EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2025 , Vol. 40 >Issue 5: 1174 - 1193

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20250503

自然资源观察

中国“山水林田湖草沙一体化”国土空间治理制度构建

  • 陈宇超 , 1 ,
  • 张杨 , 2 ,
  • 张衔春 1 ,
  • 张琰 3
展开
  • 1.浙江大学公共管理学院，杭州 310012
  • 2.首都经济贸易大学城市经济与公共管理学院，北京 100070
  • 3.自然资源部土地整治中心，北京 100035
张杨（1983-），男，河北保定人，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，研究方向为国土空间治理及自然资源可持续发展。E-mail:

陈宇超（1995-），男，浙江温州人，博士研究生，研究方向为土地制度与管理。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2023-12-25

  修回日期: 2024-11-11

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-16

基金资助

教育部哲学社会科学研究重大项目(20JZD013)

国家自然科学基金项目(42101284)

国家自然科学基金项目(42101187)

北京市自然科学基金项目(8242024)

收起

The institutional construction of territorial spatial governance for 'integrated mountains, rivers, forests, fields, lakes, grasses and deserts' in China

  • CHEN Yu-chao , 1 ,
  • ZHANG Yang , 2 ,
  • ZHANG Xian-chun 1 ,
  • ZHANG Yan 3
Expand
  • 1. School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310012, China
  • 2. Capital University of Economics and Business, College of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Beijing 100070, China
  • 3. Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China

Received date: 2023-12-25

  Revised date: 2024-11-11

  Online published: 2025-04-16

Fold

摘要

“山水林田湖草沙一体化”国土空间治理制度是生态文明建设方向，是党和国家推动国土空间治理体系和能力现代化水平的重要抓手和科学实践。辨析“山水林田湖草沙一体化”国土空间治理相关概念与理论逻辑，分析面临的治理问题和实现基础，探究制度构建的进路。研究发现：（1）目前面临的治理问题为治理对象的生态反馈需得到应有的重视、治理主体的协调联动尚有改进的余地、治理制度的协同赋能存在优化的空间；（2）必须回应中国自然生态国情下的国家治理体系与能力的现代化需求，兼顾公平和效率、统筹安全和发展，以明确治理主体和治理制度的实现基础；（3）从治理对象、治理主体、治理制度三方面开展“山水林田湖草沙一体化”国土空间治理制度构建。

关键词： “山水林田湖草沙一体化”; 国土空间治理; 制度构建; 社会—生态系统; 契合

本文引用格式

陈宇超 , 张杨 , 张衔春 , 张琰 . 中国“山水林田湖草沙一体化”国土空间治理制度构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2025 , 40(5) : 1174 -1193 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20250503

Abstract

The institution of territorial spatial governance for 'integrated mountains, rivers, forests, fields, lakes, grassland and deserts' is a direction for exploring ecological civilisation and is crucial for China to modernise its governance systems and capacity. This paper analyses the core concepts and theoretical logic of territorial spatial governance and analyses its governance problems and realisation bases. It explores the appropriate ways forward for the specific institutional construction. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The current governance problems are that the ecological feedback of the governance object needs to be taken seriously, the coordination and linkage of the governance subject is still a problem, along with the fact the synergy and empowerment of the governance system is not yet in place. (2) It is necessary to respond to the demand for modernisation of the national governance system and capacity in the context of China's natural ecology, taking into account fairness and efficiency, and integrating security and development, yet to define the basis of the realisation of the governance subject and the governance system. (3) We should carry out the construction of territorial spatial governance institutions for 'integrated mountains, rivers, forests, fields, lakes and grasses' in three aspects, namely, the governance object, governance subject and governance system.

Key words： 'integrated mountains, rivers, forests, fields, lakes, grassland and deserts'; territorial spatial governance; institutional construction; social-ecological systems; fit

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
张杨, 杨洋, 江平, 等. 山水林田湖草生命共同体的科学认知、路径及制度体系保障. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(11): 3005-3018.

DOI

[ZHANG Y, YANG Y, JIANG P, et al. Scientific cognition, path and governance system guarantee of the life community of mountains, rivers, forests, fields, lakes and grasses. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(11): 3005-3018.]

DOI

[2]
成金华, 尤喆. “山水林田湖草是生命共同体” 原则的科学内涵与实践路径. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(2): 1-6.

[CHENG J H, YOU Z. Scientific connotation and practical paths about the principle of "taking mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, and grasslands as a life community". China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(2): 1-6.]

[3]
谭荣. 自然资源资产产权制度改革和体系建设思考. 中国土地科学, 2021, 35(1): 1-9.

[TAN R. On the reform and construction of the property right system of natural resources assets. China Land Science, 2021, 35(1): 1-9.]

[4]
罗明, 于恩逸, 周妍, 等. 山水林田湖草生态保护修复试点工程布局及技术策略. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 8692-8701.

[LUO M, YU E Y, ZHOU Y, et al. Distribution and technical strategies of ecological protection and restoration projects for mountains-rivers-forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(23): 8692-8701.]

[5]
岳文泽, 王田雨, 甄延临. “三区三线” 为核心的统一国土空间用途管制分区. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(5): 52-59, 68.

[YUE W Z, WANG T Y, ZHEN Y L. Unified zoning of territorial space use control derived from the core concept of "three types of spatial zones and alert-lines". China Land Science, 2020, 34(5): 52-59, 68.]

[6]
OBERLACK C, BOILLAT S, BRÖNNIMANN S, et al. Polycentric governance in telecoupled resource systems. Ecology and Society, 2018, 23: 16, Doi: 10.5751/ES-09902-230116.

[7]
VERBURG P H, CROSSMAN N, ELLIS E C, et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: A global land project perspective. Anthropocene, 2015, 12: 29-41.

[8]
PULVER S, ULIBARRI N, SOBOCINSKI K L, et al. Frontiers in socio-environmental research: Components, connections, scale, and context. Ecology and Society, 2018, 23(3): 23, Doi: 10.5751/ES-10280-230323.

[9]
OSTROM E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 2009, 325(5939): 419-422.

DOI PMID

[10]
OSTROM E, COX M. Moving beyond panaceas: A multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environmental Conservation, 2010, 37(4): 451-463.

[11]
VATN A, VEDELD P. Fit, interplay, and scale: A diagnosis. Ecology and Society, 2012, 17(4): 12, Doi: 10.5751/ES-05022-170412.

[12]
余露, 刘源. 自然资源系统治理的创新模式探索. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(9): 2386-2402.

DOI

[YU L, LIU Y. Institutional innovations towards integrated natural resources management. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(9): 2386-2402.]

DOI

[13]
LIU J G. Integration across a metacoupled world. and Society, Ecology 2017, 22(4): 29, Doi: 10.5751/ES-09830-220429.

[14]
HULL V, LIU J G. Telecoupling: A new frontier for global sustainability. Ecology and Society, 2018, 23(4): 41, Doi: 10.5751/ES-10494-230441.

[15]
YOUNG O R. Environmental governance: The role of institutions in causing and confronting environmental problems. International Environmental Agreements, 2003, 3(4): 377-393.

[16]
YOUNG O R, KING L A, SCHROEDER H. Institutions and Environmental Change:Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008.

[17]
朱从谋, 王珂, 张晶, 等. 国土空间治理内涵及实现路径: 基于“要素—结构—功能—价值” 视角. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(2): 10-18.

[ZHU C M, WANG K, ZHANG J, et al. The connotation and realization path of territorial space governance from the perspective of "elements-structure-function-value". China Land Science, 2022, 36(2): 10-18.]

[18]
谭荣. 全民所有自然资源资产所有权委托代理机制解析. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(5): 1-10, 130.

[TAN R. The principal-agent mechanism of state-owned natural resource assets. China Land Science, 2022, 36(5): 1-10, 130.]

[19]
林坚, 吴宇翔, 吴佳雨, 等. 论空间规划体系的构建: 兼析空间规划、国土空间用途管制与自然资源监管的关系. 城市规划, 2018, 42(5): 9-17.

[LIN J, WU Y X, WU J Y, et al. Construction of the spatial planning system: With discussions on the relationship between spatial planning, territorial spatial regulation, and natural resources supervision. City Planning Review, 2018, 42(5): 9-17.]

[20]
林坚, 高远, 赵晔. 空间开发权视角下的国土空间治理探析. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(6): 1393-1402.

DOI

[LIN J, GAO Y, ZHAO Y. Exploration of national territory spatial governance from the perspective of spatial development rights. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(6): 1393-1402.]

DOI

[21]
孟鹏, 王庆日, 郎海鸥, 等. 空间治理现代化下中国国土空间规划面临的挑战与改革导向: 基于国土空间治理重点问题系列研讨的思考. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(11): 8-14.

[MENG P, WANG Q R, LANG H O, et al. Analysis of the challenges and reform orientation of territorial spatial planning system in China under the background of spatial governance system modernization: Reviews from the serial research of territorial spatial governance. China Land Science, 2019, 33(11): 8-14.]

[22]
EAKIN H, RUEDA X, MAHANTI A. Transforming governance in telecoupled food systems. Ecology and Society, 2017, 22(4): 32, Doi: 10.5751/ES-09831-220432.

[23]
OSTROM E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(4): 550-557.

[24]
MCGINNIS M D. Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 2011, 39(1): 51-78.

[25]
刘志民, 余海滨, 汪海洋. 科尔沁沙地“山水林田湖草沙” 一体化治理原理及实施重点. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3441-3447.

DOI

[LIU Z M, YU H B, WANG H Y. Principles and implementation of the integrated management of "mountain-river-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland" in Horqin Sand Land, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(12): 3441-3447.]

[26]
NORTH D C. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

[27]
OSTROM E. Institutional rational choice:An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 2007: 21-64.

[28]
张衔春, 陈宇超, 杨宇, 等. 中国区域治理中公私合作伙伴关系研究. 地理研究, 2023, 42(2): 297-311.

DOI

[ZHANG X C, CHEN Y C, YANG Y, et al. The public-private partnerships in China's regional governance. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(2): 297-311.]

[29]
YOUNG O R. Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies. PNAS, 2011, 108(50): 19853-19860.

DOI PMID

[30]
谭荣. 自然资源资产的价值和价格. 中国土地科学, 2023, 37(5): 1-9.

[TAN R. The value and price of natural resource assets. China Land Science, 2023, 37(5): 1-9.]

[31]
COENEN J, SONDEREGGER G, NEWIG J, et al. Toward spatial fit in the governance of global commodity flows. Ecology and Society, 2023, 28(2): 24, Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111690108.

[32]
易家林, 郭杰, 欧名豪, 等. 国土空间用途管制: 制度变迁、目标导向与体系构建. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(6): 1415-1429.

DOI

[YI J L, GUO J, OU M H, et al. Territorial space use regulation: Institutional change, goal orientation and system construction. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(6): 1415-1429.]

[33]
张衔春, 陈宇超, 栾晓帆. “以地谋发展” 模式的空间重构: 以浙江省山海协作工程为例. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(7): 1730-1742.

DOI

[ZHANG X C, CHEN Y C, LUAN X F. The spatial reconstruction of land-driven development mode: The projects of cooperation between mountainous and coastal areas in Zhejiang province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(7): 1730-1742.]

[34]
吴凤平, 季英雯, 李芳, 等. 跨境水资源分配典型模式特征评述及中国主张思考. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(7): 1861-1872.

DOI

[WU F P, JI Y W, LI F, et al. A review on the characteristics of typical modes of transboundary water resources allocation and China's proposition. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(7): 1861-1872.]

[35]
于昊辰, 吕晓, 杨俊, 等. 面向中国式现代化的国土空间治理: 从理论逻辑到实现路径. 中国土地科学, 2024, 38(1): 9-19.

[YU H C, LYU X, YANG J, et al. Territorial space governance towards Chinese path to modernization: From theoretical logic to implementation solutions. China Land Science, 2024, 38(1): 9-19.]

[36]
郭恩泽, 曲福田, 马贤磊. 自然资源资产产权体系改革现状与政策取向: 基于国家治理结构的视角. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(9): 2372-2385.

DOI

[GUO E Z, QU F T, MA X L. The present situation and future policy orientation of the property right system reform of natural resources assets: From the perspective of national governance structure. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(9): 2372-2385.]

[37]
胡鞍钢. 中国国家治理现代化的特征与方向. 国家行政学院学报, 2014, (3): 4-10.

[HU A G. The characters and directions of China's national governance modernisation. Journal of Chinese Academy of Governance, 2014, (3): 4-10.]

[38]
王荣宇. 农村宅基地整理的自组织何以可能: 基于公共池塘资源治理的视角. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(5): 102-111.

[WANG R Y. Why is self-organized rural residential land consolidation possible: From the perspective of common pool resources governance. China Land Science, 2022, 36(5): 102-111.]

[39]
王荣宇, 马峥嵘, 谭荣. 国家公园联动发展区宅基地盘活的模式选择: 基于群体利益异质性的视角. 中国土地科学, 2024, 38(5): 103-113.

[WANG R Y, MA Z R, TAN R, Mode selection of rural residential land redevelopment in national park linkage development areas: From the perspective of interest heterogeneity. China Land Science, 2024, 38(5): 103-113.]

[40]
冯文利, 张辉, 陈美景, 等. 数字生态文明时代国土空间规划转型. 中国土地科学, 2024, 38(3): 1-9.

[FENG W L, ZHANG H, CHEN M J, et al. Transformation of territorial space planning in the era of digital ecological civilization. China Land Science, 2024, 38(3): 1-9.]

[41]
谢花林, 李致远. 自然资源领域生态产品价值实现的多主体协同机制与路径. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(12): 2933-2949.

DOI

[XIE H L, LI Z Y. Multi-agent collaborative mechanism and path for realizing the value of ecological products in the field of natural resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(12): 2933-2949.]

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉