EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2020 , Vol. 35 >Issue 4: 845 - 856

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200408

研究论文

2000—2015年江汉平原农田生态系统NPP时空变化特征

展开
  • 1. 东华理工大学测绘工程学院,南昌 330013;
    2. 中国科学院测量与地球物理研究所,武汉 430077;
    3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
    4. 武汉大学测绘遥感信息工程国家重点实验室,武汉 430079
黄端（1990- ）,男,河南南阳人,博士,讲师,主要从事资源环境遥感与GIS、陆地生态系统生产力模型研究。E-mail: huangduan@ecut.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2019-01-09

  网络出版日期: 2020-04-28

基金资助

湖北省自然科学基金项目（2016CFB689）; 国家自然科学基金项目（41430861）

收起

Research on spatiotemporal characteristics of farmland ecosystem NPP in Jianghan Plain from 2000 to 2015

Expand
  • 1. Faculty of Geomatics, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China;
    2. Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, CAS, Wuhan 430077, China;
    3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    4. State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan 430079, China

Received date: 2019-01-09

  Online published: 2020-04-28

Fold

摘要

基于MODIS数据和VPM（Vegetation Photosynthesis Model）模型估算2000—2015年江汉平原农田NPP,利用空间自相关和Sen趋势分析方法,分析16年间江汉平原农田NPP的时空变化特征及其影响因素。结果表明：（1）江汉平原农田年均NPP在2000—2005年呈上升趋势,2005—2009年呈波动性下降趋势,2009—2015年呈上升趋势;农田年NPP总量在2000—2015年整体上趋于平稳。（2）高中低产田面积占比分别为66.03%、27.04%和6.93%。2000—2015年NPP具有很强的空间聚集性且呈逐年增强趋势,并随空间距离增加聚集性减弱;江汉平原NPP主要呈高—高聚集和低—低聚集特征。（3）江汉平原农田NPP显著上升、无显著变化和显著下降区域面积分别占1.30%、69.50%和29.20%。

关键词： NPP; 农田生态系统; 江汉平原; 时空特征; VPM模型

本文引用格式

黄端, 闫慧敏, 池泓, 耿晓蒙, 邵奇慧 . 2000—2015年江汉平原农田生态系统NPP时空变化特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020 , 35(4) : 845 -856 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200408

Abstract

NPP of cropland was estimated based on MODIS data and VPM model between 2000 and 2015 in the Jianghan Plain. The spatial autocorrelation and Sen trend methods were used to analyze the spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of cropland NPP in the study area during the 16 years. The results show that: (1) The average annual NPP of cropland in the plain increased from 2000 to 2005, decreased from 2005 to 2009, and increased from 2009 to 2015. The annual total of cropland NPP was stable from 2000 to 2015. (2) The proportions of high, medium and low yield fields were 66.03%, 27.04% and 6.93%, respectively. NPP had a strong spatial aggregation from 2000 to 2015, which showed an increasing trend year by year, and its aggregation decreased with the increase of spatial distance. The NPP is characterized by high-high aggregation and low-low aggregation in the Jianghan Plain. (3) No significant change was found in 69.5% of cropland NPP, with 1.30% of cropland NPP rising significantly and 29.20% of cropland NPP decreasing significantly in the Jianghan Plain.

Key words： NPP; farmland ecosystem; Jianghan Plain; VPM model; spatial-temporal characteristics

参考文献

[1] 朱士华, 艳燕, 邵华, 等. 1980—2014年中亚地区植被净初级生产力对气候和CO2变化的响应. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(11): 1844-1856.
[ZHU S H, YAN Y, SHAO H, et al.The responses of the net primary productivity of the dryland ecosystems in Central Asia to the CO2 and climate changes during the past 35 years. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(11): 1844-1856.]
[2] 闫慧敏, 刘纪远, 曹明奎. 中国农田生产力变化的空间格局及地形控制作用. 地理学报, 2007, 62(2): 171-180.
[YAN H M, LIU J Y, CAO M K.Spatial pattern and topographic control of China's agricultural productivity variability. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(2): 171-180.]
[3] 康婷婷. 中国农田净初级生产力和最大光能利用率参数时空特征分析. 南京: 南京大学, 2014.
[KANG T T.Study on the spatial and temporal variations of net primary productivity and maximum light use efficiency of croplands in China. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2014.]
[4] 颜凤芹. 三江平原植被净初级生产力时空变化及其影响因素分析. 长春: 中国科学院大学, 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所, 2017.
[YAN F Q.Spatial and temporal variation of net primary productivity of the Sanjiang Plain and its influencing factors. Changchun: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017.]
[5] 陈静清, 闫慧敏, 王绍强, 等. 中国陆地生态系统总初级生产力VPM遥感模型估算. 第四纪研究, 2014, 34(4): 732-742.
[CHEN J Q, YAN H M, WANG S Q, et al.Estimation of gross primary productivity in Chinese terrestrial ecosystems by using VPM Model. Quaternary Sciences, 2014, 34(4): 732-742.]
[6] 牛忠恩, 闫慧敏, 陈静清, 等. 基于VPM与MOD 17产品的中国农田生态系统总初级生产力估算比较. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(4): 191-198.
[NIU Z E, YAN H M, CHEN J Q, et al.Comparison of crop gross primary productivity estimated with VPM model and MOD 17 product in field ecosystem of China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2016, 32(4): 191-198.]
[7] 冀咏赞, 闫慧敏, 刘纪远, 等. 基于MODIS数据的中国耕地高中低产田空间分布格局. 地理学报, 2015, 70(5): 766-778.
[JI Y Z, YAN H M, LIU J Y, et al.A MODIS data derived spatial distribution of high-, medium- and low-yield cropland in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(5): 766-778.]
[8] XIAO X M, ZHANG Q Y, BRASWELL B, et al.Modeling gross primary production of temperate deciduous broadleaf forest using satellite images and climate data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 91(2): 256-270.
[9] XIAO X M, HOLLINGER D, ABER J, et al.Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 89(4): 519-534.
[10] 刘文超, 颜长珍, 秦元伟, 等. 近20 a陕北地区耕地变化及其对农田生产力的影响. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28(8): 1373-1382.
[LIU W C, YAN C Z, QIN Y W, et al.Cropland dynamics and its influence on the productivity in recent 20 years in Northern Shaanxi, China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28(8): 1373-1382.]
[11] MADUGUNDU R, AL-GAADI K A, TOLA E K , et al. Estimation of gross primary production of irrigated maize using Landsat-8 imagery and eddy covariance data. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2016, 24(2): 410-420.
[12] 牛忠恩, 闫慧敏, 黄玫, 等. 基于MODIS-OLI遥感数据融合技术的农田生产力估算. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(5): 875-885.
[NIU Z E, YAN H M, HUANG M, et al.Agricultural productivity estimation with MODIS-OLI fusion data. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(5): 875-885.]
[13] 罗亮, 闫慧敏, 牛忠恩. 农田生产力监测中3种多源遥感数据融合方法的对比分析. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(2): 268-279.
[LUO L, YAN H M, NIU Z E.Comparative analysis on three multi-source remote sensing data fusion models in monitoring farmland productivity. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2018, 20(2): 268-279.]
[14] YAN H M, FU Y L, XIAO X M, et al.Modeling gross primary productivity for winter wheat-maize double cropping system using MODIS time series and CO2 eddy flux tower data. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2009, 129(4): 391-400.
[15] WANG Z, XIAO X M, YAN X D, et al.Modeling gross primary production of maize cropland and degraded grassland in Northeastern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2010, 150(9): 1160-1167.
[16] WANG X F, MA M G, LI X, et al.Validation of MODIS-GPP product at 10 flux sites in Northern China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2013, 34(2): 587-599.
[17] WAGLE P, XIAO X M, SUYKER A E.Estimation and analysis of gross primary production of soybean under various management practices and drought conditions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2015, 99: 70-83.
[18] XIN F F, XIAO X M, ZHAO B, et al.Modeling gross primary production of paddy rice cropland through analyses of data from CO2 eddy flux tower sites and MODIS images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 190: 42-55.
[19] KALFAS J L, XIAO X M, VANEGAS D X, et al.Modeling gross primary production of irrigated and rain-fed maize using MODIS imagery and CO2 flux tower data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011, 151(12): 1514-1528.
[20] WAGLE P, ZHANGY G, JIN C, et al.Comparison of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence, light-use efficiency, and process-based GPP models in maize. Ecological Applications, 2016, 26(4): 1211-1222.
[21] LI S H, HE P, LIU B S, et al.Modeling of maize gross primary production using MODIS imagery and flux tower data. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2016, 9(2): 110-118.
[22] PATEL N R, DADHWAL V K, AGRAWAL S, et al.Satellite driven estimation of primary productivity of agroecosystems in India. ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2011, 38(8): 134-139.
[23] 尹昌君, 李岩泉, 张劲松, 等. 黄淮海平原地区防护林网冬小麦生产力模拟的初步研究. 中国农业气象, 2015, 36(5): 619-624.
[YIN C J, LI Y Q, ZHANG J S, et al.A preliminary study on modelling winter wheat GPP of farm shelterbelts in Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2015, 36(5): 619-624.]
[24] 周磊, 李刚, 贾德伟, 等. 基于光能利用率模型的河南省冬小麦单产估算研究. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017, 38(6): 108-115.
[ZHOU L, LI G, JIA D W, et al.Yield estimation of winter wheat in Henan province based on the vegetation photosynthesis model. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2017, 38(6): 108-115.]
[25] 王宏志, 宋明洁, 李仁东, 等. 江汉平原建设用地扩张的时空特征与驱动力分析. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(4): 416-420.
[WANG H Z, SONG M J, LI R D, et al.Studyon spatial temporal pattern and driving forces of construction land expansionin Jianghan Plain from 1996 to 2005. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(4): 416-420.]
[26] 王宗明, 国志兴, 宋开山, 等. 2000—2005年三江平原土地利用/覆被变化对植被净初级生产力的影响研究. 自然资源学报, 2009, 24(1): 136-146.
[WANG Z M, GUO Z X, SONG K S, et al.Effects of land use/cover change on net primary productivity of Sanjiang Plain, during 2000-2005. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009, 24(1): 136-146.]
[27] 高凤杰, 单培明, 马泉来, 等. 黑土耕作区土壤含水量空间自相关及农业生产分区. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(11): 1930-1941.
[GAO F J, SHAN P M, MA Q L, et al.Spatial autocorrelation of soil moisture and agricultural zoning in a mollisol tillage area of Northeast China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(11): 1930-1941.]
[28] GOCIC M, TRAJKOVIC S.Analysis of changes in meteorological variables using Mann-Kendall and Sen's slope estimator statistical tests in Serbia. Global & Planetary Change, 2013, 100(1): 172-182.
[29] 张亮, 丁明军, 张华敏, 等. 1982—2015 年长江流域植被覆盖度时空变化分析.自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12): 2084-2097.
[ZHANG L, DING M J, ZHANG H M, et al.Spatiotemporal variation of the vegetation coverage in Yangtze River Basin during 1982-2015. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(12): 2084-2097.]
[30] 王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134.
[WANG J F, XU C D.Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134.]
[31] 黄端, 池泓, 朱浪, 等. 荆州市农田植被净初级生产力时空特征分析. 气象科技进展, 2018, 8(5): 96-100.
[HUANG D, CHI H, ZHU L, et al.Space-time characteristics of net primary productivityof farmland vegetation in Jingzhou city. Advances in Meteorological Science and Technology, 2018, 8(5): 96-100.]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉