EN中文

自然资源学报 >

2020 , Vol. 35 >Issue 2: 387 - 398

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200211

研究论文

黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对不同地貌部位土壤可蚀性的影响

展开
  • 1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,杨凌 712100;
    2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,杨凌 712100;
    3. 黄河勘测规划设计研究院有限公司,郑州 450003
陈卓鑫（1994- ）,男,湖南邵阳人,硕士,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail: xiyu.zxchen@foxmail.com

收稿日期: 2019-04-02

  修回日期: 2019-07-05

  网络出版日期: 2020-02-28

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目（41571275）

收起

Effects of vegetation restoration on soil erodibility on different geomorphological locations in the loess-tableland and gully region of the Loess Plateau

Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Erosion and Dryland Agriculture on the Loess Plateaus, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
    2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
    3. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou 450003, China

Received date: 2019-04-02

  Revised date: 2019-07-05

  Online published: 2020-02-28

Fold

摘要

通过采集不同地貌部位（塬面、塬坡和沟坡）各土地利用（农地、草地、灌木地和林地）坡面土壤和根系样品,采用综合土壤可蚀性指数（CSEI）评价了植被恢复对土壤可蚀性的影响。结果表明：（1）不同地貌部位的CSEI差异显著,沟坡CSEI较塬坡和塬面分别增加8.1%和77.7%。（2）塬面草地、灌木地和林地的CSEI较农地分别降低21.1%、29.2%和28.8%;而塬坡和沟坡林地CSEI均低于其他土地利用。（3）CSEI与粘粒含量、砂粒含量、毛管孔隙度、根重密度、根平均直径、根长密度及根表面积密度均呈极显著负相关,而与粉粒含量和土壤容重呈显著正相关关系;粉粒含量、土壤容重和根重密度是影响CSEI的关键因素,其中粉粒含量对CSEI的直接影响最大,而根重密度通过直接或间接作用对CSEI产生负相关影响。建议在塬面上以灌木作为植被恢复模式的首选,而在塬坡和沟坡上选择以乔木为优势群落的恢复模式对水土流失的控制更为有效。

关键词： 地貌部位; 土壤特性; 黄土高原; 土地利用; 土壤可蚀性; 植被恢复; 根系特征

本文引用格式

陈卓鑫, 王文龙, 郭明明, 王天超, 郭文召, 王文鑫, 康宏亮, 杨波, 赵满 . 黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对不同地貌部位土壤可蚀性的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020 , 35(2) : 387 -398 . DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200211

Abstract

Vegetation restoration has returned a large number of steep slope farmlands to forests and grasslands, and effectively controlled soil erosion in the Loess Plateau. In the loess-tableland and gully region of the Loess Plateau, loess-tableland, hill-slope and gully-slope are widely distributed. Geomorphological location and land use may lead to differences in soil properties and vegetation root systems, and thus affect soil erodibility. However, few studies have been conducted to explore the impact of vegetation restoration at different geomorphological locations on soil erodibility, and the relationships between soil erodibility and influencing factors. This study was carried out in the Nanxiaogou watershed in the loess-tableland and gully region of the Loess Plateau. The undisturbed topsoil (0-20 cm) of farmland, grassland, shrub land and woodland was sampled on loess-tableland, hill-slope and gully-slope (no farmland on gully-slope). The comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) was obtained by weighted sum method. The results indicated that: (1) The significant difference in CSEI was found among different geomorphological locations. The CSEI of gully-slope was 8.1% and 77.7% higher than those of hill-slope and loess-tableland, respectively. (2) As for the loess-tableland, the CSEI of grassland, shrub land and woodland decreased by 21.1%, 29.2% and 28.8%, respectively compared with that of farmland. For the hill-slope and gully-slopes, the CSEI of woodland was lower than that of other land use types. (3) The CSEI had significantly negative correlations with clay content, sand content, soil capillary porosity, root weight density, root mean diameter, root length density and root surface area density, but significantly positive correlations with silt content and soil bulk density. Multivariate linear stepwise regression indicates that silt content, root mean diameter and soil bulk density are the most important factors influencing CSEI, among which silt content has the greatest direct influence on CSEI, while root mean diameter exerts negative influence on CSEI through direct or indirect effects. This study suggests that shrubs should be the preferred vegetation for vegetation restoration on the loess-tableland. Revegetation with arbor as dominant community may be more effective in controlling soil and water loss on hill-slope and gully-slope.

Key words： land use; soil property; soil erodibility; root characteristic; geomorphological locations; vegetation restoration; Loess Plateau

参考文献

[1] 李娅芸, 刘雷, 安韶山, 等. 应用Le Bissonnais法研究黄土丘陵区不同植被区及坡向对土壤团聚体稳定性和可蚀性的影响. 自然资源学报, 2016, 31(2): 287-298.
[LI Y Y, LIU L, AN S S, et al.Research on the effect of vegetation and slope aspect on the stability and erodibility of soil aggregate in loess hilly region based on Le Bissonnais method. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(2): 287-298.]
[2] WANG B, ZHANG G H, SHI Y Y, et al.Effect of natural restoration time of abandoned farmland on soil detachment by overland flow in the Loess Plateau of China. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2013, 38: 1725-1734.
[3] ZHANG B J, ZHANG G H, YANG H Y, et al.Soil resistance to flowing water erosion of seven typical plant communities on steep gully slopes on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 2019, 173: 375-383.
[4] GUO M M, WANG W L, LIANG K H, et al.Changes in soil properties and erodibility of gully heads induced by vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2018, 10(5): 712-725.
[5] ZHANG X P, ZHANG L, ZHAO J, et al.Responses of streamflow to changes in climate and land use/cover in the Loess Plateau, China. Water Resources Research, 2008, 44(7): 2183-2188.
[6] 魏慧, 赵文武, 王晶. 土壤可蚀性研究述评. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2749-2759.
[WEI H, ZHAO W W, WANG J.Research progress on soil erodibility. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. 2017, 28(8): 2749-2759.]
[7] HAWLEY M E, JACKSON T J, MCCUEN R H.Surface soil moisture variation on small agricultural watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 1983, 62: 179-200.
[8] CHARPENTIER M A, GROFFMAN P M.Soil moisture variability within remote sensing pixels. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1992, 97(D17): 18987-18995.
[9] HUO Z, SHAO M A, HORTON R.Impact of gully on soil moisture of shrubland in wind-water erosion crisscross region of the Loess Plateau. Pedosphere, 2008, 18(5): 674-680.
[10] GAO X D, WU P T, ZHAO X N, et al.Soil moisture variability along transects over a well-developed gully in the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 2011, 87: 357-367.
[11] ZIADAT F M, TAIMEH A Y, HATTAR B I.Variation of soil physical properties and moisture content along toposequences in the arid to semiarid area. Arid Land Research and Management, 2010, 24: 81-97.
[12] AN S S, DARBOUX F, CHENG M.Revegetation as an efficient means of increasing soil aggregate stability on the Loess Plateau (China). Geoderma,2013, 209-210: 75-85.
[13] 孙龙, 张光辉, 王兵, 等. 黄土高原不同退耕年限刺槐林地土壤侵蚀阻力. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(10): 191-197.
[SUN L, ZHANG G H, WANG B, et al.Soil erosion resistance of black locust land with different ages of returning farmland on Loess Plateau. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017, 33(10): 191-197.]
[14] CHEN X Y, ZHOU J.Volume-based soil particle fractal relation with soil erodibility in a small watershed of purple soil. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 70: 1735-1746.
[15] KNAPEN A, POESEN J, GOVERS G, et al.Resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 2007, 80: 75-109.
[16] ZHANG K, LI S, PENG W, et al.Erodibility of agricultural soils on the Loess Plateau of China. Soil & Tillage Research, 2004, 76: 157-165.
[17] LI Z W, ZHANG G H, GENG R, et al.Rill erodibility as influenced by soil and land use in a small watershed of the Loess Plateau, China. Biosystems Engineering, 2015, 129: 248-257.
[18] PARSAKHOO A, LOTFALIAN M, ATAOLLAH K, et al.Assessment of soil erodibility and aggregate stability for different parts of a forest road. Journal of Forestry Research, 2014, 25(1): 193-200.
[19] DE BAETS S, POESEN J, GYSSELS G, et al.Effects of grass roots on the erodibility of topsoils during concentrated flow. Geomorphology, 2006, 76: 54-67.
[20] 夏露, 宋孝玉, 符娜, 等. 黄土高塬沟壑区绿水对土地利用和气候变化的响应研究: 以南小河沟流域为例. 水利学报, 2017, 48(6): 678-688.
[XIA L, SONG X Y, FU N, et al.Impacts of land use change and climate variation on green water in the Loess Plateau Gully region: A case study of Nanxiaohegou Basin. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2017, 48(6): 678-688.]
[21] 康宏亮. 黄土高塬沟壑区土地利用方式对沟头溯源侵蚀过程的影响. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
[KANG H L.Effect of landuse on gully headward erosion process in the gully region of the Loess Plateau. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2017.]
[22] WANG B, ZHANG G H, SHI Y Y, et al.Soil detachment by overland flow under different vegetation restoration models in the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 2014, 116: 51-59.
[23] LI Y Y, SHAO M A.Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Environments, 2006, 64: 77-96.
[24] WILLIAMS J R, ARNOLD J G.A system of erosion-sediment yield models. Soil Technology, 1997, 11(1): 43-55.
[25] WANG H, ZHANG G H, LI N N, et al.Soil erodibility influenced by natural restoration time of abandoned farmland on the Loess Plateau of China. Geoderma, 2018, 325: 18-27.
[26] 陈正发, 史东梅, 金慧芳, 等. 基于土壤管理评估框架的云南坡耕地耕层土壤质量评价. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(3): 256-267.
[CHEN Z F, SHI D M, JIN H F, et al.Evaluation on cultivated-layer soil quality of sloping farmland in Yunnan based on soil management assessment framework (SMAF). Transactions of the CSAE, 2019, 35(3): 256-267.]
[27] LI Q, LIU G B, ZHANG Z, et al.Relative contribution of root physical enlacing and biochemistrical exudates to soil erosion resistance in the Loess soil. Catena, 2017, 153: 61-65.
[28] BI H, ZHANG J, ZHU J, et al.Spatial dynamics of soil moisture in a complex terrain in the semi-arid Loess Plateau Region, China. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2008, 44(5): 1121-1131.
[29] ZHENG J Y, WANG L M, SHAO M A, et al.Gully impact on soil moisture in the gully bank. Pedosphere, 2006, 16(3): 339-344.
[30] 谢云, 刘宝元, 伍永秋. 切沟中土壤水分的空间变化特征. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 278-282.
[XIE Y, LIU B Y, WU Y Q.Spatia distributio n of soil m oistures in a gully watershed. Advances in Earth Science, 2002, 17(2): 278-282.]
[31] GAO X D, WU P T, ZHAO X N, et al.Estimation of spatial soil moisture averages in a large gully of the Loess Plateau of China through statistical and modeling solutions. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 486: 466-478.
[32] MELLIGER J J, NIEMANN J D.Effects of gullies on space-time patterns of soil moisture in a semiarid grassland. Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 389: 289-300.
[33] DUAN L X, HUANG M B, ZHANG L D.Differences in hydrological responses for different vegetation types on a steep slope on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 537: 356-366.
[34] ELSEN E V D, XIE Y, LIU B Y, et al. Intensive water content and discharge measurement system in a hillslope gully in China. Catena, 2003, 54: 93-115.
[35] HUPET F, VANCLOOSTER M.Intraseasonal dynamics of soil moisture variability within a small agricultural maize cropped field. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 261: 86-101.
[36] WANG H, ZHANG G H, LI N N, et al.Variation in soil erodibility under five typical land uses in a small watershed on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 2019, 174: 24-35.
[37] YE L P, TAN W F, FANG L C, et al.Spatial analysis of soil aggregate stability in a small catchment of the Loess Plateau, China: I. Spatial variability. Soil & Tillage Research, 2018, 179: 71-81.
[38] KNAPEN A, POESEN J, GOVERS G, et al.The effect of conservation tillage on runoff erosivity and soil erodibility during concentrated flow. Hydrological Processes, 2008, 22: 1497-1508.
[39] XIAO L, XUE S, LIU G B.Fractal features of soil profiles under different land use patterns on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 2014, 6(5): 550-560.
[40] LI Q, LIU G B, ZHANG Z, et al.Effect of root architecture on structural stability and erodibility of topsoils during concentrated flow in Hilly Loess Plateau. Chinese Geographical Science, 2015, 25(6): 757-764.
[41] 刘宝元, 张科利, 焦菊英. 土壤可蚀性及其在侵蚀预报中的应用. 自然资源学报, 1999, 14(4): 345-350.
[LIU B Y, ZHANG K L, JIAO J Y.Soil erodibility and its use in soil erosion prediction model. Journal of Natural Resources, 1999, 14(4): 345-350.]
[42] 郭明明, 王文龙, 康宏亮, 等. 黄土高塬沟壑区植被自然恢复年限对坡面土壤抗冲性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(22): 138-146.
[GUO M M, WANG W L, KANG H L, et al.Effect of natural vegetation restoration age on slope soil anti-scourability in gully region of Loess Plateau. Transactions of the CSAE, 2018, 34(22): 138-146.]
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉