EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2020 , Vol. 35 >Issue 6: 1273 - 1287

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200602

资源与战略

新型城镇化、居民福祉与国土空间规划应对

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,中国科学院可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049;
    3. 中国科学院前沿科学与教育局,北京 100864;
    4. 中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州 510275;
    5. 广东省城市化与地理环境空间模拟重点实验室,广州 510275
陈明星（1982-）, 男, 安徽巢湖人, 博士, 研究员, 主要从事城镇化与区域发展研究。E-mail:chenmx@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2020-03-23

  修回日期: 2020-04-26

  网络出版日期: 2020-06-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目（41822104，41871140，41671125）；中科院战略性A类先导专项（XDA23100301）

收起

New-type urbanization, well-being of residents, and the response of land spatial planning

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. College of Resource and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Bureau of Frontier Sciences and Education, CAS, Beijing 100864, China;
    4. School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
    5. Key Laboratory of Spatial Simulation of Urbanization and Geographical Environment in Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received date: 2020-03-23

  Revised date: 2020-04-26

  Online published: 2020-06-28

Fold

摘要

我国城镇化已经步入中后期发展阶段,以人为本的新型城镇化内涵需要进一步丰富和建构。国土空间规划正是新型城镇化建设和生态文明建设落地的关键。本文提出增进居民福祉是以人为本新型城镇化的核心,梳理了居民福祉内涵的国内外相关研究、居民福祉的主客观测度指标体系与方法,归纳了影响居民福祉和幸福感的综合影响因素。借鉴国外空间规划经验,建议把增进城乡居民福祉作为国土空间规划编制的指导思想之一,并在国土空间规划实践中注重公共服务设施优化配置研究、灾害风险评估与韧性城市建设、三生空间优化、社区生活圈规划与精细化管理和大数据与智能决策系统等。城镇化是国土空间规划的重要组成,国土空间规划的科学编制有助于推动新型城镇化的高质量发展和城乡居民福祉提升,需要关注和加强城市合理等级体系、城市人口流动格局网络、半城镇化与就近城镇化模式、城乡基本公共服务配置与均等化、气候变化、城市灾害风险管理以及快速城镇化下人地关系演变等新型城镇化基础研究。

关键词： 新型城镇化; 中后期; 居民福祉; 国土空间规划; 幸福感; 美丽中国

本文引用格式

陈明星, 周园, 汤青, 刘晔 . 新型城镇化、居民福祉与国土空间规划应对[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020 , 35(6) : 1273 -1287 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200602

Abstract

The urbanization of China has entered the middle and late stage, and the connotation of the people-centered urbanization needs to be further enriched and refined. The land spatial planning is the key to the practice of the new-type urbanization and ecological civilization construction. This paper proposes that the improvement of well-being of residents is the core of the people-centered urbanization. It sorts out relevant domestic and foreign studies on the connotation of well-being, summarizes the subjective and objective measure index systems and methods of well-being, and examines the factors influencing well-being and happiness of residents. In this study, we draw on the experience of foreign spatial planning and take the improvement of the well-being of urban and rural residents as one of the guiding principles for the compilation of land spatial planning. In the process of the practice of land spatial planning, it is necessary to focus on public health, disaster risk assessment system and construction of urban resilience, optimization of "production-living-ecological" spaces, community living spatial planning, fine-scale management, and big data and intelligent decision-making system. Urbanization is the indispensable important component of national spatial planning, and the establishment of national spatial planning promotes the high-quality development of new-type urbanization and the well-being of urban-rural residents. So, we should show great concern on urban scale hierarchy structure, the pattern of population flow network, peri-urbanization and local urbanization, basic allocation and equalization of public service of urban and rural areas, the impacts of climate change and urban disaster risk management, and the basic research of the new-type urbanization, such as the evolution of man-land relationship in the rapid urbanization.

Key words： well-being; new-type urbanization; middle and late stage; happiness; Beautiful China; land spatial planning

参考文献

[1] 陆大道, 陈明星. 关于“国家新型城镇化规划(2014—2020)”编制大背景的几点认识. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 179-185.
[LU D D, CHEN M X.Several viewpoints on the background of compiling the "National New Urbanization Planning (2014-2020)". Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 179-185.]
[2] 薛德升, 王立. 1978 年以来中国城市地理研究进展. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1117-1129.
[XUE D S, WANG L.Progress of urban geography research in China since the 1980s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1117-1129.]
[3] 薛德升, 曾献君. 中国人口城镇化质量评价及省际差异分析. 地理学报, 2016, 71(2): 194-204.
[XUE D S, ZENG X J.Evaluation of China's urbanization quality and analysis of its spatial pattern transformation based on the modern life index. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(2): 194-204.]
[4] 顾朝林, 管卫华, 刘合林. 中国城镇化2050: SD模型与过程模拟. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2017, 47(7): 818-832.
[GU C L, GUAN W H, LIU H L.Chinese urbanization 2050: SD modeling and process simulation. Science China Earth Sciences, 2017, 47(7): 818-832.]
[5] 陈明星, 叶超, 陆大道, 等. 中国特色新型城镇化理论内涵的认知与建构. 地理学报, 2019, 74(4): 633-647.
[CHEN M X, YE C, LU D D, et al.Cognition and construction of the theoretical connotation for new-type urbanization with Chinese characteristics. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(4): 633-647.]
[6] 樊杰, 郭锐. 新型城镇化前置条件与驱动机制的重新认知. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 3-12.
[FAN J, GUO R.Re-recognition of precondition and driving mechanism of new-type urbanization. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 3-12.]
[7] 宁越敏, 杨传开. 新型城镇化背景下城市外来人口的社会融合. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 23-32.
[NING Y M, YANG C K.Social integration of rural migrants under the background of new-type urbanization. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 23-32.]
[8] 沈建法. 中国人口迁移, 流动人口与城市化: 现实, 理论与对策. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 33-44.
[SHEN J F.Migration, floating population and urbanization in China: Realities, theories, and strategies. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 33-44.]
[9] 方创琳. 中国新型城镇化高质量发展的规律性与重点方向. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 13-22.
[FANG C L.Basic rules and key paths for high-quality development of the new urbanization in China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 13-22.]
[10] 孙斌栋, 金晓溪, 林杰. 走向大中小城市协调发展的中国新型城镇化格局: 1952 年以来中国城市规模分布演化与影响因素. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 75-84.
[SUN B D, JIN X X, LIN J.China's new pattern of urbanization toward coordinated development of large, medium and small cities: Evolution and determinants of city size distribution since 1952. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 75-84.]
[11] 陈明星, 隋昱文, 郭莎莎. 中国新型城镇化在“十九大”后发展的新态势. 地理研究, 2019, 38(1): 181-192.
[CHEN M X, SUI Y W, GUO S S.Perspective of China's new urbanization after 19th CPC National Congress. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(1): 181-192.]
[12] 郝庆, 邓玲, 封志明. 国土空间规划中的承载力反思: 概念、理论与实践. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10): 2073-2086.
[HAO Q, DENG L, FENG Z M.Carrying capacity reconsidered in spatial planning: Concepts, methods and applications. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(10): 2073-2086.]
[13] 顾朝林, 曹根榕. 论新时代国土空间规划技术创新. 北京规划建设, 2019, (4): 64-70.
[GU C L, CAO G R.Discussion of technological innovation of national spatial planning in the new era. Beijing Planning Review, 2019, (4): 64-70.]
[14] 李巍, 杨承兴, 王录仓, 等. 魅力国土空间: 重塑区域特色的国土空间规划策略. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(3): 501-512.
[LI W, YANG C X, WANG L C, et al.National attractive territorial area: A national spatial planning strategy reshaping regional patterns. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(3): 501-512.]
[15] 甄峰, 张姗琪, 秦萧, 等. 从信息化赋能到综合赋能: 智慧国土空间规划思路探索. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10): 2060-2072.
[ZHEN F, ZHANG S Q, QIN X, et al.From informational empowerment to comprehensive empowerment: Exploring the ideas of smart territorial spatial planning. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(10): 2060-2072.]
[16] 陈明星, 梁龙武, 王振波, 等. 美丽中国与国土空间规划关系的地理学思考. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2467-2481.
[CHEN M X, LIANG L W, WANG Z B, et al.Geographical thinking on the relationship between beautiful China and land spatial planning. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2467-2481.]
[17] NORTHAM R M. Urban Geography.New York: [J]. Wiley Sons, 1975: 65-67.
[18] 陈明星, 叶超, 周义. 城市化速度曲线及其政策启示: 对诺瑟姆曲线的讨论与发展. 地理研究, 2011, 30(8): 1499-1507.
[CHEN M X, YE C, ZHOU Y.Urbanization rate and its policy implications: Discussion and development of Northam's curve. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(8): 1499-1507.]
[19] 陈明星. “加速城市化”不应成为中国“十二五”规划的重大战略抉择: 与陈玉和教授等商榷. 中国软科学, 2011, (3): 1-9.
[CHEN M X.Accelerating urbanization should not become the national strategic choice during "the 12th Five-year Plan" period: A discussion with professor CHEN Yu-he. China Soft Science, 2011, (3): 1-9.]
[20] COSTANZA R, KUBISZEWSKI I, GIOVANNINI E, et al.Development: Time to leave GDP behind. Nature, 2014, 505(7483): 283-285.
[21] DIENER E, SUH E.Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research an International & Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 1997, 40: 189-216.
[22] STIGLITZ J E, SEN A, FITOUSSI J P.Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.html, 2013-06-04.
[23] RYAN R M, DECI E L.On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, 52(1): 141-166.
[24] O'NEILL, DANIEL W, FANNING A L, et al. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1: 88-95.
[25] 黄甘霖, 姜亚琼, 刘志锋, 等. 人类福祉研究进展: 基于可持续科学视角. 生态学报, 36(23): 7519-7527.
[HUANG G L, JIANG Y Q, LIU Z F, et al.Advances in human well-being research: A sustainability science perspective. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(23): 7519-7527.]
[26] 李琰, 李双成, 高阳, 等. 连接多层次人类福祉的生态系统服务分类框架. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1038-1047.
[LI Y, LI S C, GAO Y, et al.Ecosystem services and hierarchic human well-being: Concepts and service classification framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1038-1047.]
[27] SCHWANEN T, ATKINSON S.Geographies of wellbeing: An introduction. The Geographical Journal, 2015, 181(2): 98-101.
[28] PACIONE M.Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing: A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 65(1-2): 0-30.
[29] KERK G V D, MANUEL A R. A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI-the Sustainable society index. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66(2-3): 228-242.
[30] COSTANZA R, FISHER B, ALI S, et al.Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(2-3): 267-276.
[31] 王圣云. 中国区域福祉不平衡及其均衡机制. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2017.
[WANG S Y.Regional Welfare Imbalance and Its Equilibrium Mechanism in China. Beijing: China Social Science Press, 2017.]
[32] DORLING D.Injustice: Why Social Inequality Still Persists. Bristol: Policy Press, 2011.
[33] SCHWANEN T, WANG D.Well-being, context, and everyday activities in space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2014, 104(4): 833-851.
[34] FORGEARD M J C, JAYAWICKREME E, KERN M L, et al. Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2011, 1(1): 79-106.
[35] SUMNER L W. Welfare, Happiness,Ethics. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1996.
[36] DIENER E.Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95: 542-575.
[37] DIENER E, SUH E M, LUCAS R E, et al.Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125(2): 276-302.
[38] CHRISTENSEN T, BARRETT L, BLISS-MOREAU E, et al.A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2003, 4(1): 53-78.
[39] KAHNEMAN D, KRUEGER A B, SCHKADE D A, et al.A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 2004, 306: 1776-1780.
[40] CANTRIL H.Pattern of Human Concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1965.
[41] DIENER E, EMMONS R A, LARSEN R J, et al.The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49(1): 71-75.
[42] GURIN G, VEROFF J, FELD S, et al.Americans View Their Mental Health: A Nationwide Interview Survey. Oxford, UK: Basic Books, 1960.
[43] ANDREWS, F M, WITHEY, S B.Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.
[44] RUSSELL, JAMES A.A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1980, 39(6): 1161-1178.
[45] WATSON D, CLARK L A, TELLEGEN A.Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54(6): 1063-1070.
[46] DIENER E, NAPA SCOLLON C, LUCAS R E.The Evolving Concept of Subjective Well-Being: The Multifaceted Nature of Happiness. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2009.
[47] DOLAN P, PEASGOOD T, WHITE M.Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2008, 29(1): 94-122.
[48] RYAN R M, DECI E L.On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, 52(1): 141-166.
[49] DAVID G, BLANCHFLOWER, et al. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 2004, 88: 1359-1386.
[50] DENEVE K M, COOPER H.The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124(2): 197-229.
[51] KNIGHT J, GUNATILAKA R.Aspirations, Adaptation and Subjective Well-being of Rural-urban Migrants in China. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
[52] GAO W S, SMYTH R.What keeps China's migrant workers going?: Expectations and happiness among China's floating population. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 2011, 16(2): 163-182.
[53] CLARK W A V, YI D, HUANG Y. Subjective well-being in China's changing society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116(34): 16799-16804.
[54] AMINZADEH K, DENNY S, UTTER J, et al.Neighbourhood social capital and adolescent self-reported wellbeing in New Zealand: A multilevel analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 2013, 84(Complete): 13-21.
[55] PINQUART M, SÖRENSEN S. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 2000, 15(2): 187-224.
[56] LIU Y Q, ZHANG F Z, LIU Y, et al.The effect of neighbourhood social ties on migrants' subjective wellbeing in Chinese cities. Habitat International, 2017, 66: 86-94.
[57] 刘义, 刘于琪, 刘晔, 等. 邻里环境对流动人口主观幸福感的影响: 基于广州的实证. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(7): 986-998.
[LIU Y, LIU YU Q, LIU Y, et al.Impacts of neighborhood environments on migrants' subjective wellbeing: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(7): 986-998.]
[58] EASTERLIN R A.Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Elsevier Monographs, 1974: 89-125.
[59] EASTERLIN R A.Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1995, 27(1): 35-47.
[60] OISHI S, DIENER E F, LUCAS R E, et al.Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999, 25: 980-990.
[61] DIENER E, OISHI S, LUCAS R E.Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003, 54(1): 403-425.
[62] KNIGHT J, GUNATILAKA R.Great expectations?: The subjective well-being of rural-urban migrants in China. World Development, 2010, 38(1): 113-124.
[63] CAMPBELL A, CONVERSE P E, RODGERS W L.The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Academy of Management Review, 1976, 2(4): 694.
[64] 李国平. 均衡紧凑网络型国土空间规划: 日本的实践及其启示. 资源科学, 2019, 41(9): 1610-1618.
[LI G P.Balanced, compact and networked national land spatial planning: Japan's practice and implications. Resources Science, 2019, 41(9): 1610-1618.]
[65] 王筱春, 张娜. 德国国土空间规划及其对云南省主体功能区规划的启示. 云南地理环境研究, 2013, 25(1): 44-52.
[WANG X C, ZHANG N.The Germany national spatial planning and its inspirations to principal function regions planning in Yunnan province. YunNan Geographic Environment Research, 2013, 25(1): 44-52.]
[66] 周颖, 濮励杰, 张芳怡. 德国空间规划研究及其对我国的启示. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 409-414.
[ZHOU Y, PU L J, ZHANG F Y.Spatial planning in Germany with its implication in China. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2006, 15(4): 409-414.]
[67] 刘慧, 樊杰, 李扬. “美国2050”空间战略规划及启示. 地理研究, 2013, 32(1): 90-98.
[LIU H, FAN J, LI Y."America 2050" strategic spatial planning and its inspiration to China. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(1): 90-98.]
[68] 陈利. 荷兰国土空间规划及对中国主题功能区规划的启示. 云南地理环境研究, 2012, 24(2): 90-97.
[CHEN L.The Dutch national spatial planning and to the Chinese theme function area planning enlightenment. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 2012, 24(2): 90-97.]
[69] 周姝天, 翟国方, 施益军. 英国最新空间规划体系解读及启示. 规划与设计, 2018, (8): 69-76.
[ZHOU S T, ZHAI F G, SHI Y J.Introduction to the latest spatial planning system in Britain and its implications for China. Planning Design, 2018, (8): 69-76.]
[70] 刘健. 法国国土开发政策框架及其空间规划体系: 特点与启发. 城市规划, 2011, 35(8): 60-65.
[LIU J.Policy framework and planning system of territorial development in France: Characteristics and inspirations. City Planning Review, 2011, 35(8): 60-65.]
[71] 杨保军, 陈鹏, 董珂, 等. 生态文明背景下的国土空间规划体系构建. 城市规划学刊, 2019, (4): 16-23.
[YANG B J, CHEN P, DONG K, et al.Formation of the national territory development planning system under the background of ecological civilization. Urban Planning Forum, 2019, (4): 16-23.]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉