rural tourism communities: The turning point of happiness from the development stage to the consolidation stage. Progress in Geography, 2023, 42(8): 1514-1526.]

[49]
李佳颖, 王艳伟. 基于“三生”视角的云南省农村人居环境质量评价、时空分异及驱动因素. 农业资源与环境学报, 2025, 42(2): 470-481.

[LI J Y, WANG Y W. Evaluation, spatial and temporal differentiation, and driving factors of rural habitat quality in Yunnan province based on the perspective of "production-life-ecology". Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2025, 42(2): 470-481.]

[50]
王艳飞, 李婷婷, 孟祥涛. 2010—2020年中国乡村人居环境质量评价及其演变特征. 地理研究, 2022, 41(12): 3245-3258.

DOI

[WANG Y F, LI T T, MENG X T. Evaluation of China's rural human settlements quality and its spatiotemporal change characteristics from 2010 to 2020. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(12): 3245-3258.]

[51]
梁晨, 李建平, 李俊杰. 基于“三生”功能的我国农村人居环境质量与经济发展协调度评价与优化. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(10): 19-30.

[LIANG C, LI J P, LI J J. The evaluation of the quality of rural human settlements and its coordination with regional economy in China based on the production-living-ecological theory. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(10): 19-30.]

[52]
WILLIAMS D R, VASKE JJ. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 2003, 49(6): 830-840.

DOI

[53]
黎耀奇, 王雄志, 陈朋. 基于游客与居民视角的遗产地遗产责任量表开发与检验. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(10): 60-75.

[LI Y Q, WANG X Z, CHEN P. Development and testing of heritage responsibility scale: Based on perspectives of tourists and residents. Tourism Tribune, 2019, 34(10): 60-75.]

[54]
汤丹丹, 温忠麟. 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 2020, 43(1): 215-223.

[TANG D D, WEN Z L. Statistical approaches for testing common method bias: Problems and suggestions. Journal of Psychological Science, 2020, 43(1): 215-223.]

[55]
FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18(1): 39-50.

DOI

[56]
HENSELER J, RINGLE C M, SARSTEDT M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2015, 43(1): 115-135.

DOI

[57]
HAIR J F, RISHER J J, SARSTEDT M, et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 2019, 31(1): 2-24.

[58]
HAIR J F, RINGLE C M, SARSTEDT M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2011, 19(2): 139-152.

DOI

[59]
CHIN W W, MARCOULIDES G. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Advances in Hospitality and Leisure, 1998, 8(2): 295-336.

[60]
HAIR J F, SARSTEDT M, RINGLE C M, et al. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2012, 40(3): 414-433.

DOI

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉